Where did all the money go? Funding, personnel and expenditure in Swedish universities and colleges 2001–21

References

• Altbach, P.G. & McGill Peterson, P., 2007, Higher Education in the New Century: Global challenges and innovative ideas (Rotterdam, Sense Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. & Spicer, A., 2016, ‘(Un)conditional surrender? Why do professionals willingly comply with managerialism’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(1), pp. 29–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askling, B., 1989, ‘Structural uniformity and functional diversification: Swedish higher education ten years after the higher education reform’, Higher Education Quarterly, 43(4), pp. 289–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzun, J., 1969, The American University. How it runs, where it is going (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Benner, M. & Sandström, U., 2000, ‘Inertia and change in Scandinavian public-sector research systems: the case of biotechnology’, Science and Public Policy, 27(6), pp. 443–54.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, M. & Sörlin, S., 2007, ‘Shaping strategic research: power, resources, and interests in Swedish research policy’, Minerva, 45, pp. 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E.P., 2012, Creating the Market University. How academic science became an economic engine (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W.G., 1967, The Economics of the Major Private Research Universities (Berkeley, CA, Carnegie Commission on Higher Education).
   Google Scholar
• Broström, A., Feldmann, A. & Kaulio, M., 2019, ‘Structured relations between higher education institutions and external organisations: opportunity or bureaucratisation?’, Higher Education, 78, pp. 575–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collini, S., 2012, What Are Universities For? (London, Penguin).
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R.G., 2002, Tuition Rising. Why college costs so much (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ek, A.-C., Ideland, M., Jönsson, S. & Malmberg, C., 2013, ‘The tension between marketisation and academisation in higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), pp. 1305–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, M., Lindgren, M. & Packendorff, J., 2018, ‘Universities need leadership, academics need management: discursive tensions and voids in the deregulation of Swedish higher education legislation’, Higher Education, 75, pp. 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elzinga, A., 1993, ‘Universities, research and the transformation of the state in Sweden’, in Rothblatt, S. & Wittrock, B. (Eds.) The European and American University Since 1800. Historical and sociological essays, pp. 191–233 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Engwall, L. & Nybom, T., 2007, ‘The visible hand versus the invisible hand: the allocation of research resources in Swedish universities’, in Whitley, R. & Gläser, J. (Eds.), 2007, The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems, pp. 31–49 (Heidelberg, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, B., 2012, The Fall of the Faculty. The Rise of the all-administrative university and why it matters (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D., 2015, The Utopia of Rules. On technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy (New York, Melville House).
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D., 2018, Bullshit Jobs. A theory (London, Penguin).
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, A. & Jacobsson, S., 2006, ‘Myths or reality—a scrutiny of dominant beliefs in the Swedish science policy debate’, Science and Public Policy, 33(5), pp. 321–40.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D.S., 2007, Science for Sale: The perils, rewards, and delusions of campus capitalism (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gribbe, J. & Hallonsten, O., 2017, ‘The emergence and growth of materials science in Swedish universities’, Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 47(4), pp. 459–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action. Volume 1. Reason and the rationalization of society (Cambridge, UK, Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O. & Christensson, O., 2017, ‘Collaborative technological innovation in an academic, user-oriented big science facility’, Industry and Higher Education, 31(6), pp. 399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O. & Hugander, O., 2014, ‘Supporting “future research leaders” in Sweden: institutional isomorphism and inadvertent funding agglomeration’, Research Evaluation, 23, pp. 249–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O. & Silander, C., 2012, ‘Commissioning the university of excellence: Swedish research policy and new public research funding programmes’, Quality in Higher Education, 18(3), pp. 367–81.
   Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O., 2018, ‘Development and transformation of the third sector of R&D in Sweden, 1942–2017’, Science and Public Policy, 45(5), pp. 634–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O., 2020, The Campaign. How a European big science facility ended up on the peripheral farmlands of Southern Sweden (Lund, Arkiv Academic Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hallonsten, O., 2021, ‘Stop evaluating science: a historical-sociological argument’, Social Science Information, 60(1), pp. 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E., 2011, Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education. The battle for world-class excellence (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, D. & Hallonsten, O., 2015, ‘Policy reform and academic drift: research mission and institutional legitimacy in the development of the Swedish higher education system 1977–2012’, European Journal of Higher Education, 5(2), pp. 181–96.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansta, C. & Jacob, M., 2016, ‘Mode 2 and the tension between excellence and utility: the case of a policy-relevant research field in Sweden’, Minerva, 54, pp. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, S. & Ryttberg, M., 2016, ‘Those who walk the talk: the role of administrative professionals in transforming universities into strategic actors’, Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2–3, article 31537.
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, G. & Meier, F., 2006, ‘Turning the university into an organizational actor’, in Drori, G.S., Meyer, J.W. & Hwang, H. (Eds.), 2006, Globalization and Organization: World society and organizational change, pp. 241–57 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kyvik, S., 2004, ‘Structural changes in higher education systems in Western Europe’, Higher Education in Europe, 19(3), pp. 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Magala, S., 2009, The Management of Meaning in Organizations (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B.R., 2011, ‘The research excellence framework and the “impact agenda”: are we creating a Frankenstein monster?’, Research Evaluation, 20(3), pp. 247–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, S., 2005, ‘Implementing the triple helix: the academic response to changing university-industry-government relations in Sweden’, in Gornitzka, Å., Kogan, M. & Amaral, A. (Eds.), 2005, Reform and Change in Higher Education, pp. 325–42 (Heidelberg, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Münch, R., 2014, Academic Capitalism. Universities in the global struggle for excellence (London, Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, C.N., 1957, Parkinson’s Law and Other Studies in Administration (Boston, Houghton Mifflin).
   Google Scholar
• Readings, B., 1996, The University in Ruins (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rider, S., Hasselberg, Y. & Waluszewski, A., 2013, Transformations in Research, Higher Education and the Academic Market. The breakdown of scientific thought (Heidelberg, Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Silander, C. & Haake, U., 2017, ‘Gold-diggers, supporters and inclusive profilers: strategies for profiling research in Swedish higher education’, Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), pp. 2009–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sköldberg, K., 1991, ‘Strategic change in Swedish higher education’, Higher Education, 21, pp. 551–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S., 2010, The Evolution of Modern States. Sweden, Japan, and the United States (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B. & Benner, M., 2013, ‘Doomed to be entrepreneurial: institutional transformation or institutional lock-ins of “new” universities?’, Minerva, 51, pp. 399–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, T., 2016, ‘The Swedish model of industrial relations’, in Pierre, J. (Ed.), 2016, The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics, pp. 612–27 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Teelken, C., 2012, ‘Compliance or pragmatism: how do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? A comparative study in three countries’, Studies in Higher Education, 37(3), pp. 271–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., [1905], 2003, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London, Dover).
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, B., 2010, The Great Brain Race (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar