Development of the Japanese version of the awareness questionnaire for assessment of self-awareness after acquired brain injury: reliability and validity

References

• Flashman LA, McAllister TW, McAllister TW. Lack of awareness and its impact in traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehab. 2002;17(4):285–296. doi:10.3233/NRE-2002-17403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel L, Chui A, Goverover Y, Dawson DR. Optimising activity and participation outcomes for people with self-awareness impairments related to acquired brain injury: an interventions systematic review. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;29(2):163–198. doi:10.1080/09602011.2017.1292923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Hart T, Nick TG, Whyte J, Thompson RN, Yablon SA. Early impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(2):168–176. doi:10.1053/apmr.2003.50045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Fordyce DJ, Zeiner HK, Roueche JR, Pepping M, Wood BC. Neuropsychological rehabilitation after closed head injury in young adults. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47(5):505–513. doi:10.1136/jnnp.47.5.505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gammeri R, Iacono C, Ricci R, Salatino A. Unilateral spatial neglect after stroke: current insights. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:131–152. doi:10.2147/NDT.S171461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung DP, Liu KP. Review of self-awareness and its clinical application in stroke rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2011;34(3):187–195. doi:10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283487f31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromer E, Kheloufi L, Azouvi P. Impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Part 1: assessment, clinical aspects and recovery. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(5):101468. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2020.101468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M. The center for outcome measurement in brain injury. The Awareness Questionnaire. http://www.tbims.org/combi/aq. 2004. Accessed December 28, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Bergloff P, Boake C, High JW, Levin E. The awareness questionnaire: factor structure and internal consistency. Brain Inj. 1998;12(1):63–68. doi:10.1080/026990598122863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Bergloff P, Levin E, High WM Jr, Oden KE, Nick TG. Impaired awareness and employment outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1998;13(5):52–61. doi:10.1097/00001199-199810000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellebrekers D, Winkens I, Kruiper S, Van Heugten C. Psychometric properties of the awareness questionnaire, patient competency rating scale and dysexecutive questionnaire in patients with acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2017;31(11):1469–1478. doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1377350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K. Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 health survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1037–1044. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00095-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullinger M, Alonso J, Apolone G, et al. Translating health status questionnaires and evaluating their quality: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):913–923. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00082-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuhara S, Ware JE, Kosinski M, Wada S, Gandek B. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity of the Japanese SF-36 health survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1045–1053. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00096-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg EA. A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. J Gen Psychol. 1948;39(1):15–22. doi:10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant DA, Berg EA. A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. J Exp Psychol. 1948;38(4):404–411. doi:10.1037/h0059831.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Osterrieth PA. Le test de copie d’une figure complex: contribution a l’etude de la perception et de la memoire. Archives de Psychologie. 1944;30:206–356.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada S, Liu M, Hase K, et al. Development of a short version of the motor fim™ for use in long-term care settings. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38(1):50–56. doi:10.1080/16501970510044034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyahara T, Shimizu H, Hanaoka H. Development of a Japanese version of the self-regulation skills interview, a method for assessing self-awareness in persons with brain injury, and examination of its reliability and validity. General Rehabil. 2012;40:1117–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Kashima H, Kato M. Frontal lobe function test, forms of disability and evaluation methods. Adv Neurol Sci. 1993;37:93–110.
   Google Scholar
• Japanese WAIS-III Publication Committee. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition. Tokyo, Japan: Nihon Bunka Kagakusha; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1171–1179. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. J Educat Behav Statis. 2002;27(4):335–340. doi:10.3102/10769986027004335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimoi T. The absolute reliability of evaluation. J Phys Ther Sci. 2011;26:451–461. doi:10.1589/rika.26.451.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda S, Sakagami T. Midpoint response in social research: causes, consequences and possible means to prevent it. Jpn Psychol Rev. 2014;57:472–494.
   Google Scholar
• Gwet KL. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Multiple Raters. USA: Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dromer E, Kheloufi L, Azouvi P. Impaired self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Part 2. Consequences and predictors of poor self-awareness. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021;64(5):101542. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell SB, Wilson FC, McBrinn J, Carton S. Self-awareness following acquired brain injury: measurement and relationship to executive functioning. The Irish J Psychol. 2014;35(2–3):53–68. doi:10.1080/03033910.2014.921228.
   Google Scholar
• Bivona U, Ciurli P, Barba C, et al. Executive function and metacognitive self-awareness after severe traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14(5):862–868. doi:10.1017/S1355617708081125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano GP, Altman IM. Impaired awareness of behavioral limitations after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:1058–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanham RA, Weissenburger JE, Schwab KA, Rosner MM. A longitudinal investigation of the concordance between individuals with traumatic brain injury and family or friend ratings on the katz adjustment scale. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2000;15(5):1123–1138. doi:10.1097/00001199-200010000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugishita M, Koshizuka Y, Sudou S, et al. The validity and reliability of Japanese version of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE-J) with the original procedure of the attention and calculation task (2001). Jpn J Cogn Neurosci. 2018;20:91–110.
   Google Scholar