Experience, expertise, and the rational ideal: Funds of knowledge and influence in Oregon’s decision-making bodies

References

• Abrego, L. J. (2011). Legal consciousness of undocumented Latinos: Fear and stigma as barriers to claims-making for first- and 1.5-generation immigrants. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 337–370. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: Urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43. doi:10.1177/095624780101300203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy. Frenchs Forest NSW, Australia: Pearson Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bloemraad, I. (2018). Theorizing the power of citizenship as claims-making. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(1), 4–26. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1396108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braaten, J. (1995). From communicative rationality to communicative thinking: A basis for feminist theory and practice. In J. Meehan (Ed.), Feminists read Habermas: Gendering the subject of discourse (pp. 139–161). Abingdon, Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns Ali, S., & Ganapati, S. (2020). Argumentation tactics and public deliberations. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(4), 531–557. doi:10.1080/10841806.2019.1627840
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. B. (2005). Theorizing the authentic: Identity, engagement, and public space. Administration & Society, 36(6), 688–705. doi:10.1177/0095399704270582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruikshank, B. (1999). The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De La Vega, E. (2014). Deliberative democracy: A contested interactive space. Democracy & Education, 24(2), 1–8. https://democracyeducationjournal.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1246&context=home
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, N. (1997). Towards a new social politics: Citizenship and reflexivity in late modernity. Sociology, 31(4), 697–717. doi:10.1177/0038038597031004004
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esteban-Guitart, M., Monreal-Bosch, P., Palma, M., & González-Ceballos, I. (2020). Sustaining students’ identities within the context of participatory culture: Designing, implementing and evaluating an interactive learning activity. Sustainability, 12(12), 4870. doi:10.3390/su12124870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, W. V. (2003). New citizens, new rights: Undocumented immigrants and Latino cultural citizenship. Latin American Perspectives, 30(2), 295–308. doi:10.1177/0094582X02250630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 1990(25/26), 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2005). Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33(3), 397–419. doi:10.1177/0090591704271990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, I., Garfinkel-Castro, A., & Pfeiffer, D. (2019). Planning with diverse communities. American Planning Association. https://www.planning. org/publications/report/9165143/
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hafer, J. A., & Ran, B. (2016). Developing a citizen perspective of public participation: Identity construction as citizen motivation to participate. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(3), 206–222. doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1202080
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (2005). “Science and democracy:” Replayed or redesigned? Social Epistemology, 19(1), 5–18. doi:10.1080/02691720500084226
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustinx, L., & Denk, T. (2009). The “black box” problem in the study of participation. Journal of Civil Society, 5(3), 209–226. doi:10.1080/17448680903351693
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Liggett, T. (2014). Deliberative democracy in English-language education: Cultural and linguistic inclusion in the school community. Democracy & Education, 22(2), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez, J. W. (2021) Latino immigrants in civil society: Addressing the double-bind of participation for expansive learning in participatory budgeting, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(1), 76–102. doi:10.1080/10508406.2020.1807349.
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez, J. W., & Hoff, C. (In Press). Transforming collaborative governing bodies for immigrants: the roles of culture and influence. Journal of the American Planning Association. doi:10.1080/01944363.2022.2121309
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez, J. W., Hoff, C., Rausch, L., Graciosa, M., & Renirie, A. (2021). The landscape of civic participation among immigrants: Documenting service on decision-making bodies as a third type of civic engagement activities. In R. Bussel (Ed.), A state of immigrants: A new look at the immigrant experience in Oregon. Labor Education Research Center, University of Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez, J. W., & Martinez-Cosio, M. (2019). Designing for equitable civic engagement: Participatory design and discourse in contested spaces. Journal of Civil Society, 15(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2018.1559471
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez, J. W., & Martinez-Cosio, M. (2021). Differentiating participation: Identifying and defining civic capacities used by Latino immigrants in participatory budgeting. City & Community, 20(3), 212–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1535684121993473
   Google Scholar
• Meléndez, J. W., & Parker, B. (2019). Learning in participatory planning processes: Taking advantage of concepts and theories across disciplines. Planning Theory and Practice, 20(1), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1558748
   Google Scholar
• Mosher, F. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service (Vol. 53). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nishishiba, M. (2012). Local government diversity initiatives in Oregon: An exploratory study. State and Local Government Review, 44(1), 55–66. doi:10.1177/0160323X12439475
   Google Scholar
• Pajnik, M. (2006). Feminist reflections on Habermas’s communicative action: The need for an inclusive political theory. In European Journal of Social Theory, 9(3), 385–404. doi:10.1177/1368431006065719
   Google Scholar
• Papastergiadis, N. (2000). The turbulence of migration: Globalization, deterritorialization and hybridity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, S., & Scala, F. (2017). Gender mainstreaming and the discursive politics of public service values. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 39(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1273726
   Google Scholar
• Price, P., Lukinbeal, C., Gioioso, R., Arreola, D., Fernández, D., Ready, T., & De Los Angeles Torres, M. (2011). Placing Latino civic engagement. Urban Geography, 32(2), 179–207. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.32.2.179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramarajan, L. (2014). Past, present and future research on multiple identities: Toward an intrapersonal network approach. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 589–659. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.912379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Representative bureaucracy: A lever to enhance social equity, coproduction, and democracy. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 21–30. doi:10.1111/puar.12649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco, R. (2004). Transforming citizenship: Membership, strategies of containment, and the public sphere in Latino communities. Latino Studies, 2(1), 4–25. doi:10.1057/palgrave.lst.8600058
   Google Scholar
• Quick, K. S., & Feldman, M. S. (2011). Distinguishing participation and inclusion. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), 272–290. doi:10.1177/0739456X11410979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, C. (2018). Instrumental and constructivist conceptualizations of ethnicity: Implications for Latin American social movements research. Estudios Internacionales: Revista Del Instituto de Estudios Internacionales de La Universidad de, 189, 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Triantafillou, P. (2015). The politics of neutrality and the changing role of expertise in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 37(3), 174–187. doi:10.1080/10841806.2015.1053362
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1995). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1987). Impartiality and the civic public: Some implications of feminist critiques of moral and political theory. In S. Benhabib & D. Cornell (Eds.), Feminism as critique (pp. 56–76). United Kingdom: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zingale, N. C., Cook, D., & Mazanec, M. (2018). Change calls upon public administrators to act, but in what way? Exploring administration as a platform for governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40(3), 180–199. doi:10.1080/10841806.2018.1485447
   Google Scholar