Examining interwoven narratives: multidirectional memory between enslaved labourers and mill workers in Northern England heritage sites

References

• Arendt, H. 1968. “Collective Responsibility.” In Responsibility and Judgment, Edited by J. Kohn, 135–143. New York: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, S. L. T., and D. Stone, eds. 2023. Whose Heritage?: Challenging Race and Identity in Stuart Hall’s Post-Nation Britain. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, J. 2001. “The Marketing of Slavery.” In Slavery, Contested Heritage and Thanatourism, Edited by G. M. S. Dann and A. V. Seaton, 85–105. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bernier, C.-M., A. Rice, L. Himid, and H. Durkin. 2019. Inside the Invisible: Memorialising Slavery and Freedom in the Life and Works of Lubaina Himid. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, C. 2009. “The Development of Labor History in UK Museums and the People’s History Museum.” International Labor and Working-Class History 76 (1): 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0147547909990044.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 2022. “Beyond Abolition: Challenging the ‘un-visibility’ of enslavement-associated commerce in England and New England.” PhD diss, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 2023. “An Appeal to Supersede the Slave Trade Triangle in English Museums.” Atlantic Studies 20 (1): 33–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810.2021.1913969.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, B. 2003. “William Wilberforce’s Sentimental Rhetoric: Parliamentary Reportage and the Abolition Speech of 1789.” In The Age of Johnson: A Scholarly Annual, edited by P. J. Korshin and J. Lynch, 281–305. New York: AMS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craps, S. 2013. Postcolonial Witnessing: Trauma Out of Bonds. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cubitt, G. 2012. “Museums and Slavery in Britain: The Bicentenary of 1807.” In Politics of Memory: Making Slavery Visible in the Public Space, edited by A. L. Araujo, 159–177. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, C. 2017. “Illustrating a Point.” Interpretation Journal: Association for Heritage Interpretation 22 (1): 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Donington, K., R., Hanley, and J. Moody. 2016. “Introduction.” In Britain’s History and Memory of Transatlantic Slavery: Local Nuances of a ‘National Sin’, edited by K. Donington, R. Hanley, and J. Moody, 1–18. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, D. 2012. Solidarity: Hidden Histories and Geographies of Internationalism. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fitton, R. S., and A. P. Wadsworth. 1958. The Strutts and the Arkwrights 1758-1930: A Study of the Early Factory System. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, C. 2021. “Country Houses, Slavery, and the Victorians: Reinterpreting Heritage Sites.” In Black Neo-Victoriana, edited by F. E. Garrido, M. Tronicke, and J. Wacker, 230–249. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Garden, M.-C. E. 2006. “The Heritagescape: Looking at Landscapes of the Past.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (5): 394–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600821621.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, B., G. J. Ashworth, and J. E. Tunbridge. 2000. A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture & Economy. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, S. 2019. “What’s in a Price? The American Raw Cotton Market in Liverpool and the Anglo-American War.” Business History 61 (6): 942–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2018.1434146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, R. 2016. “Slavery and the Birth of Working-Class Racism in England, 1814-1833.” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 26:103–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080440116000074.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, J. A. 2012. “Introduction: ‘Victims of Slavery Even on the Threshold of Our homes’: Richard Oastler and Yorkshire Slavery.” In Slavery in Yorkshire: Richard Oastler and the Campaign Against Child Labor in the Industrial Revolution, edited by J. A. Hargreaves and E. A. H. Haigh, 1–40. Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inikori, J. E. 2002. Africans and the Industrial Revolution in England: A Study in International Trade and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, B. J. 2019. “Violence, Silence and the Four Truths: Towards Healing, in U.S.-American Historical Memory.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 25 (7): 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2018.1542333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matless, D. 2023. About England. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, B. R., and P. Deane. 1962. Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J. 2020. The Persistence of Memory: Remembering Slavery in Liverpool, ‘Slavery Capital of the World’. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. 2016. “Multidirectional Memory, Many-Headed Hydras and Glasgow.” In Britain’s History and Memory of Transatlantic Slavery: Local Nuances of a ‘National Sin’, edited by K. Donington, R. Hanley, and J. Moody, 195–215. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. 2018. “The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Improvement: David Dale, Robert Owen and New Lanark Cotton.” In Cultures of Improvement in Scottish Romanticism 1707-1840, edited by A. Benchimol and G. Lee, 111–131. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oldfield, J., and M. Wills. 2021. “Remembering 1807: Lessons from the Archives.” History Workshop Journal 90:253–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbaa016.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, A. 2007. “The COTTON THAT CONNECTS, the CLOTH THAT BINDS: Manchester’s Civil War, Abe’s Statue, and Lubaina Himid’s Transnational Polemic.” Atlantic Studies 4 (2): 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14788810701596851.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, A. 2010. Creating Memorials, Building Identities: The Politics of Memory in the Black Atlantic. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, A. 2017. “Vagrant Presences: Lost Children, and the Black Atlantic and Northern Britain.” Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 65 (2): 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2017-0019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riello, G. 2013. Cotton: The Fabric That Made the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roediger, D. 2016. “Making Solidarity Uneasy: Cautions on a Keyword from Black Lives Matter to the Past.” American Quarterly 68 (2): 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2016.0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. 2016. Interpreting Difficult History at Museums and Historic Sites. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. 2009. Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. 2013. “Multidirectional Memory and the Implicated Subject: On Sebald and Kentridge.” In Performing Memory in Art and Popular Culture, edited by L. Plate and A. Smelik, 39–58. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rothberg, M. 2019. The Implicated Subject: Beyond Victims and Perpetrators. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, P. X. 2020. Slave Empire: How Slavery Built Modern Britain. London: Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Seaton, A. V. 2001. “Sources of Slavery – Destinations of Slavery: The Silences and Disclosures of Slavery Heritage in the UK and US.” In Slavery, Contested Heritage and Thanatourism, edited by M. S. D. Graham and A. V. Seaton, 107–129. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, S., L., Jones, and J. Feuer-Cotter. 2015. “The Global Connections of Cotton in the Derwent Valley Mills in the Later Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries.” In The Industrial Revolution: Cromford, the Derwent Valley and the Wider World, edited by C. Wrigley, 150–170. Cromford: The Arkwright Society.
   Google Scholar
• Shackel, P. A. 2013. “‘Where We Need to go’: Comments on ‘Decennial Reflections on a Geography of Heritage ’.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (4): 384–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2012.695132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. 2010. “‘Man’s Inhumanity to man’ and Other Platitudes of Avoidance and Misrecognition: An Analysis of Visitor Responses to Exhibitions Marking the 1807 Bicentenary.” Museum & Society 8 (3): 197–198.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., G. Cubitt, R. Wilson, and K. Fouseki, eds. 2011. Representing Enslavement and Abolition in Museums: Ambiguous Engagements. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sobers, S. 2020. “Colonial Complexity in the British Landscape: An African-Centric Autoethnography.” In The Routledge Handbook of Memory and Place, edited by S. De Nardi, H. Orange, S. High, and E. Koskinen-Koivisto, 42–51. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. 2020. The Interest: How the British Establishment Resisted the Abolition of Slavery. London: The Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Till, K. E. 2005. The New Berlin: Memory, Politics, Place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. 2010. “Significant Silence: Where Was Slave Agency in the Popular Imagery of 2007?” In Imagining Transatlantic Slavery, edited by C. Kaplan and J. Oldfield, 162–190. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar