Differences in grade 7 students’ understanding of the equal sign

References

• Alibali, M., Hattikudur, S., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., & McNeil, N. (2007). A longitudinal examination of middle school students’ understanding of the equal sign and equivalent equations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701360902
   Google Scholar
• Asquith, P., Stephens, A., Knuth, E., & Alibali, M. (2007). Middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge of students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equal sign and variable. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060701360910
   Google Scholar
• Baroody, A. J., Feil, Y., & Johnson, A. R. (2007). An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1976). How children view equality sentences. PMDC Technical Report No. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Blanton, M., Otálora, Y., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K. B., Gibbins, A., & Kim, Y. (2018). Exploring kindergarten students’ early understandings of the equal sign. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(3), 167–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1474534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomhøj, M. (1997). Funktionsbegrebet og 9. klasse elevers begrebsforståelse. Nordic Mathematics Education, 5(1), 7–29.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, C. E., McNeil, N. M., Chesney, D. L., & Matthews, P. G. (2015). A specific misconception of the equal sign acts as a barrier to children’s learning of early algebra. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Younes, R., Han, S. Y., & Garner, K. (2012). Changes in equality problem types across four decades in four second and sixth grade textbook series. Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 166–189.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. (1952). The χ2 test of goodness of fit. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23(3), 315–345.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2014). Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics. Developmental Review, 34(4), 344–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, H., & Sumpter, L. (2021). Algebraic and fractional thinking in collective mathematical reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(3), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10044-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, K. P., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (1999). Children’s understanding of equality: A foundation for algebra. Teaching Children Mathematics, 6(4), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.6.4.0232
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey, D., & Thomas, M. O. (2008). Student perspectives on equation: The transition from school to university. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217478
   Google Scholar
• Hattikudur, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2010). Learning about the equal sign: Does comparing with inequality symbols help? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Erlbaum (pp. 1–27) .
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, V. R., Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Battey, D. (2007). Professional development focused on children’s algebraic reasoning in elementary school. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 258–288. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joliffe, I. T., & Morgan, B. J. T. (1992). Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 1(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029200100105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, I. (2008). A diagrammatic view of the equals sign: Arithmetical equivalence as a means, not an end. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800802233688
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Inglis, M., Gilmore, C., & Dowens, M. (2012). Substitution and sameness: Two components of a relational conception of the equals sign. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Inglis, M., Gilmore, C., & Evans, R. (2013). Teaching the substitutive conception of the equals sign. Research in Mathematics Education, 15(1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2012.756635
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., & Pratt, D. (2012). A substituting meaning for the equals sign in arithmetic notating tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311062
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., McNeil, N. M., Weinberg, A., & Stephens, A. C. (2005). Middle school students’ understanding of core algebraic concepts: Equivalence & variable. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 37(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655899
   Google Scholar
• Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Pang, J. (2020). Students’ opposing conceptions of equations with two equal signs. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 23(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1777364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Ding, M., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Sources of differences in children’s understandings of mathematical equality: Comparative analysis of teacher guides and student texts in China and the United States. Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000801980845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. Zentralblatt Für Didaktik Der Mathematik, 49(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P., Rittle-Johnson, B., McEldoon, K., & Taylor, R. (2012). Measure for measure: What combining diverse measures reveals about children’s understanding of the equal sign as an indicator of mathematical equality. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 316–350. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.3.0316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Why won’t you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76(4), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00884.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N. M., Grandau, L., Knuth, E. J., Alibali, M. W., Stephens, A. C., Hattikudur, S., & Krill, D. E. (2006). Middle-school students’ understanding of the equal sign: The books they read can’t help. Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2403_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Alibali, M. W. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to the other? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P., Taylor, R., & McEldoon, K. (2011). Assessing knowledge of mathematical equivalence: A construct-modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1) , 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2011a). Kommentarmaterial till kursplanen i matematik. [Additional notes to curriculum in mathematics]. Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2011b). Läroplan för grundskolan, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet 2011. [Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the recreation centre, 2011]. Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education]. (2011c). Kommentarmaterial till kunskapskraven i matematik. [Additional notes to assessment criterium in mathematics]. Fritzes.
   Google Scholar
• Skolverket [Swedish National Agency for Education] (2011d). Kursplan för gymnasiet, matematik. [Curriculum for mathematics at upper secondary school, 2011] http://www.skolverket.se-/laro-planer-amnen-ochkurser/gymnasieutbildning-/gymnasieskola.
   Google Scholar
• Skott, J., Hansen, H. C., Jess, K., & Schou, J. (2010). Matematik för lärare, Ypsilon grundbok band 2 [Mathematics for teachers, Ypsilon core reading volume 2]. Gleerups Utbildning.
   Google Scholar
• Star, J. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, A. C., Knuth, E. J., Blanton, M. L., Isler, I., Gardiner, A. M., & Marum, T. (2013). Equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign: The impact of task selection in eliciting elementary students’ understandings. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Vetenskapsrådet [The Swedish Research Council]. (2017). God forskningssed [Good research practice]. www.vr.se
   Google Scholar