The use of end-expiratory occlusion test vs. inferior vena cava respiratory variation for the prediction of volume responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: A comparative study

References

• Lee SJ, Ramar K, Park JG, et al. Increased fluid administration in the first three hours of sepsis resuscitation is associated with reduced mortality: a retrospective cohort study. Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4):908–915. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecconi M, Hofer C, Teboul JL, et al. Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study. Intensive care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1529–1537. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3850-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahjoub Y, Lejeune V, Muller L, et al. Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study †. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;112(4):681–685. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biais M, Lanchon R, Sesay M, et al. Changes in stroke volume Induced by Lung Recruitment Maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2017;126(2):260–267. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1–39.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitov A, Frankel HL, Blaivas M, et al. Guidelines for the Appropriate use of Bedside general and cardiac Ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients-Part II: Cardiac Ultrasonography. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1206–1227. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theerawit P, Morasert T, Sutherasan Y. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care. 2016 Dec 1;36:246–251. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orso D, Guglielmo N, Federici N, et al. Accuracy of the caval index and the expiratory diameter of the inferior vena cava for the diagnosis of dehydration in elderly. J Ultrasound. 2016 Sep 1;19(3):203–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive care Med. 2004 Sep 1;30(9):1740–1746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feissel M, Michard F, Faller JP, et al. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive care Med. 2004 Sep 1;30(9):1834–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, et al. The changes in pulse pressure variation or stroke volume variation after a “tidal volume challenge” Reliably predict fluid responsiveness during low tidal volume ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):415–421. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina A, Montagnini C, Cammarota G, et al. Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Aug;36(8):583–591. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco P. Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings. Ultrasound J. 2020 Apr 21;12(1):21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monnet X, Osman D, Ridel C, et al. Predicting volume responsiveness by using the end-expiratory occlusion in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):951–956. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181968fe1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georges D, de Courson H, Lanchon R, et al. End-expiratory occlusion maneuver to predict fluid responsiveness in the intensive care unit: an echocardiographic study. Crit Care. 2018 Feb 8;22(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Si X, Xu H, Liu Z, et al. Does respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients? A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018 Nov;127(5):1157–1164. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive care Med. 2021 Nov 1;47(11):1181–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattan E, Ospina-Tascón GA, Teboul JL, et al. Systematic assessment of fluid responsiveness during early septic shock resuscitation: secondary analysis of the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK trial. Crit Care. 2020 Jan 23;24(1):23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si X, Song X, Lin Q, et al. Does End-expiratory occlusion test predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients? A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock. 2020 May 18;54(6):751–760. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó M, Bozó A, Darvas K, et al. Role of inferior vena cava collapsibility index in the prediction of hypotension associated with general anesthesia: an observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righetti F, Castellano G. Fluid responsiveness in septic shock. Crit Care. 2014;18(Suppl 1):150. doi: 10.1186/cc13340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desai N, Garry D. Assessing dynamic fluid-responsiveness using transthoracic echocardiography in intensive care. BJA Educ. 2018 Jul;18(7):218. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherpanath TGV, Geerts BF, Lagrand WK, et al. Basic concepts of fluid responsiveness. Neth Heart J. 2013 Dec;21(12):530–536. doi: 10.1007/s12471-013-0487-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtado S, Reis L. Inferior vena cava evaluation in fluid therapy decision making in intensive care: practical implications. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019;31(2):240–247. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190039
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gavelli F, Shi R, Teboul JL, et al. The end-expiratory occlusion test for detecting preload responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 May 24;10(1):65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetterslev M, Møller-Sørensen H, Johansen RR, et al. Systematic review of cardiac output measurements by echocardiography vs. thermodilution: the techniques are not interchangeable. Intensive care Med. 2016 Aug;42(8):1223–1233. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4258-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL, et al. Respiratory variations of aortic VTI: a new index of hypovolemia and fluid responsiveness. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Oct;283(4):H1729–1733. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00308.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamia B, Ochagavia A, Monnet X, et al. Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity. Intensive care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1125–1132. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0646-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarado Sánchez JI, Caicedo Ruiz JD, Diaztagle Fernández JJ, et al. Predictors of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients mechanically ventilated at low tidal volumes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Feb 8;11(1):28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira RM, da SA, Faller J, et al. Comparative analysis of the collapsibility index and Distensibility index of the inferior vena cava Through echocardiography with pulse pressure variation that Predicts fluid responsiveness in Surgical patients: An observational Controlled Trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020 Aug 1;34(8):2162–2168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au SM, Vieillard-Baron A. Bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients: a true hemodynamic monitoring tool. J Clin Monit Comput. 2012 Oct;26(5):355–360. doi: 10.1007/s10877-012-9385-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkaya A, Yesilaras M, Aksay E, et al. The interrater reliability of ultrasound imaging of the inferior vena cava performed by emergency residents. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;31(10):1509–1511. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pınar S G, Pekdemir M, Özturan IU, et al. Assessment of end-tidal carbon dioxide and vena cava collapsibility in volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2022 Feb 1;117(1):34–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao B, Yu LJ, Sun Y-B. Sun Y bo, Zhao Y xiao, li L di. The value of the inferior vena cava Area Distensibility index and its diameter ratio for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Shock. 2019 Jul;52(1):37. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long E, Oakley E, Duke T, et al. Paediatric research in Emergency Departments International Collaborative (PREDICT). Does respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock. 2017 May;47(5):550–559. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000801
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guinot PG, Godart J, de Broca B, et al. End-expiratory occlusion manoeuvre does not accurately predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jun 1;112(6):1050–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gavelli F, Teboul JL, Monnet X. The end-expiratory occlusion test: please, let me hold your breath! Crit Care. 2019 Aug 7;23(1):274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biais M, Larghi M, Henriot J, et al. End-expiratory occlusion test Predicts fluid responsiveness in patients with Protective ventilation in the operating room. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2017 Dec;125(6):1889. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Via G, Tavazzi G, Price S. Ten Situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view. Intensive care Med. 2016 Jul;42(7):1164–1167. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4357-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar