Criminal Judicial Actions of the Defence Lawyer and Prosecutor: Problems of the U.S. Legal System

References

• Bali, A. S., Edmond, G., Ballantyne, K. N., Kemp, R. I., & Martire, K. A. (2020). Communicating forensic science opinion: An examination of expert reporting practices. Science & Justice, 60(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice. (2022). https://ccfaj.org
   Google Scholar
• Costa, S., & Santos, F. (2019). The social life of forensic evidence and the epistemic sub-cultures in an inquisitorial justice system: Analysis of Saltão case. Science & Justice: journal of the Forensic Science Society, 59(5), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Castro, A. S. (2021). Judicial attitudes under shifting jurisprudence: Evidence from Brazil’s New drug law of 2006. International Review of Law and Economics, 68, 106006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2021.106006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zoete, J., Fenton, N., Noguchi, T., & Lagnado, D. (2019). Resolving the so-called “probabilistic paradoxes in legal reasoning” with Bayesian networks. Science & Justice, 59(4), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carranza, WI 121. (2014). https://casetext.com/case/office-of-lawyer-regulation-v-carranza-in-re-disciplinary-proceedings-against-pablo-carranza
   Google Scholar
• Disciplinary Proceedings Against Goluba, WI 32. (2013). https://casetext.com/case/office-of-lawyer-regulation-v-goluba-in-re-disciplinary-proceedings-against-david-a-goluba
   Google Scholar
• Disciplinary Proceedings Against Lamb, WI-FI 52. (2015). https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/2015/a14-774.html
   Google Scholar
• Disciplinary Proceedings Against Loew, WI 40. (2012). https://caselaw.findlaw.com/wi-supreme-court/1600077.html
   Google Scholar
• Disciplinary Proceedings Against Pierski, WI 99. (2011). https://casetext.com/case/in-matter-of-disciplinary-proceedings-against-pierski
   Google Scholar
• Disciplinary Proceedings Against Raneda, WI 42. (2012). https://caselaw.findlaw.com/wi-supreme-court/1599835.html
   Google Scholar
• Dror, I., McCormack, B., & Epstein, J. (2018). Better science for better justice: A proposal for joint experts. Science & Justice, 58(6), 465–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2018.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubauskas, G. (2021). Conditions influencing the change of defense budgets–The case of Lithuania. Insights into Regional Development, 3(2), 282–288. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2021.3.2(8)
   Google Scholar
• Earnhart, D., & Rousseau, S. (2019). Are lawyers worth the cost? Legal counsel in environmental criminal court cases. International Review of Law and Economics, 60, 105857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2019.105857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, N., & Fleisher, W. (2019). Effective interviewing and interrogation techniques. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ismagulov, K. E., & Kazhmuratova, D. S. (2016). On the issue of the legal status of persons participating in criminal proceedings. Bulletin of the Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2(43), 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanytskyy, S. O., Bondar, V. S., Bunina, A. P., Morozov, D. A., & Fursov, D. Y. (2020). Ethical and legal issues of interaction between a defence lawyer and a prosecutor during the criminal trial. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1474–1480. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.167
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J., Ling, S., & Cuellar, M. (2020). Public beliefs about the accuracy and importance of forensic evidence in the United States. Science & Justice: journal of the Forensic Science Society, 60(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketners, K. (2015). Possibility for personal wealth taxation system in Latvia. Economic Science for Rural Development, 37, 211–219.
   Google Scholar
• Ketners, K. (2020). Spending review as essential part of public sector budgeting: Latvian experience [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference “Economic Science for Rural Development” (Vol. 53, pp. 97–106). https://doi.org/10.22616/ESRD.2020.53.011
   Google Scholar
• Kinis, U. (2018). From Responsible Disclosure Policy (RDP) towards State Regulated Responsible Vulnerability Disclosure Procedure (hereinafter–RVDP): The Latvian approach. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(3), 508–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, M., & Dror, I. E. (2021). Expert reliability in legal proceedings: “Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe, with which expert should we go?” Science & Justice, 61(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinkovic, M. (2021). Development of the party system and the character of coalition governments in Slovakia in the years 2006-2016. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filosofiya, Sotsiologiya, Politologiya, 60(60), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/60/17
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, G. S., Enzinger, E., Hughes, V., Jessen, M., Meuwly, D., Neumann, C., Planting, S., Thompson, W. C., van der Vloed, D., Ypma, R. J. F., Zhang, C., Anonymous, A., & Anonymous, B. (2021). Consensus on validation of forensic voice comparison. Science & Justice: journal of the Forensic Science Society, 61(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2021.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau, V., Baechler, S., & Crispino, F. (2019). Management of crime scene units by Quebec police senior managers: Insight on forensic knowledge and understanding of key stakeholders. Science & Justice: journal of the Forensic Science Society, 59(5), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passalacqua, N. V., Pilloud, M. A., & Belcher, W. R. (2019). Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency. Science & Justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society, 59(5), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelepeychenko, L., Zatsnyi, Y., & Zaitseva, M. (2021). Cognitive dissonance as factor of influence in American courtroom discourse. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5nS3.1497
   Google Scholar
• Records of the Supreme Court of the United States. (2021). https://www.archives.gov/research/guide-fed-records/groups/267.html
   Google Scholar
• Reid, C. A., & Howes, L. M. (2020). Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts. Science & Justice: journal of the Forensic Science Society, 60(2), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2019.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sammons, J., & Daniel, L. (2017). Digital forensics trial graphics. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sikimić, M. (2022). Security of European critical infrastructures outside the European Union: A review of the Western Balkans national laws. Insights into Regional Development, 4(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2022.4.2(5)
   Google Scholar
• State v. Thompson. (2011). https://casetext.com/case/state-v-thompson-46039-laapp-2-cir-22312
   Google Scholar
• The U.S. Legal System: A Short Description. (2022). https://ar.usembassy.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2016/03/U_S__Legal_System_English07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Voznyak, H. V., Yehorycheva, S. B., Grzebyk, M., & Pelekhatyy, A. O. (2019). Budgetary control at the local level under financial decentralization in Ukraine: Problems and their solutions. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 3(30), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v3i30.179708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeigler, A., & Rojas, E. (2018). Preserving electronic evidence for trial. Syngress.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Q. (2020). Reputational cost of securities fraud in Japan under a public-enforcement-centered sanction regime. International Review of Law and Economics, 63, 105915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar