Assessing the risk of users of child sexual exploitation material committing further offences: a scoping review

References

• Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. (2011). An overview of the federal post conviction risk assessment. Administrative Office of the U.S.
   Google Scholar
• Allely, C. S., & Dubin, L. (2018). The contributory role of autism symptomology in child pornography offending: Why there is an urgent need for empirical research in this area. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 9(4), 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIDOB-06-2018-0008
   Google Scholar
• *Allely, C. S., Kennedy, S., & Warren, I. (2019). A legal analysis of Australian criminal cases involving defendants with autism spectrum disorder charged with online sexual offending. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 66, Article 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (1995). The LSI-OR: Interview and scoring guide. Ontario Ministry of Solicitor General and Correctional Services.
   Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, R. K., & VanZuylen, H. (2015). Online child pornography offenders are different: A meta-analysis of the characteristics of online and offline sex offenders against children. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0270-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babchishin, K. M., Merdian, H. L., Bartels, R. M., & Perkins, D. (2018). Child sexual exploitation materials offenders: A review. European Psychologist, 23(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Barnett, G. D., Wakeling, H. C., & Howard, P. D. (2010). An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and Wales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(4), 443–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210384274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Black, C., Christofferson, S., & Grace, R. (2018). Predicting recidivism among an adult male child sexual abuse imagery offender population with the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool Short Version (CPORT- SV): A New Zealand validation study [Master of Science in Psychology thesis, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/handle/10092/15944
   Google Scholar
• *Bourke, M. L., Fragomeli, L., Detar, P. J., Sullivan, M. A., Meyle, E., & O’Riordan, M. (2015). The use of tactical polygraph with sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.886729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brankley, A. E., Babchishin, K. M., & Hanson, R. K. (2021). STABLE-2007 demonstrates predictive and incremental validity in assessing risk-relevant propensities for sexual offending: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 33(1), 34–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063219871572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brennan, M., & Hammond, S. (2017). A methodology for profiling paraphilic interest in child sexual exploitation material users on peer-to-peer networks. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1241308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Buschman, J., & Bogaerts, S. (2009). Polygraph testing internet offenders. In D. Wilcox (Ed.), The use of the polygraph in assessing, treating and supervising sex offenders: A practitioner's guide (pp. 113–128). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• *Buschman, J., Bogaerts, S., Foulger, S., Wilcox, D., Sosnowski, S., & Cushman, B. (2010). Sexual history disclosure polygraph examinations with cybercrime offences: A first Dutch explorative study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(3), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X09334942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Buschman, J., Wilcox, D., Krapohl, D., Oelrich, M., & Hackett, S. (2010). Cybersex offender risk assessment. An explorative study. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552601003690518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Centre for Child Protection. (2017). Survivors’ survey: Executive summary. CCCP. https://protectchildren.ca/en/resources-research/survivors-survey-results/
   Google Scholar
• *Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre. (2012). A picture of abuse: A thematic assessment of the risk of contact child sexual abuse posed by those who posses indecent images of children. https://www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/a-picture-of-abuse-a-thematic-assessment-of-the-risk-of-contact-child-sexual-abuse-posed-by-those-who-possess-indecent-images-of-children-executive-summary/r/a11G00000017xruIAA
   Google Scholar
• *Cohen, T. (2018). Predicting sex offender recidivism: Using the federal post conviction risk assessment instrument to assess the likelihood of recidivism among federal sex offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 15(3), 456–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cohen, T. H., & Spidell, M. C. (2016). How dangerous are they? An analysis of sex offenders under federal post-conviction supervision. Federal Probation Journal, 80(2), 21–32. https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/usct10024-fedprobation-sept2016_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dombert, B., Schmidt, A. F., Banse, R., Briken, P., Hoyer, J., Neutze, J., & Osterheider, M. (2016). How common is men’s self-reported sexual interest in prepubescent children? The Journal of Sex Research, 53(2), 214–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1020108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eke, A. W., & Seto, M. C. (2016). Scoring guide for the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). https://www.researchgate.net/project/Child-Pornography-Offender-Risk-Tool-CPORT
   Google Scholar
• *Eke, A., Maaike, H., & Seto, M. (2019). A validation study of the child pornography offender risk tool (CPORT). Sexual Abuse, 31(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063218762434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, I. A., & Beech, A. R. (2009). Understanding online child pornography use: Applying sexual offense theory to internet offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, I. A., Beech, A. R., & Mandeville-Norden, R. (2013). The psychological profiles of internet, contact, and mixed internet/contact sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212439426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Elliott, I. A., Mandeville-Norden, R., & Beech, A. R. (2019). Reoffending rates in a U.K. community sample of individuals with convictions for indecent images of children. Law and Human Behavior, 43(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000328
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsevier. (2020). Mendeley. https://www.mendeley.com
   Google Scholar
• *Fortin, F., Paquette, S., & Leclerc, C. (2019). The effect of child sexual exploitation images collection size on offender sentencing. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 33(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2018.1560553
   Google Scholar
• *Gannon, T. A., Wood, J. L., Pina, A., Vasquez, E. A., & Fraser, I. (2012). The evaluation of the mandatory polygraph pilot (Ministry of Justice Research Series). https://insidetime.org/download/research_&_reports/ministry_of_justice/evaluation-of-mandatory-polygraph-pilot_MoJ-July12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Glasgow, D. (2010). The potential of digital evidence to contribute to risk assessment of internet offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903428839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Graham, S. (unpublished). Evidence-based practice-gaps and risks: Challenges for practitioners risk assessing internet sex offenders.
   Google Scholar
• Grubin, D., Kamenskov, M., Dwyer, R. G., & Stephenson, T. (2019). Post-conviction polygraph testing of sex offenders. International Review of Psychiatry, 32(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2018.1561428
   Google Scholar
• *Grubin, D., Joyce, A., & Holden, E. J. (2014). Polygraph testing of “low risk” offenders arrested for downloading indecent images of children. Sex Offender Treatment, 9(1). http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/131.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K. (2000). Will they do it again? Predicting sex-offense recidivism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J. R., Scott, T.-L., & Helmus, L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The dynamic supervision project (User Report No. 2007-05). Public Safety Canada. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/ssssng-rsk-sxl-ffndrs/index-en.aspx#a01
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2000). Improving risk assessment for sexual offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behaviour, 24(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005482921333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. S. (2016). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. In L. Craig & M. Rettenberger (Volume Eds.) & D. Boer (Series Ed.), The Wiley handbook on the theories, assessment, treatment of sexual offending: Volume II. Assessment (pp. 643–666). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Helmus, L.-M., Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K. M., & Harris, A. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by static-99R and static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(9), 1148–1171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812443648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P. (2015). OGRS4. The revised offender group reconviction scale. In R. Moore (Ed.), A compendium of research and analysis on the offender assessment system (OASys) 2009–2013 (Ministry of Justice Analytical Series, Unnumbered). Ministry of Justice. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-and-analysis-on-the-offender-assessment-system
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P., Francis, B., Soothill, K., & Humphreys, L. (2009). OGRS 3: The revised offender group reconviction scale (Research Summary 7/09). Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, P. D., & Barnett, G. D. (2015). The development and validation of the OASys sexual reoffending predictor (OSP). In R. Moore (Ed.), A compendium of research and analysis on the offender assessment system (OASys) 2009–2013 (Ministry of Justice Analytical Series, Unnumbered). Ministry of Justice. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-and-analysis-on-the-offender-assessment-system
   Google Scholar
• *Howard, P. D., Barnett, G. D., & Mann, R. (2014). Specialization in and within sexual offending in England and Wales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 26(3), 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213486934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Howard, P. D., & Wakeling, H. C. (2021). Comparing two predictors of sexual recidivism: The Risk Matrix 2000 and the OASys Sexual Reoffending Predictor (Ministry of Justice Analytical Series 2021). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/955345/comparing-2-predictors-sexual-recidivism.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., Lowenkamp, C. T., VanBenschoten, S. W., & Robinson, C. (2011). The construction and validation of the federal post conviction risk assessment (PCRA). Federal Probation, 75(2), 16–29. https://www.uscourts.gov/federal-probation-journal/2011/09/construction-and-validation-federal-post-conviction-risk
   Google Scholar
• Lanning, K. (2001). Child molesters and cyber pedophiles – a behavioral perspective. In R. R. Hazelwood & A. Wolbert Burgess (Eds.), Practical aspects of rape investigation (pp. 199–220). CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• *Long, M., Alison, L., Tejeiro, R., Hendricks, E., & Giles, S. (2016). KIRAT: Law enforcement’s prioritization tool for investigating indecent image offenders. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 22(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Long, M. L., Alison, L. A., & McManus, M. A. (2012). Child pornography and likelihood of contact abuse: A comparison between contact child sexual offenders and noncontact offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(4), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063212464398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Johnson, J., VanBenschoten, S. W., Robinson, C., & Holsinger, A. M. (2013). The federal post conviction risk assessment (PCRA): A construction and validation study. Psychological Services, 10(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McManus, M. A., Long, M. L., Alison, L. A., & Almond, L. (2015). Factors associated with contact child sexual abuse in a sample of indecent image offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(3), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2014.927009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice and HM Prison and Probation Service. (2021). Implementation and use of OASys Sexual Reoffending Predictor (OSP) policy framework. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/implementation-and-use-of-oasys-sexual-reoffending-predictor-osp-policy-framework
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, L. (2012). A comparison of offence history and post-release outcomes for sexual offenders against children in New Zealand who attended or did not attend the Kia Marama Special Treatment Unit. Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury.
   Google Scholar
• *Osborn, J., Elliott, I. A., Middleton, D., & Beech, A. R. (2010). The use of actuarial risk assessment measures with UK internet child pornography offenders. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 2(3), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.5042/jacpr.2010.0333
   Google Scholar
• *Pilon, A. (2016). The predictive validity of the general and offence-specific risk assessment tools for child pornography offenders’ reoffending [Master of Arts thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada]. Retrieved from https://harvest.usask.ca/handle/10388/ETD-2016-01-2414
   Google Scholar
• Quayle, E., Allegro, S., Hutton, L., Sheath, M., & Lööf, L. (2014). Rapid skill acquisition and online sexual grooming of children. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quayle, E., & Taylor, M. (2002). Child pornography and the internet: Perpetuating a cycle of abuse. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(4), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620290086413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M., Wong, W. K. T., Breckenridge, J., Scott, S., Cooper, S., & Peleg, N. (2021). Production and distribution of child sexual abuse material by parental figures. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.720089825405188. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savoie, V., Quayle, E., Flynn, E., & O’Rourke, S. (2021). Predicting risk of reoffending in persons with child sexual exploitation material offense histories: The use of child pornography offender risk tool in a Scottish population. Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10790632211047190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Savoie, V. (2020). Predicting risk of reoffending in child sexual exploitation material offenders: The use of Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool in a Scottish population [Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, University of Edinburgh]. https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/37284
   Google Scholar
• Seto, M. C., Hanson, R. K., & Babchishin, K. M. (2011). Contact sexual offending by men with online sexual offenses. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23(1), 124–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210369013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto, M. C., Reeve, L., & Jung, S. (2010). Explanations given by child pornography offenders for their crimes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903572396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Seto, M. C., & Eke, A. (2005). The criminal histories and later offending of child pornography offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320501700209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Seto, M. C., & Eke, A. (2015). Predicting recidivism among adult male child pornography offenders: Development of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool (CPORT). Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Seto, M. C., & Eke, A. (2017). Correlates of admitted sexual interest in children among individuals convicted of child pornography offenses. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sheehan, B. J., & Leone, M. C. (2013). Courts caught in the web: Fixing a failed system with factors designed for sentencing child pornography offenders [Masters of Judicial Studies thesis, University of Nevada].
   Google Scholar
• *Smid, W., Schepers, K., Kamphuis, J. H., van Linden, S., & Bartling, S. (2015). Prioritizing child pornography notifications: Predicting direct victimization. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(4), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063213514453
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Soldino, V., Carbonell-Vayá, E. J., & Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2021). Spanish validation of the child pornography offender risk tool. Sexual Abuse, 33(5), 503–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063220928958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surjadi, B., Bullens, R., van Horn, J., & Bogaerts, S. (2010). Internet offending: Sexual and non-sexual functions within a Dutch sample. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600903470054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, D. (2010). Scoring guide for risk matrix 2000.10/SVC. Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Underhill, R. (2017). Highly emotionally congruent sex offenders against children display correlates of sexual deviancy. Batchelor of Arts Honours Degree, Carleton University.
   Google Scholar
• *Wakeling, H. C., Howard, P., & Barnett, G. (2011). Comparing the validity of the RM2000 scales and OGRS3 for predicting recidivism by internet sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23(1), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210375974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Webb, L., Craissati, J., & Keen, S. (2007). Characteristics of internet child pornography offenders: A comparison with child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005). Child pornography possessors arrested in internet-related crimes: Findings from the national juvenile online victimization study. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/jvq/CV81.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Wood, J. L., Alleyne, E., Ó Ciardha, C., & Gannon, T. A. (2020). An evaluation of polygraph testing by police to manage individuals convicted or suspected of sexual offending. University of Kent. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/81207/
   Google Scholar