1,528
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The European and national parliaments in the area of freedom, security and justice: does interparliamentary cooperation lead to joint oversight?

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Assemblée Nationale. (2014, September 17). Réunion interparlementaire sur le projet de parquet européen et la protection des données personnelles.
  • Auel, K., & Christiansen, K. (2015). After Lisbon: National parliaments in the European Union. West European Politics, 38(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.990693
  • Auel, K., & Neuhold, C. (2017). Multi-arena players in the making? Conceptualizing the role of national parliaments since the Lisbon Treaty. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(10), 1547–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1228694
  • Bengtson, C. (2007). Interparliamentary cooperation within European. In J. O’Brennan & T. Raunio (Eds.), National parliaments within the enlarged European Union: From ‘victims’ of integration to competitive actors? (pp. 46–65). Routledge.
  • Borońska-Hryniewiecka, K. (2021). National parliaments as ‘multi-arena players’ in the European Union? Insights into Poland and France. Journal of European Integration, 43(6), 701–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1800672
  • Bundesrat (2012, March 30). Vorschlag für eine Verordnung des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates zum Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten und zum freien Datenverkehr.
  • Camera dei deputati. (2011, April 4). Parere motivato in merito all’atto dell’Unione europea ‘Proposta di regolarnento del Parlamento europeo e def Consiglio ·concernente la tutela delle persona fisiche con riguardo al trattamento dei dati personali e la libero circolazione di tali dat.
  • Cooper, I. (2013). Bicameral or tricameral? National Parliaments and Representative Democracy in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799939
  • Cooper, I. (2015). A yellow card for the striker: National parliaments and the defeat of EU legislation on the right to strike. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1406–1425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1022569
  • Cooper, I. (2018). A new form of democratic oversight in the EU: The joint parliamentary scrutiny group for Europol. Perspectives on Federalism, 10(3), 184–213. https://doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0036
  • COSAC. (2017, November 26–28). Plenary meeting of the LVIII COSAC. Contribution of the LVIII COSAC.
  • Costa, O., & Latek, M. (2001). Paradoxes and limits of interparliamentary cooperation in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 23(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330108429099
  • Council of the EU. (2012). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (general data protection regulation) – comments on Articles 11–27.
  • Crum, B., & Fossum, E. (2009). The multilevel parliamentary field: A framework for theorizing representative democracy in the EU. European Political Science Review, 1(2), 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000186
  • Dionigi, M. K. (2017). Lobbying in the European Parliament. The battle for influence. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Eisele, O. (2017). Complementing, competing or co-operating? Exploring newspapers’. Portrayals of the EP and National Parliaments in EU Affairs. Journal of European Integration, 39(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2017.1281262
  • European Parliament. (2011). European Parliament resolution of 6 July 2011 on a comprehensive approach on personal data protection in the European Union (2011/2025(INI)).
  • European Parliament. (2012). Draft agenda, interparliamentary committee meeting, European Parliament – national parliaments, the reform of the EU data protection framework – building trust in a digital and global world.
  • European Parliament. (2018a). Rules of procedure of the joint parliamentary scrutiny group on Europol. Retrieved from Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the EU.
  • European Parliament. (2018b). Rules of procedures of the joint parliamentary scrutiny group on Europol.
  • European Parliament. (2020). Relations between the European Parliament and EU national parliaments. Annual Report 2019.
  • European Parliament, & Romanian Presidency of the Council of the EU. (2019). Summary conclusions by the co-chairs.
  • Fasone, C. (2014). European economic governance and parliamentary representation. What place for the European parliament? European Law Journal, 20(2), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12069
  • Gattermann, K. (2014). Opportunities, strategies and ideologies: The incentives of European Parliament political groups for inter-parliamentary cooperation. OPAL Online Paper Series, 16. https://www.pademia.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2014/02/16.pdf
  • Griglio, E., & Lupo, N. (2018). Inter-parliamentary Cooperation in the EU and outside the Union: Distinctive Features and Limits of the European Experience. Perspectives on Federalism, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.2478/pof-2018-0031
  • Griglio, E., & Nicola, N. (2018). The conference on stability, economic coordination and governance: Filling the gaps of parliamentary oversight in the EU. Journal of European Integration, 40(3), 358–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2018.1450873
  • Hefftler, C., & Gattermann, K. (2015). Interparliamentary cooperation in the European Union: Patterns, problems and potential. In C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, & J. Smith (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of national parliaments and the European Union (pp. 94–115). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2021). Settling it on the multi-level parliamentary field? A fields approach to interparliamentary cooperation in foreign and security policy. West European Politics, 45(2), 262–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1858609
  • Kreilinger, V. (2017). A watchdog for Europe’s policemen: The new joint parliamentary scrutiny group for Europol [Policy Paper No. 197]. Jacques Delors Institut.
  • LIBE Committee. (2012, October 9). Interparliamentary committee meeting. The reform of the EU data protection framework – building trust in a digital and global world, European Parliament.
  • LIBE Committee. (2018, May 15). Interparliamentary committee meeting. The implementation of the data protection package at the eve of its application, European Parliament.
  • Lupo, N., & Fasone, C. (2016). Introduction. In N. Lupo & C. Fasone (Eds.), Parliaments in the composite European constitution, Interparliamentary cooperation in the composite European constitution (pp. 1–20). Hart Publishing.
  • Maurer, A., & Wessels, W. (2001). National parliaments on the ways to Europe. Losers or latecomers? Baden-Baden.
  • Miklin, E. (2013). Inter-parliamentary cooperation in EU affairs and the Austrian parliament: Empowering the opposition? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 19(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2013.736785
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2007). Interparliamentary co-operation in EU justice and home affairs. Paper presented at the fifty years of interparliamentary cooperation, Bundersrat, Berlin.
  • Neunreither, K. (2005). The European parliament and national parliaments: Conflict or cooperation? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3–4), 466–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330500273802
  • Riksdag, S. (2012). Reasoned opinion issued by the Riksdag of the Kingdom of Sweeden, 2011/12: KU25.
  • Ripoll Servent, A. (2018). The European Parliament. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Ripoll Servent, A., & Roederer-Rynning, C. (2018). The European Parliament: A normal parliament in a polity of a different kind. In W. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.152
  • Sénat, F. (2012). Résolution européenne portant avis motivé sur la conformité au principe de subsidiarité de la proposition de règlement du Parlement européen et du Conseil relatif à la protection des données à caractère personnel.
  • Tacea, A. (2018). Quand la JAI fait dissidence. Politique Européenne, 59(59), 58–93. https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.059.0058
  • Tacea, A. (2020). Des gouvernements sous le regard de leur parlement: la participation des parlements français, italien et britannique à l'élaboration et au contrôle des politiques européennes de justice et de sécurité intérieure. LGDJ.
  • Tacea, A. (2021). From legal to political reasoning: National parliaments’ use of reasoned opinions in the area of freedom, security and justice. Journal of Commun Market Studies, 59(6), 1573–1589. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13213