Citizenship in action: participatory urban visualization in contested urban space

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. 2006. “Writing against Culture.” In Feminist Anthropology, a Reader, edited by E. Lewin, 153–169. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2010. “More of the Same is Not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning Be Instrumental with the Challenges Ahead?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37 (6): 1115–1127.10.1068/b36068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2005. “Creativity as a Drive for Change.” Planning Theory 4 (3): 247–269.10.1177/1473095205058496
   Google Scholar
• Alkanova, N., S. Jorda, M. Tomitsch, and A. Vande Moere 2013. “Reveal-It!: the Impact of a Social Visualization Projection on Public Awareness and Discourse”, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3461–3470
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kodmany, K. 1999. “Using Visualization Techniques for Enhancing Public Participation in Planning and Design: Process, Implementation, and Evaluation.” Landscape and Urban Planning 45: 37–45.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angotti, T., C. S. Doble, and P. Horrigan, eds. 2012. Service-Learning in Design and Planning: Educating at the Boundaries. Oakland, CA: New Village Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A., and J. Holston. 1999. “Cities and Citizenship.” Public Culture 8 (2): 187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Arefi, M. 2004. “An Asset-Based Approach to Policymaking: Revisiting the History of Urban Planning and Neighborhood Change in Cincinnati’s West End.” Cities 21 (6): 491–500.10.1016/j.cities.2004.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S., J. Lomholt, N. Temple, and R. Tobe, eds. 2010. The Humanities in Architectural Design: A Contemporary and Historical Perspective. London: Routlage.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, J. and L. Porter 2012. “Indigenous Recognition in State-based Planning Systems: Understanding Textual Mediation in Contact Zone.” Planning Theory 11 (2): 170–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B., and K. Wakeford, eds. 2008. Expanding Architecture: Design as Activism. New York, NY: Metropolis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L. 2010. “Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory: Outlines for an Actor-Rational Approach in Planning.” Planning Theory 9 (1): 28–62.10.1177/1473095209346499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollens, S. A. 1998. “Urban Planning amidst Ethnic Conflict: Jerusalem and Johannesburg.” Urban Studies 35 (4): 729–749.10.1080/0042098984727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. 2010. Reflective Practice, Writing and Professional Development. 3rd ed. California: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, F. W. 1996. “Integration and Division: Sharing and Segregating in Belfast.” Planning Practice and Research 11 (2): 151–158.10.1080/02697459650036305
   Google Scholar
• Boonstra, B., and L. Boelens. 2011. “Self-Organization in Urban Development: Towards a New Perspective on Spatial Planning.” Urban Research and Practice 4 (2): 99–122.10.1080/17535069.2011.579767
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, C. 1996. The City of Collective Memory: Its Historical Imagery and Architectural Entertainments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L., and L. D. Mitgang. 1996. Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. 2005. “THE DARKER SIDE OF LOCAL COMMUNITIES: IS THIS THE REAL WORLD OF PLANNING?”. Planning Theory and Practice 6 (4): 517–541.10.1080/14649350500349672
   Google Scholar
• Cuff, D. 1992. Architecture: The Story of Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cupers, K. 2005. “Towards a Nomadic Geography: Rethinking Space and Identity for the Potentials of Progressive Politics in the Contemporary City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 29 (4): 729–739.10.1111/ijur.2005.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corburn, J. 2003. “Bringing Local Knowledge into Environmental Decision Making: Improving Urban Planning for Communities at Risk.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (4): 420–433.10.1177/0739456X03022004008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depriest-Hricko, L. R., and D. L. Prytherch. 2013. “Planning and Sense of Place in a ‘Dying’ Downtown: Articulating Memories and Visions in Middletown, Ohio.” Journal of Urban Design 18 (1): 145–165.10.1080/13574809.2012.739548
   Google Scholar
• Dearborn, L. M. 2012. “Moving from Service-Learning to Professional Practice: ESLARP’s Impact on Its Alumni.” In Service-Learning in Design and Planning: Educating at the Boundaries, edited by Tom Angotti, Cheryl S. Doble and Paula Horrigan, 151–166. Oakland, CA: New Village Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2001. “Memory, Democracy and Urban Space: Bangkok’s ‘Path to Democracy’.” Journal of Urban Design 6 (3): 265–282.10.1080/13574800120105788
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, T. 1987. “Design and Studio Pedagogy.” Journal of Architectural Education 41 (1): 16–25.10.1080/10464883.1987.10758461
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, T. A., and L. H. Mann, eds. 1996. Restructuring Architecture: Critical Discourses and Social Practices. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faier, E. 2005. Organizations, Gender and the Culture of Palestinian Activism in Haifa, Israel. London: Routlage.
   Google Scholar
• Falah, G., M. Hoy, and R. Sarker. 2000. “Co-Existence in Selected Mixed Arab-Jewish Cities in Israel: By Choice or by Default?” Urban Studies 37 (4): 775–796.10.1080/00420980050004017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallman, D. 2007. “Supporting Studio Culture in Design Research”. In: Proceedings of international association of societies of design research, the Hong Kong Polytechnic University School of Design, Nov 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Finney, N. and C. Rishbeth. 2006. “Engaging with Marginalised Groups in Public Open Space Research: The Potential of Collaboration and Combined Methods.” Planning Theory & Practice 7 (1): 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2011. “Learning from Practice in the Face of Conflict and Integrating Technical Expertise with Participatory Planning: Critical Commentaries on the Practice of Planner-Architect Laurence Sherman Mediation and Collaboration in Architecture and Community Planning: A Profile of Larry Sherman Practical Elements of Facilitative Leadership and Collaborative Problem Solving Where Do Collaborative Planning Instincts Come from? Lessons from the Field Words, Bodies, Things.” Planning Theory and Practice 12 (2): 287–310.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, T. D., W. P. Stewart, and K. Gladdys. 2008. “Social Ethics of Landscape Change : Toward Community-Based Land-Use Planning.” Qualitative Inquiry 14 (3): 384–401.10.1177/1077800407309409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goren, T. 2008. Cooperation in the Shadow of Confrontation. Ramat-Gan: University of Bar Ilan Press (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Goren, T. 2006. The Fall of Arab Haifa in 1948. Beer-Sheva: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev Press (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Gregoy, A., and A. Heiselt 2014. “Reflecting on Service-Learning in Architecture: Increasing the Academic Relevance of Public Interest Design Projects”, Globalizing Architecture: Flows and Disruptions, in 102nd ACSA Annual Meeting
   Google Scholar
• Habibi, E. 1993. Sarayah, the Ghoul’s Daughter. Tel Aviv: Hakibbutz Hameuhad (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Haifa Municipality. 2015. “Demography, Strategic Planning and Research.” In Statistical Yearbook, 63. Haifa, Haifa Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdi, N. 2011. The Placemaker's Guide to Building Community. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, M. C., R. A. Eribes, and C. Poster, eds. 2006. From the Studio to the Streets: Service Learning in Planning and Architecture. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2003. “The Right to the City.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (4): 939–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, D. 1995. The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P. 2006. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holston, J. 2008. Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J., and A. Loukaitou-Sideris. 2001. “Choosing Confrontations or Consensus in the Inner City: Lessons from a Community University Partnership.” Planning Theory and Practice 2 (3): 293–310.10.1080/14649350120096839
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. 1998. “Information in Communicative Action Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 64: 52–63.10.1080/01944369808975956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P., and L. Forsyth. 2009. Architecture. Routlage: Participation and Society, London.
   Google Scholar
• Kallus, R. 2011. “Politics of Urban Space in an Ethno-Nationally Contested City: Strategies and Everyday Practices”, Chapter 4 In Everyday Life in the Segmented City, edited by Perrone, C., Manella, G. and Tripodi, L., 67–96, Research in Urban Sociology 11. London: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Kallus, R., and T. Shamur. 2015. “Professional Education in an Ethno-Nationally Contested City: Architectural Students Engage with Their Professional and National Identities.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 32 (1): 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanafani, G. 2001[1969]. “Returning to Haifa.” In The Other Rooms: Three Palestinian Novellas, edited by A. Elad-Bouskila. Or Yehudah: Hed Artsi (translated from Arabic into Hebrew by Shilo Gideon and Shanibuim Itzhak).
   Google Scholar
• Keith, M., and S. Pile, eds. 1993. Place and the Politics of Identity. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, L. 2008. Triumph of Order: Democracy and Public Space in New York and London. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerling, B. 2008. Clash of Identities: Explorations in Israeli and Palestinian Societies. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmerling, B. and J.S. Migdal. 2003. The Palestinian People: A History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1996 [1968]. “The Right to the City” In Writings on Cities, edited by H. Lefebvre (Auth.), E. Kofman and E. Lebas, 63–184. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laino, H., and M. Laine. 2012. “Do Matters of Concern Matter? Bringing Issues back to Participation.” Planning Theory 11 (1): 89–103.10.1177/1473095211417595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukaitou-Sideris, A. 1993. “Privatization of Public Open Space: The Los Angeles Experience.” Town Planning Review 64 (2): 139–167.10.3828/tpr.64.2.6h26535771454436
   Google Scholar
• Madan, C., and N. Bansal. 2013. “Multi-Disciplinary Approach in Education Design”. Journal of Art and Architecture Studies 2 (2): 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Marcos, R., and U. Weiland, eds. 2013. Handmade Urbanism: Mumbai, São Paulo, Istanbul, Mexico City, Cape Town: From Community Initiatives to Participatory Models. Berlin: Jovis.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, L. C., and D. D. Perkins. 2006. “Finding Common Ground: The Importance of Place Attachment to Community Participation and Planning.” Journal of Planning Literature 20 (4): 335–350.10.1177/0885412205286160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2003. The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York, NY: Gulliford.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 1995. “The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85 (1): 108–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. B. 1996. “About Suffering: Voice, Genre, and Moral Community”, about Suffering: Voice, Genre, and Moral Community.” Daedalus 125 (1): 25–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyseth, T., J. Ploger, and T. Holm. 2010. “Planning beyond the Horizon: The Tromsø Experiment.” Planning Theory 9 (3): 223–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, D., and D. Monterescu. 2008. “Reconfiguring the Mixed Town: Urban Transformations of Ethnonational Relations in Palestine and Israel.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 40: 195–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roakes, S., and D. Norris-Tirrell. 2000. “Community Service Learning in Planning Education: A Framework for Course Development.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 20: 100–110.10.1177/073945600128992636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J. 2002. “Reflexivity Redux: A Pithy Polemic on ‘Positionality’.” Anthropological Quarterly 75 (4): 755–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, R. ed. 2012. Haifa: Between Reality and a Vision for a Shared City. Haifa: Shatil (in Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., and M. Pennington. 2000. “Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential of Social Capital.” Local Environment 5 (2): 153–169.10.1080/13549830050009328
   Google Scholar
• Salama, A., and N. Wilkinson, eds. 2007. Design Studio Pedagogy: Horizons for the Future. Gateshead, England: The Urban International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saltzman, C. 2002. “On Reflexivity.” American Anthropologist 104 (3): 805–811.10.1525/aa.2002.104.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercook, L. 2003. “Out of the Closet: The Importance of Stories and Storytelling in Planning Practice.” Planning Theory and Practice 4 (1): 11–28.10.1080/1464935032000057209
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L., and G. Attili 2010. Multimedia Explorations in Urban Policy and Planning: Beyond the Flatlands. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Segev, T. 1984. 1949: The First Israelis. Jerusalem: Domono Press (Hebrew).
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2002. “Cosmopolitanism and the Social Experience of Cities.” In Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context and Practice, edited by Vertovec Steven and Robin Cohen, 42–47. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1977. The Fall of Public Man. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, A., and B. Cosgriff. 1998. “Problem-Based Learning: A Bridge between Planning Education and Planning Practice.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 17: 348–357.10.1177/0739456X9801700409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, W. 2011. “Strategy-Making for Sustainability: An Institutional Learning Approach to Transformative Planning Practice.” Planning Theory and Practice 12 (2): 205–221.10.1080/14649357.2011.580158
   Google Scholar
• Stohr, K., and C. Sinclair. 2012. Design like You Give a Damn: Building Change from the Ground up. New York, NY: Harry N. Abrams.
   Google Scholar
• Stohr, K., and C. Sinclair. 2006. Design like You Give a Damn: Architectural Responses to Humanitarian Crises. Melbourne: Metropolis Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, N., and S. Low. 2006. “Introduction: The Imperative of Public Space.” In The Politics of Public Space, edited by S. Low and N. Smith, 1–16. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spiller, N., and N. Clear, eds. 2014. Educating Architects: How Tomorrow's Practitioners Will Learn Today. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2000. “The Problem with Community in Planning.” Journal of Planning Literature 15 (2): 171–183.10.1177/08854120022092971
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2009. Urban Design Reclaimed: Tools, Techniques, and Strategies for Planners. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association: Planners Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2013. “Physical Clarity and Necessary Interruption.” Planning Theory and Practice 14 (2): 272–274.
   Google Scholar
• Umemoto, K., and H. Igarashi. 2009. “Deliberative Planning in a Multicultural Milieu.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 29 (1): 39–53.10.1177/0739456X09338160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 1996. “Renegotiating the ‘Heterosexual Street’: Lesbian Production of Space.” In Body Space: Destabilizing Geographies of Gender and Sexuality, edited by N. Duncan, 145–154. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Herzele, A. 2004. “Local Knowledge in Action: Valuing Nonprofessional Reasoning in the Planning Process.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 24 (2): 197–212.10.1177/0739456X04267723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vande Moere, A., and D. Hill. 2012. “Designing for the Situated and Public Visualization of Urban Data.” Journal of Urban Technology 19 (2): 25–46.10.1080/10630732.2012.698065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin, S., and L. Horelli 2012. “Playing with the Glocal through Participatory E-Planning”. Journal of Community Informatics 8 (3) online.
   Google Scholar
• Wates, N. 2000. The Community Planning Handbook. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, P. 2015. “Meet Me on the Corner? Shaping the Conditions for Cross-cultural Interaction in Urban Public Space.” In: Interculturalism in Cities: Concept, Policy and Implementation, edited by R. Zapata-Barrero, 53–75. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Yanar, A. 2007. “Knowledge, Skills and Indoctrination in Studio Pedagogy.” In Design Studio Pedagogy: Horizons for the Future, Gateshead, edited by A. Salama and N. Wilkinson, 63–73. England: The Urban International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yaron, H. 2010. Zionist Arabesques: Modern Landscapes, Non-Modern Texts. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yonay, Y. 2000. “An Ethnographer's Credo: Methodological Reflections following an Anthropological Journey among the Econ.” Journal of Economic Issues 34 (2): 341–356.10.1080/00213624.2000.11506272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D., and A. Meneley, eds. 2005. Auto-Ethnographies: The Anthropology of Academic Practices, Peterborough. Ontario: Broadview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 1997. “Cultural Strategies of Economic Development and the Hegemony of Vision.” In The Urbanization of Injustice, edited by A. Merrifield and E. Swyngedouw, 223–243. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
   Google Scholar