‘A cloud burst erupts’: visual rhetoric and Los Angeles’ Grand Intervention

References

• Allmendinger, P., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2002. “The Communicative Turn in Urban Planning: Unravelling Paradigmatic, Imperialistic and Moralistic Dimensions.” Space & Polity 6 (1): 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 2014. “Drawing and Thinking: Representing Place in the Practice of Place-making.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (3): 278–297.10.1080/13574809.2014.890045
   Google Scholar
• Corwin, S. 2014. “Los Angeles Has Arrived.” City Grows Blog. Accessed May 26, 2014. http://blog.citygro.ws/post/71896758166/los-angeles-has-arrived#
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. 1995. “Contesting the Public Realm: Struggles over the Public Space in Los Angeles.” Journal of Architectural Education 49 (1): 4–9.10.1080/10464883.1995.10734658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuff, D. 2000. The Provisional City: Los Angeles Stories of Architecture and Urbanism. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forester, eds. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press: Durham; London.
   Google Scholar
• Fogelson, R. M. 1993. The Fragmented Metropolis, Los Angeles 1850–1930. 2nd ed. Berkeley: CA, University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A. 1999. “Soundbite Cities: Imagining Futures in Debates over Urban Form.” Journal of Architecture and Planning Research 16 (1): 33–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, S. 2005. “Theory of Visual Rhetoric”. In Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods and Media, edited by K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis and K. Kenny, 145. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. 2009. Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice 4th ed. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton, W. 1997. The Reluctant Metropolis: The Politics of Urban Growth in Los Angeles. Point Arena: Solano Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grand Avenue Committee. n.d. Project Overview. http://www.grandavenuecommittee.org/overview.html
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, C. 2009. “Civic Park’s Design Has an Identity Crisis” Los Angeles Times, March 12. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/12/entertainment/et-civic-park12
   Google Scholar
• Johnson Fain and Pereira Association. (1996). Los Angeles Civic Center Shared Facilities and Enhancement Plan: Phase I Memorandum. Los Angeles: Los Angeles Civic Center Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. H. 1989. L.A. Follies: Design and Other Diversions in a Fractured Metropolis. Santa Monica, Ca: Cityscape Press
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. M. 1997. The History of Forgetting: Los Angeles and the Erasure of Memory. London; New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwan. 1996. Reading Images: the Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Los Angeles Times. 2005. “Puzzling Out a Park.” Current, Section M, Sunday, June 25, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A., and T. Banerjee. 1998. Urban Design Downtown: Poetics and Politics of Form. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbaum, S. 1990. “Reading Plans.” Journal of the American Planning Association Summer 350–356.
   Google Scholar
• McKerrow, R. 1989. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis” Communication Monographs 56: 91–111.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, C. 1946. Southern California: An Island on the Land. Salt Lake City, UT: Peregrine Smith Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman Lear Center n.d. “Grand Intervention: Architecture, Design and Civic Engagement.” Accessed July 1, 2014. http://learcenter.org/project/grand/
   Google Scholar
• Pastier, J. 1970. “L.A.’s Civic Center: Accent on Quantity Rather Than Quality.” Los Angeles Times ( 1923-Current File), ProQuest Historical Newspapers Los Angeles Times (1881–2986) ( Nov 22, 1970, pg. J1).
   Google Scholar
• Peattie, L. 1987. Planning: Rethinking Ciudad Guayana. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pojani, D., and D. Stead. 2015. “Urban Planning and Design as Verbal and Visual Rhetoric.” Journal of Urban Design 20 (5): 582–614. doi: 10.1080/13574809.205.1071653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1979). “Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy”. In Metaphor and Thought, edited by A. Ortony, 254–283. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, W. H. 1941. “The Civic Center”. In Los Angeles: Preface to a Master Plan, edited by G. W. Robbins and J. D. Tilton, i–xii. Los Angeles, CA: Pacific Southwest Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. J., and E. W. Soja. 1996. The City: Los Angeles and Urban Theory at the End of the Twentieth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. 1969. American City Planning Since 1890. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1976. Fall of Public Man. New York: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, K. 1990. Material Dreams: Southern California Through the 1920s. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, K. 1997. “Civic Center: Government Intervention May Save the City’s Heart.” Los Angeles Times Home Edition, May 25, 1997: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, R. 1981. Los Angeles: The Centrifugal City. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. 1993. “Planning as a Rhetorical Activity: Survey Research as a Trope in Arguments About Electric Power Planning in Chicago.” Journal of the American Planning Association 59 (3): 334–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. 1996. Planning as Persuasive Storytelling: The Rhetorical Construction of Chicago’s Electric Future. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar