The prospect of antimicrobial peptides from Bacillus species with biological control potential against insect pests and diseases of economic importance in agriculture, forestry and fruit tree production

References

• Cerda R, Avelino J, Gary C, et al. Primary and secondary yield losses caused by pests and diseases: assessment and modeling in coffee. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):1. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown B, Wylie F. Diseases and pests of Australian Forest nurseries: past and present. In: Proceedings of the First Meeting of IUFRO Working Party S.2.07–09 (Diseases and Insects in Forest Nurseries), Sutherland, J.R., Glover,S.G. (Eds). August 23-30, 1990, Victoria, British Colombia, Canada. The Pacific Forestry Centre (Forestry Canada, Pacific and Yukon Region), Victoria, British Colombia, Canada, 1991. p. 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pimentel D. Green revolution agriculture and chemical hazards. Sci Total Environ. 1996;188: S86–S98. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05280-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal G, Jindal V, Dhawan A. Insect pest problems and crop losses: changing trends. Indian J Ecol. 2010;37:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Abubakar Y, Tijjani H, Egbuna C, et al. Pesticides, history, and classification. In: Egbuna C, Sawicka B, editors. Natural remedies for pest, disease and weed control. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2020. p. 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kole R, Roy K, Panja B, et al. Use of pesticides in agriculture and emergence of resistant pests. IJAH. 2019;58(2-SPL):53–70. doi: 10.36062/ijah.58.2SPL.2019.53-70.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins NJ, Bass C, Dixon A, et al. The evolutionary origins of pesticide resistance. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019;94(1):135–155. doi: 10.1111/brv.12440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guedes RNC, Walse SS, Throne JE. Sublethal exposure, insecticide resistance, and community stress. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017;21:47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2017.04.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakore Y. The biopesticide market for global agricultural use. Ind Biotechnol. 2006;2(3):194–208. doi: 10.1089/ind.2006.2.194.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller JG. Daily poison: pesticides-an underestimated danger. Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland; 2020, 315.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Kumar P. Pesticides in agriculture and environment: impacts on human health. In: Kumar V, Kumar R, Singh J, Kumar P. editors. Contaminants in agriculture and environment: health risks and remediation. Haridwar, India: Agriculture and Environmental Science Academy. 2019. p. 76.
   Google Scholar
• Berini F, Katz C, Gruzdev N, et al. Microbial and viral chitinases: attractive biopesticides for integrated pest management. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36(3):818–838. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copping LG, Menn JJ. Biopesticides: a review of their action, applications and efficacy. Pest Manag Sci. 2000;56(8):651–676. doi: 10.1002/1526-4998(200008)56:8<651::AID-PS201>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Dikshit A. Biopesticides: an ecofriendly approach for pest control. J Biopest. 2010;3:186.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira VB, Estrella LF, Alves MGR, et al. Residues of legacy organochlorine pesticides and DDT metabolites in highly consumed fish from the polluted Guanabara Bay, Brazil: distribution and assessment of human health risk. J Environ Sci Health B. 2020;55(1):30–41. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2019.1654808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bempah CK, Asomaning J, Boateng J. Market basket survey for some pesticides residues in fruits and vegetables from Ghana. J Microbiol Biotechnol Food Sci. 2020;9:850–871.
   Google Scholar
• Scheepmaker J, Butt T. Natural and released inoculum levels of entomopathogenic fungal biocontrol agents in soil in relation to risk assessment and in accordance with EU regulations. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2010;20(5):503–552. doi: 10.1080/09583150903545035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bren A, Hart Y, Dekel E, et al. The last generation of bacterial growth in limiting nutrient. BMC Syst Biol. 2013;7(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-7-27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Köhl J, Booij K, Kolnaar R, et al. Ecological arguments to reconsider data requirements regarding the environmental fate of microbial biocontrol agents in the registration procedure in the European Union. BioControl. 2019;64(5):469–487. doi: 10.1007/s10526-019-09964-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajuna HB, Kim I, Han YS, et al. Aphicidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis strain AH-2 against cotton aphid (Aphis gossypii). Entomol Res. 2021;51(4):151–160. doi: 10.1111/1748-5967.12481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaterra A, Badosa E, Daranas N, et al. Bacteria as biological control agents of plant diseases. Microorganisms. 2022;10(9):1759. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10091759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kim S, Jung H, et al. Exploiting bacterial genera as biocontrol agents: mechanisms, interactions and applications in sustainable agriculture. J Plant Biol. 2023;66(6):485–498. doi: 10.1007/s12374-023-09404-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon J-H, Won S-J, Maung CEH, et al. The role of Lysobacter antibioticus HS124 on the control of fall webworm (Hyphantria cunea drury) and growth promotion of Canadian poplar (Populus canadensis moench) at Saemangeum reclaimed land in Korea. Microorganisms. 2021;9(8):1580. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9081580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon J-H, Won S-J, Moon J-H, et al. Control of fungal diseases and increase in yields of a cultivated jujube fruit (Zizyphus jujuba miller var. Inermis rehder) orchard by employing Lysobacter antibioticus HS124. Forests. 2019;10(12):1146. doi: 10.3390/f10121146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon J-C, Marchesi JR, Mougel C, et al. Host-microbiota interactions: from holobiont theory to analysis. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0619-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolatabadian A. Plant–microbe interaction. Biology. 2020;10(1):15. doi: 10.3390/biology10010015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ali SAM, Sayyed R, Mir MI, et al. Induction of systemic resistance in maize and antibiofilm activity of surfactin from Bacillus velezensis MS20. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:879739. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.879739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargabus R, Zidack N, Sherwood J, et al. Characterisation of systemic resistance in sugar beet elicited by a non-pathogenic, phyllosphere-colonizing Bacillus mycoides, biological control agent. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2002;61(5):289–298. doi: 10.1006/pmpp.2003.0443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Wang X, Ma Q, et al. Bacillus velezensis CLA178-induced systemic resistance of rosa multiflora against crown gall disease. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:587667. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.587667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung EJ, Hossain MT, Khan A, et al. Bacillus oryzicola sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from the roots of rice with antimicrobial, plant growth promoting, and systemic resistance inducing activities in rice. Plant Pathol J. 2015;31(2):152–164. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.12.2014.0136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam VB, Meyer T, Arias AA, et al. Bacillus cyclic lipopeptides iturin and fengycin control rice blast caused by Pyricularia oryzae in potting and acid sulfate soils by direct antagonism and induced systemic resistance. Microorganisms. 2021;9(7):1441. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongena M, Jourdan E, Adam A, et al. Surfactin and fengycin lipopeptides of Bacillus subtilis as elicitors of induced systemic resistance in plants. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9(4):1084–1090. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Shao D, Jiang C, et al. Biological activity of lipopeptides from Bacillus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(15):5951–5960. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8396-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villegas-Escobar V, González-Jaramillo LM, Ramírez M, et al. Lipopeptides from Bacillus sp. EA-CB0959: active metabolites responsible for in vitro and in vivo control of Ralstonia solanacearum. Biol Control. 2018;125:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongena M, Jacques P. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16(3):115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X-H, Scholz R, Borriss M, et al. Difficidin and bacilysin produced by plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens are efficient in controlling fire blight disease. J Biotechnol. 2009;140(1-2):38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.10.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao S, Liang J, Xu Y, et al. Bacillaene, sharp objects consist in the arsenal of antibiotics produced by Bacillus. J Cell Physiol. 2023:1–15. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar F, Ortiz A, Sansinenea E. A strong antifungal activity of 7-O-succinyl macrolactin a vs macrolactin a from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ELI149. Curr Microbiol. 2020;77(11):3409–3413. doi: 10.1007/s00284-020-02200-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choub V, Won S-J, Ajuna HB, et al. Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds from Bacillus velezensis CE 100 against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Horticulturae. 2022;8(6):557. doi: 10.3390/horticulturae8060557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao P, Li P, Wu S, et al. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from Bacillus subtilis CF-3 reduce anthracnose and elicit active defense responses in harvested litchi fruits. AMB Exp. 2019;9(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0841-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li X-Y, Mao Z-C, Wu Y-X, et al. Comprehensive volatile organic compounds profiling of Bacillus species with biocontrol properties by head space solid phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2015;25(2):132–143. doi: 10.1080/09583157.2014.960809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena AK, Kumar M, Chakdar H, et al. Bacillus species in soil as a natural resource for plant health and nutrition. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;128(6):1583–1594. doi: 10.1111/jam.14506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won S-J, Moon J-H, Ajuna HB, et al. Biological control of leaf blight disease caused by Pestalotiopsis maculans and growth promotion of Quercus acutissima Carruth container seedlings using Bacillus velezensis CE 100. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(20):11296. doi: 10.3390/ijms222011296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon J-H, Won S-J, Maung CEH, et al. Bacillus velezensis CE 100 inhibits root rot diseases (Phytophthora spp.) and promotes growth of Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endlicher) seedlings. Microorganisms. 2021;9(4):821. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Kim TY, Won S-J, et al. Control of fungal diseases and fruit yield improvement of strawberry using Bacillus velezensis CE 100. Microorganisms. 2022;10(2):365. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon J-H, Ajuna HB, Won S-J, et al. Entomopathogenic potential of Bacillus velezensis CE 100 for the biological control of termite damage in wooden architectural buildings of Korean cultural heritage. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(9):8189. doi: 10.3390/ijms24098189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon J-H, Ajuna HB, Won S-J, et al. The anti-termite activity of Bacillus licheniformis PR2 against the subterranean termite, Reticulitermes speratus kyushuensis Morimoto (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Forests. 2023;14(5):1000. doi: 10.3390/f14051000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed T, Askari M, Meng Z, et al. Current insights on vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vip) as next generation pest killers. Toxins. 2020;12(8):522. doi: 10.3390/toxins12080522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma L, Muñoz D, Berry C, et al. Molecular and insecticidal characterization of a novel cry-related protein from Bacillus thuringiensis toxic against Myzus persicae. Toxins. 2014;6(11):3144–3156. doi: 10.3390/toxins6113144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimopoulou A, Theologidis I, Benaki D, et al. Direct antibiotic activity of bacillibactin broadens the biocontrol range of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MBI600. Msphere. 2021;6(4):e0037621. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00376-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni R, Keharia H. Phytostimulation and biocontrol potential of gram-positive endospore-forming Bacilli. Planta. 2021;254(3):49. doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03695-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yánez-Mendizabal V, Viñas I, Usall J, et al. Endospore production allows using spray-drying as a possible formulation system of the biocontrol agent Bacillus subtilis CPA-8. Biotechnol Lett. 2012;34(4):729–735. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0834-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadfi N, Cherif M, Fliss I, et al. Evaluation of bacterial isolates from salty soils and Bacillus thuringiensis strains for the biocontrol of Fusarium dry rot of potato tubers. J Plant Pathol. 2001; 83, 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Devi PV, Duraimurugan P, Chandrika K. Bacillus thuringiensis-based nanopesticides for crop protection. In: Koul O, editor. Nano-biopesticides today and future perspectives. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 2019. p. 249–260.
   Google Scholar
• Fira D, Dimkić I, Berić T, et al. Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J Biotechnol. 2018;285:44–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissler M, Heravi KM, Henkel M, et al. Lipopeptide biosurfactants from Bacillus species. In: Douglas GH, Daniel KYS, Ashby RD, editors. Biobased surfactants. 2nd ed. Urbana (IL): AOCS Press; 2019. p. 205–240.
   Google Scholar
• Théatre A, Cano-Prieto C, Bartolini M, et al. The surfactin-like lipopeptides from bacillus spp.: natural biodiversity and synthetic biology for a broader application range. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:623701. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.623701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Ren B, Gao H, et al. Optimization for the production of surfactin with a new synergistic antifungal activity. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e34430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeriouh H, de Vicente A, Pérez-García A, et al. Surfactin triggers biofilm formation of Bacillus subtilis in melon phylloplane and contributes to the biocontrol activity. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16(7):2196–2211. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoll A, Salvatierra-Martínez R, González M, et al. The role of surfactin production by Bacillus velezensis on colonization, biofilm formation on tomato root and leaf surfaces and subsequent protection (ISR) against Botrytis cinerea. Microorganisms. 2021;9(11):2251. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9112251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park G, Nam J, Kim J, et al. Structure and mechanism of surfactin peptide from Bacillus velezensis antagonistic to fungi plant pathogens. Bull Korean Chem Soc. 2019;40(7):704–709. doi: 10.1002/bkcs.11757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meena KR, Kanwar SS. Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: applications in food safety and therapeutics. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:473050–473059. doi: 10.1155/2015/473050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thérien M, Kiesewalter HT, Auria E, et al. Surfactin production is not essential for pellicle and root-associated biofilm development of Bacillus subtilis. Biofilm. 2020;2:100021. doi: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2020.100021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarwar A, Hassan MN, Imran M, et al. Biocontrol activity of surfactin a purified from Bacillus NH-100 and NH-217 against rice bakanae disease. Microbiol Res. 2018;209:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard-Rochette M, Machrafi Y, Cossus L, et al. Bacillus pumilus PTB180 and Bacillus subtilis PTB185: production of lipopeptides, antifungal activity, and biocontrol ability against Botrytis cinerea. Biol Control. 2022;170:104925. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.104925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Zhang S, Zhang S, et al. Isolation and characterization of a new cyclic lipopeptide surfactin from a marine-derived Bacillus velezensis SH-B74. J Antibiot. 2020;73(12):863–867. doi: 10.1038/s41429-020-0347-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MS, Piccoli DA, McDowell T, et al. Evaluating the biocontrol potential of Canadian strain Bacillus velezensis 1B-23 via its surfactin production at various pHs and temperatures. BMC Biotechnol. 2021;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12896-021-00690-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady EN, MacDonald J, Ho MT, et al. Characterization and complete genome analysis of the surfactin-producing, plant-protecting bacterium Bacillus velezensis 9D-6. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12866-018-1380-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arjes HA, Vo L, Dunn CM, et al. Biosurfactant-mediated membrane depolarization maintains viability during oxygen depletion in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Biol. 2020;30(6):1011.e1016–1022.e1016. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arjes HA, Vo L, Dunn CM, et al. Biosurfactant production maintains viability in anoxic conditions by depolarizing the membrane in Bacillus subtilis. bioRxiv. 2019;720532.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Lu Y, Shan M, et al. A mini-review: mechanism of antimicrobial action and application of surfactin. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;38(8):143. doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03323-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan N, Maymon M, Hirsch AM. Combating Fusarium infection using Bacillus-based antimicrobials. Microorganisms. 2017;5(4):75. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5040075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong A-D, Li H-P, Yuan Q-S, et al. Antagonistic mechanism of iturin a and plipastatin a from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S76-3 from wheat spikes against Fusarium graminearum. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R-S, Wang F-G, Qi Z-Q, et al. Iturins produced by Bacillus velezensis Jt84 play a key role in the biocontrol of rice blast disease. Biol Control. 2022;174:105001. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Rooney AP. Iturinic lipopeptide diversity in the Bacillus subtilis species group–important antifungals for plant disease biocontrol applications. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1794. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Wang N, Hu J, et al. Isolation and characterization of a new iturinic lipopeptide, mojavensin a produced by a marine-derived bacterium Bacillus mojavensis B0621A. J Antibiot. 2012;65(6):317–322. doi: 10.1038/ja.2012.19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Guo X, Qiao X, et al. Activity of fengycin and iturin a isolated from Bacillus subtilis Z-14 on Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici and soil microbial diversity. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:682437. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.682437.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang D, Yu S, Zhao D, et al. Inhibitory effects of non-volatiles lipopeptides and volatiles ketones metabolites secreted by Bacillus velezensis C16 against alternaria solani. Biol Control. 2021;152:104421. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Cao X, Zhang H. Production of iturin a by Bacillus velezensis ND and its biological control characteristics. J Basic Microbiol. 2023;63(2):179–189. doi: 10.1002/jobm.202200473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrebola E, Jacobs R, Korsten L. Iturin a is the principal inhibitor in the biocontrol activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PPCB004 against postharvest fungal pathogens. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108(2):386–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04438.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez F, Castro M, Príncipe A, et al. The plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains MEP218 and ARP23 capable of producing the cyclic lipopeptides iturin or surfactin and fengycin are effective in biocontrol of sclerotinia stem rot disease. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;112(1):159–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05182.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Xie J, Qi Y, et al. A thermotolerant marine Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S185 producing iturin A5 for antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(9):516. doi: 10.3390/md19090516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Qiu J, Yang X, et al. Identification of lipopeptide iturin a produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NCPSJ7 and its antifungal activities against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum. Foods. 2022;11(19):2996. doi: 10.3390/foods11192996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeriouh H, Romero D, Garcia-Gutierrez L, et al. The iturin-like lipopeptides are essential components in the biological control arsenal of Bacillus subtilis against bacterial diseases of cucurbits. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011;24(12):1540–1552. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang Y, Zhao F, Liu X, et al. Enhanced production of antifungal lipopeptide iturin a by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LL3 through metabolic engineering and culture conditions optimization. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12934-019-1121-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yue H, Zhong J, Li Z, et al. Optimization of iturin a production from Bacillus subtilis ZK-H2 in submerge fermentation by response surface methodology. 3 Biotech. 2021;11(2):36. doi: 10.1007/s13205-020-02540-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asaka O, Shoda M. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off of tomato with Bacillus subtilis RB14. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62(11):4081–4085. doi: 10.1128/aem.62.11.4081-4085.1996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizumoto S, Hirai M, Shoda M. Enhanced iturin a production by Bacillus subtilis and its effect on suppression of the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75(6):1267–1274. doi: 10.1007/s00253-007-0973-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steller S, Vater J. Purification of the fengycin synthetase multienzyme system from Bacillus subtilis b213. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 2000;737(1-2):267–275. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(99)00481-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yánez-Mendizábal V, Zeriouh H, Viñas I, et al. Biological control of peach brown rot (Monilinia spp.) by Bacillus subtilis CPA-8 is based on production of fengycin-like lipopeptides. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2012;132(4):609–619. doi: 10.1007/s10658-011-9905-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Q, Dong W, Li S, et al. Fengycin produced by Bacillus subtilis NCD-2 plays a major role in biocontrol of cotton seedling damping-off disease. Microbiol Res. 2014;169(7-8):533–540. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.12.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang F, Xiao J, Zhang Y, et al. Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of Bacillus halotolerans against Botrytis cinerea causing grey mould in postharvest strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2021;174:111456. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Wang J, Liu B, et al. Biocontrol of tomato bacterial wilt by the new strain Bacillus velezensis FJAT-46737 and its lipopeptides. BMC Microbiol. 2020;20(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01851-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumpathong W, Intra B, Euanorasetr J, et al. Biosurfactant-producing Bacillus velezensis PW192 as an anti-fungal biocontrol agent against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides and Colletotrichum musae. Microorganisms. 2022;10(5):1017. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10051017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Teng K, Wang T, et al. Antimicrobial Bacillus velezensis HC6: production of three kinds of lipopeptides and biocontrol potential in maize. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;128(1):242–254. doi: 10.1111/jam.14459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif A, Zhang F, Li P, et al. Fengycin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 inhibits Fusarium graminearum growth and mycotoxins biosynthesis. Toxins. 2019;11(5):295. doi: 10.3390/toxins11050295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baindara P, Korpole S. Lipopeptides: status and strategies to control fungal infection. In: Basak A, Chakraborty R, Mandal S. editors. Recent trends in antifungal agents and antifungal therapy. New Delhi, India: Springer Nature, 2016. p. 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Suneeta P, Aiyanathan KEA, Nakkeeran S. Bacillomycins–the effective molecules in plant disease management. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7(2):823–835. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2018.702.104.
   Google Scholar
• Lim SM, Yoon M-Y, Choi GJ, et al. Diffusible and volatile antifungal compounds produced by an antagonistic Bacillus velezensis G341 against various phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Pathol J. 2017;33(5):488–498. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.04.2017.0073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao S, Chen N, Chai Z, et al. Secondary metabolites from marine-derived Bacillus: a comprehensive review of origins, structures, and bioactivities. Mar Drugs. 2022;20(9):567. doi: 10.3390/md20090567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin P, Wang H, Tan Z, et al. Antifungal mechanism of bacillomycin D from Bacillus velezensis HN-2 against Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Penz. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2020;163:102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Q, Zhang C, Lu F, et al. Identification of bacillomycin D from Bacillus subtilis fmbJ and its inhibition effects against Aspergillus flavus. Food Control. 2014;36(1):8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.07.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mácha H, Marešová H, Juříková T, et al. Killing effect of Bacillus velezensis FZB42 on a Xanthomonas campestris pv. Campestris (Xcc) strain newly isolated from cabbage Brassica oleracea Convar. capitata (L.): a metabolomic study. Microorganisms. 2021;9(7):1410. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9071410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Li B, Zhang N, et al. Production of bacillomycin-and macrolactin-type antibiotics by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 for suppressing soilborne plant pathogens. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(12):2976–2981. doi: 10.1021/jf204868z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Shao J, Li B, et al. Contribution of bacillomycin D in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to antifungal activity and biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(3):808–815. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02645-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao R, Cai Y, He P, et al. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens YN201732 produces lipopeptides with promising biocontrol activity against fungal pathogen Erysiphe cichoracearum. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:598999. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.598999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Q, Yang Y, Yuan Q, et al. Bacillomycin D produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens is involved in the antagonistic interaction with the plant-pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(19):e01075–01017. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01075-17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna-Bulbarela A, Tinoco-Valencia R, Corzo G, et al. Effects of bacillomycin D homologues produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 83 on growth and viability of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides at different physiological stages. Biol Control. 2018;127:145–154. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo C, Liu J, Bilal M, et al. Extracellular lipopeptide bacillomycin L regulates serial expression of genes for modulating multicellular behavior in Bacillus velezensis Bs916. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105(18):6853–6870. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11524-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Mandic-Mulec I, Zhang H, et al. Antibiotic bacillomycin D affects iron acquisition and biofilm formation in Bacillus velezensis through a Btr-mediated FeuABC-dependent pathway. Cell Rep. 2019;29(5):1192.e1195–1202.e1195. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarojini V, Cameron AJ, Varnava KG, et al. Cyclic tetrapeptides from nature and design: a review of synthetic methodologies, structure, and function. Chem Rev. 2019;119(17):10318–10359. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choub V, Maung CEH, Won S-J, et al. Antifungal activity of cyclic tetrapeptide from Bacillus velezensis CE 100 against plant pathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Pathogens. 2021;10(2):209. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzón-Espinosa A, Martinez-Matamoros D, Castellanos L, et al. Cereusitin A, a cyclic tetrapeptide from a Bacillus cereus strain isolated from the soft coral Antillogorgia (syn. Pseudopterogorgia) elisabethae. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017;58(7):634–637. doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim TY, Hwang SH, Noh JS, et al. Antifungal potential of Bacillus velezensis CE 100 for the control of different Colletotrichum species through isolation of active dipeptide, cyclo-(D-phenylalanyl-D-prolyl). Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7786. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong M-H, Lee Y-S, Cho J-Y, et al. Isolation and characterization of metabolites from Bacillus licheniformis MH48 with antifungal activity against plant pathogens. Microb Pathog. 2017;110:645–653. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.07.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May JJ, Wendrich TM, Marahiel MA. The dhb operon of Bacillus subtilis encodes the biosynthetic template for the catecholic siderophore 2, 3-dihydroxybenzoate-glycine-threonine trimeric ester bacillibactin. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(10):7209–7217. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M009140200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nithyapriya S, Lalitha S, Sayyed R, et al. Production, purification, and characterization of bacillibactin siderophore of Bacillus subtilis and its application for improvement in plant growth and oil content in sesame. Sustainability. 2021;13(10):5394. doi: 10.3390/su13105394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukushima T, Allred BE, Sia AK, et al. Gram-positive siderophore-shuttle with iron-exchange from Fe-siderophore to apo-siderophore by Bacillus cereus YxeB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(34):13821–13826. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304235110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbee MF, Ali MS, Choi J, et al. Bacillus velezensis: a valuable member of bioactive molecules within plant microbiomes. Molecules. 2019;24(6):1046. doi: 10.3390/molecules24061046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhao D, Qi G, et al. Effects of Bacillus velezensis FKM10 for promoting the growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. and inhibiting Fusarium verticillioides. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:2889. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesaulya H, Hasinu J, Tuhumury GN. Potential of Bacillus spp produces siderophores insuppressing thewilt disease of banana plants. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2018;102:012016. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/102/1/012016.
   Google Scholar
• Shin J-H, Park B-S, Kim H-Y, et al. Antagonistic and plant growth-promoting effects of Bacillus velezensis BS1 isolated from rhizosphere soil in a pepper field. Plant Pathol J. 2021;37(3):307–314. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.03.2021.0053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XH, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome sequence of the plant growth–promoting bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(9):1007–1014. doi: 10.1038/nbt1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunyashev T, Laptev GY, Yildirim E, et al. Identification of genes associated with the synthesis of siderophores by the Bacillus subtilis. J Livest Sci. 2021;12(4):287–291. doi: 10.33259/JLivestSci.2021.287-291.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty K, Francis A, Chakraborty RD, et al. Marine macroalga-associated heterotrophic Bacillus velezensis: a novel antimicrobial agent with siderophore mode of action against drug-resistant nosocomial pathogens. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(9):5561–5575. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02513-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty K, Kizhakkekalam VK, Joy M, et al. Bacillibactin class of siderophore antibiotics from a marine symbiotic Bacillus as promising antibacterial agents. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(1):329–340. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11632-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw MA, Falkiner FR. Bacteriocins: nature, function and structure. Micron. 1996;27(6):467–479. doi: 10.1016/s0968-4328(96)00028-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinter R, Milner J, Walker D. Bacteriocins active against plant pathogenic bacteria. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40(6):1498–1502. doi: 10.1042/BST20120206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abriouel H, Franz CM, Omar NB, et al. Diversity and applications of Bacillus bacteriocins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(1):201–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00244.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz R, Molohon KJ, Nachtigall J, et al. Plantazolicin, a novel microcin B17/streptolysin S-like natural product from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Bacteriol. 2011;193(1):215–224. doi: 10.1128/JB.00784-10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz R, Vater J, Budiharjo A, et al. Amylocyclicin, a novel circular bacteriocin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(10):1842–1852. doi: 10.1128/JB.01474-14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt K, Schimana J, Müller J, et al. Screening for biologically active metabolites with endosymbiotic Bacilli isolated from arthropods. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;217(2):199–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11475.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghanifar S, Keyhanfar M, Emtiazi G. Production and partial purification of thermostable bacteriocins from Bacillus pumilus ZED17 and DFAR8 strains with antifungal activity. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2019;8:41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray E, Lee K, Souleimanov A, et al. A novel bacteriocin, thuricin 17, produced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria strain Bacillus thuringiensis NEB17: isolation and classification. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100(3):545–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02822.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami I, Rhouma A, Jaouadi B, et al. Optimization and biochemical characterization of a bacteriocin from a newly isolated Bacillus subtilis strain 14B for biocontrol of Agrobacterium spp. strains. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009;48(2):253–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02524.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arguelles Arias A, Ongena M, Devreese B, et al. Characterization of amylolysin, a novel lantibiotic from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GA1. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e83037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazari M, Smith DL. A PGPR-produced bacteriocin for sustainable agriculture: a review of thuricin 17 characteristics and applications. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:916. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tareq FS, Kim JH, Lee MA, et al. Antimicrobial gageomacrolactins characterized from the fermentation of the marine-derived bacterium Bacillus subtilis under optimum growth conditions. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(14):3428–3434. doi: 10.1021/jf4009229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath CM, Scaglione JB, Kittendorf JD, et al. NRPS/PKS hybrid enzymes and their natural products. Vol. 1. Mander H-WBLL, editor. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier; 2010. p. 453–492.
   Google Scholar
• Chen K, Tian Z, Luo Y, et al. Antagonistic activity and the mechanism of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DH-4 against citrus green mold. Phytopathology. 2018;108(11):1253–1262. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-17-0032-R.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Chen C, Chen K, et al. Biocontrol and the mechanisms of Bacillus sp. w176 against postharvest green mold in citrus. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2020;159:111022. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.111022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-A, Song J-S, Kim PI, et al. Bacillus velezensis TSA32-1 as a promising agent for biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi. JoF. 2022;8(10):1053. doi: 10.3390/jof8101053.
   Google Scholar
• Um S, Fraimout A, Sapountzis P, et al. The fungus-growing termite Macrotermes natalensis harbors bacillaene-producing Bacillus sp. that inhibit potentially antagonistic fungi. Sci Rep. 2013;3(1):3250. doi: 10.1038/srep03250.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Z, Zhang R, Wang D, et al. Enhanced control of cucumber wilt disease by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SQR9 by altering the regulation of its DegU phosphorylation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(9):2941–2950. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03943-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miras M, Dubnau D. A DegU-P and DegQ-dependent regulatory pathway for the K-state in Bacillus subtilis. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1868. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erega A, Stefanic P, Dogsa I, et al. Bacillaene mediates the inhibitory effect of Bacillus subtilis on Campylobacter jejuni biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(12):e02955–e02920. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02955-20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Koumoutsi A, Scholz R, et al. Genome analysis of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 reveals its potential for biocontrol of plant pathogens. J Biotechnol. 2009;140(1-2):27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.10.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Tang X-X, Yan X, et al. A new macrolactin antibiotic from deep sea-derived bacteria Bacillus subtilis B5. Nat Prod Res. 2016;30(24):2777–2782. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2016.1155576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AB, Ott GR. Total synthesis of (−)-macrolactin A. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118(51):13095–13096. doi: 10.1021/ja963543a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Li Y, Yuan Y, et al. Identification of non-volatile and volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus siamensis LZ88 and their antifungal activity against Alternaria alternata. Biol Control. 2022;169:104901. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.104901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni J, Yu L, Li F, et al. Macrolactin R from Bacillus siamensis and its antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2023;39(5):117. doi: 10.1007/s11274-023-03563-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Raza W, Shen Q, et al. Antifungal activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6 volatile compounds against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78(16):5942–5944. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01357-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Zhang F, Wu Y, et al. Recovery of several cell pellet-associated antibiotics produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NJN-6. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2014;59(2):169–176. doi: 10.1111/lam.12260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tojo S, Kim J-Y, Tanaka Y, et al. The mthA mutation conferring low-level resistance to streptomycin enhances antibiotic production in Bacillus subtilis by increasing the S-adenosylmethionine Pool size. J Bacteriol. 2014;196(8):1514–1524. doi: 10.1128/JB.01441-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazle Rabbee M, Baek K-H. Antimicrobial activities of lipopeptides and polyketides of Bacillus velezensis for agricultural applications. Molecules. 2020;25(21):4973. doi: 10.3390/molecules25214973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker JB, Walsh CT. Action and timing of BacC and BacD in the late stages of biosynthesis of the dipeptide antibiotic bacilysin. Biochemistry. 2013;52(5):889–901. doi: 10.1021/bi3016229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajavel M, Mitra A, Gopal B. Role of Bacillus subtilis BacB in the synthesis of bacilysin. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(46):31882–31892. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.014522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Li X, Wu H, et al. Research advances on Bacilysin from Bacillus. J Nanjing Agric Univ. 2018;41:778–783.
   Google Scholar
• Han X, Shen D, Xiong Q, et al. The plant-beneficial rhizobacterium Bacillus velezensis FZB42 controls the soybean pathogen Phytophthora sojae due to bacilysin production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021;87(23):e01601–e01621. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01601-21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palazzini JM, Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, et al. Bacillus velezensis RC 218 as a biocontrol agent to reduce Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation: genome sequencing and secondary metabolite cluster profiles. Microbiol Res. 2016;192:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.06.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Afsharmanesh H, Perez-Garcia A, Zeriouh H, et al. Aflatoxin degradation by Bacillus subtilis UTB1 is based on production of an oxidoreductase involved in bacilysin biosynthesis. Food Control. 2018;94:48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wu H, Chen L, et al. Difficidin and bacilysin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 have antibacterial activity against Xanthomonas oryzae rice pathogens. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12975. doi: 10.1038/srep12975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Wu H, Chen L, et al. Bacilysin overproduction in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 markerless derivative strains FZBREP and FZBSPA enhances antibacterial ­activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(10):4255–4263. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6251-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im SM, Yu NH, Joen HW, et al. Biological control of ­tomato bacterial wilt by oxydifficidin and difficidin-producing Bacillus methylotrophicus DR-08. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2020;163:130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondol MAM, Shin HJ, Islam MT. Diversity of secondary metabolites from marine bacillus species: chemistry and biological activity. Mar Drugs. 2013;11(8):2846–2872. doi: 10.3390/md11082846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olishevska S, Nickzad A, Restieri C, et al. Bacillus velezensis and Paenibacillus peoriae strains effective as biocontrol agents against Xanthomonas bacterial spot. Appl Microbiol. 2023;3(3):1101–1119. doi: 10.3390/applmicrobiol3030076.
   Google Scholar
• Zweerink MM, Edison A. Difficidin and oxydifficidin: novel broad spectrum antibacterial antibiotics produced by Bacillus subtilis III. Mode of action of difficidin. J Antibiot. 1987;40(12):1692–1697. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.40.1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani A, Rana A, Dhaka RK, et al. Bacterial volatile organic compounds as biopesticides, growth promoters and plant-defense elicitors: current understanding and future scope. Biotechnol Adv. 2023;63:108078. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida OAC, de Araujo NO, Mulato ATN, et al. Bacterial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) promote growth and induce metabolic changes in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1056082. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1056082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heenan-Daly D, Coughlan S, Dillane E, et al. Volatile compounds from Bacillus, Serratia, and Pseudomonas promote growth and alter the transcriptional landscape of Solanum tuberosum in a passively ventilated growth system. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:628437. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.628437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo H, Mendiara I, Arias E, et al. Antifungal activity of the volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus velezensis strains against postharvest fungal pathogens. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2020;166:111208. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Z, Zhang B, Liu H, et al. Identification of endophytic Bacillus velezensis ZSY-1 strain and antifungal activity of its volatile compounds against Alternaria solani and Botrytis cinerea. Biol Control. 2017;105:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Xiao X, Wang J, et al. Antagonistic effects of volatiles generated by Bacillus subtilis on spore germination and hyphal growth of the plant pathogen, Botrytis cinerea. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30(5):919–923. doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9626-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrebola E, Sivakumar D, Korsten L. Effect of volatile compounds produced by Bacillus strains on postharvest decay in citrus. Biol Control. 2010;53(1):122–128. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asari S, Matzén S, Petersen MA, et al. Multiple effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens volatile compounds: plant growth promotion and growth inhibition of phytopathogens. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92(6):fiw070. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W-W, Wei M, Zhu B-Y, et al. Antagonistic activities of volatiles from four strains of Bacillus spp. and Paenibacillus spp. against soil-borne plant pathogens. Agric Sci China. 2008;7(9):1104–1114. doi: 10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60153-4.
   Google Scholar
• He C-N, Ye W-Q, Zhu Y-Y, et al. Antifungal activity of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus methylotrophicus and Bacillus thuringiensis against five common spoilage fungi on loquats. Molecules. 2020;25(15):3360. doi: 10.3390/molecules25153360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Méndez-Bravo A, Cortazar-Murillo EM, Guevara-Avendaño E, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria associated with avocado display antagonistic activity against Phytophthora cinnamomi through volatile emissions. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0194665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamante MI, Elfar K, Eskalen A. Evaluation of the ­antifungal activity of endophytic and rhizospheric ­bacteria against grapevine trunk pathogens. Microorganisms. 2022;10(10):2035. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10102035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li B, Wang Y, et al. Lipopeptides, a novel protein, and volatile compounds contribute to the antifungal activity of the biocontrol agent Bacillus atrophaeus CAB-1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(21):9525–9534. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5198-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enebak S, Carey W. Evidence for induced systemic protection to fusiform rust in loblolly pine by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Plant Dis. 2000;84(3):306–308. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2000.84.3.306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu D-D, Liu H-X, Jiang C-H, et al. The plant growth–promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus cereus AR156 induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana by simultaneously activating salicylate-and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent signaling pathways. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2011;24(5):533–542. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-10-0213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Gu Y, Li J, et al. Biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LJ02 induces systemic resistance against cucurbits powdery mildew. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:883. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargabus R, Zidack N, Sherwood J, et al. Screening for the identification of potential biological control agents that induce systemic acquired resistance in sugar beet. Biol Control. 2004;30(2):342–350. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2003.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-S, Lee J, Lee C-h, et al. Activation of pathogenesis-related genes by the rhizobacterium, Bacillus sp. JS, which induces systemic resistance in tobacco plants. Plant Pathol J. 2015;31(2):195–201. doi: 10.5423/PPJ.NT.11.2014.0122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahir HAS, Gu Q, Wu H, et al. Bacillus volatiles adversely affect the physiology and ultra-structure of Ralstonia solanacearum and induce systemic resistance in tobacco against bacterial wilt. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):40481. doi: 10.1038/srep40481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang CJ, Tsay JF, Chang SY, et al. Dimethyl disulfide is an induced systemic resistance elicitor produced by Bacillus cereus C1L. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68(9):1306–1310. doi: 10.1002/ps.3301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu C-M, Farag MA, Hu C-H, et al. Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2004;134(3):1017–1026. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.026583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu CM, Hu CH, Reddy M, et al. Different signaling pathways of induced resistance by rhizobacteria in Arabidopsis thaliana against two pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae. New Phytol. 2003;160(2):413–420. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00883.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Moyne A-L, Reddy M, et al. The role of salicylic acid in induced systemic resistance elicited by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria against blue mold of tobacco. Biol Control. 2002;25(3):288–296. doi: 10.1016/S1049-9644(02)00108-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beth Mudgett M. New insights to the function of phytopathogenic bacterial type III effectors in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56(1):509–531. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han Q, Wu F, Wang X, et al. The bacterial lipopeptide iturins induce Verticillium dahliae cell death by affecting fungal signalling pathways and mediate plant defence responses involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity. Environ Microbiol. 2015;17(4):1166–1188. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakmakci R, Dönmez MF, Erdoğan Ü. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, some soil properties, and bacterial counts. Turk J Agric For. 2007;31:189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever JD, Platt TG, Morton ER. Microbial population and community dynamics on plant roots and their feedbacks on plant communities. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66(1):265–283. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092611-150107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szczech M, Shoda M. The effect of mode of application of Bacillus subtilis RB14-C on its efficacy as a biocontrol agent against Rhizoctonia solani. J Phytopathol. 2006;154(6):370–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2006.01107.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea-Molina PA, Pedraza-Herrera LA, Beauregard PB, et al. A biocontrol Bacillus velezensis strain decreases pathogen Burkholderia glumae population and occupies a similar niche in rice plants. Biol Control. 2022;176:105067. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas-Ruiz NE, Sansinenea-Royano E, Cedillo-Ramirez ML, et al. Analysis of Bacillus thuringiensis population dynamics and its interaction with Pseudomonas fluorescens in soil. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(9):e27953. doi: 10.5812/jjm.27953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veselova S, Burkhanova G, Rumyantsev S, et al. Strains of Bacillus spp. regulate wheat resistance to greenbug  aphid Schizaphis graminum Rond. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2019;55(1):41–47. doi: 10.1134/S0003683819010186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid MH-O, Khan A, Hossain MT, et al. Induction of systemic resistance against aphids by endophytic Bacillus velezensis YC7010 via expressing PHYTOALEXIN DEFICIENT4 in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:211. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Soto JH, Estrada-Hernández MG, Ibarra-Laclette E, et al. Inoculation of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) with growth-promoting Bacillus subtilis retards whitefly Bemisia tabaci development. Planta. 2010;231(2):397–410. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1061-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendran L, Ramanathan A, Durairaj C, et al. Endophytic Bacillus subtilis enriched with chitin offer induced systemic resistance in cotton against aphid infestation. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect. 2011;44(14):1375–1389. doi: 10.1080/03235408.2010.499719.
   Google Scholar
• Herman M, Nault B, Smart C. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on bell pepper production and green peach aphid infestations in New York. Crop Protect. 2008;27(6):996–1002. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2007.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehnder G, Kloepper J, Yao C, et al. Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against cucumber beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J Econ Entomol. 1997;90(2):391–396. doi: 10.1093/jee/90.2.391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar