Navigating Genres in Interdisciplinary Life Sciences Doctoral Programs

References

• Artemeva, N. (2005). A time to speak, a time to act: A rhetorical genre analysis of a novice engineer’s calculated risk taking. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19(4), 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651905278309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barringer, S. N., Leahey, E., & Salazar, K. (2020). What catalyzes research universities to commit to interdisciplinary research? Research in Higher Education, 61(6), 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09603-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (2009). Genre and cognitive development: Beyond writing to learn. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 283–298). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2009.2324.2.14
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C., & De Los Santos, R. A. (2005). Measuring incommensurability: Are toxicology and ecotoxicology blind to what the other sees? In R. A. Harris (Ed.), Rhetoric and incommensurability (pp. 424–463). Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biancani, S., Dahlander, L., McFarland, D. A., & Smith, S. (2018). Superstars in the making? The broad effects of interdisciplinary centers. Research Policy, 47(3), 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakeslee, A. M. (2001). Interacting with audiences: Social influences on the production of scientific writing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600097
   Google Scholar
• Brodin, E. M., & Avery, H. (2020). Cross-disciplinary collaboration and scholarly independence in multidisciplinary learning environments at doctoral level and beyond. Minerva, 58(3), 409–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09397-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromham, L., Dinnage, R., & Hua, X. (2016). Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success. Nature, 534(7609), 684–687. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B. C. K., & Pak, A. W. P. (2007). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education, and policy: 2. Promoters, barriers, and strategies of enhancement. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 30(6), E224–E232. https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v30i6.2950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, K. L., McConnell, M., Schuchardt, A., Peffer, M. E., & Kirgiz, M. S. (2022). Challenges facing interdisciplinary researchers: Findings from a professional development workshop. PLOS ONE, 17(4), e0267234. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devitt, A. J. (1993). Generalizing about genre: New conceptions of an old concept. College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 573–586. https://doi.org/10.2307/358391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druschke, C. G., Reynolds, N., Morton-Aiken, J., Lofgren, I. E., Karraker, N. E., & McWilliams, S. R. (2018). Better science through rhetoric: A new model and pilot program for training graduate student science writers. Technical Communication Quarterly, 27(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2018.1425735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryer, D. B. (2015). “The fact that I could write about it made me think it was real”: An interview with Carolyn R. Miller. Composition Forum, 31. https://compositionforum.com/issue/31/carolyn-miller-interview.php
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, L. (2019). Cross-border teaching experiences in Canada and the U.S.: A writing teacher reflects. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 29, 173–183. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.763
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1998). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 15(3), 330–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088398015003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freadman, A. (1994). Anyone for tennis? In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre in the new rhetoric (pp. 37–56). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Freadman, A. (2020). A Tardy uptake. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 30, 105–132. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.781
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre in the new rhetoric (pp. 2–18). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Giltrow, J. (2002). Meta-genre. In R. M. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 187–205). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Canada, N. S. and E. R. C. of Cof C. (2021, February 25). NSERC - Departmental Plan—2021-22. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Retrieved December 7, 2022: http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/Reports-Rapports/DP/2021-2022/index_eng.asp?wbdisable=true
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. S., & Herndl, C. (2013). Multiple ontologies in pain management: Toward a postplural rhetoric of science. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.733674
   Google Scholar
• James Jacob, W. (2015). Interdisciplinary trends in higher education. Palgrave Communications, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2015.1
   Google Scholar
• Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813639
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, G. (1993). Women writing the academy: Audience, authority, and transformation. Southern Illinois University Press. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/id/11030739
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larivière, V., Haustein, S., Börner, K., & Glanzel, W. (2015). Long-Distance Interdisciplinarity Leads to Higher Scientific Impact. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0122565. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E., & Barringer, S. N. (2020). Universities’ commitment to interdisciplinary research: To what end? Research Policy, 49(2), 103910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E., Barringer, S. N., & Ring-Ramirez, M. (2019). Universities’ structural commitment to interdisciplinary research. Scientometrics, 118(3), 891–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2992-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Recursivity. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. (Vol. 2, pp. 745–746). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, E. G. (2009). “Working consensus” and the rhetorical situation: The homeless blog’s negotiation of public meta-genre. In J. Giltrow & D. Stein, (Eds.). Genres in the internet: Issues in the theory of genre (pp. 113–142). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.188.05mau
   Google Scholar
• McNely, B. (2017). Moments and metagenres: Coordinating complex, multigenre narratives. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(4), 443–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917713252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1979). A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English, 40(6), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/375964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (2015). Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later (2014). Letras & Letras, 31(3), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.14393/LL63-v31n3a2015-5
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. R. (2020). Exercising genres: A rejoinder to Anne Freadman. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 30, 133–140. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.843
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1991). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. (n.d.). FY 2023 Budget. NSF - National Science Foundation Retrieved December 7, 2022: https://beta.nsf.gov/budget
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco, R. C. S., Manhães, M., & Maldonado, M. U. (2017). Innovation, interdisciplinarity, and creative destruction. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. C. S. Pacheco, Eds., The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd, pp. 303–318). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.25
   Google Scholar
• Pantelides, K. (2015). Metagenre on the WPA-L: Transitional threads as nexus for micro/macro-level discourse on the dissertation. Composition Forum, 31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1061563
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2002). Genre and identity: Individuals, institutions, and ideology. In R. M. Coe, L. Lingard, & T. Teslenko (Eds.), The rhetoric and ideology of genre (pp. 57–71). Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2011). Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen Eds., Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 59–74). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_4
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2014). Rhetorical genre theory and academic literacy. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), A83–A94.
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2017). The once and future writing centre: A reflection and critique. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 27, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.573
   Google Scholar
• Paré, A. (2019). Re-writing the doctorate: New contexts, identities, and genres. Journal of Second Language Writing, 43, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., & McAlpine, L. (2009). The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings. In C. Bazerman, A. Bonini, & D. Figueiredo (Eds.), Genre in a changing world (pp. 183–197). The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfirman, S., & Martin, P. J. S. (2017). Facilitating interdisciplinary scholars. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & R. C. S. Pacheco, Eds., The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd, pp. 587–600). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.47
   Google Scholar
• Porter, A. L., & Rafols, I. (2009). Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics, 81(3), 719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2197-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. (2002). Interdisciplinarity as a site of contestation. Presented at the British Education Research Association, University of Exeter. University of Exeter. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002521.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, S. (2004). Crossing borders can be risky but rewarding. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/crossing-borders-can-be-risky-but-rewarding/187826.article
   Google Scholar
• Russell, D. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, L. R. (2016). Defining moments: Genre beginnings, genre invention, and the case of the English-language dictionary. In M. J. Reiff & A. Bawarshi (Eds.), Genre and the performance of publics (pp. 83–99). University Press of Colorado. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1b3h9s8.8
   Google Scholar
• Schryer, C. F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10(2), 200–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D. (2011). The paradox of writing in doctoral education: Student experiences. In L. McAlpine & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 75–95). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_5
   Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D. (2014). Writing groups as critical spaces for engaging normalized institutional cultures of writing in doctoral education. In C. Aitchison & C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 65–81). Routledge. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14703297.2015.1105942
   Google Scholar
• Starke-Meyerring, D., Paré, A., Sun, K. Y., & El-Bezre, N. (2014). Probing normalized institutional discourses about writing: The case of the doctoral thesis. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(2), A13–A27.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1996). Occluded genres in the academy: The case of the submission letter. In E. Ventola & A. Mauranen (Eds.), Academic writing: Intercultural and textual issues (pp. 45–58). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.41.06swa
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. M. (2016). Beyond convention: Genre innovation in academic writing. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.5173647
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, C. M., Sommer-Farias, B., & Gevers, J. (2020). Teaching and researching genre knowledge: Toward an enhanced theoretical framework. Written Communication, 37(3), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320916554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thieme, K. (2019). Surface and depth: Metalanguage and professional development in Canadian writing studies. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 29, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.31468/cjsdwr.757
   Google Scholar
• Villeneuve, D., Durán-Rodas, D., Ferri, A., Kuttler, T., Magelund, J., Mögele, M., … Silva, C. (2020). What is interdisciplinarity in practice? Critical reflections on doing mobility research in an intended interdisciplinary doctoral research group. Sustainability, 12(1), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. L., & Lawless, S. (2021). The missing and murdered indigenous women and girls national inquiry: Meta-genre, genre hybridity, and social change. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 31, 37. https://doi.org/10.31468/dw/r.835
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, F. J. (2011). A phenomenological approach to trauma and resilience. In F. J. Wertz, K. Charmaz, M. L. McMullen, R. Josselson, R. Anderson, & E. McSpadden (Eds.), Five ways of doing qualitative analysis (pp. 124–164). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, C. (2013). Observing inscriptions at work: Visualization and text production in experimental physics research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(2), 150–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.755911
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, C. (2023). Genre and metagenre in biomedical research writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 37(2), 140–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519221143113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (., & Hyland, K. (2021). Elements of doctoral apprenticeship: Community feedback and the acquisition of writing expertise. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar