Contexts and dimensions of algorithm literacies: Parents’ algorithm literacies amidst the datafication of parenthood

References

• Alper, M. (2023). Kids across the Spectrums: Growing up Autistic in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila, J., & Pandya, J. Z. (2013). Critical digital literacies as social Praxis: Intersections and Challenges. In C. Lankshear, & M. Knobel, (Eds.), New Literacies and Digital Epistemologies (p. 10006 Vol. 54), Peter Lang New York. 29 Broadway 18th Floor. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Barassi, V. (2019). Datafied citizens in the age of coerced digital participation. Sociological Research Online, 24(3), 414–429. doi:10.1177/1360780419857734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, R., & Potter, A. (2021). Sharenting and parents’ digital literacy: An agenda for future research. Communication Research & Practice, 7(1), 6–20. doi:10.1080/22041451.2020.1847819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, S. (2019). Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2589–2606. doi:10.1177/1461444819854731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital media literacies: Rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative & International Education, 2(1), 43–55. doi:10.2304/rcie.2007.2.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, D., Banaji, S., Carr, D., Cranmer, S., & Willett, R. (2005). The media literacy of children and young people: A review of the research literature.
   Google Scholar
• Caronia, L. (2009). The Cultural Roots of knowledge vs. The Myths underlying the contemporary digital turn in education. In Media Literacy in Europe. Controversies, challenges and perspectives (pp. 25–33). Euromeduc.
   Google Scholar
• Charters, E. (2003). The use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Education Journal, 12(2). doi:10.26522/brocked.v12i2.38
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2015). Purposeful, critical, and flexible: Vital dimensions of online reading and learning. In EUROMEDUC (Ed.), Reading at a Crossroads? (pp. 67–78). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, K. (2022). Practical knowledge of algorithms: The case of BreadTube. New Media & Society, 146144482210818. doi:10.1177/14614448221081802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, K. M. (2020). Critical algorithmic literacy: Power, epistemology, and platforms. Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, K., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2020). Algorithmic knowledge gaps: A new horizon of (digital) inequality. International Journal of Communication, 14, 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, R. (2011). Converging perspectives in audience studies and digital literacies: Youthful interpretations of an online genre. European Journal of Communication, 26(4), 343–360. doi:10.1177/0267323111423379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, R. (2019). Early Motherhood in digital societies: Ideals, anxieties and ties of the perinatal. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R. (2023). Parents’ understandings of social media algorithms in children’s lives in England: Misunderstandings, parked understandings, transactional understandings and proactive understandings amidst datafication. Journal of Children and Media, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, R., Chimirri, N., Jorge, A., & Trueltzsch-Wijnen, C. (2023). Parents’ social networks, transitional moments and the shaping role of digital communications: An exploratory study in Austria, Denmark, England and Portugal. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1–18. doi:10.1332/204674321X16841332631111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, R., Chimirri, N., Jorge, A., & Trultzsch-Wijnen, C. (2023). Parents’ social networks, transitional moments and the shaping role of digital communications: an exploratory study in Austria, Denmark, England and Portugal. Families, Relationships and Societies Online First https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/frs/aop/article-10.1332-204674321X16841332631111/article-10.1332-204674321X16841332631111.xml . In .
   Google Scholar
• DeVito, M. A. (2017). From editors to algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–773. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVito, M. A. (2021). Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to algorithmic literacy on changing platforms. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–38. doi:10.1145/3476080
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dogruel, L. (2021). Folk theories of algorithmic operations during Internet use: A mixed methods study. The Information Society, 37(5), 287–298. doi:10.1080/01972243.2021.1949768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., & Ugwudike, P. (2023). Governing families: Problematising technologies in social Welfare and Criminal Justice. Taylor & Francis. doi:10.4324/9781003080343
   Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., Rickman, A., Vaccaro, K., Aleyasen, A., Vuong, A., Karahalios, K., & Sandvig, C. (2015, April). ” I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]” Reasoning about Invisible Algorithms in News Feeds. Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 153–162).
   Google Scholar
• Fotopoulou, A. (2021). Conceptualising critical data literacies for civil society organisations: Agency, care, and social responsibility. Information, Communication & Society, 24(11), 1640–1657. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1716041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouquaert, T., & Mechant, P. (2022). Making curation algorithms apparent: A case study of ‘Instawareness’ as a means to heighten awareness and understanding of Instagram’s algorithm. Information, Communication & Society, 25(12), 1769–1789. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1883707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, 167(2014), 167.
   Google Scholar
• Gran, A. B., Booth, P., & Bucher, T. (2021). To be or not to be algorithm aware: A question of a new digital divide? Information, Communication & Society, 24(12), 1779–1796. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1736124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B. (1999). The new literacy challenge?. Literacy Learning: Secondary Thoughts, 7(1), 36–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, J., & Hargittai, E. (2023). The importance of algorithm skills for informed Internet use. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 20539517231168100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, J., Hargittai, E., Karaoglu, G., & Brombach, L. (2021). Algorithm awareness as an important internet skill: the case of voice assistants. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1770-1788.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., Sandvig, C., & Eslami, M. (2014). A path to understanding the effects of algorithm awareness. CHI’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 631–642.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., Gruber, J., Djukaric, T., Fuchs, J., & Brombach, L. (2020). Black box measures? How to study people’s algorithm skills. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 764–775. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodkinson, P., & Brooks, R. (2023). Caregiving fathers and the negotiation of crossroads: Journeys of continuity and change. The British Journal of Sociology, 74(1), 35–49. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iser, W. (1974). The implied reader: Patterns of communication in prose fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R., Chimirri, N., Jorge, A., & Trueltzsch-Wijnen, C. (2023). Parents' social networks, transitional moments and the shaping role of digital communications: an exploratory study in Austria, Denmark, England and Portugal. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1-18.
   Google Scholar
• Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Algorithmic folk theories and identity: How TikTok users co-produce knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction, 5( CSCW2), 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kaun, A. (2022). Suing the algorithm: The mundanization of automated decision-making in public services through litigation. Information, Communication & Society, 25(14), 2046–2062. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2021.1924827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klawitter, E., & Hargittai, E. (2018). “It’s like learning a whole other language”: The role of algorithmic skills in the curation of creative goods. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3490–3510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Le‐Phuong Nguyen, K., Harman, V., & Cappellini, B. (2017). Playing with class: Middle‐class intensive mothering and the consumption of children’s toys in Vietnam. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(5), 449–456. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C., & Macvarish, J. (2014). Parenting culture studies. Springer. doi:10.1057/9781137304612
   Google Scholar
• Leighton, J. P. (2017). Using think-aloud interviews and cognitive labs in educational research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. doi:10.1080/10714420490280152
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Engaging with media—a matter of literacy? Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(1), 51–62. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2007.00006.x
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2010). Media literacy and media policy. Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen: Die deutschprachige und britische Diskussion, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children’s lives. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., Stoilova, M., & Nandagiri, R. (2020). Data and privacy literacy: The role of the school in educating children in a datafied society. The Handbook of Media Education Research, 413–425.
   Google Scholar
• Lomborg, S., & Kapsch, P. H. (2020). Decoding algorithms. Media, Culture & Society, 42(5), 745–761. doi:10.1177/0163443719855301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. (2013). Defining critical literacy. In Moving critical literacies forward (pp. 37–49). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lupinacci, L. (2022). Phenomenal algorhythms: The sensorial orchestration of “real-time” in the social media manifold. New Media & Society, 146144482211099. doi:10.1177/14614448221109952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madge, C., & O’connor, H. (2006). Parenting gone weird: Empowerment of new mothers on the internet? Social & Cultural Geography, 7(2), 199–220. doi:10.1080/14649360600600528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, A. N. (2020). Taking data literacy to the streets: Critical pedagogy in the public sphere. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 227–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascheroni, G. (2020). Datafied childhoods: Contextualising datafication in everyday life. Current Sociology, 68(6), 798–813. doi:10.1177/0011392118807534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCosker, A. (2017). Data literacies for the postdemographic social media self. First Monday.
   Google Scholar
• Mihailidis, P. (2018). Civic media literacies: Re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 152–164. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1428623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollen, A., & Dhaenens, F. (2018). Audiences’ coping practices with intrusive interfaces: Researching audiences in algorithmic, datafied, platform societies. In R. Das, & B. Ytre-Arne (Eds.), The Future of Audiences: A Foresight Analysis of Interfaces and Engagement (pp. 43–60). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oeldorf-Hirsch, A., & Neubaum, G. (2023). What do we know about algorithmic literacy? The status quo and a research agenda for a growing field. SocArxiv November, 18, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 163–174. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L., & Sefton-Green, J. (2021). Digital rights, digital citizenship and digital literacy: What’s the difference? NAER: Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 15–27. doi:10.7821/naer.2021.1.616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L., & Selwyn, N. (2019). ‘Personal data literacies’: A critical literacies approach to enhancing understandings of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 21(2), 419–437. doi:10.1177/1461444818799523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsania, V. S., Kalyani, F., & Kamani, K. (2016). A comparative analysis: DuckDuckGo vs. Google search engine. GRD Journals-Global Research and Development Journal for Engineering, 2(1), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Polizzi, G. (2021). Internet users’ utopian/dystopian imaginaries of society in the digital age: Theorizing critical digital literacy and civic engagement. New Media & Society, 25(6), 1205–1226. doi:10.1177/14614448211018609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader, E., & Gray, R. (2015, April). Understanding user beliefs about algorithmic curation in the Facebook news feed. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 173–182).
   Google Scholar
• Reisdorf, B. C., & Blank, G. (2021). Algorithmic literacy and platform trust. In Handbook of digital inequality (pp. 341–357). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D., Kee, K. F., & Shin, E. Y. (2022). Algorithm awareness: Why user awareness is critical for personal privacy in the adoption of algorithmic platforms? International Journal of Information Management, 65, 102494. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siibak, A., & Traks, K. (2019). The dark sides of sharenting. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies, 11(1), 115–121. doi:10.1386/cjcs.11.1.115_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles, I., Espinoza-Rojas, J., Naranjo, A., & Tristán, M. F. (2019). The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix. Communication, Culture & Critique, 12(4), 499–518. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcz025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles, I., Segura-Castillo, A., Solís, R., & Sancho, M. (2020). Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the global south. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720923377. doi:10.1177/2053951720923377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, I. A., & Beavis, C. (2004). Doing literacy online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, I., & Beavis, C. (2004). Doing Literacy Online: Teaching, learning and playing in an electronic world. New York, NY: Hampton Press, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Swart, J. (2021). Experiencing algorithms: How young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media. Social Media+ Society, 7(2), 20563051211008828. doi:10.1177/20563051211008828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swart, J. (2023). Tactics of news literacy: How young people access, evaluate, and engage with news on social media. New Media & Society, 25(3), 505-521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toff, B., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). “I just google it”: Folk theories of distributed discovery. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 636–657. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the Dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 782–797. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.994544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. doi:10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
   Google Scholar
• Ytre-Arne, B., & Das, R. (2021). Audiences’ communicative agency in a datafied age: Interpretative, relational and increasingly prospective. Communication Theory, 31(4), 779–797. doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ytre-Arne, B., & Moe, H. (2021). Folk theories of algorithms: Understanding digital irritation. Media, Culture & Society, 43(5), 807–824. doi:10.1177/0163443720972314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar