References
- Acland D. 2022. What’s in, what’s out? Toward a rigorous definition of the boundaries of benefit-cost analysis. Econ Philos. 38(1):34–50. doi:10.1017/S0266267120000486.
- Adler M. 2007. Why de minimis? University of Pennsylvania Law School, Public Research Paper No. 07-26. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=992878.
- Adler M. 2023. Public comment on revisions to Circular A-4. Available at https://www.regulations.gov/comment/OMB-2022-0014-0136.
- Adler M. 2005. Against “individual risk”: a sympathetic critique of risk assessment. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev. 153(4):1121–1250. doi:10.2307/4150613.
- Adler M. 2008. Risk equity: a new proposal. Harvard Environ Law Rev. 32(1):1–47.
- AFL-CIO. 2022. Death on the job—the toll of neglect: a national and state-by-state profile of worker safety and health in the United States. 31st ed., p. 256. Available at https://aflcio.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/2214_DOTJ_Final_42622_nobug.pdf.
- Allais M. 1953. Le comportment de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole americaine. Econometrica. 21(4):503–546. Partial English translation available at http://mikael.cozic.free.fr/papers/allais53.pdf. doi:10.2307/1907921.
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute v. Donovan (“Cotton Dust Case”). 1981. 452 U.S. 490, decided June 17, U.S. Supreme Court.
- Aven T. 2007. On the ethical justification for the use of risk acceptance criteria. Risk Anal. 27(2):303–312. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00883.x.
- Bell D. 1982. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper Res. 30(5):961–981. doi:10.1287/opre.30.5.961.
- Blumenthal D. 1990. Red no. 3 and other colorful controversies. FDA Consumer. 24(4):18.ff.
- Booij A, van de Kuilen G. 2009. A parameter-free analysis of the utility of money for the general population under prospect theory. J Econ Psychol. 30(4):651–666. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.05.004.
- Bouder F, Slavin D, Löfstedt R, editors. 2007. The tolerability of risk: a new framework for risk management. London, UK: Earthscan by Routledge. p. 160.
- Bowles D. 2007. Tolerable risk for dams: how safe is safe enough?” U.S. Society on Dams Annual Conference, March 2007, Philadelphia, PA. p. 24.
- Bromberg K, Finkel A. 2023. OMB Circular A-4 should require robust and transparent pre-proposal stakeholder collaboration. Yale J Reg, Symposium on Modernizing Regulatory Review, available at https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/ombcircular-a-4-should-require-robust-and-transparent-pre-proposal-stakeholder-collaboration-bykevin-l-bromberg-and-adam-m-finkel/.
- Byrd D, Lave L. 1987. Narrowing the range: a framework for risk regulators. Issues Sci Technol Summer:92–100.
- Calabresi G, Bobbitt P. 1987. Tragic choices. NY: W.W. Norton.
- Carruth R, Goldstein B. 2001. Relative risk greater than two in proof of causation in toxic tort litigation. Jurimetrics. 41(2):195–209.
- Coglianese, C, Finkel A, Carrigan C, editors. 2014. Does regulation kill jobs? Philadelphia, PA, USA: University of Pennsylvania Press. p. 312.
- Comar C. 1979. Risk: a pragmatic de minimis approach. Science. 203(4378):319–319. doi:10.1126/science.203.4378.319.
- Cortese A, Powell J, Preuss P, Scroggin D, Kerester A, Yosie T. 1988. Defining the undefinable: what risks are acceptable? Five individual essays in The Environmental Forum. p. 22–32.
- Cranor C, Finkel A. 2018. Toward the usable recognition of individual benefits and costs in regulatory analysis and governance. Regul Govern. 12(1):131–149. doi:10.1111/rego.12128.
- Cropper M, Hammit J, Robinson L. 2011. Valuing mortality risk reductions: progress and challenges Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 3:313–336.
- Cross F, Byrd D, Lave L. 1991. Discernible risk: a proposed standard for significant risk in carcinogen regulation. Adminis Law Rev. 43(1):61–88.
- Cullen A, Frey C. 1999. Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: a handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Driesen D. 2004. Distributing the costs of environmental, health, and safety protection: the feasibility principle, cost-benefit analysis, and regulatory reform. Syracuse University College of Law. Available at https://surface.syr.edu/lawpub/29/.
- Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher B, Ubel P, Jankovic A, Derry H, Smith D. 2007. Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the subjective numeracy scale. Med Decis Making. 27(5):672–680. doi:10.1177/0272989X07304449.
- Farrow S. 2011. Incorporating equity in regulatory and cost-benefit analysis using risk-based preferences. Risk Anal. 31(6):902–907. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01474.x.
- Fiksel J. 1985. Toward a de minimis policy in risk regulation. Risk Anal. 5(4):257–259. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00178.x.
- Finkel A. 1990. Confronting uncertainty in risk management: a guide for decision-makers. Resources for the Future, p. 82. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adam-Finkel-2/publication/245769033_Confronting_Uncertainty_in_Risk_Management_A_Guide_for_Decision_Makers/links/5721fa6208ae5c4373ac33e2/Confronting-Uncertainty-in-Risk-Management-A-Guide-for-Decision-Makers.pdf.
- Finkel A. 1992. A unified approach to protecting both individuals and populations. Panelist presentation at the National Academy of Sciences (Committee on Risk Assessment Methodology) Workshop on Single-Scenario Exposure Assessment, Washington, D.C., Feb 10–11.
- Finkel A. 1995. Towards less misleading comparisons of uncertain risks: the example of aflatoxin and alar. Environ Health Perspect. 103(4):376–385. doi:10.1289/ehp.95103376.
- Finkel A. 2011. Invited testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Small Business. The Regulatory Flexibility Act Improvements Hearing. Available at https://republicans-smallbusiness.house.gov/uploadedfiles/finkel_testimony.pdf.
- Finkel AM. 2014. The Cost of Nothing Trumps the Value of Everything: The Failure of Regulatory Economics to Keep Pace with Improvements in Quantitative Risk Analysis. Michigan Journal of Environmental and Administrative Law, 4(1):91–156. Available at https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1031&context=mjeal.
- Finkel AM. 2018. Demystifying Evidence-Based Policy Analysis by Revealing Hidden Value-Laden Constraints. Hastings Cent Rep. 48 Suppl 1:S21–S49. Available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/1 0 .1 002/hast.818.
- Finkel A, Johnson B. 2018. The limits of self-interest: results from a novel stated-preference survey to estimate the social benefits of life-prolonging regulations. Environ Law. 48:453–476. Available at https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/26720-48-3finkel-and-johnson.
- Finkel A. 2020. What are you so afraid of?” Essay available at https://insidesources.com/what-are-you-so-afraid-of/.
- Finkel A. 2023. Public comment on revisions to Circular A-4. Available at https://www.regulations.gov/comment/OMB-2022-0014-0156.
- Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P, Derby S, Keeney R. 1981. Acceptable risk. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press, p. 185.
- Greene J, Baron J. 2001. Intuitions about declining marginal utility. J Behav Decis Making. 14(3):243–255. doi:10.1002/bdm.375.
- Hathaway J. 1989. An environmentalist’s perspective on the magnitude of the health risk from pesticide residues in food. Food Drug Cosmetic Law Journal. 44(6):659–669.
- Hey J, Neugebauer T, Pasca C. 2010. George-Louis Leclerc de Buffon’s “Essays on moral arithmetic”. LSF Working Paper No. 10-06, University of Luxembourg. Available at https://orbilu.uni.lu/bitstream/10993/40308/2/hey%20et%20al%202010.pdf.
- Hrudey S, Krewski D. 1995. Is there a safe level of exposure to a carcinogen? Environ Sci Technol. 29(8):370A–375A. doi:10.1021/es00008a747.
- Hunter P, Fewtrell L. 2001. Acceptable risk. Chapter 2 in Water quality: guidelines, standards, and health, World Health Organization. London (UK): IWA Publishing.
- Industrial Union Department, AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum Institute (“Benzene case”). 1980. 448 U.S. 607, decided July 2, U.S. Supreme Court.
- Jacquemet N, Joule R-V, Luchini S, Shogren J. 2013. Preference elicitation under oath. J Environ Econ Manage. 65(1):110–132. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2012.05.004.
- Johnson B, Finkel A. 2016. Public perceptions of regulatory costs, their uncertainty and interindividual distribution. Risk Anal. 36(6):1148–1170. doi:10.1111/risa.12532.
- Johnson B, Finkel A. 2022. Information effects on lay tradeoffs between national regulatory costs and benefits. Risk Anal. 42(12):2620–2638. doi:10.1111/risa.13886.
- Johnson B, Finkel A. 2023. Sensitivity to scope in estimating the social benefits of prolonging a life for regulatory decisions using national stated preference tradeoffs. Environ Syst Decis. 43(3):509–528. doi:10.1007/s10669-023-09899-x.
- Kaplan S, Garrick B. 1981. On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal. 1(1):11–27. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x.
- Kelly K. 1991. The myth of 10−6 as a definition of acceptable risk. Paper presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 1991. p. 10. Available at https://pdf4pro.com/cdn/the-myth-of-10-6-as-a-definition-of-acceptable-40dac.pdf.
- Khazan O. 2022. One-way masking works. The Atlantic. Available at https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2022/01/does-it-help-wear-mask-if-no-one-else/621177/.
- Kocher D, Hoffman F. 1991. Regulating environmental carcinogens: where do we draw the line? Environ Sci Technol. 25(12):1986–1989. doi:10.1021/es00024a003.
- Layard R, Nickell S, Mayraz G. 2008. The marginal utility of income. J Public Econ. 92(8-9):1846–1857. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.01.007.
- Levy J. 2021. Accounting for health risk inequality in regulatory impact analysis: barriers and opportunities. Risk Anal. 41(4):610–618. doi:10.1111/risa.13714.
- Lowrance W. 1976. Of acceptable risk: science and the determination of safety. Los Altos (CA): William Kaufmann, p. 181.
- Lundgren B, Stefansson H. 2020. Against the de minimis principle. Risk Anal. 40(5):908–914. doi:10.1111/risa.13445.
- Mantel N, Bryan W. 1961. “Safety” testing of carcinogenic agents. J Natl Cancer Inst. 27:455–470.
- Milvy P. 1986. A general guideline for management of risk from carcinogens. Risk Anal. 6(1):69–79. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00195.x.
- Morgan M, Henrion M. 1990. Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with risk and uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Mumpower J. 1986. An analysis of the de minimis strategy for risk management. Risk Anal. 6(4):437–446. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00956.x.
- National Research Council. 1983. Commission on Life Sciences, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Available at https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/366/risk-assessment-in-the-federal-government-managing-the-process.
- Our World in Data. 2022. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=∼50%2B.
- Peterson M. 2002. What is a de minimis risk? Risk Manage. 4(2):47–55. doi:10.1057/palgrave.rm.8240118.
- Pratt J, Zeckhauser R. 1987. Proper risk aversion. Econometrica. 55(1):143–154. doi:10.2307/1911160.
- Public Law 114-182: Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. Available at https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ182/PLAW-114publ182.pdf.
- Qiu Y, Smith Hopkins J. 2015. A tattered safety net for workers. Center for Public Integrity, blog and interactive dataset available at https://publicintegrity.org/inequality-poverty-opportunity/workers-rights/a-tattered-safety-net-for-workers/.
- Rae A. 2007. Acceptable residual risk—principles, philosophies, and practicalities. Conference Paper, IEEE Explore, November 2007. p. 7.
- Robinson L, Hammitt J, Zeckhauser R. 2016. Attention to distribution in U.S. regulatory analyses. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 10(2):308–328. doi:10.1093/reep/rew011.
- Rodricks J. 1988. Origins of risk assessment in food safety decision making. J Am Coll Toxicol. 7(4):539–542. doi:10.3109/10915818809019529.
- Roy S, Kshirsagar R. 2021. Development of risk acceptance criteria in the Indian context. Process Saf Environ Protect. 148:358–369. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.021.
- Sewell B, Whyatt R. 1989. Intolerable risk: pesticides in our children’s food. A Natural Resources Defense Council Report. p. 39. Available at https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/hea_11052401a.pdf0.
- Shrader-Frechette K. 1985. Technological risk and small probabilities. J Bus Ethics. 4(6):431–445. doi:10.1007/BF00382604.
- Soper J. 1979. Test of economic literacy: discussion guide and rationale. Joint Council on Economic Education, U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, p. 58. Available at https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED173256.pdf.
- Spangler M. 1987. Policy issues related to worst case analyses and the establishment of acceptable standards of de minimis risk. Chapter 1 in Uncertainty in risk assessment, risk management, and decision making (Covello V, Lave L, Moghissi A, Uppuluri V, editors). Boston, MA, USA: Springer. p. 1–26. Available at https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_1.pdf.
- Sullivan M. 2023. Distributional weights should be dropped from the draft Circular A-4. Yale J Regulation, online symposium. Available at https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/distributional-weights-should-be-dropped-from-the-draft-circular-a-4-by-mary-sullivan/.
- Sunstein C, Zeckhauser R. 2008. Overreaction to fearsome risks. Univ. of Chicago Public Law Working Paper No. 253. Available at https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/12921743/Overreaction%20to%20Fearsome%20Risks.pdf.
- Sunstein C. 2021. Some costs & benefits of cost-benefit analysis. Daedalus. 150(3):208–219. doi:10.1162/daed_a_01868.
- Thaler R. 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ. 1(1):39–60. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7.
- Travis C, Hattemer-Frey H. 1988. Determining an acceptable level of risk. Environ Sci Technol. 22(8):873–876. doi:10.1021/es00173a003.
- Travis C, Richter S, Crouch E, Wilson R, Klema E. 1987. Cancer risk management: a review of 132 federal regulatory decisions. Environ Sci Technol. 21(5):415–420. doi:10.1021/es00159a001.
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1992. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J Risk Uncertainty. 5(4):297–323. doi:10.1007/BF00122574.
- U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2021. Gasoline explained: use of gasoline. [accessed 2023 Jul 3]. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/gasoline/use-of-gasoline.php.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Science Advisory Board review of valuing mortality risk reductions for environmental policy: a white paper. Available at https://omb.report/icr/201809-2090-001/doc/86189901.pdf.
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2021. Compliance manual on religious discrimination, Sec. 12. Available at https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/section-12-religious-discrimination.
- UK Health and Safety Executive. 2001. Reducing risks, protecting people: HES’s decision-making process. Norwich: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, p. 88. Available at https://www.hse.gov.uk/managing/theory/r2p2.pdf.
- Västfjäll D, Slovic P. 2013. Cognition and emotion in judgment and decision making. In Robinson M, Watkins E, Harmon-Jones E, editors. Handbook of cognition and emotion. New York, NY, USA: Guilford Press. p. 252–271.
- Viscusi W. 2008. The flawed hedonic damages measure of compensation for wrongful death and personal injury. J Foren Econ. 20(2):113–135. doi:10.5085/0898-5510-20.2.113.
- Weinberg A. 1985. Science and its limits: The regulator's dilemma. Issues Sci and Technol. 2:59–72.
- Whipple C, editor. 1987. De minimis risk. New York and London: Plenum Press, p. 215.
- White House. 2021. Executive Order 14008: tackling the climate crisis at home and abroad. p. 219–223. Available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/27/executive-order-on-tackling-the-climate-crisis-at-home-and-abroad/.
- Wilson R, Crouch E. 1987. Risk assessment and comparisons: an introduction. Science. 236(4799):267–270. doi:10.1126/science.3563505.
- Wilson R. 1988. Measuring and comparing risks to establish a de minimis risk level. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 8(3):267–282. doi:10.1016/0273-2300(88)90014-1.
- Xie Z, Hay S, Hirsch H. 2023. Care to comment? Topics discussed in revised Circular A-4 public comments. George Washington University Regulatory Studies Center; blogpost available at https://regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/care-comment-topics-discussed-revised-circular-a4-public-comments.