Damage Detection and Prediction of Ultrasonic Behaviours in Piezoelectric Materials Using Hybrid Deep Convolutional Neural Network

References

• N. V. Nguyen et al., Analysis and active control of geometrically nonlinear responses of smart FG porous plates with graphene nanoplatelets reinforcement based on Bezier extraction of NURBS, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 180, 105692 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Chen et al., Piezoelectric materials for sustainable building structures: Fundamentals and applications, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 101, 14 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. T. Chorsi et al., Piezoelectric biomaterials for sensors and actuators, Adv. Mater. 31 (1), 1802084 (2019). DOI: 10.1002/adma.201802084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Sun et al., Stretchable piezoelectric sensing systems for self‐powered and wireless health monitoring, Adv. Materials Technol. 4 (5), 1900100 (2019). DOI: 10.1002/admt.201900100.
   Google Scholar
• D. X. Duarte et al., Development and validation of failure preventive tools for aeronautical applications, Eng. Fail. Anal. 101, 329 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.03.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Kulkarni et al., Application of piezoelectric technology in automotive systems, Mater. Today: Proc. 5 (10), 21299 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.532.
   Google Scholar
• J. Guo, and X. Li, Surface effects on an electrically permeable elliptical nano-hole or nano-crack in piezoelectric materials under anti-plane shear, Acta Mech. 229 (10), 4251 (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s00707-018-2232-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. A. Han et al., Point‐defect‐passivated MoS2 nanosheet‐based high performance piezoelectric nanogenerator, Adv. Mater. 30 (21), 1800342 (2018). DOI: 10.1002/adma.201800342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Chen et al., Eco-friendly highly sensitive transducers based on a new KNN–NTK–FM lead-free piezoelectric ceramic for high-frequency biomedical ultrasonic imaging applications, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 66 (6), 1580 (2018). DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2876063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. S. Priya et al., Investigations on nucleation, HRXRD, optical, piezoelectric, polarizability and Z-scan analysis of l–arginine maleate dihydrate single crystals, Opt. Mater. 66, 434 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2017.02.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Tian et al., Pulsed laser-scanning laser Doppler vibrometer (PL-SLDV) phased arrays for damage detection in aluminum plates, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 121, 158 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.11.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Tripathi et al., Classification of micro-damage in piezoelectric ceramics using machine learning of ultrasound signals, Sensors 19 (19), 4216 (2019). DOI: 10.3390/s19194216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. Agarwal et al., Damage localization in piezo-ceramic using ultrasonic waves excited by dual point contact excitation and detection scheme, Ultrasonics 108, 106113 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. S. Lori et al., Frequency characteristics of a GPL-reinforced composite microdisk coupled with a piezoelectric layer, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (2), 144 (2020). DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00217-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mohammadimehr, and R. Rostami, Bending and vibration analyses of a rotating sandwich cylindrical shell considering nanocomposite core and piezoelectric layers subjected to thermal and magnetic fields, Appl. Math. Mech-Engl. Ed 39 (2), 219 (2018). DOI: 10.1007/s10483-018-2301-6.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Sun et al., Flexible piezoelectric energy harvester/sensor with high voltage output over wide temperature range, Nano Energy 61, 337 (2019). DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Naqi et al., Pulsed gate switching of MoS2 field‐effect transistor based on flexible polyimide substrate for ultrasonic detectors, Adv. Funct. Materials 31 (7), 2007389 (2021). DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202007389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Yun et al., Mechanical, electrical, and thermal properties of graphene nanosheet/aluminum nitride composites, Ceram. Int. 41 (7), 8643 (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.03.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. G. Papageorgiou, I. A. Kinloch, and R. J. Young, Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites, Prog. Mater. Sci. 90, 75 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Albelwi, and A. Mahmood, A framework for designing the architectures of deep convolutional neural networks, Entropy 19 (6), 242 (2017). DOI: 10.3390/e19060242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Feng et al., Structural damage detection using deep convolutional neural network and transfer learning, KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 23 (10), 4493 (2019). DOI: 10.1007/s12205-019-0437-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zhao, Z. Zhang, and L. Wang, Manta ray foraging optimization: An effective bio-inspired optimizer for engineering applications, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103300 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.103300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Rautela, and S. Gopalakrishnan, Ultrasonic guided wave based structural damage detection and localization using model assisted convolutional and recurrent neural networks, Expert Syst. Appl. 167, 114189 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.114189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar