Of professionals, non-professionals and everything in between: redefining the notion of the ‘translator’ in the crowdsourcing era

References

• Austermühl, F., and C. Mirwald. 2008. “Images of Translators in Localization Discourse.” Translation in Transition 8:1–39. http://translationjournal.net/images/e-Books/PDF_Files/Images%20of%20Translators%20in%20Localization%20Discourse.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. 1993. “Representativeness in Corpus Design.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (4): 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, L. 2019. “Fit for Purpose Translation.” In Handbook of Translation Technology, edited by M. O’Hagan, 453–468. New York-London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Dam, H. V., and K. Z. Zethsen. 2008. “Translator Status – Helpers and Opponents in the Ongoing Battle of an Emerging Profession.” Target International Journal of Translation Studies 22 (2): 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22.2.02dam.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do Carmo, F. 2020. “‘Time is Money’ and the Value of Translation.” Translation Spaces 9 (1): 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.00020.car.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, S. 2017. “The Impact of Translation Technologies on the Process and Product of Translation.” International Journal of Communication 10 (23): 947–969.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, K. 2006. “Putting the Cart Behind the Horse: Rethinking Localization Quality Management.” In Perspectives on Localization, edited by K. Dunne, 95–117. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Elia. 2016. Expectations and Concerns of the European Language Industry. EUATC European Union of Associations of Translation Companies. http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/translation/programmes/languageindustry/platform/documents/2016_survey_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Faes, F. 2015. The Elusive Uberization of Translation. Slator: Language Industry Intelligence. https://slator.com/the-elusive-uberization-of-translation/.
   Google Scholar
• Firat, G. 2021. “Uberization of Translation: Impact on Working Conditions.” Journal of Internationalization and Localization 8 (1): 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1075/jial.20006.fir.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, M. 2016. “Cause for Concern? Attitudes Towards Translation Crowdsourcing in Professional Translators’ Blogs.” Jostrans 25:149–173. https://www.jostrans.org/issue25/art_flanagan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gambier, Y. 2014. “Changing Landscape in Translation.” International Journal of Society, Culture and Language 22:1–12. https://www.ijscl.net/article_4638.html.
   Google Scholar
• García, I. 2015. “Cloud Marketplaces: Procurement of Translators in the Age of Social Media.” Jostrans: The Journal of Specialized Translation 23:18–38. https://www.jostrans.org/issue23/art_garcia.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gengo. 2023. “Translator Workflow: How-To Guide.” Accessed September 10, 2023. https://support.gengo.com/hc/en-us/articles/231440987-Translator-Workbench-How-to-Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadessy, M., A. Henry, and R. Roseberry, eds 2001. Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, C., and M. Warren. 2010. “What Can a Corpus Tell Us About Multi-Word Units?” In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited by A. O’Keeffe and M. McCarthy, 212–226. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hebenstreit, G. 2019. “Coming to Terms with Social Translation: A Terminological Approach.” Translation Studies 12 (2): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2019.1681290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. 2013. Translation and Web Localization. New York/London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. 2017a. Crowdsourcing and Online Collaborative Translations: Expanding the Limits of Translation Studies. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. 2017b. “How Much Would You Like to Pay? Reframing and Expanding the Notion of Translation Quality Through Crowdsourcing and Volunteer Approaches.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 25 (3): 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1285948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. 2018. “Crowdsourcing and Translation Quality: Novel Approaches in the Language Industry and Translation Studies.” In Translation Quality Assessment: From Principles to Practice, edited by J. Moorkens, 69–93. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. 2019. “Technology and Non-Professional Translation.” In The Handbook of Translation and Technology, edited by M. O’Hagan, 230–254. New York-London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. 2020. “The ‘Technological Turn’ in Translation Studies: Are We There Yet? A Transversal Cross-Disciplinary Approach.” Translation Spaces 9 (2): 314–341. https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.19012.jim.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. 2022. “Quo Vadis, Crowdsourcing and Online Collaborative Translation?” INContext: Studies in Translation and Interculturalism 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.54754/incontext.v2i1.13.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. Forthcoming. “Augmentation and Translation Crowdsourcing: Are Collaborative translators’ Minds Really ‘Augmented’?” Translation, Cognition and Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00079.jim.
   Google Scholar
• Katan, D. 2011. “Status of Translators.” In Handbook of Translation Studies 2, edited by Y. Gambier and L. van Doorslaer, 146–152. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N. 2013. There’s Big Money in Crowdsourced Translation – or There Is? Common Sense Advisory Blogs. http://www.commonsenseadvisory.com/default.aspx?Contenttype=ArticleDetAD&tabID=63&Aid=3023&moduleId=390&__hstc=24461221.669e7554cfcc70fd69cadbdd3c154dab.1471824000159.1471824000161.1471824000162.2&__hssc=24461221.1.1471824000162&__hsfp=1773666937.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, N., R. Ray, and D. A. DePalma. 2011. “From Crawling to Sprinting: Community Translation Goes Mainstream.” Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series – Themes in Translation Studies 10:45–76. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v10i.278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. 2001. Lexis and Creativity in Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Kocincová, L., Baisa V, Jakubıcek M, Kovár V. 2015. “Interactive Visualizations of Corpus Data in Sketch Engine.” In Proceedings of the Workshop on Innovative Corpus Query and Visualization Tools at NODALIDA 2015, edited by Grigonyte, 17–22. Linköping: University Electronic Press.https://www.sketchengine.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Interactive_Visualizations_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. F. M. 2021. “Translator Professionalism in Asia.” Perspectives 29 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1676277.
   Google Scholar
• Lommel, A. 2020. “Augmented Translation: Are We There Yet?”. https://csa-research.com/Blog/ArticleID/706/augmented-translation-2020.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough-Dolmaya, J. 2011. “The Ethics of Crowdsourcing.” Linguistica Antverpiensia 10:97–111. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v10i.279.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough-Dolmaya, J. 2012. “Analyzing the Crowdsourcing Model and Its Impact on Public Perceptions of Translation.” The Translator 18 (2): 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2012.10799507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, M. 2011. “Introduction: Community Translation: Translation as a Social Activity and Its Possible Consequences in the Advent of Web 2.0 and Beyond.” Linguistica Antverpiensia 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v10i.275.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, M., eds 2019. The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Technology. New York-London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olohan, M. 2004. Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies. London-New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olohan, M. 2014. “Why Do You Translate? Motivation to Volunteer and TED Translation.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 7 (1): 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2013.781952.
   Google Scholar
• Plitt, M., and F. Masselot. 2010. “A Productivity Test of Statistical Machine Translation Post-Editing in a Typical Localisation Context.” Prague Bulletin Math Linguistics 93 (1): 7–16. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10108-010-0010-x.
   Google Scholar
• Ruokonen, M. 2013. “Studying Translator Status: Three Points of View.” In Haasteena näkökulma: Point of View as Challenge. VAKKI Publications 2, edited by M. Eronen and M. Rodi-Risberg, 327–338. Vaasa: University of Vaasa. http://www.vakki.net/publications/2013/VAKKI2013_Ruokonen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ruokonen, M. 2016. “Realistic but Not Pessimistic: Finnish Translation Students’ Perceptions of Translator Status.” Jostrans: The Journal of Specialised Translation 25:188–212. https://www.jostrans.org/issue25/art_ruokonen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, A. 2018. “Disruption in Translator-Client Matching: Paid Crowdsourcing Platforms Vs Human Project Managers.” Revista Tradumàtica: traducció tecnologies de la informació i la comunicació 16:85–94. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Tradumatica/article/download/350186/441456.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, A. 2021. “The Value of Translation in the Era of Automation: An Examination of Threats.” In When Translation Goes Digital, edited by R. Desjardins, et al., 231–255. Cham: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tethras. 2023. “Pricing”. Accessed September 10, 2023. https://www.tethras.com/pricing.
   Google Scholar
• Textmaster. 2023. “Translation Web Content Pricing.” Accessed September 10, 2023. https://www.textmaster.com/translation-web-content-pricing/.
   Google Scholar
• Zwischenberger, C. 2022. “Online Collaborative Translation: Its Ethical, Social, and Conceptual Conditions and Consequences.” Perspectives 30 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2021.1872662.
   Google Scholar