Discretion and its effects: analyzing the role of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement styles

References

• Al Halbusi, H., Al-Sulaiti, K., Abbas, J., & Al-Sulaiti, I. (2022). Assessing factors influencing technology adoption for online purchasing amid COVID-19 in Qatar: Moderating role of word of mouth. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 13, 942527. https://doi.org/10.3389/FENVS.2022.942527
   Google Scholar
• Al Halbusi, H., Williams, K. A., Mansoor, H. O., Hassan, M. S., & Hamid, F. A. H. (2019). Examining the impact of ethical leadership and organisational justice on employees’ ethical behavior: Does person–organisation fit play a role? Ethics & Behavior, 30(7), 514–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1694024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1994). Responsive regulation: Transcending the deregulation debate. Oxford University Press on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Bureaucracy, S. L. (1980). Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, C., Shen, Q., & Tang, N. (2022). Do visiting monks give better sermons? “Street-level bureaucrats from higher-up” in targeted poverty alleviation in China. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, D. P. (2016). Public, nonprofit, and for-profit sector regulatory approaches in third-party regulatory administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. A. (2000). Empirical research on the deterrent effect of environmental monitoring and enforcement. Environmental Law Reporter News & Analysis, 30(4), 10245–10252.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, F., Blair, J., & Tracy, E. (1999). Verbal reports are data! A theoretical approach to cognitive interviews. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Davidovitz, M., & Cohen, N. (2021). Frontline social service as a battlefield: Insights from street-level bureaucrats’ interactions with violent clients. Social Policy & Administration, 56(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. C. (1969). Discretionary justice: A preliminary inquiry. Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, N. (2019). Street-level enforcement style: A multidimensional measurement instrument. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1465954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, N., Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2018). Does disclosure of performance information influence street‐level bureaucrats’ enforcement style? Public Administration Review, 78(5), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, N., & Raaphorst, N. (2021). Automation and discretion: Explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce. Public Management Review, 78(5), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12926
   Google Scholar
• Department of Labour. (2017). Jabatan Tenaga Kerja Semenanjung Malaysia. https://jtksm.mohr.gov.my/images/pdf/Penerbitan/buletin/Jilid1_Aug2017_LI_Series.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method–2007 update with new internet, visual, and mixed-mode guide. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Eshuis, J., De Boer, N., & Klijn, E. H. (2022). Street-level bureaucrats’ emotional intelligence and its relation with their performance. Public Administration, 101(3), 804–821. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne, J. (2013). Ambiguity and relational signals in regulator–regulatee relationships. Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01160.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. (2016). Professional discretion in welfare services: Beyond street-level bureaucracy. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, W. T., Jr. (1998). Regulatory enforcement styles. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
   Google Scholar
• Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, M. S., Al Halbusi, H., Razali, A., Ariffin, R. N. R., & Williams, K. A. (2022). The Swedish gamble: Trust in the government and self-efficacy in the battle to combat COVID-19. Current Psychology, 42(21), 17935–17950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02947-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, M. S., Raja Ariffin, R. N., Mansor, N., & Al Halbusi, H. (2021a). An examination of street-level bureaucrats’ discretion and the moderating role of supervisory support: Evidence from the field. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, M. S., Raja Ariffin, R. N., Mansor, N., & Al Halbusi, H. (2021b). The moderating role of willingness to implement policy on street-level bureaucrats’ multidimensional enforcement style and discretion. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(6), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.2001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, M. S., Raja Ariffin, R. N., Mansor, N., & Al Halbusi, H. (2021c). Rebelliousness and street-level bureaucrats’ discretion: Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Administrative Science, 18(1), 173–198.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2008). Implementing public policy: An introduction to the study of operational governance. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Møller, M. Ø. (2019). An approach to the development of comparative cross-national studies of street-level bureaucracy. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 35(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2019.1593880
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Varone, F. (2021). The public policy process. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P. L. (2019). The decision made: On the inspection encounter. In N. Raaphorst & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Inspectors and enforcement at the front line of government (pp. 227–258). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2015). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, K., & Han, Y. (2019). Exploring the sources of cognitive gap between accountability and performance. Public Personnel Management, 49(3), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026019873031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilke, S., & Tummers, L. (2018). Which clients are deserving of help? A theoretical model and experimental test. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & McCluskey, R. (2018). The art of “bureaucraft”: Why and how bureaucrats respond to citizen voice. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/13446
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. A. (1994). Regulatory enforcement. In D. H. Rosenbloom & R. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of regulation and administrative law (pp. 383–385). M. Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Keulemans, S., & Van de Walle, S. (2020). Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ attitude towards clients: Towards a measurement instrument. Public Policy and Administration, 35(1), 84–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718789749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., de Boer, N., & Eshuis, J. (2022). Leading frontline enforcers: How supervisors’ leadership style impacts inspectors’ enforcement style. Public Management Review, 24(3), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1833610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of E-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroeger, N. (1975). Bureaucracy, social exchange, and benefits received in a public assistance agency. Social Problems, 23(2), 182–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, D., Paraciani, R., & Raspanti, D. (2021). A strategy is necessary. The policy–client conflict within different relational asymmetries: A comparison at the street-level. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(13/14), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-07-2021-0188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. ed.: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2022). A note on pursuing work on street-level bureaucracy in developing and transitional countries. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, C. W.-H., Fryxell, G. E., & Van Rooij, B. (2009). Changes in enforcement styles among environmental enforcement officials in China. Environment and Planning A, 41(11), 2706–2723. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lotta, G., Pires, R., Hill, M., & Møller, M. O. (2022). Recontextualizing street-level bureaucracy in the developing world. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascini, P. (2013). Why was the enforcement pyramid so influential? And what price was paid? Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (2012). Policy design and implementation. The Sage Handbook of Public Administration, 279–291.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S. W., & Musheno, M. C. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Winter, S. (1999). Regulatory enforcement and compliance: Examining Danish agro-environmental policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(4), 625–651. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199923)18:4<625:AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2011). Regulatory enforcement styles and compliance. In C. Parker & V. L. Nielsen (Eds.), Explaining compliance: Business responses to regulation (pp. 222–244). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• May, P., & Winter, S. (2000). Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish agro‐environmental inspection. Law & Policy, 22(2), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00089
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Wood, R. S. (2003). At the regulatory front lines: Inspectors’ enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mug014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, M. K., Glaser, B., & Donald, K. M. (1998). On the front lines of welfare delivery: Are workers implementing policy reforms? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199824)17:1<1:AID-PAM1>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A.-R. (2022). Discretion on the frontlines of the implementation of the Ghana School Feeding Programme: Street-level bureaucrats adapting to austerity in northern Ghana. Public Administration and Development, 42(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L. (2015). Law enforcement behaviour of regulatory inspectors. In A. Buffat, M. Hill, & P. Hupe (Eds.), Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 115–131). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaphorst, N., & Groeneveld, S. (2018). Double standards in frontline decision making: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Administration & Society, 50(8), 1175–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechtschaffen, C. (1997). Deterrence vs. cooperation and the evolving theory of environmental enforcement. Southern California Law Review, 71, 1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, A. J. (1984). Consequences of compliance and deterrence models of law enforcement for the exercise of police discretion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47(4), 83–122. https://doi.org/10.2307/1191688
   Google Scholar
• Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
   Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J. R. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024289
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of market research (pp. 1–40). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-1
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. T. (1994). Managing regulatory enforcement in the United States. In D. H. Rosenbloom & R. D. Schwartz (Eds.), Handbook of regulation and administrative law (pp. 423–463). M. Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, C. N. (1981). Attitudinal tendencies among officials. In C. T. Goodsell (Ed.), The public encounter: Where state and citizen meet (pp. 43–68). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, I., & Kelly, J. (2006). Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: Re-visiting Lipsky. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19(7), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550610704662
   Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., van Engen, N., & Tummers, L. (2018). The necessity of discretion: A behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P. G. (2006). From good intentions to successful implementation: The case of patient safety in Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 49(4), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2006.tb01992.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C., & Johnson, V. (1991). The urban public hospital as street-level bureaucracy: The employee perspective. Public Personnel Management, 20(3), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102609102000302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2012). Policy alienation of public professionals: The construct and its measurement. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L., Steijn, B., & Bekkers, V. (2012). Explaining the willingness of public professionals to implement public policies: Content, context, and personality characteristics. Public Administration, 90(3), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02016.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. & Lahat, L. (2017). Do public officials trust citizens? A welfare state perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 51(7), 1450–1469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Fan, C., & Chen, S. (2021). The impact of campaign-style enforcement on corporate environmental Action: Evidence from China’s central environmental protection inspection. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zikmund, W. G., Babin, B. J., Carr, J. C., & Griffin, M. (2003). Business research methods. Thomson/South-Western.
   Google Scholar