Effect of sitting time on the vasopressor requirement in elderly patients after spinal anesthesia: A randomized controlled study

References

• Jaul E, Barron J. Age-related diseases and Clinical and Public Health Implications for the 85 Years old and over population. Front Public Health. 2017;5:335. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallet H, Guidet B, Boumendil A, et al. The impact of age-related syndromes on ICU process and outcomes in very old patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2023;13(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01160-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budic I, Velickovic I. Editorial: enhanced recovery after surgery. Front Med. 2019;6:62. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivevski AG, Karadjova D, Ivanov E, et al. Neuraxial anesthesia in the Geriatric Patient. Front Med. 2018;5:254. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang Z, Ren Y, et al. Aging and age‐related diseases: from mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Biogerontology. 2021;22(2):165–87. doi: 10.1007/s10522-021-09910-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferré F, Martin C, Bosch L, et al. Control of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in adults. Local Reg Anesth. 2020;13:39–46. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S240753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux JJ, Wakabayashi K, Jooma Z. Defining the role of thoracic spinal anaesthesia in the 21st century: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2023;130(1):e56–e65. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favarel-Garrigues JF, Sztark F, Petitjean ME, et al. Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in the elderly: single dose versus titration through a catheter. Anesth Analg. 1996;82(2):312–6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199602000-00017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelstein SB, M JE. Anesthesia considerations for the geriatric patient. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2017;6(3):115–21. doi: 10.1007/s13670-017-0206-0
   Google Scholar
• Matei D, Buculei I, Luca C, et al. Impact of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on the mechanisms of atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(16):9097. doi: 10.3390/ijms23169097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsaeid MA, Sayed AM. Comparison between position change after low-dose spinal anesthesia and higher dose with sitting position in elderly patients: block characteristics, hemodynamic changes, and complications. Anesth Essays Res. 2019;13(3):476–80. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_101_19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coppejans HC, Hendrickx E, Goossens J, et al. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(1):243–7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000189049.11005.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kongur E, Saylan S, Eroğlu A. The effects of patient position on early complications of spinal anesthesia induction in arthroscopic knee surgery. Acta Clin Croat. 2021;60:68–74. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.01.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veering BT, Burm AG, Spierdijk J. Spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Effects of age on neural blockade and pharmacokinetics. Br J Anaesth. 1988;60(2):187–94. doi: 10.1093/bja/60.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hakeem EE, Kaki AM, Almazrooa AA, et al. Les effets sur les besoins liquidiens et d’éphédrine du maintien de la position assise pendant cinq minutes par rapport au décubitus immédiat après une rachianesthésie pour un accouchement par césarienne: une étude randomisée contrôlée. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(12):1083–1089. doi: 10.1007/s12630-011-9593-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amer GFM, E-DMI N, Ali AAEm A. Comparison between 2, 4 and 6 Minute Sitting Positions Versus Immediately Lying down on Hemodynamic Variables, Fluid and Ephedrine Requirement after Spinal Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Section. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2019;76(6):4332–4339. doi: 10.21608/ejhm.2019.43988
   Google Scholar
• Lenga P, Papakonstantinou V, Kiening K, et al. Outcomes of cervical spinal stenosis surgery in patients Aged≥ 65 years based on insurance status: a single-center cohort study from a tertiary center in Germany. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023;3(10):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05700-9
   Google Scholar
• Abdel Kader A, Ali Hekal K, Amr Ragheb Y, et al. Single-shot spinal anesthesia with heavy bupivacaine in two regimens versus continuous spinal anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Tanta Med J. 2018;46(2):99–107. doi: 10.4103/tmj.tmj_30_17
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal N, Rawlani S. Spinal anaesthesia in sitting position for 30 seconds vs conventional spinal anaesthesia: which is better. PJSR. 2017;10:17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Han G, Zhao GY, Li L, et al. Comparison of hemodynamics after combined spinal-epidural anesthesia between decubitus and sitting positions in aged patients undergoing total hip replacement. Pharmacology. 2014;93(3–4):193–6. doi: 10.1159/000362214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Lee MJ, Kim MN, et al. Effect of position changes after spinal anesthesia with low-dose bupivacaine in elderly patients: sensory block characteristics and hemodynamic changes. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64(3):234–9. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.3.234
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sargin A, Karaman S, Turksal E, et al. Abstract Pr200: effects of sitting up for three minutes or one minute versus immediately lying down after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 2016;123:258. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000492599.52249.3c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar