Readability of patient education material in stroke: a systematic literature review

References

• Dubay W. The Adult Literacy Studies. The Principles of Readability. Vol. 92627949. 3309th ed. CA: ERIC Clearinghouse; 2004:631–3309
   Google Scholar
• U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Healthy People. Final review 2012. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hpdata2010/hp2010finalreview.pdf. 2010. (accessed May 30, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Doak CC, Doak LG, Friedell GH, Meade CD. Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: strategies for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:151–162. doi:10.3322/canjclin.48.3.151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Education Statistics N. Data point: Adult literacy in the United States. n.d. doi:10.1787/9789264204256-en.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss BD, Schwartzberg JG, Davis TC, Parker RM, Williams MV, Wang CC. Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians. Chicago: American Medical Association Foundation; 2003. http://lib.ncfh.org/pdfs/6617.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baker MT, Taub HA. Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center. JAMA. 1983;250:2646–2648. doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340190048030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis TC, Mayeaux EJ, Fredrickson D, Bocchini JA, Jackson RH, Murphy PW. Reading ability of parents compared with reading level of pediatric patient education materials. Pediatrics. 1994;93(3):460–468. doi:10.1542/peds.93.3.460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients’ use of the internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:180–185. doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooth L, Hoffmann T. Patient perceptions of the quality of information provided in a hospital stroke rehabilitation unit. Br J Occup Ther. 2004;67:111–117. doi:10.1177/030802260406700303.
   Google Scholar
• Flink M, Lindblom S, von Koch L, Carlsson AC, Ytterberg C. Health literacy is associated with less depression symptoms, higher perceived recovery, higher perceived participation, and walking ability one year after stroke – a cross-sectional study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2023;2023:1–7. doi:10.1080/10749357.2023.2178133.
   Google Scholar
• Ganzer CA, Insel KC, Ritter LS. Associations between working memory, health literacy, and recall of the signs of stroke among older adults. J Neurosci Nurs. 2012;44:236–243. doi:10.1097/JNN.0b013e3182666231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazar M, Khan SA, Kumar R, Hafeez A. Effectiveness of health literacy intervention on cardiovascular diseases among university students of Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:504. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4348-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polunina NV, Kostenko EV. An effect of education and health literacy on the efficacy of rehabilitation of post-stroke patients. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im SS Korsakova. 2017;117:48–54. doi:10.17116/jnevro20171173248-54.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szabó P, É B, Kósa K. Readability and comprehension of printed patient education materials. Front Publ Health. 2021;9:725840. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.725840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Carrier A. Do rehabilitation professionals need to consider their clients’ health literacy for effective practice? Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:756–765. doi:10.1177/0269215509360752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetc R. Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk. JBI Manual Evi Syn. 2020. doi:10.46658/JBIMES-20-08.
   Google Scholar
• Kasabwala K, Misra P, Hansberry DR, Agarwal N, Baredes S, Setzen M, et al. Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013;3:325–333. doi:10.1002/alr.21097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclaughlin G. SMOG grading - a New readability Formula. Journal of Reading. 1969;12(8):639–646.
   Google Scholar
• Fang IE. By computer Flesch’s: reading ease score and a syllable counter. Behav Sci. 1968;13:249–251. doi:10.1002/bs.3830130312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson J. Lix and Rix: variations on a Little-known readability Index on JSTOR. J Read. 1983;26:490–496.
   Google Scholar
• Gunning R. The Technique of Clear Writing. University of Wisconsin, Madison: McGraw-Hill; 1952:289.
   Google Scholar
• Fry E. A readability Formula that saves time. J Read. 1968;11:513–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Company; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kotecki J, Bayer R. Suitability assessment for the diet quality screening tool. https://cardinalscholar.bsu.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/202115/SAM%20questionnaire.pdf?sequence=8&isAllowed=y. n.d. (accessed May 30, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Davis TC, Long SW, Jackson RH, Mayeaux EJ, George RB, Murphy PW, et al. Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993;25:391–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin E, McKenna K, Worrall L. Stroke education materials on the World Wide web: an evaluation of their quality and suitability. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:29–40. doi:10.1310/JKJK-N2MP-9LQ1-FF2N.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh TM, Volsko TA. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care. 2008;53:1310–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surman R, Bath PA. An assessment of the quality of information on stroke and speech and language difficulty web sites. J Inf Sci. 2013;39:113–125. doi:10.1177/0165551512469775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Tridimas A, Fitzsimmons PR. A readability assessment of online stroke information. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:1362–1367. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.11.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MA, Shin C-N, Trustworthiness AK. Readability, and suitability of web-based information for stroke prevention and self-management for Korean Americans: critical Evaluation. Interact J Med Res. 2018;7:e10440. doi:10.2196/10440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaiwi II, Alfaraj SZ, Pines JM. Content and quality of online health information on stroke and TIA. J Consum Health Internet. 2018;22:313–322. doi:10.1080/15398285.2018.1539904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames S, McKenna K, Worrall L, Read S. The suitability of written education materials for stroke survivors and their carers. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10:70–83. doi:10.1310/KQ70-P8UD-QKYT-DMG4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K. Analysis of stroke patients’ and carers’ reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;60:286–293. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleligay A, Worrall LE, Rose TA. Readability of written health information provided to people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2008;22:383–407. doi:10.1080/02687030701415872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan L, Logsdon MC, McGill S, Stikes R, Senior B, Helinger B, et al. Evaluation of printed health education materials for use by low-education families. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014;46:218–228. doi:10.1111/jnu.12076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ing MM, Linton KF, Vento MA, Nakagawa K. Investigation of stroke Needs (INVISION) study: stroke awareness and education. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2015;74:141–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging. 2005;22:163–182. doi:10.2165/00002512-200522020-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Get With The Guidelines, Patient Education Materials | American Heart Association. https://www.heart.org/en/professional/quality-improvement/get-with-the-guidelines-patient-education-materials. n.d. (accessed May 30, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Dowse R, Ehlers M. Medicine labels incorporating pictograms: do they influence understanding and adherence? Patient Educ Couns. 2005;58:63–70. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar