Residents’ preferences for walkable neighbourhoods

References

• Astell-Burt, Thomas, Xiaoqi Feng, and Gregory S. Kolt. 2013. “Green Space is Associated with Walking and Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) in Middle-to-Older-Aged Adults: Findings from 203 883 Australians in the 45 and up Study.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 48 (5): 404–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. 2007. Doing Focus Groups. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P., and K. Jackson, eds. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. London: Sage Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Beesley, Kerry, Jennifer Helen White, Megan K. Alston, Anne L. Sweetapple, and Michael Pollack. 2011. “Art after Stroke: The Qualitative Experience of Community Dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Group Art Programme.” Disability & Rehabilitation 33 (22–23): 2346–2355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloor, M., J. Frankland, M. Thomas, and K. Robson. 2001. Focus Groups in Social Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, Michael L., Neville Owen, Adrian Bauman, Ornella Clavisi, and Eva Leslie. 2000. “Social–Cognitive and Perceived Environment Influences Associated with Physical Activity in Older Australians.” Preventive Medicine 31 (1): 15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breheny, M. 1997. “Urban Compaction: Feasible and Acceptable?” Cities 14 (4): 209–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calthorpe, Peter. 1993. The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, Matthew, Steven Tiesdell, Tim Health, and Taner Oc, eds. 2010. Public Places, Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Couch, C., and J. Karecha. 2006. “Controlling Urban Sprawl: Some Experiences from Liverpool.” Cities 23 (5): 353–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupland, A. 1997. “Local Policy and Mixed Uses.” In Reclaiming the City - Mixed Use Development, edited by A. Coupland, 203–226. London: E&RN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Cozens, Paul, and David Hillier. 2008. “The Shape of Things to Come: New Urbanism, the Grid and the Cul-De-Sac.” International Planning Studies 13 (1): 51–73.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. E. 1991. Contested Ground—Collective Action and the Urban Neighborhood. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davison, G., K. Dovey, and I. Woodcock. 2012. “‘Keeping Dalston Different’: Defending Place-Identity in East London.” Planning Theory & Practice 13 (1): 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Day, Rosemary. 2008. “Local Environments and Older People’s Health: Dimensions from a Comparative Qualitative Study in Scotland.” Health & Place 14 (2): 299–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 2005. “Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More than We Do It.” Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (4): 367–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duany, Andres, Jeff Speck, and Mike Lydon, eds. 2010. The Smart Growth Manual. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P., and A. Tsouros. 2006. Promoting Physical Activity and Active Living in Urban Environments: The Role of Local Governments. Copenhagen: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Filion, P., T. Bunting, and K. Warriner. 1999. “The Entrenchment of Urban Dispersion: Residential Preferences and Location Patterns in the Dispersed City.” Urban Studies 36 (8): 1317–1347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, L. D., J. F. Sallis, B. E. Saelens, L. Leary, K. Cain, T. L. Conway, and P. M. Hess. 2010. “The Development of a Walkability Index: Application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study.” British Journal of Sports Medicine 44 (13): 924–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulford, C. 1996. “The Compact City and the Market: The Case of Residential Development.” In The Compact City—Sustainable Urban Form? edited by M. Jenks, E. Burton, and K. Williams, 105–115. London: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2010. Cities for People. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2011. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington D.C.: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P., and H. Richardson. 1997. “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?” Journal of the American Planning Association 63 (1): 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griew, Pippa, Melvyn Hillsdon, Charlie Foster, Emma Coombes, Andy Jones, and Paul Wilkinson. 2013. “Developing and Testing a Street Audit Tool Using Google Street View to Measure Environmental Supportiveness for Physical Activity.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 10 (1): 103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, S., J. F. Sallis, D. Weber, E. Maibach, and M. Hollander. 2008. “Is Support for Traditionally Designed Communities Growing? Evidence from Two National Surveys.” Journal of the American Planning Association 74 (2): 209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy, Susan, Xinyu Cao, and Patricia L. Mokhtarian. 2006. “Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California.” Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (1): 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., P. McNamara, M. Elson, and A. Doak. 1988. Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change—The British Planning System in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, Peter, Mark Scott, and Declan Redmond. 2009. “An Examination of Residential Preferences for Less Sustainable Housing: Exploring Future Mobility among Dublin Central City Residents.” Cities 26 (1): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P. 2008. “Regulating the Social Impacts of Studentification: A Loughborough Case Study.” Environment and Planning A 40 (2): 323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humpel, Nancy, Neville Owen, Don Iverson, Eva Leslie, and Adrian Bauman. 2004. “Perceived Environment Attributes, Residential Location, and Walking for Particular Purposes.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 26 (2): 119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, H., and L. Yardley 2004. “Content and Thematic Analysis.” In Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology, edited by H. Joffe and L. Yardley, 56–68. London: Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J. 1995. “Qualitative Research. Introducing Focus Groups.” BMJ : British Medical Journal 311 (7000): 299–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Fanhua, Haiwei Yin, and Nobukazu Nakagoshi. 2007. “Using GIS and Landscape Metrics in the Hedonic Price Modeling of the Amenity Value of Urban Green Space: A Case Study in Jinan City, China.” Landscape and Urban Planning 79 (3–4): 240–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koster, H. J., and J. Rouwendal. 2012. “The Impact of Mixed Land Use on Residential Property Values.” Journal of Regional Science 52 (5): 733–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., and M. A. Casey. 2000. Focus Groups. a Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Sungduck, and Emily Talen. 2014. “Measuring Walkability: A Note on Auditing Methods.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (3): 368–388.
   Google Scholar
• Leinberger, C. B., and M. Alfonzo. 2012. Walk This Way: The Economic Promise of Walkable Places in Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Washington: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Leishman, C., P. Aspinall, M. Munro, and F. J. Warren. 2004. Preferences, Quality and Choice in New-Build Housing. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Levine. 2006. Zoned Out: Regulation, Markets, and Choices in Transportation and Metropolitan Land-Use. Washington: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, J., and L. D. Frank. 2007. “Transportation and Land-Use Preferences and Residents’ Neighborhood Choices: The Sufficiency of Compact Development in the Atlanta Region.” Transportation 34 (2): 255–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. G., and M. Baldassare. 2010. “The Complexity of Public Attitudes toward Compact Development: Survey Evidence from Five States.” Journal of the American Planning Association 76 (2): 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyden, K. M. 2003. “Social Capital and the Built Environment: The Importance of Walkable Neighbourhoods.” American Journal of Public Health 93 (9): 1546–1551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, F. H., S. Farber, and R. Ewing. 2015. “Compact Development and Preference Heterogeneity in Residential Location Choice Behaviour: A Latent Class Analysis.” Urban Studies 52 (2): 314–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linowes, R. R., and D. T. Allensworth. 1973. The Politics of Land Use—Planning, Zoning and the Private Developer. New York: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, A., P. Hall, and N. Gallent. 2007. “New East Manchester: Urban Renaissance or Urban Opportunism?” European Planning Studies 15 (1): 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson, W. 1977. Environmental Choice, Human Behaviour, and Residential Satisfaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow-Jones, H. A., E. G. Irwin, and B. Roe. 2004. “Consumer Preference for Neotraditional Neighborhood Characteristics.” Housing Policy Debate 15 (1): 171–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D., and E. Gearin. 2001. “Current Preferences and Future Demand for Denser Residential Environments.” Housing Policy Debate 12 (4): 633–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. [n.d]. Neighbourhood Statistics, [online] http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Neville, Ester Cerin, Eva Leslie, Lorinne duToit, Neil Coffee, Lawrence D. Frank, Adrian E. Bauman, Graeme Hugo, Brian E. Saelens, and James F. Sallis. 2007. “Neighborhood Walkability and the Walking Behavior of Australian Adults.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 33 (5): 387–395. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Neville, Nancy Humpel, Eva Leslie, Adrian Bauman, and James F. Sallis. 2004. “Understanding Environmental Influences on Walking: Review and Research Agenda.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27 (1): 67–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2001. “Neighbourhood Activism amongst Homeowners as a Politics of Space.” Professional Geographer 53 (2): 178–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, Daniel J., and James R. Dunn. 2015. “Tenure-Mix in Toronto: Resident Attitudes and Experience in the Regent Park Community.” Housing Studies 30 (8): 1257–1280. doi:10.1080/02673037.2015.1013091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, A. 1996. “Mixed-Use Development: Ambiguous Concept, Simplistic Analysis and Wishful Thinking?” Planning Practice and Research 11 (1): 85–97.
   Google Scholar
• Saelens, Brian E., James F. Sallis, and Lawrence D. Frank. 2016. “Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling: Findings from the Transportation, Urban Design, and Planning Literatures.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine 25 (2): 80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallis, James F., Robert B. Cervero, William Ascher, Karla A. Henderson, M. Katherine Kraft, and Jacqueline Kerr. 2006. “An Ecological Approach to Creating Active Living Communities.” Annual Review of Public Health 27 (1): 297–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, P. 1980. Urban Politics: A Sociological Interpretation. Harmondsworth: Penguine Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M., P. Russell, and D. Redmond. 2007. “Active Citizenship, Civil Society and Managing Spatial Change in the Rural-Urban Fringe.” Policy and Politics 35 (1): 163–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M., P. Russell, and D. Redmond. 2012. “Active Citizenship and Local Representational Politics in 21st Century Ireland: The Role of Residents’ Groups within Dublin’s Planning Arena.” European Planning Studies 20 (2): 147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senior, M., C. Webster, and N. Blank. 2004. “Residential Preferences versus Sustainable Cities: Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence from a Survey of Relocating Owner-Occupiers.” Town Planning Review 75 (3): 337–357.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J. R., S. Fleming, and S. Witt. 1986. Housebuilding, Planning and Community Action: The Production and Negotiation of the Built Environment. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Plc.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., and N. S. Billig. 2012. “Public Perceptions of Compact Suburbia in Progressive, Burgeoning Communities.” Journal of Urban Design 17 (3): 313–335.
   Google Scholar
• Song, Y., and G. J. Knaap. 2003. “New Urbanism and Housing Values: A Disaggregate Assessment.” Journal of Urban Economics 54 (2): 218–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southampton City Council. 2004. Development Design Guide. Southampton: Southampton City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Southampton City Council. 2006. Residential Design Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Southampton City Council. 2015. Local Development Framework Core Strategy Development Plan Document - Amended Version Incorporating the Core Strategy Partial Review March 2015. Southampton: Southampton City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E., ed. 2013. Charter of the New Urbanism. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.
   Google Scholar
• Tu, C. C., and M. J. Eppli. 1999. “Valuing New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands.” Real Estate Economics 27 (3): 425–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, C. C., and M. J. Eppli. 2001. “An Empirical Examination of Traditional Neighborhood Development.” Real Estate Economics 29 (3): 485–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2014. A New Strategy of Sustainable Neighbourhood Planning: Five Principles. Nairobi: UN-Habitat Urban Planning and Design Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Upreti, Bishnu Raj, and Dan van der Horst. 2004. “National Renewable Energy Policy and Local Opposition in the UK: The Failed Development of a Biomass Electricity Plant.” Biomass and Bioenergy 26 (1): 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation. 2007. Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide. Geneva: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. 1999. “Urban Intensification Policies in England: Problems and Contradictions.” Land Use Policy 16 (3): 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and K. O’Neill. 2014. “Understanding Factors Affecting People’s Attitudes toward Living in Compact and Mixed-Use Environments: A Case Study of a New Urbanist Project in Eugene, Oregon, USA.” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability 7 (1): 1–22.
   Google Scholar