Locating the modernist state. On whether or not modernist principles govern contemporary policy practice

References

• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511814617
   Google Scholar
• Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Pinguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir. (2010). Democratic governance. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blessett, B., Gaynor, T. S., Witt, M., & Alkadry, M. G. (2016). Counternarratives as critical perspectives in public administration curricula. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(4), 267–284. doi:10.1080/10841806.2016.1239397
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, J. (2018). What makes evidence-based policy making such a useful myth? The case of NICE guidance on bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom. Governance, 31(2), 199–214. doi:10.1111/gove.12285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., & 't Hart, P. (1996). Understanding policy fiascoes. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information. Thematic analysis and code deveopment. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. (1986). Organizing for inconsistencies: On organizational conflict, depression and hypocrisy as substitutes for action. Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 2(3–4), 165–185. doi:10.1016/0281-7527(86)90014-9
   Google Scholar
• Callen, J. C., & Austin, E. K. (2016). Deterritorializing utopia: The possibility of techno-utopias in societies of control. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 38(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/10841806.2015.1128220
   Google Scholar
• Clarence, E. (2002). Technocracy reinvented: The new evidence based policy movement. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 1–11. doi:10.1177/095207670201700301
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coser, L. (1974). Greedy institutions. Patterns of undivided commitment. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorren, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2021). Chameleonic knowledge. A study of ex-ante analysis in large infrastructure policy processes. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 289–312. doi:10.1007/s11077-021-09423-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorren, L., Verhoest, K., van Dooren, W., & Wolf, E. E. A. (2018). Plannen over Grenzen. De selectie en prioritering van infrastructuurprojecten. Steunpunt Bestuurlijke Vernieuwing.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, D. J. (1995). The language of public administration. Bureaucracy, modernity and postmodernity. The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feitsma, J. N. P. (2018). The Behavioural State: Critical observations on technocracy and psychocracy. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 387–410. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9325-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, P. (2010). Against method (4th ed.). Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., Bruzelius, N., & Rothengatter, W. (2003). Megaprojects and Risk. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2011). Madness: The invention of an idea (A. Sheridan, Ed.). Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Frissen, P. H. A. (1999). Politics, governance and technology. A postmodern narrative on the virtual state. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. (A. W. Rawls, Red.). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1995). Boundaries of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 342–393). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The philosophical discourse of modernity. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1980). Great planning disasters. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Kensen, S. (2000). The dialogue as basis for democratic governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22(1), 117–131. doi:10.1080/10841806.2000.11643430
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. doi:10.1080/10841806.2000.11643430
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leijten, M. (2017). What lies beneath. Bounded manageability in complex underground infrastructure projects. Deflt University.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1979). Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517. doi:10.2307/976178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1975). The uncertainty of the past. Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3(2), 147–171. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1975.tb00521.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, P., & Gerrits, L. (2017). Evaluating technological progress in public policies.: The case of the high-speed railways in the Netherlands. Complexity, Governance & Networks, (1), 48–62. doi:10.20377/cgn-42
   Google Scholar
• McSwite, O. C. (1997). Legitimacy in public administration. A discourse analysis. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2007). Postmodern public administration. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. (2018). Rijksbegroting 2019. A - Infrastructuurfonds. Minister van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu. (2016). Spelregels van het Meerjarenprogramma Infrastructuur, Ruimte en Transport (MIRT). Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu. (2017). Nationale Markt- en Capaciteitsanalyse 2017. Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.
   Google Scholar
• Mouter, N. (2017). Dutch politicians’ use of cost-benefit analysis. Transportation, 44(5), 1127–1145. doi:10.1007/s11116-016-9697-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutley, S. M., Walter, I., & Davies, H. T. O. (2007). Using evidence. How research can inform public services. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up. Evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British Government. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 43–60. doi:10.1177/095207670201700304
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (1998). Complexity. A philsophical overview. Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1976). Administrative behavior. A study of decision-making processes in an administrative organization (3rd ed.). The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2007). Survival of the ideas that fit. An evolutionary analogy for the use of evidence in policy. Social Policy and Society, 6(1), 25–35. doi:10.1017/S1474746406003319
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2011). Telling policy stories. An ethnographic study of the use of evidence in policy-making in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 237–255. doi:10.1017/S0047279410000723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Policy Paradox. The art of political decision making (3rd ed.). W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Taleb, N. N. (2010). The Black Swan. The impact of the highly improbable (2nd ed.). Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In K. Sahlin-Andersson, R. Suddaby, C. Oliver, & R. Greenwood (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Triantafillou, P. (2015a). The political implications of performance management and evidence-based policymaking. The American Review of Public Administration, 45(2), 167–181. doi:10.1177/0275074013483872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantafillou, P. (2015b). The politics of neutrality and the changing role of expertise in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 37(3), 174–187. doi:10.1080/10841806.2015.1053362
   Google Scholar
• Trommel, W. (2009). Gulzig bestuur. Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (New York, N.Y.), 185(4157), 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brink, G. (2007). Moderniteit als opgave. Een antwoord aan relativisme en constervatisme. Sun.
   Google Scholar
• van den Brink, G. (2015). Hoe wij beter over kennis kunnen nadenken (Vol. 1). Boom bestuurskunde.
   Google Scholar
• van Nispen, F., & Scholten, P. (2015). Policy analysis in the Netherlands: An introduction. In F. van Nispen & P. Scholten (Eds.), Policy analysis in the Netherlands (pp. 1–9). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Putten, R. (2015). Bestuurskunde voorbij het maakbaarheidsdenken? Bestuurskunde, 24(2), 74–84. doi:10.5553/Bk/092733872015024002008
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2017). Surviving information overload: How elite politicians select information. Governance, 30(2), 229–244. doi:10.1111/gove.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431. doi:10.2307/3109916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1968). The study of administration. In A. S. Link (Red.), The papers of Woodrow Wilson (Vol. 5, pp. 359–380). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, E. E. A., & Van Dooren, W. (2017). How policies become contested. A spiral of imagination and evidence in a large infrastructure project. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 449–468. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9275-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C. L., & Turkienicz, B. (1988). Brasília and the ageing of modernism. Cities, 5(4), 347–364. doi:10.1016/0264-2751(88)90025-X
   Google Scholar