The Fragmentation Bias in Valuing and Qualifying Open Space

References

• Bengs, Christer, KaisaSchmidt-Thmoé, SiminDavoudi, MichelleWishardt, TrevorHart, KevinThomas, JimWalsh, DominicStead, and EduardaMarques de Costa. 2006. “ESPON 1.1.2. Final Report: Urban - Rural Relations in Europe.” In ESPON 1.1.2, edited by C.Bengs and K.Schmidt-Thomé. Helsinki: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Helsinki University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bomans, Kirsten. 2011. “Revisting Dynamics and Values of Open Space. The Case of Flanders.” PhD diss., at the Arenberg Doctoral School of Science, Engineering & Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KULeuven, Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Bomans, K., V.Dewaelheyns, and H.Gulinck. 2011. “Pasture for Horses: An Underestimated Land Use Class in an Urbanized and Multifunctional Area.” International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning6 (2): 195–211. 10.2495/SDP-V6-N2-195-211.
   Google Scholar
• Brabec, Elizabeth, and ChipSmith. 2002. “Agricultural Land Fragmentation: The Spatial Effects of Three Land Protection Strategies in the Eastern United States.” Landscape and Urban Planning58 (2-4): 255–268. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00225-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broussard, Shorna R., CamilleWashington-Ottombre, and Brian K.Miller. 2008. “Attitudes Toward Policies to Protect Open Space: A Comparative Study of Government Planning Officials and the General Public.” Landscape and Urban Planning86 (1): 14–24. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busck, Anne Gravsholt, Søren PilgaardKristensen, SørenPræstholm, and JørgenPrimdahl. 2008. “Porous Landscapes - The Case of Greater Copenhagen.” Urban Forestry & Urban Greening7 (3): 145–156. 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Carsjens, Gerrit J., and Wimvan der Knaap. 2002. “Strategic Land-Use Allocation: Dealing with Spatial Relationships and Fragmentation of Agriculture.” Landscape and Urban Planning58 (2-4): 171–179. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00219-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge, Sharon K.1996. “Ecological Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation: Implications for Landscape Architecture and Planning.” Landscape and Urban Planning36 (1): 59–77. 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00341-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2000. “European Landscape Convention.” Accessed March 12, 2013. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/landscape/default_en.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, Samuel A., KevinMcGarigal, and Maile C.Neel. 2008. “Parsimony in Landscape Metrics: Strength, Universality, and Consistency.” Ecological Indicators8 (5): 691–703. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Decker, P., M.Ryckewaert, B.Vandekerckhove, A.Pisman, F.Vastmans, and M.Le Roy. 2010. Ruimte voor wonen. Trends en uitdagingen[Space for Living, Trends and Challenges]. Antwerp: Garant.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaelheyns, V., K.Bomans, and H.Gulinck. 2011. The Powerful Garden. Emerging Views on the Garden Complex. Antwerp: Garant Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency, and Swiss Federal Office for the Environment. 2011. “Landscape Fragmentation in Europe. Joint EEA-FOEN Report.” In EEA Report No 2/2011. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrig, L.2001. “How Much Habitat is Enough?” Biological Conservation100 (1): 65–74. 10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00208-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T.1995. Land Mosaics. 4th ed.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, Dieter. 2007. “Spatial Synergy and Supportiveness of Public Space.” Journal of Urban Design12 (2): 261–274. 10.1080/13574800701306369.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffikin, Frank, MalachyMcEldowney, and KenSterrett. 2010. “Creating Shared Public Space in the Contested City: The Role of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design15 (4): 493–513. 10.1080/13574809.2010.502338.
   Google Scholar
• Geoghegan, Jacqueline. 2002. “The Value of Open Spaces in Residential Land Use.” Land Use Policy19 (1): 91–98. 10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00040-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidlow, Christopher J., Naomi J.Ellis, and SamBostock. 2012. “Development of the Neighbourhood Green Space Tool (NGST).” Landscape and Urban Planning106 (4): 347–358. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Graaf, J., and J.Barendse. 2001. “The Charm of a Pause Landscape. The New Map of Hook of Holland.” Archis5 (186): 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, Rudolf. 2006. “Function-Analysis and Valuation as a Tool to Assess Land Use Conflicts in Planning for Sustainable, Multi-Functional Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning75 (3-4): 175–186. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, Lars, Krisvan Koppen, Rudolf S.de Groot, and Ekko C.van Ierland. 2006. “Spatial Scales, Stakeholders and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Economics57 (2): 209–228. 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives, Christopher D., and DaveKendal. 2013. “Values and Attitudes of the Urban Public Towards Peri-Urban Agricultural Land.” Land Use Policy34 (0): 80–90. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, J. A.2000. “Landscape Division, Splitting Index, and Effective Mesh Size: New Measures of Landscape Fragmentation.” Landscape Ecology15 (2): 115–130. 10.1023/A:1008129329289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, Jochen A., RenéBertiller, ChristianSchwick, KalinMüller, CharlotteSteinmeier, Klaus C.Ewald, and JabouryGhazoul. 2008. “Implementing Landscape Fragmentation as an Indicator in the Swiss Monitoring System of Sustainable Development (Monet).” Journal of Environmental Management88 (4): 737–751. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman, R. H. G.2002. “Homogenisation and Fragmentation of the European Landscape: Ecological Consequences and Solutions.” Landscape and Urban Planning58 (2-4): 211–221. 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00222-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, Karl.2013. “Green-Networks: Integrating Alternative Circulation Systems into Post-industrial Cities.” Journal of Urban Design18 (1): 36–58. 10.1080/13574809.2012.739545.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsey, Greg, JeffWilson, JihuiAnne Yang, and ChristopherAlexa. 2008. “Urban Greenways, Trail Characteristics and Trail Use: Implications for Design.” Journal of Urban Design13 (1): 53–79. 10.1080/13574800701804033.
   Google Scholar
• Llausàs, Albert, and JoanNogué. 2012. “Indicators of Landscape Fragmentation: The Case for combining Ecological Indices and the Perceptive Approach.” Ecological Indicators15 (1): 85–91. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-sideris, Anastasia. 1996. “Cracks in the City: Addressing the Constraints and Potentials of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design1 (1): 91–103. 10.1080/13574809608724372.
   Google Scholar
• Maas, Jolanda, RobertAVerheij, PeterPGroenewegen, Sjerpde Vries, and PeterSpreeuwenberg. 2006. “Green Space, Urbanity, and Health: How Strong is the Relation?” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health60 (7): 587–592. 10.1136/jech.2005.043125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, Elizabeth. 2002. “Structuring a Landscape, Structuring a Sense of Place: The Enduring Complexity of Olmsted and Vaux's Brooklyn Parkways.” Journal of Urban Design7 (2): 117–143. 10.1080/1357480022000012203.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, Ülo, FelixMüller, and ThomasWrbka. 2005. “Functional and Structural Landscape Indicators: Upscaling and Downscaling Problems.” Ecological Indicators5 (4): 267–272. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michels, Th., and C. F. Jaarsma. 1987. “Minor Rural Roads. Planning, Design and Evaluation.” Paper read at European Workshop Minor rural roads, Wageningen, 28–30 October 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Afdeling Ruimtelijke Planning. 1998. Ruimtelijk Structuurplan Vlaanderen (RSV). Integrale versie [Spatial Structure Plan Flanders. Integral version]. Brussels: Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap.
   Google Scholar
• Munroe, D. K., C.Croissant, and A. M.York. 2005. “Land Use Policy and Landscape Fragmentation in an Urbanizing Region: Assessing the Impact of Zoning.” Applied Geography25 (2): 121–141. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGI (Cartographer, National Geographic Institute). 2004. Geographical Data Set, Digital Format: Topografische Landgebruikskaart [Topographical Land Use Map]. Brussels: Nationaal Geografisch Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Norusis, M. J.2006. SPSS 15.0 Statistical Procedures Companion. Upper Sadle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Division of Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pascual-Hortal, Lucía, and SantiagoSaura. 2007. “Impact of Spatial Scale on the Identification of Critical Habitat Patches for the Maintenance of Landscape Connectivity.” Landscape and Urban Planning83 (2-3): 176–186. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, F., and H.Gulinck. 2000. “Changing Minor Rural Road Networks in Relation to Landscape Sustainability and Farming Practices in West Europe.” Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment77 (1-2): 95–99. 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00095-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, Jian, YanglinWang, YuanZhang, JianshengWu, WeifengLi, and YouLi. 2010. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Landscape Metrics in Quantifying Spatial Patterns.” Ecological Indicators10 (2): 217–223. 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Alister.2011. “Beyond the Conventional: Meeting the Challenges of Landscape Governance Within the European Landscape Convention?” Journal of Environmental Management92 (10): 2754–2762. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selman, Paul. 2006. “Planning at the Landscape Scale.” In The RTPI Library Series 12, edited by C.Hague, T.Richardson, and R.Upton. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sepe, Marichela.2009. “PlaceMaker Method: Planning ‘Walkability’ by Mapping Place Identity.” Journal of Urban Design14 (4): 463–487. 10.1080/13574800903265504.
   Google Scholar
• Swanwick, Carys.2009. “Society's Attitudes to and Preferences for Land and Landscape.” Land Use Policy26 (Supplement 1): S62–S75. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, Emily.2010. “The Spatial Logic of Parks.” Journal of Urban Design15 (4): 473–491. 10.1080/13574809.2010.502335.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, Emily.2011. “The Geospatial Dimension in Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design16 (1): 127–149. 10.1080/13574809.2011.521029.
   Google Scholar
• Tress, Bärbel, and GuntherTress. 2003. “Scenario Visualisation for Participatory Landscape Planning–a Study from Denmark.” Landscape and Urban Planning64 (3): 161–178. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00219-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Valk, Arnold, and Terryvan Dijk. 2009. Regional Planning for Open Space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Thomas, AnnPisman, HansLeinfelder, and GeorgesAllaert. 2011. “For Every House a Garden…A Morphological Assessment of Residential Development in Flanders' Rural Areas.” In The Powerful Garden. Emerging Views on the Garden Complex, edited by V.Dewaelheyns, K.Bomans, and H.Gulinck, 85–106. Antwerp: Garant Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vouligny, Évelyne, GéraldDomon, and JulieRuiz. 2009. “An Assessment of Ordinary Landscapes by an Expert and by its Residents: Landscape Values in Areas of Intensive Agricultural Use.” Land Use Policy26 (4): 890–900. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagendorp, T., H.Gulinck, P.Coppin, and B.Muys. 2006. “Land Use Impact Evaluation in Life Cycle Assessment Based on Ecosystem Thermodynamics.” Energy31 (1): 112–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar