1,295
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How Planning Authorities Can Improve Quality through the Design Review Process: Lessons from Edinburgh

&
Pages 101-114 | Published online: 13 Feb 2009

References

  • CABE/DETR (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment and Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions) . 2000 . By Design: Urban Design in the Planning System—Towards Better Practice , London : Thomas Telford .
  • CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment) . 2001 . Local Government Design Survey—the Results , London : CABE .
  • CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment) . 2003 . Protecting Design Quality in Planning , London : CABE .
  • CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment) . 2006a . Design Review , London : CABE .
  • CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment) . 2006b . How to do Design Review: Creating and Running a Successful Panel , London : CABE .
  • CABE (Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment) . 2006c . The Cost of Bad Design , London : CABE .
  • Carmona , M. 1998 . “ Urban design & planning practice ” . In Introducing Urban Design: Interventions and Response , Edited by: Greed , C. and Roberts , M. 39 – 63 . London : Longman .
  • Carmona , M. , DeMagalhaes , C. and Edwards , M. 2002 . Stakeholder views on value and urban design . Journal of Urban Design , 7 ( 2 ) : 145 – 169 .
  • CEC (City of Edinburgh Council) (2002) Urban Design and the Planning System. City of Edinburgh Council, Report to Planning Committee, 7 February.
  • CEC (City of Edinburgh Council) . 2003a . Edinburgh Standards for Urban Design , Edinburgh : City of Edinburgh Council .
  • CEC (City of Edinburgh Council) (2003b) The Quality of Urban Design: Report of the Urban Design Working Group. City of Edinburgh Council, Report to Planning Committee, 6 February.
  • CEC (City of Edinburgh Council) (2004) The Quality of Urban Design: Implementation of Urban Design Working Group Recommendations Summary. City of Edinburgh Council, February.
  • CEC (City of Edinburgh Council) . 2005 . Developing Urban Housing, Final report—January 2005 , Edinburgh : Communities Scotland & The City of Edinburgh Council .
  • CEC (City of Edinburgh Council) . 2007 . Edinburgh City Local Plan Deposit Draft , Edinburgh : City of Edinburgh Council .
  • DCfW (Design Commission for Wales) . 2006 . The Experience of the Design Commission for Wales Design Review Panel 2003–2005 , Cardiff : DCfW .
  • Delafons , J. 1994 . Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control , Edited by: Scheer , B. C. and Preiser , W. F. E. 13 – 19 . New York : Chapman & Hall . Democracy and design, in:
  • DOE (Department of the Environment) . 1980 . Circular 22/80: Development Control, Policy and Practice , London : HMSO .
  • Donovan , J. and Larkham , P. 1996 . Rethinking design guidance . Planning Practice & Research , 11 ( 3 ) : 303 – 318 .
  • Higgins , M. and Karski , A. 2000 . “ The built environment and design ” . In Introduction to Planning Practice , Edited by: Allmendinger , P. , Prior , A. and Raemaekers , J. Chichester : Wiley & Sons .
  • Higgins , M. , Brown , C. , McCarthy , J. , Prior , A. , Hachmann , V. and Durning , B. 2007 . Scottish Planning Authorities Skills Assessment , Broxburn : The Improvement Service .
  • Hubbard , P. 1994 . Recognising design quality in development control . Town & Country Planning , 63 ( 11 ) : 311 – 313 .
  • Llewelyn-Davies . 2000 . Urban Design Compendium , London : Housing Corporation & English Partnerships .
  • Madanipour , A. 2004 . Viewpoint: why urban design? . Town Planning Review , 75 ( 2 ) : i – iv .
  • Madanipour , A. 2006 . Roles and challenges of urban design . Journal of Urban Design , 11 ( 2 ) : 173 – 193 .
  • McMillan , S. , ed. 2004 . Designing Better Buildings , London : Spon .
  • Moughtin , C. 2003 . Urban Design: Street & Square , London : Architectural Press .
  • ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) . 2004 . Community Involvement in Planning: The Government's Objectives , London : The Stationary Office .
  • ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) . 2005 . Planning Policy Statement 1: Delivering Sustainable Development , London : The Stationary Office .
  • Oxford Brookes University . 2004 . Skills Base in the Planning System: Survey Results , London : Local Government Association .
  • Paterson , E. 2006 . Quality new development in English market towns: case studies examining the role of town planning . Journal of Urban Design , 11 ( 2 ) : 225 – 241 .
  • Plater-Zyberk , E. 1994 . “ Forward ” . In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control , Edited by: Scheer , B. C. and Preiser , W. F. E. vii – xiv . New York : Chapman & Hall .
  • Preiser , W. F. E. 1994 . “ Preface ” . In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control , Edited by: Scheer , B. C. and Preiser , W. F. E. xv – xvii . New York : Chapman & Hall .
  • Punter , J. 1993 . “ Developing design skills for development controllers ” . In Making Better Places: Urban Design Now , Edited by: Hayward , R. and McGlynn , S. 10 – 18 . Oxford : Butterworth .
  • Punter , J. 1994 . “ Design review and conservation in England: historical development and contemporary relationships ” . In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control , Edited by: Scheer , B. C. and Preiser , W. F. E. 51 – 61 . New York : Chapman & Hall .
  • Punter , J. 1999a . Improving the instruments, processes and products of aesthetic control in Europe . Urban Design International , 4 ( 1 & 2 ) : 79 – 100 .
  • Punter , J. 1999b . Aesthetic control/design control in the United Kingdom . Urban Design International , 4 ( 1 & 2 ) : 67 – 75 .
  • Punter , J. 1999c . “ Design ” . In British Planning—50 Years of Urban and Regional Policy , Edited by: Cullingworth , B. 137 – 155 . London : Athlone Press .
  • Punter , J. 2003 . From design advice to peer review: the role of the urban design panel in Vancouver . Journal of Urban Design , 8 ( 2 ) : 113 – 135 .
  • Punter , J. 2006 . “ The planning system and the delivery of design quality ” . In Urban Design Futures , Edited by: Moor , M. and Rowland , J. 50 – 56 . London : Routledge .
  • Punter , J. 2007 . Developing urban design as public policy: best practice principles for design review and development management . Journal of Urban Design , 12 ( 2 ) : 167 – 202 .
  • Punter , J. and Carmona , M. 1997 . The Design Dimension of Planning: Theory, Content and Best Practice for Design Policies , London : E&FN Spon .
  • Royal Fine Art Commission . 1994 . What Makes a Good Building? , London : HMSO .
  • RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute . 2002 . From Design Policy to Design Quality , London : Thomas Telford .
  • RTPI (Royal Town Planning Institute) . 2005 . A Survey of Discipline Knowledge and Generic Skills of RTPI Corporate Members , London : RTPI .
  • Scheer , B. C. 1994 . “ Introduction: the debate on design review ” . In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control , Edited by: Scheer , B. C. and Preiser , W. F. E. 1 – 10 . New York : Chapman & Hall .
  • Scottish Executive . 2001a . Designing Places , Edinburgh : Scottish Executive Development Department .
  • Scottish Executive . 2001b . A Policy on Architecture for Scotland , Edinburgh : Scottish Executive Development Department .
  • Scottish Executive . 2003 . Your Place, Your Plan: A White Paper on Public Involvement in Planning , Edinburgh : Scottish Executive Development Department .
  • Scottish Executive . 2007 . Building our Legacy: Statement on Scotland's Architecture Policy , Edinburgh : Scottish Executive .
  • University College London (UCL)/Deloitte . 2007 . Shaping and Delivering Tomorrow's Places: Effective Practice in Spatial Planning , London : RTPI .
  • Wall , I. 2005 . “ Quoted in: Urban design: time to take stock the Scottish Executive's Urban Design Conference ” . In Prospect—Architecture and Design in Scotland , April 2005 Edinburgh : Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.