Metacognitive Comprehension Monitoring: Cognitive Abilities Explain Performance Differences Between Younger and Older Adults

References

• Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2013). Working memory across the lifespan: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.748027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(4), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967909547342
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bann, C. M., Bayen, U. J., McCormack, L. A., & Uhrig, J. D. (2006). Effects of reading habits, reading comprehension, and memory beliefs on older adults’ knowledge about medicare. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 25(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464805283627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2023, January 17). Anteil der Studienberechtigten an der altersspezifischen Bevölkerung (Studienberechtigtenquote) nach Art der Hochschulreife [Proportion of persons with higher education entrance qualification in the age-specific population (rate of persons with higher education entrance qualification) by type of higher education entrance qualification]. https://www.datenportal.bmbf.de/portal/de/Tabelle-2.5.85.html
   Google Scholar
• Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2018). The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9422-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. (2004). What happens to information to be suppressed in working‐memory tasks? Short and long term effects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(6), 1059–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, K. E., Elliott, E. M., Golob, E. J., Brown, J. S., Kim, S., & Jazwinski, S. M. (2021). Strategic encoding and retrieval processes in verbal recall among middle‐aged and older adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(12), 547–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beni, R., Borella, E., & Carretti, B. (2007). Reading comprehension in aging: The role of working memory and metacomprehension. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 14(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580500229213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruïne, A., Jolles, D., & van den Broek, P. (2021). Minding the load or loading the mind: The effect of manipulating working memory on coherence monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 118, Article 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeShon, R. P. (1998). A cautionary note on measurement error corrections in structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freed, E. M., Hamilton, S. T., & Long, D. L. (2017). Comprehension in proficient readers: The nature of individual variation. Journal of Memory and Language, 97, 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.07.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J. (1997). Comprehension monitoring of written discourse across early-to-middle adolescence. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(3), 207–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007989901667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, S., & Myerson, J. (1996). Experimental evidence for differential slowing in the lexical and nonlexical domains. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 3(2), 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825589608256621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helder, A., van Leijenhorst, L., & van den Broek, P. (2016). Coherence monitoring by good and poor comprehenders in elementary school: Comparing offline and online measures. Learning and Individual Differences, 48, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, K., & Perleth, C. (2000). Kognitiver Fähigkeitstest für 4. bis 12. Klassen [Cognitive ability test for Grades 4 to 12]. Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institut für deutsche Sprache. (2009). DeRewo. Korpusbasierte Wortlisten [DeRewo. Corpus-based word lists]. Technical Report IDS-KL-2009-02.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeggi, S. M., Studer-Luethi, B., Buschkuehl, M., Su, Y., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2010). The relationship between n-back performance and matrix reasoning. Implications for training and transfer. Intelligence, 38(6), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.‐S. G. (2015). Developmental, component‐based model of reading fluency: An investigation of predictors of word‐reading fluency, text‐reading fluency, and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 459–481. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2012). Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40(5), 812–826. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., Li, J., Nguyen, A. T. P., & Ta, C. P. (2021). Memory and comprehension of narrative versus expository texts: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 732–749. https://do.org/f359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. M. S., Cohen, J. A., & Wingfield, A. (2006). Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading. Memory & Cognition, 34(6), 1355–1367. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, J. L., & O’Brien, E. J. (1998). Accessing the discourse representation during reading. Discourse Processes, 26(2–3), 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh, S. R., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2009). Age differences in tracking characters during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 37(6), 769–778. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.6.769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Albrecht, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(4), 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.18.4.777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2016). Separating the activation, integration, and validation components of reading. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 249–276). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 344–354. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, B. R., Gao, X., Noh, S. R., Anderson, C. J., & Stine-Morrow, E. (2012). The effects of print exposure on sentence processing and memory in older adults: Evidence for efficiency and reserve. Aging, Neuropsychology & Cognition, 19(1–2), 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.628376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelegrina, S., Capodieci, A., Carretti, B., & Cornoldi, C. (2015). Magnitude representation and working memory updating in children with arithmetic and reading comprehension disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(6), 658–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414527480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H., Dardick, W., & Tao, S. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radvansky, G. A., & Dijkstra, K. (2007). Aging and situation model processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., & Turek, J. J. (2012). A dynamic developmental link between verbal comprehension-knowledge (gc) and reading comprehension: Verbal comprehension-knowledge drives positive change in reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 50(6), 841–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2015). Validation and comprehension of text information: Two sides of the same coin. Discourse Processes, 52(5–6), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1025665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: A two-step model of validation. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Selective review of cognitive aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 16(5), 754–760. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710000706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Tibken, C., & Richter, T. (2022). The development of metacognitive knowledge from childhood to young adulthood: Major trends and educational implications. In J. Lockman (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 63, pp. 273–307). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2022.04.006
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 574–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (2013). Validation in reading comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413495236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto, C., Gutierrez de Blume, A. P., Rebolledo, V., Rodríguez, F., Palma, D., & Gutiérrez, F. (2023). Metacognitive monitoring skills of reading comprehension and writing between proficient and poor readers. Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09317-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. (2022, January 24). Anteil der Personen mit Hochschulabschluss nach Altersgruppen in Deutschland in den Jahren 2009, 2014 und 2019 [Proportion of people with a university degree by age group in Germany in 2009, 2014, and 2019]. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1227976/umfrage/anteil-der-personen-mit-hochschulabschluss-nach-altersgruppen/
   Google Scholar
• Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., & Radvansky, G. A. (2018). Discourse processing and development through the adult lifespan. In M. F. Schober, D. N. Rapp, & M. A. Britt (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (pp. 247–268). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., Howard, C. B., & Sáez, L. (2006). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(3), 252–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390030501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibken, C., Richter, T., von der Linden, N., Schmiedeler, S., & Schneider, W. (2022). The role of metacognitive competences in the development of school achievement among gifted adolescents. Child Development, 93(1), 117–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibken, C., Richter, T., Wannagat, W., Schmiedeler, S., von der Linden, N., & Schneider, W. (2022). Measuring comprehension monitoring with the inconsistency task in adolescents: Stability, associations with reading comprehension skills, and differences between grade levels. Discourse Processes, 59(5–6), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2022.2073736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trizano-Hermosilla, I., & Alvarado, J. M. (2016). Best alternatives to Cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: Congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Frontiers in Psychology, Article 7:769 . https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umanath, S., & Marsh, E. J. (2012). Aging and the memorial consequences of catching contradictions with prior knowledge. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 1033. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., & Helder, A. (2017). Cognitive processes in discourse comprehension: Passive processes, reader-initiated processes, and evolving mental representations. Discourse Processes, 54(5–6), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2017.1306677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. W., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartman, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wannagat, W., Steinicke, V., Tibken, C., & Nieding, G. (2022). Same topic, different genre: Elementary school children’s mental representations of information embedded in narrative and expository texts. Learning and Instruction, 80, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (5th ed.). WAIS–IV. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1991). Effects of skill on standards used by younger and older adults to evaluate understanding. Reading Psychology, 12(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271910120204
   Google Scholar
• Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1994). Contributions of working memory and evaluation and regulation of understanding to adults’ recall of texts. Journal of Gerontology, 49(5), P201–P212. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/49.5.P201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1999). Influence of text genre on adults’ monitoring of understanding and recall. Educational Gerontology, 25(8), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/036012799267440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabrucky, K., Moore, D., & Agler, L. M. L. (2012). Metacomprehension across the lifespan: Influence of education and instructional support. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 601–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.170
   Google Scholar
• Zabrucky, K., Moore, D., & Schultz, N. R. (1987). Evaluation of comprehension in young and old adults. Developmental Psychology, 23(1), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.23.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar