The performance of C-MAC videostylet versus D-Blade during tracheal intubation in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: A randomized comparative trial

References

• Bharti N, Arora S, Panda NB. A comparison of McCoy, TruView, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with immobilized cervical spine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2014 Apr;8(2):188–192. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.130705
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robitaille A, Williams SR, Tremblay MH, et al. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization: direct laryngoscopy versus GlideScope video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2008 Mar;106(3):935–941, table of contents. 10.1213/ane.0b013e318161769e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). NICE guideline NG41. Spinal injury. London, UK: NICE; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Urwyler N, et al. The performance of rigid scopes for tracheal intubation: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia. 2016 Dec;71(12):1456–1463. doi: 10.1111/anae.13626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, et al. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):670–679. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yildirim A, Kiraz HA, Agaoglu I, et al. Comparison of Macintosh, McCoy and C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope intubation by prehospital emergency health workers: a simulation study. Int Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;12(1):91–97. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1437-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enomoto Y, Asai T, Arai T, et al. Pentax-AWS, a new videolaryngoscope, is more effective than the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with restricted neck movements: a randomized comparative study. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Apr;100(4):544–548. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Kim JA, Kim CS, et al. Comparison of tracheal intubation with the airway scope or clarus video system in patients with cervical collars. Anaesthesia. 2011 Aug;66(8):694–698. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06762.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua DS, Mah CL, Wang CF. The Shikani optical stylet as an alternative to the GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult intubations–a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):402–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07023.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam K, Lee Y, Park HP, et al. Cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation using an optiscope versus the McGrath Videolaryngoscope in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: a prospective randomized crossover study. Anesth Analg. 2019 Dec;129(6):1666–1672. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003635
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norskov AK. Preoperative airway assessment - experience gained from a multicentre cluster randomised trial and the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Dan Med J. 2016 May;63(5):B5241. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27127020/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omur D, Bayram B, Ozbilgin S, et al. Comparison of different stylets used for intubation with the C-MAC D-Blade((R)) Videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2017 Sep-Oct;67(5):450–456. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2016.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, et al. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg. 2005 Sep;101(3):910–915. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000166975.38649.27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TK, Son JD, Seo H, et al. A randomized crossover study comparing cervical spine motion during intubation between two lightwand intubation techniques in patients with simulated cervical immobilization: laryngoscope-assisted versus conventional lightwand intubation. Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):485–490. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby ET, Warltier D. Airway management in adults after cervical spine trauma. Anesthesiology. 2006 Jun;104(6):1293–1318. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200606000-00026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini RP, Larson DM. Clinical evaluation and airway management for adults with cervical spine instability. Anesthesiol Clin. 2015 Jun;33(2):315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2015.02.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumari A, Choudhuri P, Agrawal N. A comparative study of the C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation with manual in-line stabilization of neck in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Jul-Sep;39(3):435–443. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_471_21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo KH, Kim KM, John H, et al. Comparison of C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope efficacy for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spinal injury: a prospective randomized comparative study. BMC Anesthesiol. [2020 May 14];20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01021-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik H, Park HP. Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine. BMC Anesthesiol. [2020 Aug 15];20(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01118-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabecker S, Ottenhausen T, Theiler L, et al. Prospective observational study evaluating the C-MAC video stylet for awake tracheal intubation: a single-centre study. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Aug;87(8):873–879. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.21.15302-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pius J, Noppens RR, El-Tahan MR. Learning curve and performance in simulated difficult airway for the novel C-MAC® video-stylet and C-MAC® Macintosh video laryngoscope: a prospective randomized manikin trial. PLOS ONE. 2020;15(11):e0242154. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney DR, Cooney NL, Wallus H, et al. Performance of emergency physicians utilizing a video-assisted semi-rigid fiberoptic stylet for intubation of a difficult airway in a high-fidelity simulated patient: a pilot study. Int J Emerg Med. [2012 May 29];5(1):24. doi: 10.1186/1865-1380-5-24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooney DR, Beaudette C, Clemency BM, et al. Endotracheal intubation with a video-assisted semi-rigid fiberoptic stylet by prehospital providers. Int J Emerg Med. 2014;7(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12245-014-0045-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webb A, Kolawole H, Leong S, et al. Comparison of the Bonfils and Levitan optical stylets for tracheal intubation: a clinical study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011 Nov;39(6):1093–1097. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1103900618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osman YM, El-Aziz RAE-R A. Effectiveness of C-MAC video-stylet versus C-MAC D-blade video-laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult airway: randomized comparative study. Egypt J Anaesth. 2023;39(1):233–240. doi:10.1080/11101849.2023.2186511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Rastogi S, Yadav SK, et al. Biochemical markers and haemodynamic changes of stress response after intubation with direct laryngoscopy versus video laryngoscopy versus fiberoptic intubation: a comparative study. Indian J Clin Anaesthesia. 2020 11;7(4):681–686. doi: 10.18231/j.ijca.2020.122
   Google Scholar
• Fan H, Cao H, Sun Y, et al. Endotracheal intubation in elective cervical surgery: a randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded study. Medicine. 2017 Oct;96(43):e7817. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laosuwan P, Earsakul A, Numkarunarunrote N, et al. Randomized cinefluoroscopic comparison of cervical spine motion using McGrath series 5 and Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with manual in-line stabilization. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015 Jan;98(Suppl 1):S63–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kill C, Risse J, Wallot P, et al. Videolaryngoscopy with glidescope reduces cervical spine movement in patients with unsecured cervical spine. J Emergency Med. 2013 Apr;44(4):750–756. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.07.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudolph C, Schneider JP, Wallenborn J, et al. Movement of the upper cervical spine during laryngoscopy: a comparison of the Bonfils intubation fibrescope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):668–672. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04224.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra TP, Pelz DM, Shaikh AA, et al. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison of shikani optical stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope. Can J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;54(6):441–447. doi: 10.1007/BF03022029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlen BM, Gercek E. Three-dimensional cervical spine movement during intubation using the Macintosh and Bullard laryngoscopes, the Bonfils fibrescope and the intubating laryngeal mask airway. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Nov;21(11):907–913. doi: 10.1097/00003643-200411000-00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar