References
- Abbott, A. D. (2004). Methods of discovery Heuristics for the Social Sciences. W.W. Norton & Company.
- Agrawal, A. (2020a). ‘Aarogya Setu voluntary for rail, plane passengers,' says central govt in Karnataka HC. Medianama. Retrieved June 16, 2020, from https://www.medianama.com/2020/06/223-aarogya-setu-karnataka-high-court/
- Agrawal, A. (2020b, May 15). Govt reconsidering mandating Aarogya Setu: Senior MEITY official. Medianama. https://www.medianama.com/2020/05/223-government-reconsiders-mandating-aarogya-setu/
- Ahluwalia, M. S. (2020). BACKSTAGE: The Story behind India’s High Growth Years. Rupa Publications India.
- Anderson, C. W. (1979). The place of principles in policy analysis. American Political Science Review, 73(3), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955399
- Aronson, M. (2007). Private bodies, public power and Soft Law in the High Court. Federal Law Review, 35(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22145/flr.35.1.1
- Behr, M. (2020, September 21). Venues must hold personal data under new contact tracing rules. digit.fyi. https://digit.fyi/venues-must-hold-personal-data-under-new-contact-tracing-rules/
- Bhandari, V. (2022). Digital rights and the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of Aarogya Setu and Why we should care. In Y. Jain & S. Nabia (Eds.), Covid-19: A View from the Margins (pp. 469–490). Manohar Books.
- Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street‐level to system‐level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00168
- Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x
- Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S.-G. (2013). Coproduction of Government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12092
- Cole, M. (2022, August 22). What’s wrong with technocracy? The Boston Review. https://bostonreview.net/articles/whats-wrong-with-technocracy/
- Cooper, T. L. (2012). The responsible administrator: An approach to ethics for the administrative role. John Wiley & Sons.
- David, T. (2006). The normative case study. American Journal of Sociology, 111(6), 1631–1676. https://doi.org/10.1086/499913
- Davis, J. L., & Chouinard, J. B. (2016). Theorizing affordances: From request to refuse. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 36(4), 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617714944
- Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2021). Big questions, small policy analysis? What a policy scholar is for? In A. Brik & L. A. Pal (Eds.), The future of the policy sciences. Edward Eldar Publishing.
- Dunlop, C. A., Ongaro, E., & Baker, K. (2020). Researching COVID-19: A research agenda for public policy and administration scholars. Public Policy and Administration, 35(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720939631
- Flückiger, A. (2009). Why do we obey soft law. In P. Knoepfel, S. Nahrath, F. Varone, & M. Benninghoff (Eds.), Rediscovering public law and public administration in comparative policy analysis: A tribute to Peter Knoepfel (pp. 45–62). Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes.
- Flückiger, A. (2012). Keeping domestic soft law accountable: Towards a gradual formalization. In J. Pauwelyn (Ed.), Informal international lawmaking (pp. 409–436). Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199658589.003.0020
- Hernández-Orallo, E., Manzoni, P., Calafate, C. T., & Cano, J.-C. (2022). A methodology for evaluating digital contact tracing apps based on the COVID-19 experience. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 12728. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17024-2
- House of Commons, House of Lords, Joint Committee on Human Rights. (2020). Human Rights and the Government’s Response to Covid-19: Digital Contact Tracing: Third Report of Session 2019–21. HC 343, HL Paper 59, Joint Committee on Human Rights, Committee Office, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. Retrieved May 8, 2020, from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt5801/jtselect/jtrights/343/343.pdf
- Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street‐level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.x
- Jasanoff, S. (1994). Acceptable evidence in a pluralistic society. In D. G. Mayo & R. D. Hollander (Eds.), Acceptable evidence: Science and values in risk management (pp. 29–47). Oxford University Press.
- Jasanoff, S. (2015). Serviceable truths: Science for action in law and policy. Texas Law Review, 93(7), 1723.
- Jordan, S. R. (2014). Beneficence and the expert bureaucracy. Public Integrity, 16(4), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.2753/PIN1099-9922160404
- Kavanagh, M. M., & Singh, R. (2020). Democracy, capacity, and coercion in pandemic response: COVID-19 in comparative political perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 997–1012. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-8641530
- Killock, J. (2020, October 14). NHS App users get privacy; Other visitors get nothing Open Rights Group Blog. https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/nhs-app-users-get-privacy-other-visitors-get-nothing/
- Klar, R., & Lanzerath, D. (2020). The ethics of COVID-19 tracking apps – Challenges and voluntariness. Research Ethics, 16(3–4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120943622
- Klenk, M., & Duijf, H. (2021). Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: Who is (not) free to go? Ethics and Information Technology, 23(Suppl 1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0
- Lomas, N. (2020, May 7). UK’s NHS COVID-19 app lacks robust legal safeguards against data misuse, warns committee. techcrunch.com. https://techcrunch.com/2020/05/07/uks-nhs-covid-19-app-lacks-robust-legal-safeguards-against-data-misuse-warns-committee/
- Maccari, L., & Cagno, V. (2021). Do we need a contact tracing app? Computer Communications, 166, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.11.007
- Mandhani, A. (2020, May 20). Courts set new bail conditions – Register as ‘Covid-19 warrior’, download Aarogya Setu app. ThePrint. https://theprint.in/judiciary/courts-set-new-bail-conditions-register-as-covid-19-warrior-download-aarogya-setu-app/425589/
- Manthorpe, R. (2020, March 31). Coronavirus: Govt set to release ‘contact tracking’ app which detects nearby virus carriers. Sky News. https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-set-to-release-contact-tracking-app-which-detects-nearby-virus-carriers-11966243
- Martin, G. (2020, October 11). Experts warn of ‘mass violation of rights’ as contact-tracing data collected in pubs sold on. yahoo.co.uk. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/contact-tracing-data-sold-on-coronavirus-141855189.html
- McConnell, A. (2018). Hidden agendas: Shining a light on the dark side of public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1739–1758. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1382555
- Mehra, A. (2020, June 01). Troubling symptoms. Caravan. https://caravanmagazine.in/commentary/covid-19-pandemic-create-dystopian-surveillance-regime
- Mehrotra, K. (2020, April 11). Behind Aarogya Setu app push: ‘At least 50% people must download for impact’. Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/coronavirus/behind-aarogya-setu-app-push-at-least-50-people-must-download-for-impact-6357121/
- Merton, R. K. (1973). The normative structure of science. In R. K. Merton & N. W. Storer (Eds.), Sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). University of Chicago Press.
- Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
- Peters, B. G. (1998). Conclusions: The future of instrument research. In P. Eliadis, M. M. Hill, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Designing government: From instruments to governance (pp. 353–364). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
- Peters, B. G. (2021). Studying public administration in authoritarian regimes. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1870241
- Raina, P. (2020, June 08). Problems follow India’s Virus Tracing App. U.S. News & World Report. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-countries/articles/2020-06-08/indias-poor-left-out-by-governments-coronavirus-contact-tracing-app?
- Sager, F. (2009). Governance and Coercion. Political Studies, 57(3), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00743.x
- Selinger, E., & Whyte, K. P. (2012). Nudging cannot solve complex policy problems. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X0000177X
- Sossin, L., & Smith, C. W. (2002). Hard choices and soft law: Ethical codes policy guidelines and the role of the courts in regulating government. Alberta Law Review, 40, 867–894.
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Univ of California Press.
- Weeks, G. (2018). Defining soft law. In Soft law and public authorities: Remedies and reform (pp. 13–40). Hart Publishing.
- Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197–222. https://doi.org/10.2307/2139277
- Wymant, C., Ferretti, L., Tsallis, D., Charalambides, M., Abeler-Dörner, L., Bonsall, D., Hinch, R., Kendall, M., Milsom, L., Ayres, M., Holmes, C., Briers, M., Fraser, C. (2021). The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 App. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z
- Yerramsetti, S. (2021). Not decided in the kitchen! Technocracy and the regulatory-welfare politics of India’s Direct Benefits Transfer reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(4), 908–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852319873708
- Yerramsetti, S. (2022). Public sector digitalisation and stealth intrusions upon individual freedoms and democratic accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2110909