Recommended Practices in Latent Class Analysis Using the Open-Source R-Package tidySEM

References

• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akogul, S., & Erisoglu, M. (2016). A comparison of information criteria in clustering based on mixture of multivariate normal distributions. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 21, 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca21030034
   Google Scholar
• Baughman, A. L. (2007). Mixture model framework facilitates understanding of zero-inflated and hurdle models for count data. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 17, 943–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701514098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., & Govaert, G. (2003). Choosing starting values for the EM algorithm for getting the highest likelihood in multivariate Gaussian mixture models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 41, 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9473(02)00163-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Luo, W., Palardy, G. J., Glaman, R., & McEnturff, A. (2017). The efficacy of common fit indices for enumerating classes in growth mixture models when nested data structure is ignored: A monte carlo study. SAGE Open, 7, 215824401770045. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017700459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2009). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Corana, A., Marchesi, M., Martini, C., & Ridella, S. (1987). Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the “simulated annealing” algorithm—corrigenda for this article is available here. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 13, 262–280. https://doi.org/10.1145/29380.29864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depaoli, S. (2013). Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: Frequentist versus Bayesian estimation. Psychological Methods, 18, 186–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2022). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, M. A. T., & Jain, A. K. (2002). Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24, 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.990138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeman, J. J., & Solari, A. (2011). Multiple testing for exploratory research. Statistical Science, 26, 584–597. https://doi.org/10.1214/11-STS356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28, 100–108. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2346830 https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (Second). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hennig, C., Meila, M., Murtagh, F., & Rocci, R. (2015). Handbook of Cluster Analysis. Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10, 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamshidian, M., & Jalal, S. (2010). Tests of homoscedasticity, normality, and missing completely at random for incomplete multivariate data. Psychometrika, 75, 649–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-010-9175-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, N. O. (2003). A note on ’testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 90, 991–994. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/30042105 https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/90.4.991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Fourth). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamprecht, A.-L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, C., Arcila, R., Martin Del Pico, E., Dominguez Del Angel, V., van de Sandt, S., Ison, J., Martinez, P. A., McQuilton, P., Valencia, A., Harrow, J., Psomopoulos, F., Gelpi, J. L., Chue Hong, N., Goble, C., & Capella-Gutierrez, S. (2020). Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Science, 3, 37–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/DS-190026
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T., & Shi, D. (2021). A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data. Psychological Methods, 26, 466–485. No Pagination Specified–No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The oxford handbook of quantitative methods: Vol. 2: Statistical Analysis (p. 551). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Eye, A. v (1994). On the arbitrary nature of latent variables. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 226–242). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Neale, M. C., Hunter, M. D., Pritikin, J. N., Zahery, M., Brick, T. R., Kirkpatrick, R. M., Estabrook, R., Bates, T. C., Maes, H. H., & Boker, S. M. (2016). OpenMx 2.0: Extended structural equation and statistical modeling. Psychometrika, 81, 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-014-9435-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S., Breckler, S., … DeHaven, A. C. (2016). Transparency and openness promotion (TOP) guidelines. OSF Preprints, https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/vj54c
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4, 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
   Google Scholar
• Peikert, A., Van Lissa, C. J., & Brandmaier, A. M. (2021). Reproducible research in r: A tutorial on how to do the same thing more than once. Psych, 3, 836–867. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3040053
   Google Scholar
• Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rissanen, J. (1983). A universal prior for integers and estimation by minimum description length. The Annals of Statistics, 11, 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176346150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An r package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, J. B. (2017). Latent class analysis: An example for reporting results. Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy, 13, 1196–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2016.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrucca, L., Fop, M., Murphy, T. B., & Raftery, A. E. (2016). Mclust 5: Clustering, classification and density estimation using Gaussian finite mixture models. The R Journal, 8, 289–317. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tein, J. Y., Coxe, S., & Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Structural Equation Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20, 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Schoot, R., Sijbrandij, M., Winter, S. D., Depaoli, S., & Vermunt, J. K. (2017). The GRoLTS-checklist: Guidelines for reporting on latent trajectory studies. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1247646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lissa, C. J. (2022a). Complementing preregistered confirmatory analyses with rigorous, reproducible exploration using machine learning. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 0, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070254
   Google Scholar
• Van Lissa, C. J. (2022b). tidySEM: Tidy structural equation modeling. Retrieved from www.github.com/cjvanlissa/tidySEM
   Google Scholar
• Van Lissa, C. J., Brandmaier, A. M., Brinkman, L., Lamprecht, A. L., Peikert, A., Struiksma, M. E., & Vreede, B. M. I. (2021a). WORCS: A workflow for open reproducible code in science. Data Science, 4, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.3233/DS-210031
   Google Scholar
• Van Lissa, C. J., Gu, X., Mulder, J., Rosseel, Y., Zundert, C. V., & Hoijtink, H. (2021b). Teacher’s corner: Evaluating informative hypotheses using the bayes factor in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 28, 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2020.1745644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K. (2010a). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K. (2010b). Longitudinal research using mixture models. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 119–152). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11760-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K. (2023). The Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin test for latent class and latent profile analysis: A note on the different implementations in Mplus and LatentGOLD. Private Website. https://jeroenvermunt.nl/VLMR_Mplus_LatentGOLD2023.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2000). Latent GOLD 2.0 user’s guide. Statistical Innovations Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., Magidson, J., Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A., & Liao, T. F, (2004). Latent class analysis. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. F. Liao (Eds.), The sage encyclopedia of social sciences research methods (pp. 549–553). Sage. Retrieved from https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/0caedd00-27c1-42bd-bb4e-d1dcb0864956
   Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 192–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46, 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L. (2005). The grammar of graphics. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar