Integrative Spatial Quality: A Relational Epistemology of Space and Transdisciplinarity in Urban Design and Planning

References

• Alexander, C., S.Ishikawa, M.Silverstein, M.Jacobson, I.Fiksdahl-King, and S.Angel. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, S.1999. Points + Lines: Diagrams and Projects for the City. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D., and A.Jacobs. 1982. Toward an Urban Design Manifesto (Working Paper No. 384). Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, Wendy, CarolinePark, and ErikaGoble. 2008. “From Interdisciplinary to Transdisciplinary Research: A Case Study.” Qualitative Health Research18 (4): 557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon, E.1974. The Design of Cities. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, T.2001. “The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places.” Journal of the American Planning Association67 (1): 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, T., and M.Southworth, eds. 1991. City Sense and City Design: Writings and Projects of Kevin Lynch. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, J.2014. “Do Not Define Urban Design too Narrowly.” Journal of Urban Design19 (1): 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, I.1998. “Urban Design as an Anti-Profession.” Urban Design Quarterly65: 15.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L.2010. “Coping with the Irreducible Uncertainties of Planning: An Evolutionary Approach.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, edited by J.Hillier and P.Healey, 413–424. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• BonJour, L., and ErnestSosa. 2003. Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs Externalism, Foundations vs Virtues. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P.1997. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge, G.2013. “A Transactional Perspective on Space.” International Planning Studies18 (3–4): 304–320.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M.2014. “The Place-Shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process.” Journal of Urban Design19 (1): 2–36.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., C.De Magalhães, and M.Edwards. 2002. “Stakeholder Views on Value and Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design7 (2): 145–169.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J., M.Crawford, and J.Kaliski. 2008. Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D., ed. 1999. Epistemology: The Classic Readings. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, V., M.Goethals, B.De Meulder, J.Schreurs, and F.Moulaert. 2014. “Beyond Design and Participation: The Thought for Food Project in Flanders, Belgium.” Journal of Urban Design19 (4): 412–435.
   Google Scholar
• Cozens, P. M.2008. “New Urbanism, Crime and the Suburbs: A Review of the Evidence.” Urban Policy and Research26 (4): 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, M.1995. “Contesting the Public Realm: Struggles over Public Space in Los Angeles.” Journal of Architectural Education49 (1): 4–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N.1982. “Designerly Ways of Knowing.” Design Studies3 (4): 221–227.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N.2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Crysler, G., S.Cairns, and H.Heynen, eds. 2012. Handbook Architectural Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, G.1961. Townscape. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A.2011. “Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy.” In Companion to Urban Design, edited by T.Banerjee and A.Loukaitou-Sideris, 84–96. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M.1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Groot, R.2006. “Function-Analysis and Valuation as a Tool to Assess Land use Conflicts in Planning for Sustainable, Multi-Functional Landscapes.” Landscape and Urban Planning75 (3–4): 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, M., and J. M.Van Der Voordt, eds. 2002. Ways to Study and Research Urban, Architectural and Technical Design. Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Landa, M.2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• De Smet, A.2013. “The Role of Temporary Use in Urban (Re)Development: Examples from Brussels.” Brussels Studies: The E-Journal for Academic Research on Brussels. Accessed November 13, 2013. http://brusselsstudies.be/medias/publications/BruS72EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F.Guattari. [1972] 2004a. Anti-Oedipus. Vol. 1 of Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Brian Massumi. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F.Guattari. [1980] 2004b. A Thousand Plateaus. Vol. 2 of Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by B. Massumi. London and New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dewaelheyns, V., E.Vanempten, K.Bomans, A.Verhoeve, and H.Gulinck. 2014. “The Fragmentation Bias in Valuing and Qualifying Open Space.” Journal of Urban Design19 (4): 436–455.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K.1999. Framing Places. Mediating Power in Built Form. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K.2005. “The Silent Complicity of Architecture.” In Habitus: A Sense of Place, edited by J.Hillier and E.Rooksby, 283–296. Hants: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K.2010. Becoming Places: Urbanism/Architecture/Identity/Power. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and S.Handy. 2009. “Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.” Journal of Urban Design14 (1): 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J.1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J.2000. “Perceptual Learning in Development: Some Basic Concepts.” Ecological Psychology12 (4): 295–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosling, David, and B.Maitland. 1984. Concepts of Urban Design. London/New York: Academy Editions/Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P.2006. “Relational Complexity and the Imaginative Power of Strategic Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies14 (4): 525–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P.2008. “Making Choices that Matter: The Practical Art of Situated Strategic Judgements in Spatial Strategy-Making.” In Empowering the Planning Fields: Ethics, Creativity and Action, edited by J.Van den Broeck, F.Moulaert, and S.Oosterlynck, 23–41. Leuven: Acco.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P.2009. “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought.” Journal of Planning Education and Research28 (3): 277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, L., K.van Koppen, R. S.de Groot, and E. C.van Ierland. 2006. “Spatial Scales, Stakeholders and the Valuation of Ecosystem Services.” Ecological Economics57 (2): 209–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heylighen, A., and J.Herssens. 2014. “Designerly Ways of Not Knowing: What Designers Can Learn about Space from People Who are Blind.” Journal of Urban Design19 (3): 317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J.2011. “Strategic Navigation Across Multiple Planes: Towards a Deleuzean-Inspired Methodology for Strategic Spatial Planning.” Town Planning Review82 (5): 503–527.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. J.2007. “Pragmatic Communicative Action Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research26 (3): 272–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, M.2002. The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inam, A.2002. “Meaningful Urban Design: Teleological/Catalytic/Relevant.” Journal of Urban Design7 (1): 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J.[1961] 1974. Death and Life of American Cities: The Failure of Town Planning. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Ahmed Z.2010. “Rethinking Doxiadiś Ekistical Urbanism: Sustainability and Globalization as a Dialectical Framework for Design.” Positions2010 (1): 6–39.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Ahmed Z.2011. “When History Becomes the Corpus for Designerly Way of Thinking.” In Historiography of Architecture, edited by P.Vandal, 23–29. Lahore: THAAP.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Ahmed Z.2013. “On Design and Politics of Co-Producing Public Space: The Long Marches and the Reincarnation of the ‘Forecourt’ of the Pakistani Nation.” International Journal of Islamic Architecture2 (1): 125–156.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Ahmed Z., F.Moulaert, and J.Schreurs. 2013. “Epistemology of Space: Exploring Relational Perspectives in Planning, Urbanism, and Architecture.” International Planning Studies18 (3–4): 287–303.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Ahmed Z., H.Vandevyvere, and K.Allacker. 2013. “Design for the Ecological Age: Rethinking the Role of Sustainability in Architectural Education.” Journal of Architectural Education67 (2): 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J., T.Mitcham, and C.Frodeman. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, Alex. 2009. “Where and How Does Urban Design Happen?” In Urban Design, edited by AlexKrieger and William S.Saunders, 113–130. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H.1991. The Production of Space. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A.2012. “Addressing the Challenges of Urban Landscapes: Normative Goals for Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design17 (4): 467–484.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K.1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press and Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K.1981. Good City Form. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A.2006. “Roles and Challenges of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design11 (2): 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A., ed. 2010. Whose Public Space?London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A.2013. “Researching Space, Transgressing Epistemic Boundaries.” International Planning Studies18 (3–4): 372–388.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V., and R.Buchanan. 1995. The Idea of Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S.2012. “Science, Pseudo-Science and Urban Design.” Urban Design International17 (4): 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D.2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V.2014. “Evaluating Public Space.” Journal of Urban Design19 (1): 53–88.
   Google Scholar
• Miciukiewicz, K., F.Moulaert, A.Novy, S.Musterd, and J.Hillier. 2012. “Introduction: Problematising Urban Social Cohesion: A Transdisciplinary Endeavour.” Urban Studies49 (9): 1855–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S. A., and A.Karvonen. 2008. “Sustainable Architecture in Context: STS and Design Thinking.” Science Studies21 (1): 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafavi, M., and G.Doherty, eds. 2010. “Ecological Urbanism.” Baden: Lars Müller Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and D.Cassinari. 2014. “Enabling Transdisciplinary Research on Social Cohesion in the City: The Social Polis Experience.” In Research Methods in Spatial Planning. A Case-Based Guide to Research Design, edited by E.Da Silva, P.Healey, N.Harris, and P.Van den Broeck. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and A., Mehmood. 2014. “Towards Social Holism: Social Innovation, Holistic Research Methodology and Pragmatic Collective Action in Spatial Planning.” In Research Methods in Spatial Planning: A Case-Based Guide to Research Design, edited by E.Da Silva, P.Healey, N.Harris, and P.Van den Broeck. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and B.Van Dyck. 2013. “Framing Social Innovation Research: A Sociology of Knowledge Perspective.” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, edited by F.Moulaert, et al., 466–479. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., B.Van Dyck, A. Z.Khan, and J.Schreurs. 2013. “Building a Meta-Framework to ‘Address’ Spatial Quality.” International Planning Studies18 (3–4): 389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E.2007. “Sustainable Ecological Systems: An Impossibility?” Presented at the 2007 Annual Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being. San Francisco, February 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Petcou, C., and D.Petrescu. 2007. “Acting Space. Transversal Notes, On-The-Ground Observations and Concrete Questions for Us All.” In Urban Act. A Handbook for Alternative Practice, edited by aaa-PEPRAV, 319–328. Paris: aaa-PEPRAV.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A.1970. “The Study of Spatial Quality.” Journal of Aesthetic Education4 (4): 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A.1982. The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sankalia, T.2014. “The Median Picnic: Street Design, Urban Informality and Public Space Enforcement.” Journal of Urban Design19 (4): 473–495.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, B.2011. “Metropolitan Form and Landscape Urbanism.” In Companion to Urban Design, edited by T.Banerjee and A.Loukaitou-Sideris, 611–618. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schreurs, J., L.Boudry, et al. 2006. “Ontwerpend onderzoek: een constante zorg.” In Inzet, Opzet, Voorzet. Stadsprojecten in Vlaanderen, 118–131. Antwerp-Apeldoorn: Garant Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Schreurs, J.2007. “Communicating Quality: Words and Images.” ARQ Architectural Research Quarterly11 (3–4): 325–333.
   Google Scholar
• Segers, R., P.Van den Broeck, A. Z.Khan, F.Moulaert, J.Schreurs, B.De Meulder, K.Miciukiewicz, G.Vigar, and A.Madanipour, eds. 2013. Handboek Ruimtelijke Kwaliteit. Brussels: Academic and Scientific Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., and J.Schreurs. 2013. “Pragmatism and Research by Design: Epistemological Virtues and Methodological Challenges.” International Planning Studies18 (3–4): 358–371.
   Google Scholar
• Sitte, C.[1889] 1965. City Planning According to Artistic Principles. Translated by George R. Collins and Christiane Crasemann Collins. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, M.2014. “Public Life, Public Space, and the Changing Art of City Design.” Journal of Urban Design19 (1): 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Stefansdottir, H.2014. “A Theoretical Perspective on How Bicycle Commuters Might Experience Aesthetic Features of Urban Space.” Journal of Urban Design19 (4): 496–510.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, E.2000. “An Integrative Theory of Urban Design.” Journal of the American Planning Association66 (3): 265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols, D., K. L.Hall, B. K.Taylor, and R. P.Moser. 2008. “The Science of Team Science: Overview of the Field and Introduction to the Supplement.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine35 (2S): S77–S89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardiveau, A., and D.Mallo. 2014. “Unpacking and Challenging Habitus: An Approach to Temporary Urbanism as a Socially Engaged Practice.” Journal of Urban design19 (4): 456–472.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer-Bacon, B. J.1997. “The Nurturing of a Relational Epistemology.” Educational Theory47 (2): 239–260.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N.2003. “Space: The Fundamental Stuff of Human Geography.” In Key Concepts in Geography, edited by S.Holloway, S.Rice, and G.Vallentine, 95–107. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tuana, Nancy. 2013. “Embedding Philosophers in the Practices of Science: Bringing Humanities to the Sciences.” Synthese190 (11): 1955–1973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, P., M.Abdelwahab, K.Miciukiewicz, and J.Hillier. 2013. “On Analysing Space from a Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Perspective: The Cultural Park for Children in Cairo.” International Planning Studies18 (3–4): 321–341.
   Google Scholar
• van der Valk, A., and T.van Dijk. 2009. Regional Planning for Open Space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Caroline S., J. D.Roessner, K.Bobb, J. T.Thompson Klein, K. W.Boyack, J.Keyton, I.Rafols, and K.Börner. 2011. “Approaches to Understanding and Measuring Interdisciplinary Scientific Research (IDR): A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Informetrics165 (2011): 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Waldheim, C., ed. 2006. The Landscape Urbanism Reader. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A.2012. Mapping Controversies in Architecture. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar