Achieving sustainable excellence: A theoretical comparison of established quality awards

References

• American Society for Quality. 2023. What is organizational excellence? Organizational excellence model.
   Google Scholar
• Application Guidelines. 1988. Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Gaithersburg, MD: United States Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Award Criteria. 1992. Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Gaithersburg, MD: United States Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Award Criteria. 1995. Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Gaithersburg, MD: United States Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bohoris, G. A. 1995. A comparative assessment of some major quality awards. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 12 (9):30–43. doi: 10.1108/02656719510101178.
   Google Scholar
• Breja, S. K., D. K. Banwet, and K. C. Iyer. 2016. Towards sustainable excellence: Strategic analysis of Deming Prize winning companies. TQM Journal 28 (3):390–410. doi: 10.1108/TQM-09-2012-0070.
   Google Scholar
• Chae, H., C. E. Koh, and V. R. Prybutok, West Liberty University. 2014. Information technology capability and firm performance: Contradictory findings and their possible causes. MIS Quarterly 38 (1):305–26. doi: 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.1.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Co, H. C., and F. Barro. 2009. Stakeholder theory and ­dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 29 (6):591–611. doi: 10.1108/01443570910957573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, C. G. 2023. The project manager’s guide to mastering Agile: Principles and practices for an adaptive approach. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Coimbra, H., K. Cormican, O. McDermott, and J. Antony. 2023. Leading the transformation: Agile success factors in an Irish manufacturing company. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 34 (15–16):1940–67. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2023.2214515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumer Reports. 2023. Takata airbag recall: Everything you need to know. https://www.consumerreports.org/cars/car-recalls-defects/takata-airbag-recall-everything-you-need-to-know-a1060713669/.
   Google Scholar
• Corporate Register. 2023. Corporate register reporting awards. Accessed June 2023. https://www.corporateregister.com/crra/.
   Google Scholar
• Criteria for Performance Excellence. 1997. Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award. Gaithersburg, MD: United States Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Delivering Progress Every Day: Amazon’s. 2021. Sustainability report. Accessed June 2023. https://sustainability.aboutamazon.com/reporting-and-downloads.
   Google Scholar
• Deming Prize Committee. 2015. The Application Guide for Deming Prize 2015. Accessed June 2023. https://www.juse.or.jp/upload/files/Deming_prize_EN/download/Application_Guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deming Prize Committee. 2023. The Application Guide for Deming Prize 2023. Accessed June 2023. https://www.juse.or.jp/upload/files/DP_en_application_2023.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Denning, S. 2019. Lessons learned from mapping successful and unsuccessful Agile transformation journeys. Strategy & Leadership 47 (4):3–11. doi: 10.1108/SL-04-2019-0052.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, G. S., and S. L. Jarrell. 1998. The effects of total quality management on corporate performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business 71 (2):253–307. doi: 10.1086/209744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFQM Excellence Model 1st Edition. 2013. The European Foundation for Quality Management, https://efqm.org/the-efqm-model/.
   Google Scholar
• EFQM Excellence Model 2nd Edition. 2023. The European Foundation for Quality Management, https://efqm.org/the-efqm-model/.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, M. J., and A. R. Buhovac. 2014. Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Felton, R. 2023. Dozens of car models tied to potentially explosive air-bag part, WSJ finds. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/dozens-of-car-models-tied-to-potentially-explosive-air-bag-part-wsj-finds-f6e76afd?mod=hp_lead_pos3.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. B., and E. J. Flynn. 2005. Synergies between supply chain management and quality management: Emerging implications. International Journal of Production Research 43 (16):3421–36. doi: 10.1080/00207540500118076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GE 2022 Sustainability Report. 2022. Accessed June 2023. https://www.ge.com/sites/default/files/ge2022_sustainability_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G. R., C. Veloutsou, M. M. Goode, and L. Moutinho. 2004. Measuring customer satisfaction in the fast food industry: A cross-national approach. Journal of Services Marketing 18 (5):371–83. doi: 10.1108/08876040410548294.
   Google Scholar
• Girotra, K., and S. Netessine. 2013. OM forum-business model innovation for sustainability. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 15 (4):537–44. doi: 10.1287/msom.2013.0451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, P. N., D. Mitra, and C. Moorman. 2012. What is quality? An integrative framework of processes and states. Journal of Marketing 76 (4):1–23. doi: 10.1509/jm.09.0416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes Silva, F. J., K. Kirytopoulos, L. Pinto Ferreira, J. C. Sá, G. Santos, and M. C. Cancela Nogueira. 2022. The three pillars of sustainability and agile project management: How do they influence each other. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 29 (5):1495–512. doi: 10.1002/csr.2287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, T., J. Pinkse, L. Preuss, and F. Figge. 2015. Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics 127 (2):297–316. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2047-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, M., G. Grela, and M. Oronowicz. 2023. Impact of Shared Leadership Quality on Agile Team Productivity and Project Results. Project Management Journal 54 (3):285–305. doi: 10.1177/87569728221150436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, A., and D. N. Halsall. 2002. Comparison of the 14 deadly diseases and the business excellence model. Total Quality Management 13 (2):255–63. doi: 10.1080/09544120120102487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iaquinto, A. L. 1999. Can winners be losers? The case of the Deming prize for quality and performance among large Japanese manufacturing firms. Managerial Auditing Journal 14 (1/2):28–35. doi: 10.1108/02686909910245531.
   Google Scholar
• Intel Corporate Responsibility Report. 2019–2020. Accessed June 2023. https://csrreportbuilder.intel.com/pdfbuilder/pdfs/CSR-2019-20-Full-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. W., M. Swink, and K. Linderman. 2015. Performance effects of early and late Six Sigma adoptions. Journal of Operations Management 36 (1):244–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2015.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kannan, V. R., and K. C. Tan. 2005. Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: Understanding their linkages and impact on business performance. Omega 33 (2):153–62. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynak, H. 2003. The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management 21 (4):405–35. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6963(03)00004-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynak, H., and J. L. Hartley. 2008. A replication and ­extension of quality management into the supply chain. Journal of Operations Management 26 (4):468–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuei, C. H., and M. H. Lu. 2013. Integrating quality management principles into sustainability management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24 (1–2):62–78. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.669536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasrado, F., and R. Kassem. 2021. Let’s get everyone ­involved! The effects of transformational leadership and organizational culture on organizational excellence. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 38 (1):169–94. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-11-2019-0349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., S. Wu, C. Zhong, and Y. Liu. 2020. The sustainable effect of operational performance on financial benefits: Evidence from Chinese quality awards winners. Sustainability 12 (5):1966. doi: 10.3390/su12051966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manresa, A., and D. Escobar Rivera. 2021. Excellence in sustainable management in a changing environment. Sustainability 13 (4):2296. doi: 10.3390/su13042296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J., M. Elg, and I. Gremyr. 2020. The many meanings of quality: Towards a definition in support of sustainable operations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 1–14. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2020.1844564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, I., M. Zairi, and M. Ashari Idris. 2002. Sustaining and transferring excellence: A framework of best practice of TQM transformation based on winners of Baldrige and European Quality Awards. Measuring Business Excellence 6 (3):20–30. doi: 10.1108/13683040210441959.
   Google Scholar
• Meng, J. 2014. Unpacking the relationship between organizational culture and excellent leadership in public relations: An empirical investigation. Journal of Communication Management 18 (4):363–85. doi: 10.1108/JCOM-06-2012-0050.
   Google Scholar
• NIST. 2002. Baldrige National Quality Program: 2002 criteria for performance excellence.
   Google Scholar
• NIST. 2013. Baldrige National Quality Program: 2013-2014 Baldrige criteria for performance excellence (Business/Nonprofit).
   Google Scholar
• NIST. 2023. Baldrige Performance Excellence Program: 2023-2024 Baldrige Excellence Framework Business/Nonprofit Criteria.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, X., and V. Prybutok. 2015. Relative effectiveness of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award categories. International Journal of Production Research 53 (2):629–47. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2014.961207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, X., V. Prybutok, and H. Xie. 2020. Integration of supply chain management and quality management within a quality focused organizational framework. International Journal of Production Research 58 (2):448–66. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2019.1593548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, X., X. Wei, L. Xu, Y. Cao, and V. Prybutok. 2022. An organizational framework for sustainable supply chain management: An integrated theoretical perspective. Quality Management Journal 29 (4):267–88. doi: 10.1080/10686967.2022.2112928.
   Google Scholar
• Prybutok, V., X. Zhang, and D. Peak. 2011. Assessing the effectiveness of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award model with municipal government. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 45 (3):118–29. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2010.12.003.
   Google Scholar
• Saarikallio, M., and P. Tyrväinen. 2023. Quality culture boosts agile transformation—Action research in a business-to-business software business. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process 35 (1):e2504. doi: 10.1002/smr.2504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrano, S. A., and R. J. Reichard. 2011. Leadership strategies for an engaged workforce. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 63 (3):176–89. doi: 10.1037/a0025621.
   Google Scholar
• Talwar, B. 2011. Business excellence models and the path ahead. TQM Journal 23 (1):21–35. doi: 10.1108/17542731111097461.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. C. 2002. A comparative study of 16 national quality awards. TQM Magazine 14 (3):165–71. doi: 10.1108/09544780210425874.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. C., M. F. Wong, T. Mehta, and H. H. Khoo. 2003. Factors affecting the development of national quality awards. Measuring Business Excellence 7 (3):37–45. doi: 10.1108/13683040310496499.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, W. F., and B. G. Dale. 1997. Self-assessment: Methods, management and process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 211 (5):365–75. doi: 10.1243/0954405971516347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Deming Prize Committee. 2015. The Application Guide for Deming Prize 2015. Accessed June 2023. https://www.juse.or.jp/upload/files/Deming_prize_EN/download/Application_Guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Deming Prize Committee. 2023. The Application Guide for Deming Prize 2023. Accessed June 2023. https://www.juse.or.jp/upload/files/DP_en_application_2023.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• The Sustainability Consortium. 2023. Accessed June 2023. https://sustainabilityconsortium.org/.
   Google Scholar
• The Volkswagen Group Sustainability Report. 2022. Accessed June 2023. https://www.volkswagen-group.com/en/reporting-15808#downloads.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoutsoura, M. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and ­financial performance. Berkeley, California: Center for Responsible Business.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, H., X. Wei, X. Peng, and V. Prybutok. 2022. The evolution of supply chain management as measured with the Baldrige excellence framework. Quality Management Journal 29 (4):234–47. doi: 10.1080/10686967.2022.2112927.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., X. Wei, Y. Cao, X. Peng, and V. Prybutok. 2023. Achieving business excellence through sustainable supply chain management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 34 (13–14):1830–56. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2023.2206554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakrzewska, M., K. Piwowar-Sulej, S. Jarosz, A. Sagan, and M. Sołtysik. 2022. The linkage between Agile project management and sustainable development: A theoretical and empirical view. Sustainable Development 30 (5):855–69. doi: 10.1002/sd.2285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zink, K. J., and A. Schmidt. 1998. Practice and implementation of self-assessment. International Journal of Quality Science 3 (2):147–70. doi: 10.1108/13598539810211969.
   Google Scholar