Transforming spaces into lively public open places: case studies of practical interventions

References

• Barendse P, S. Duerink, Y. Govaart. 2007. “A Multi Stakeholder Collaborative Urban Planning Model”. ENHR 2007 International Conference ‘Sustainable Urban Areas’, Workshop 21: Tools to facilitate housing and urban processes. Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, H. 2009. “Linking the Quality of Public Spaces to Quality of Life.” Journal of Place Management and Development 2 (3): 240–248.
   Google Scholar
• Bolitzer, B., and N. R. Netusil. 2000. “The Impact of Open Spaces on Property Values in Portland, Oregon.” Journal of Environmental Management 59 (3): 185–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolund, P., and S. Hunhammar. 1999. “Ecosystem Services in Urban Areas.” Ecological Economics 29 (2): 293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona M., W. Heath, T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell. 2003. Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., C. Magalheas, and L. Hammond. 2008. Public Space: The Management Dimension. London and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, K., and B. Roberts. 2011. Competitive Cities in the 21st Century: Cluster-Based Local Economic Development. Mandaluyong City, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• City of Johannesburg. 2004. “Delineate and Manage an Urban Development Boundary. Integrated Development Plan 2003/2004.” Chapter 8: 211–283.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, J., and M. Morner. 2005. “Corporate Commons: Sustaining Competitiveness through Public Goods in Multidivisional Firms.” International Journal of Learning and Change 1 (1): 28–45.
   Google Scholar
• Future of places. 2015. “Benefits of Public Space.” Accessed September 10, 2015. http://futureofplaces.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/FoP_Benefits-of-Public-Space.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hobart City Council. 2011. Public Spaces and Public Life, a City with People in Mind: Plans for a Lively Inner City. Tasmania: Hobart City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkison, S., and J. M. Hero. 2004. “The Efficacy of Small-Scale Conservation Efforts, as Assessed on Australian Golf Courses.” Biological Conservation 135 (4): 576–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jepson Jr, E. J., 2007. “Reviews - Land Use, Zoning, Growth Management, and Planning Law-Urban Place: Reconnecting with the Natural World.” Journal of the American Planning Association 73(1): 121.
   Google Scholar
• Jim, C., Y. Wendy, and Y. Chen. 2006. “Impacts of Urban Environmental Elements on Residential Housing Prices in Guangzhou (China).” Journal of Landscape and Urban Planning 78: 422–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazmierczak, A. E., R. P. Armitage, and P. James. 2010. “Urban Green Spaces: Natural and Accessible?” In The Case of Greater Manchester, UK. Urban Biodiversity and Design, Conservation Science and Practice Series, edited by N. Müller, P. Werner, and J. G. Kelcey, 383–405. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• LICI. 2014. “Lively Cities Project. Reclaim Public Space for Public Use.” http://www.lively-cities.eu/urban-lifestyle-point-ulp-rubrique-15-2.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., F. Mao, W. Zhou, Q. Li, J. Haung, and X. Zhu. 2007. Accessibility Assessment of Urban Green Space: A Quantitative Perspective. Beijing: School of Architecture, Tsinghua University. 2p.
   Google Scholar
• Loudier, C., and J. L. Dubois. 2001. “Public Spaces: Between Insecurity and Hospitality”, Cahiers de l'IAURIF. Institut d’Aménagement et urbanisme de la Région d’Ile-de-France, 2002, 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard H, S. Borresen. 2010. Urban Space for Everyone: Conclusions and Recommendations. The Danish Crime Prevention Council and the Danish Building Research Institute (SBi). Aalborg: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Poklembovái, V., T. Kluvánková-Oravskáii, M. Finkaiii. 2013. “Challenges of New Commons, Urban Public Spaces”.
   Google Scholar
• PPS (Project for Public Places). 2011. “Why Public Spaces Fail. Placemaking for Communities.” 6. http://www.pps.org/reference/grplacefeat/.
   Google Scholar
• PPS (Project for Public Places). 2012. “Placemaking and the Future of Cities.” 35. http://www.pps.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/PPS-Placemaking-and-the-Future-of-Cities.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Soholt H. 2004. “Life, Spaces and Buildings—Turning the Traditional Planning Process Upside down”. Walk21-V Cities for People, 5th International Conference on Walking in the 21st Century, June 9-11 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, R. 2006. Urban Spaces—Enhancing the Attractiveness and Quality of the Urban Environment. Vienna: WP3 Joint Strategy. University of Technology. December 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sutanta H., A. Rajabifard, I. D. Bishop. 2009. “An Integrated Approach for Disaster Risk Reduction Using Spatial Planning and SDI Platform”. Proceedings of the Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial International Conference, Adelaide 2009, Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute, 341–351.
   Google Scholar
• Thaiutsa, B., L. Puangchit, R. Kjelgren, and W. Arunpraparut. 2008. “Urban Green Space, Street Tree and Heritage Large Tree Assessment in Bangkok, Thailand.” Forestry and Urban Greening 7 (3): 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Weiland, U., M. Richter, and H. D. Kasperidus. 2005. “Environmental Management and Planning in Urban Regions - Are There Differences between Growth and Shrinkage?” Sustainable Development and Planning II 1: 441–450.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for Public Spaces.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley H., C. Swanwick, N. Dunnet, 2003. “Nature, Role and Value of Green Space in Towns and Cities: An Overview.” Accessed September 18, 2009. http://www.atypom-link.com/ALEX/doi/abs/10.2148/benv.29.2.94.54467
   Google Scholar
• Wyporek, B. 2000. “ISoCaRP Millennium Report Findings for the Future. the Work of the Congresses of ISoCaRP 1965—1999”. Accessed September 1, 2015. http://isocarp.org/app/uploads/2014/08/millenium_report.pdf
   Google Scholar