Attitudes towards and perceptions of females who sexually offend against children: a comparison between students and professionals

References

• Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Hames, C. (2014). They treat US like human beings: Experiencing a therapeutic sex offender prison: Impact on prisoners and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(4), 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14553227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brayford, J. (2012). Female sexual offending: An impermissible crime. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 14(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2012.5
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise & Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 4(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532599167879
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, M. (2020). Quantitative analysis of public perceptions of female sex offenders (9335.) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/9335
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. S. (2018). The new portrayal of female child sexual offenders in the print media: A qualitative content analysis. Sexuality & Culture, 22(1), 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-017-9459-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, W. T., Wakeman, E. E., Miller, S. L., Clements, C. B., & Sun, F. (2008). The community attitudes toward sex offenders scale: The development of a psychometric assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507310193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, H., Dawson, D. L., & Das Nair, R. (2014). Female-perpetrated sexual abuse: A review of victim and professional perspectives. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 20(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2013.798690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comartin, E. B., Kernsmith, P. D., & Kernsmith, R. M. (2009). Sanctions for sex offenders: Fear and public policy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48(7), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670903196066
   Google Scholar
• Cortoni, F., Babchishin, K. M., & Rat, C. (2017). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816658923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Schematic bases of belief change. In J. R. Eiser (Ed.), Attitudinal judgment (pp. 197–226). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Denov, M. S. (2001). A culture of denial: Exploring professional perspectives on female sex offending. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjcrim.43.3.303
   Google Scholar
• Denov, M. S. (2004). Perspectives on female sex offending: A culture of denial. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries Robbé, M., Mann, R. E., Maruna, S., & & Thornton, D. (2015). An exploration of protective factors supporting desistance from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse, 27(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214547582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedoroff, J. P., & Moran, B. (1997). Myths and misconceptions about sex offenders. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6(4), 263–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K., & Ireland, C. A. (2006). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the influence of offense type: A comparison of staff working in a forensic setting and students. The British Journal of Forensic Practice, 8(2), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636646200600009
   Google Scholar
• Gakhal, B. K., & Brown, S. J. (2011). A comparison of the general public's, forensic professionals’ and students’ attitudes towards female sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.540678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, T. A., & Rose, M. R. (2008). Female child sexual offenders: Towards integrating theory and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. (2012). In pursuit of the beast: Undergraduate attitudes towards sex offenders and implications for society, rehabilitation and British psychology education. Internet Journal of Criminology. Retrieved from: http://eprints.lincoln.ac.uk/id/eprint/11939/1/Harper_In_Pursuit_of_the_Beast_IJC_July_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Hogue, T. E. (2015). The emotional representation of sexual crime in the national British press. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 34(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14544474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Bartels, R. M. (2017). The influence of implicit theories and offender characteristics on judgements of sexual offenders: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1250963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., Hogue, T. E., & Bartels, R. M. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important? Aggression & Violent Behavior, 34, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, C. A., & Bartels, R. M. (2018). Implicit theories and offender representativeness in judgments about sexual crime. Sexual Abuse, 30(3), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063216658019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherton, J. (1999). The idealization of women: Its role in the minimization of child sexual abuse by females. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(2), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00119-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherton, J., & Beardsall, L. (1998). Decisions and attitudes concerning child sexual abuse: Does the gender of the perpetrator make a difference to child protection professionals? Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(12), 1265–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(98)00101-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogue, T. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. Issues in Criminological & Legal Psychology, 19, 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hogue, T. E., & Peebles, J. (1997). The influence of remorse, intent and attitudes toward sex offenders on judgments of a rapist. Psychology, Crime & Law, 3(4), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169708410821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, Y. (1994). Predicting trait versus process inferences: The role of implicit theories [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• King, L. L., & Roberts, J. J. (2015). The complexity of public attitudes toward sex crimes. Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-Based Research, Policy, and Practice, 12(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2015.1005266?journalCode=uvao20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjelsberg, E., & Loos, L. H. (2008). Conciliation or condemnation? Prison employees’ and young peoples’ attitudes towards sexual offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(1), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2008.9914406
   Google Scholar
• Lea, S., Auburn, T., & Kibblewhite, K. (1999). Working with sex offenders: The perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 43(1), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X99431010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 49(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X04271304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2001). Females who sexually abuse children: Assessment and treatment issues. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218710109525003
   Google Scholar
• Nobles, M. R., Levenson, J. S., & Youstin, T. J. (2012). Effectiveness of residence restrictions in preventing sex offense recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 58(4), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712449230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, J. M. (2014). Women's Crimes, Criminology, and Corrections. Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. L., & Ferguson, C. J. (2011). Punishment and rehabilitation attitudes toward sex offenders versus nonsexual offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2011.570287
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, M., Fido, D., & Heym, N. (2021). Perceptions around adult and child sex offenders and their rehabilitation as a function of education in forensic psychology independent of traditionalism and perpetrator sex. Forensic Science International: Mind and Law, 2, Article 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiml.2020.100039
   Google Scholar
• Sanghara, K. K., & Wilson, J. C. (2006). Stereotypes and attitudes about child sexual abusers: A comparison of experienced and inexperienced professionals in sex offender treatment. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 11(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X68818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones, C., Willis, G. M., & Grace, R. C. (2012). Beyond static and dynamic risk factors: The incremental predictive validity of release planning in sex offender risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511416472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serran, G., Fernandez, Y., Marshall, W. L., & Mann, R. E. (2003). Process issues in treatment: Application to sexual offender programs. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 34(4), 368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.34.4.368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senethavilay, H. (2018). Effect of gender on perceptions of female sex offenders (4888.) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/4888/
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Assessing the impact of sex offender registration and community notification on sex-offending trajectories. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 37(5), 570–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810363570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozdan, S., Briken, P., & Dekker, A. (2019). Uncovering female child sexual offenders – needs and challenges for practice and research. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(3), 401. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8030401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases – biases in judgments reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekes, J. R., Pelletier, G., & Beaudette, D. (1995). Correctional officers: How do they perceive sex offenders? International Journal of Offender Therapy & Comparative Criminology, 39(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X9503900107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wnuk, D., Chapman, J. E., & Jeglic, E. L. (2006). Development and refinement of a measure of attitudes toward sex offender treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43(3), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n03_03
   Google Scholar
• Willis, G. M., & Grace, R. C. (2009). Assessment of community reintegration planning for sex offenders: Poor planning predicts recidivism. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 36(5), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809332874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. M., & Johnston, L. (2012). Planning helps: The impact of release planning on subsequent re-entry experiences of child sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.506576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, G. M., Levenson, J. S., & Ward, T. (2010). Desistance and attitudes towards sex offenders: Facilitation or hindrance? Journal of Family Violence, 25(6), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9314-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zgoba, K., Veysey, B. M., & Dalessandro, M. (2010). An analysis of the effectiveness of community notification and registration: Do the best intentions predict the best practices? Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820903357673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar