The Politics of Polyphony: Dangerous Modernity and the Structure of the Novel in Dostoevsky and Bakhtin

References

• Alekseev, M.P. “O dramaticheskikh opytakh Dostoevskogo.” In Tvorchestvo Dostoevskogo: Sbornik statei i materialov, ed. L.P. Grossman. Odessa: 1921.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. Problemy poetiki Dostoevskogo. Moscow: Sovetskaia Rossiia, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. “1961 god. Zametki.” In Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 5. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, ed. and tr. Caryl Emerson. University of Minnesota Press: 1999.]
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M.M. Problemy tvorchestva Dostoevskogo. Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 2. Moscow: Russkie slovari, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. “Tekuchaia sovremennost’,” tr. and ed. Iu.V. Asochakov. St. Petersburg, piter, 2008. [Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Modernity. Polity Press: Cambridge, UK]
   Google Scholar
• Bogdanova, O.A. “O proiskhozhdenii literaturovedcheskogo poniatiia ‘polifoniia.’” STEPHANOS [Electronic publication]. Moscow: MGU, 2016, no. 3 (17), pp. 220–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bocharov, S.G. ”Kommentarii” (on Problemy tvorchestva Dostoyevskogo). In M.M. Bakhtin, Sobranie sochinenii, vol. 2. Moscow, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Chulkov, G.I. Kak rabotal Dostoevskii. Moscow: Iurait, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Dostoevskii [Dostoevsky], F.M. Dnevnik pisatelia 1881. Avtobiograficheskoe. Dubia. In F.M Dostoevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, vol. 27. Leningrad: Nauka, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Dostoevskii [Dostoevsky], F.M. Brat’ia Karamazovy. Knigi I–X. In F.M. Dostoevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, vol. 14. Leningrad: Nauka, 1985a.
   Google Scholar
• Dostoevskii [Dostoevsky], F.M. “Pis’ma 1860–1868.” In F.M. Dostoevskii, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii, vol. 28, kn. 2. Leningrad: Nauka, 1985b.
   Google Scholar
• Dzhouns [Jones], M.V. Dostoevskii posle Bakhtina. Issledovanie fantasticheskogo realizma Dostoevskogo, tr. A.V. Skidan. St. Petersburg, 1998. Malcolm V. Jones, Dostoyevsky after Bakhtin: Readings in Dostoyevsky’s Fantastic Realism. Cambridge, UK: 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Gess, N. and S. Janßen eds. Wissens-Ordnungen: zu einer historischen Epistemologie der Literatur. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel, H., and B. Ventarola. Literatur als Herausforderung. Zwischen ästhetischem Autonomiestreben, kontextueller Fremdbestimmung und dem Gestaltungsanspruch gesellschaftlicher Zukunft. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Kalugin, D.Ia. “Istoriia poniatiia ‘obshchestvo’ ot Srednevekov’ia k Novomu vremeni: russkii opyt.” In Ot obshchestvennogo k publichnomu, ed. O.V. Kharkhordin. St. Petersburg.: Evropeiskii universitet, 2011, pp. 305–394.
   Google Scholar
• Karpi [Carpi], G. Dostoevskii-ekonomist. Ocherki po sotsiologii literatury. Moscow: Falanster, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kasatkina, T.A. Kharakterologiia Dostoevskogo. Tipologiia emotsional’no-tsennostnykh orientatsii. Moscow: Nasledie, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kasatkina, T.A. Sviashchennoe v povsednevnom. Dvusostavnyi obraz v proizvedeniiakh F.M. Dostoevskogo. Moscow: IMLI RAN, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Khirshman [Hirschman], A.O. Ritorika reaktsii: izvrashchenie, tshchetnost’, opasnost’, tr. D. Uzlaner. Moscow: ID VShE, 2010. [ Albert O. Hirschman, The Rhetoric of Reaction, perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1991]
   Google Scholar
• Lotman, L.M. Realizm russkoi literatury 60-kh godov XIX veka. Leningrad: Nauka, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Magomedova, D.M. “Poniatie «golosa» v estetike M.M. Bakhtina.” Filologicheskii zhurnal, 2005, no. 1, pp. 194–201.
   Google Scholar
• Magomedova, D.M. “Polifoniia.” In Poetika. Slovar’ aktual’nykh terminov i poniatii, ed. N.D. Tamarchenko. Moscow: Intrada, 2008, pp. 48–49.
   Google Scholar
• Makhlin, V.L. “Dva konteksta odnogo stoletiia.” In M.M. Bakhtin, Tetralogiia. Moscow: Labirint, 1998, pp. 458–496.
   Google Scholar
• Malinova, O.Iu. “Obshchestvo, publika, obshchestvennost’ v Rossii serediny XIX – nachala XX veka: Otrazhenie v poniatiiakh praktik publichnoi kommunikatsii i obshchestvennoi samodeiatel’nosti.” In “Poniatiia o Rossii”: K istoricheskoi semantike imperskogo perioda, vol. I. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012, pp. 428–463.
   Google Scholar
• Medvedev, P.N. “Formal’nyi metod v literaturovedenii. Kriticheskoe vvedenie v sotsiologicheskuiu poetiku.” In M.M. Bakhtin, Tetralogiia. Moscow: Labirint, 1998, pp. 109–296.
   Google Scholar
• Merten, S. Die Entstehung des Realismus aus der Poetik der Medizin: Die Russische Literatur der 40er bis 60er Jahre des 19. Jahrhunderts. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Mikhailov, A.V. Obratnyi perevod: Russkaia i zapadno-evropeiskaia kul’tura, problemy vzaimosviazei. Moscow: IaSK, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, F. Burzhua: mezhdu istoriei i literaturoi, tr. I. Kushnareva. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo Instituta Gaidara, 2014. [Franco Moretti, The Bourgeois Between History and Literature. London, 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Neretina, S.S. Filosofskie odinochestva. Moscow: IF RAN, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolosi, R. Degeneration erzählen: Literatur und Psychiatrie im Russland der 1880er und 1890er Jahre. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Parsamov, V.S. “‘Bilet na vkhod’ Ivana Karamazova (k probleme ‘Dostoevskii i Zhozef de Mestr’).” Lotmanovskii sbornik, vyp. 4. Moscow: OGI, 2014, pp. 375–383.
   Google Scholar
• Paperno, I. 2005. “La prose des années 1870–1890.” In Histoire de la littérature russe, ed. E. Etkind et al., vol. 2/2, pp. 789–823.
   Google Scholar
• Poljakova, E. 2013. Differente Plausibilitäten: Kant und Nietzsche, Tolstoi und Dostojewski über Vernunft, Moral und Kunst. Berlin [u.a.]: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, K., J. Schönert, and M. Titzmann, eds. 1997. Die Literatur und die Wissenschaften 1770–1930. Stuttgart: Metzler.
   Google Scholar
• Sdvizhkov, D.A. “Ot obshchestva k intelligentsii: istoriia poniatii kak istoriia samosoznaniia.” In “Poniatiia o Rossii”: K istoricheskoi semantike imperskogo perioda, vol. I. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012, pp. 382–427.
   Google Scholar
• Seriot, P. 2010. Preface to V.N. Vološinov, Le Marxisme et la philosophie du langage. Essai d’application de la méthode sociologique en linguistique. Limoges: Lambert-Lucas, pp. 13–113.
   Google Scholar
• Shvets, A. “Liricheskoe delegirovanie: veshchi v literaturnom bytu imazhistov.” Translit. 2018. no. 21, pp. 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov, I.P. Psikhodiakhronologika. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Soboleva, M. 2010. Die Philosophie Michail Bachtins: Von der existenziellen Ontologie zur dialogischen Vernunft. Hildesheim: Olms-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tikhanov [Tihanov], G. “Bakhtin, Lukach i nemetskii romantizm,” tr. N.K. Bonetskaia. Dialog. Karnaval. Khronotop, 1996, no. 3, pp. 117–42.
   Google Scholar
• Todd III, U.M. [William Mills], “Dostoevskii kak professional’nyi pisatel’, professiia, zaniatie, etika.” Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2002, no. 58, pp. 15–43.
   Google Scholar
• Vogl, J. 2002. Kalkül und Leidenschaft. Poetik des ökonomischen Menschen. Munich: Sequenzia Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zasse [Sasse], S. Iad v ukho. Ispoved’ i priznanie v russkoi literature, tr. B. Skuratov and I. Chubarov. Moscw: RGGU, 2012. [S. Sasse, Wortsünden. Beichten und Gestehen in der russischen Literatur. Fink Verlag, 2009]
   Google Scholar