Lies divorced from context: evidence for Context Embedded Perception (CEP) as a feasible measure for deception detection

References

• Goldsmith, M. (2016). Metacognitive quality-control processes in memory retrieval and reporting. In J. Dunlosky & S. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of metamemory (pp. 357–385). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., & Koriat, A. (2008). The strategic regulation of memory accuracy and informativeness. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 48, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(07)48001-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, M., Pansky, A., & Koriat, A. (2014). Metacognitive control of memory reporting. In T. Perfect & D. S. Lindsay (Eds.), Sage Handbook of applied memory (pp. 481–500). Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (1999). Repeated interrogations - stretching the deception detection paradigm. Expert Evidence, 7(3), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008993326434
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. C., Vrij, A., Nahari, G., & Ludwig, K. (2017). Applying the verifiability approach to insurance claims settings: Exploring the effect of the information protocol. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K. (2006). Memory and reality. American Psychologist, 61(8), 760–771. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., Bush, J. G., & Mitchell, K. J. (1998). Interpersonal reality monitoring: Judging the sources of other people’s memories. Social Cognition, 16(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1998.16.2.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelter, R. (2020). Bayesian alternatives to null hypothesis significance testing in biomedical research: a non-technical introduction to Bayesian inference with JASP. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0863-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1994). Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.123.3.297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leins, D. A., Fisher, P. F., & Ross, S. J. (2013). Exploring liars’ strategies for creating deceptive reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Erlbaum Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odinot, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2010). Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X401382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G. (2018a). Reality monitoring in the forensic context: Digging deeper into the speech of liars. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(3), 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G. (2018b). The applicability of the verifiability approach to the real world. In J. P. Rosenfeld (Ed.), Detecting concealed information and deception: Recent developments (pp. 329–349). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Ashkenazi, T., Fisher, R. P., Granhag, P. A., Hershkovitz, I., Masip, J., Meijer, E., Nisin, Z., Sarid, N., Taylor, P. J., Verschuere, B., & Vrij, A. (2019). ‘Language of lies’: Urgent issues and prospects in verbal lie detection research. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 24(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., & Nisin, Z. (2019). Digging further into the speech of liars: Future research prospects in verbal Lie detection. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., & Vrij, A. (2015). Systematic errors (biases) in applying verbal lie detection tools: Richness in detail as a test case. Crime Psychology Review, 1(1), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744006.2016.1158509
   Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2012). Does the truth come out in the writing? SCAN as a lie detection tool. Law and Human Behavior, 36(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). The verifiability approach: Countermeasures facilitate its ability to discriminate between truths and lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palena, N., Caso, L., Vrij, A., & Nahari, G. (2020). The verifiability approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and detection of deception. In P. A. Granhag, & L. A. Stromwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in Forensic contexts (pp. 64–102). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Doorn, J., van den Bergh, D., Böhm, U., Dablander, F., Derks, K., Draws, T., Etz, A., Evans, N. J., Gronau, Q. F., Haff, J. M., Hinne, M., Kucharsk´y, S., Ly, A., Marsman, M., Matzke, D., Komarlu Narendra Gupta, A. R., Sarafoglou, A., Stefan, A., Voelkel, J. G., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2021). The JASP guidelines for conducting and reporting a Bayesian analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 813–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2019). Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), 89–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610390861
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Jupe, L., & Harvey, A. (2018). Within-subjects verbal lie detection measures: A comparison between total detail and proportion of complications. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 23(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Nahari, G. (2019). The verifiability approach. In J. Dickinson, N. Schreiber Compo, R. Carol, & M. McCauley (Eds.), Evidence-based investigative interviewing (pp. 116–133). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Smira, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., … Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar