Policy agendas in Germany – database and descriptive insights

References

• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1962). Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer, S., Breunig, C., Giger, N., & Wüst, A. (2021). The diminishing value of representing the disadvantaged: Between group representation and individual career paths. British Journal of Political Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., Christian, B., & Emiliano, G. (2019). Comparative policy agendas: Theory, tools, data. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F., Jones, B. D., & Wilkerson, J. (2011). Comparative studies of policy dynamics. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 947–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011405160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, S. (2019). Gone fishing: The creation of the comparative agendas project master codebook. In F. R. Baumgartner, C. Breunig, & E. Grossman (Eds.), Comparative policy agendas: Theory, tools, data (pp. 17–34). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breunig, C., & Schnatterer, T. (2020). Die politische Agenda Deutschlands. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61(1), 131–149. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-020-00226-6
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. CoRR, abs/1810.04805.
   Google Scholar
• Ellermann, A. (2021). The comparative politics of immigration: Policy choices in Germany, Canada, Switzerland, and the United States. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer and Stefaan Walgrave. (2014). Agenda setting, policies, and political systems: A comparative approach. In C. Green-Pedersen & S. Walgrave (Eds.), Political agenda setting. An approach to studying political systems (pp. 1–16). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guinaudeau, I. (2015). Documentation on the coding of German manifestos. Working paper, Sciences Po Bordeaux.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public Arena model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1086/228951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismayr, W. (2007). Bundestag. In S. Schmidt, G. Hellmann, & R. Wolf (Eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Aussenpolitik (pp. 175–191). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• John, P., Bertelli, A. M., Bevan, S., & Jennings, W. (2013). Policy agendas in British politics. Comparative studies of political agendas. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jurka, T. P., Collingwood, L., Boydstun, A. E., Grossman, E., & van Atteveldt, W. (2012). RTextTools: Automatic text classification via supervised learning. R package version 1.3.9. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RTextTools
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, H. (2020). The survival of interest groups: Evidence from Germany. West European Politics, 43(7), 1436–1454. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1662634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korte, Karl-Rudolf. (2002). Das Wort hat der Bundeskanzler. Eine Analyse der großen Regierungserklärungen von Adenauer bis Schroeder. Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pakull, D., Goldberg, F., & Bernhagen, P. (2020). Die Repräsentation der Bürgerinnen und Bürger durch organisierte Interessen in Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61(3), 525–551.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, Sven-Oliver, Will Lowe, Jens Wäckerle, and Stuart Soroka. (2019). Multilingual sentiment analysis: A new approach to measuring conflict in legislative speeches. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 44(1), 97–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudzio, W. (2015). Das politische system Deutschlands. Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66(3), 239–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, Elmer Eric. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. (1987). West Germany: The policy of the middle way. Journal of Public Policy, 7(02), 135–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005213
   Google Scholar
• Schnatterer, T. (2021). Regierungsprioritäten oder Salienz- Die politische Agenda der Meinungsumfragen im Auftrag des Bundespresseamts, Working paper, Sciences Po Bordeaux.
   Google Scholar
• Shpaizman, I. (2019). Using CAP data for qualitative policy research. In F. R. Baumgartner, C. Breunig, & E. Grossman (Eds.), Comparative policy agendas: theory, tools, data. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198835332.003.0033
   Google Scholar
• Traber, D., Hänni, M., Giger, N., & Breunig, C. (2021). Social status, political priorities and unequal representation. European Journal of Political Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauner, F., & Turton, J. (2017). ‘Welcome culture’: The emergence and transformation of a public debate on migration. Austrian Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.1587.vol46iss1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar