Modelling 3D spatial enclosure of urban open spaces

References

• Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa, and M. Silverstein. 1977. A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhresheh, Majdi M. 2007. “Enclosure as a Function of Height-to-Width Ratio and Scale: Its Influence on User’s Sense of Comfort and Safety in Urban Street Space”. Gainesville, FL: Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Florida. Dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Ardaman, Emel. 2007. “Perspective and Istanbul, the Capital of the Ottoman Empire.” Journal of Design History 20 (2): 109–130.10.1093/jdh/epm008
   Google Scholar
• Ashihara, Y. 1983. The Aesthetic Townscape. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, E. N. 1975. Design of Cities. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2001. “Exploring Isovist Fields: Space and Shape in Architectural and Urban Morphology.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 123–150.10.1068/b2725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt, M. L. 1979. “To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6: 47–65.10.1068/b060047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benguigui, L., and D. Czamanski. 2004. “Simulation Analysis of the Fractality of Cities.” Geographical Analysis 36 (1): 69–84.10.1111/gean.2004.36.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottema, Marcel. 1993. “Wind Climate and Urban Geometry.” Doctoral Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbia, F., and F. Boucheriba. 2010. “Impact of Street Design on Urban Microclimate for Semi Arid Climate (Constantine).” Renewable Energy 35 (2): 343–347. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2009.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, Elizabeth. 2000. “The Compact City: Just or Just Compact? A Preliminary Analysis.” Urban Studies 37 (11):1969–2006. http://usj.sagepub.com/content/by/year.10.1080/00420980050162184
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Z., D. G. Favro, and R. Ingersoll. 1994. Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Zeynep. 1993. The Remaking of Istanbul: Portrait of an Ottoman City in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and Y. Zhou. 2003. “The Rank-size Rule and Fractal Hierarchies of Cities: Mathematical Models and Empirical Analyses.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 799–818.10.1068/b2948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen, Gordon. 1971. The Concise Townscape. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, Gordon. 1972. “Space, Time and the Disruption of Behaviour in Cities.” Environment and Planning 4: 459–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerniak, Julia. 2006. “Looking Back at Landscape Urbanism: Speculations on Site.” The Landscape Urbanism Reader: 112–113.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, Reid, and Otto Clemente. 2013. Measuring Urban Design. Washington, DC: Island Press.10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Jia, Cheng-zhao Wu, Geoffrey Wall, and Li Cheng. 2011. “Comparison of Urban Residents’ Use and Perceptions of Urban Open Spaces in China, Canada and USA.” In 47th ISOCARP Congress, Wuhan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., and A. Natapov. 2014. “Different Approaches of Visibility Analyses Applied on Hilly Urban Environment.” Survey Review 46 (338): 366–382. doi:10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., A. Shashkov, and Y. Doytsher. 2013. “Voxel Based Volumetric Visibility Analysis of Urban Environments.” Survey Review 45 (333): 451–461. doi:10.1179/1752270613Y.0000000059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., and I. A. Wagner. 2003. “Spatial Openness as a Practical Metric for Evaluating Built-up Environments.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (1): 37–49.10.1068/b12861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, Dafna. 2014. “3D LOS Visibility Analysis Model: Incorporating Quantitative/Qualitative Aspects in Urban Environments.” In Geodesign by Integrating Design and Geospatial Sciences, edited by Danbi J. Lee, Eduardo Dias, and Henk J. Scholten, 219–236. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, Dafna, Michael Burt, and Yigal Tzamir. 2003. “A 3-D Visual Method for Comparative Evaluation of Dense Built-up Environments.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (4):575–587.10.1068/b2941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, Dafna, and Israel A. Wagner. 2006. “The Spatial Openness Index: An Automated Model for Three Dimensional Visual Analysis of Urban Environments.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 23 (1):77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2001. Life between Buildings: Using Public Space. Bogtrykkeriet, Skive: The Danish Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giritlioğlu, Cengiz. 1991. Şehirsel Mekan Öğeleri Ve Tasarımı. Istanbul, Turkey: İ. T. Ü Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Gousie, Michael B. 2013. “The Case for 3D Visualization in DEM Assessment.” In Advances in Spatial Data Handling, edited by Sabine Timpf and Patrick Laube, 27–43. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hamaina, Rachid, Thomas Leduc, and Guillaume Moreau. 2012. “Towards Urban Fabrics Characterization Based on Buildings Footprints.” In Bridging the Geographic Information Sciences, edited by D. Josselin J. Gensel, and D. Vandenbroucke, 327–346. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, Chester, Lisa Aultman-Hall, Stephanie E. Hurley, and Austin Troy. 2015. “Effects of Skeletal Streetscape Design on Perceived Safety.” Landscape and Urban Planning 142: 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauck, Thomas, and Volker Kleinekort. 2011. “Infrastructural Urbanism: Addressing the in-between.” In Infrastructural Urbanism: Addressing the in-between, edited by Thomas Hauck, Regine Keller, and Volker Kleinekort, 9–18. Berlin: DOM Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Im, Seung-Bin. 1984. “Visual Preferences in Enclosed Urban Spaces: An Exploration of a Scientific Approach to Environmental Design.” Environment and Behavior 16 (2): 235–262. doi:10.1177/0013916584162005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenks, Michael, and Rod Burgess. 2000. Compact Cities: Sustainable Urban Forms for Developing Countries. New York: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karperien, Audrey. 2015. “Fractal Dimansion and Lacunarity: FracLac for ImageJ.” Accessed December 12, 2015. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/plugins/fraclac/fraclac.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, H. Serdar. 2010. “A Quantitative Method Proposal for the Analysis of the Dynamic Structure of Urban Pattern.” PhD Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Koltsova, Anastasia, Bige Tunçer, and Gerhard Schmitt. 2013. “Visibility Analysis for 3D Urban Environments.” Paper presented at the eCAADe 2013: Computation and Performance–Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Delft, The Netherlands, September 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzholzer, Sanda. 2012. “Research and Design for Thermal Comfort in Dutch Urban Squares.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 64: 39–48. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzholzer, Sanda, and Jusuck Koh. 2010. “Immersed in Microclimatic Space: Microclimate Experience and Perception of Spatial Configurations in Dutch Squares.” Landscape and Urban Planning 95 (1–2): 1–15.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morello, E., and C. Ratti. 2009. “A Digital Image of the City: 3D Isovists in Lynch’s Urban Analysis.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36 (5): 837–853.10.1068/b34144t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moughtin, C. 2003a. Urban Design: Method and Techniques. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moughtin, C. 2003b. Urban Design: Street and Square. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moughtin, C., T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell. 1999. Urban Design: Ornament and Decoration. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myint, Soe Win, and Nina Lam. 2005. “A Study of Lacunarity-Based Texture Analysis Approaches to Improve Urban Image Classification.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29 (5): 501–52310.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Nasar, Jack L. 1989. “Perception, Cognition, and Evaluation of Urban Places.” In Public Places and Spaces, edited by Irwin Altman and Ervin H. Zube, 31–56. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4684-5601-1
   Google Scholar
• Oke, T. R. 1988. “Street Design and Urban Canopy Layer Climate.” Energy and Buildings 11 (1–3): 103–113.10.1016/0378-7788(88)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke, T. R. 1987. Boundary Layer Climates. Vol. 5. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Olgyay, Victor, and Aladar Olgyay. 1963. Design with Climate: Bioclimatic Approach to Architectural Regionalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plotnick, R. E., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O’Neill. 1993. “Lacunarity Indices as Measures of Landscape Texture.” Landscape Ecology 8 (3): 201–211.10.1007/BF00125351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A., and R. Hawkes. 1970. “The Perception of Urban Complexity.” Journal of the American Planning Association 36 (2): 106–111.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, Amos. 1987. “Pedestrian Street Use: Culture and Perception.” Public Streets for Public Use: 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rico, Eduardo. 2011. “The Role of Infrastructural Landscapes within the Image of the City.” In Infrastructural Urbanism: Addressing the in-between, edited by Thomas Hauck, Regine Keller, and Volker Kleinekort, 257–272. Berlin: DOM Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A., and B. J. West. 1999. “A Universal Rule for the Distribution of Sizes.” Environment 26: 909–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarradin, F., D. Siret, M. Couprie, and J. Teller. 2007. “Comparing Sky Shape Skeletons for the Analysis of Visual Dynamics along Routes.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34: 840–857.10.1068/b32143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroder, C., W. Mackaness, and F. Reitsma. 2007. Quantifying Urban Visibility Using 3D Space Syntax. Paper presented at the Geographic Information Science research conference (GISRUK), Maynooth, Ireland, 11–13th April 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Shach-Pinsly, Dalit, Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman, and Michael Burt. 2007. “‘Visual Exposure’analysis Model: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Case Studies.” Urban Design International 12 (2–3): 155–168.10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000199
   Google Scholar
• Shach-Pinsly, Dalit, Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman, and Michael Burt. 2011. “Visual Exposure and Visual Openness: An Integrated Approach and Comparative Evaluation.” Journal of Urban Design 16 (2): 233–256. doi:10.1080/13574809.2011.548979.
   Google Scholar
• Sitte, C. 1979. Der Stadtebau Nach Seinen Kunsderischen Grundsdtzen. Reprinted as the Art of Building Cities: City Building according to Its Artistic Fundamentals. Westport: Hyperion Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skauge, Jorn. 1995. “Urban Design Analysis by Computer.” Cities 12 (6): 425–430.10.1016/0264-2751(95)00089-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, Léa Cristina Lucas, Daniel Souto Rodrigues, and José F. G. Mendes. 2003. Sky View Factors Estimation Using a 3D-GIS Extension. Paper presented at the Eighth International IBPSA Conference, Eindhoven, Netherlands, August 11–14.
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E. I. I. I. 2003. “Advances in Visual Diversity and Entropy.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 449–463.10.1068/b12986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps, Arthur E., and Sandy Smith. 2002. “Environmental Enclosure in Urban Settings.” Environment and Behavior 34 (6): 781–794.10.1177/001391602237246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamps, Arthur E. 2002. “Fractals, Skylines, Nature and Beauty.” Landscape and Urban Planning 60 (3): 163–184.10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00054-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suleiman, Wassim, Thierry Joliveau, and Eric Favier. 2013. “A New Algorithm for 3D Isovists.” In Advances in Spatial Data Handling, edited by Sabine Timpf and Patrick Laube, 157–173. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Teller, J. 2003. “A Spherical Metric for the Field-Oriented Analysis of Complex Urban Open Spaces.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 339–356.10.1068/b12930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, Fatih, and Fulin Bolen. 2009. “Urban Sprawl Measurement of Istanbul.” European Planning Studies 17 (10): 1559–1570. doi:10.1080/09654310903141797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theiler, James. 1988. “Lacunarity in a Best Estimator of Fractal Dimension.” Physics Letters A 133 (4–5): 195–200.10.1016/0375-9601(88)91016-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2001. Depthmap: A Program to Perform Visibility Graph Analysis. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Space Syntax Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., M. Doxa, D. O. O’Sullivan, and A. Penn. 2001. “From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28 (1): 103–121.10.1068/b2684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Christopher W. 2003. Human Symmetry Perception and Its Computational Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ünlü, Alper. 1998. Çevresel Tasarımda Ilk Kavramlar [The First Concepts of Environmental Design]. Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul Technical University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villagra, Paula, Carolina Rojas, Ryuzo Ohno, Ma Xue, and Karina Gómez. 2014. “A GIS-Base Exploration of the Relationships between Open Space Systems and Urban Form for the Adaptive Capacity of Cities after an Earthquake: The Cases of Two Chilean Cities.” Applied Geography 48: 64–78. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, Ed. 2011. “Infrastructural Form, Interstitial Spaces and Informal Acts.” In Infrastructural Urbanism: Addressing the in-between, edited by Thomas Hauck, Regine Keller, and Volker Kleinekort, 145–158. Berlin: DOM Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Jianjun, Gary J. Robinson, and Kevin White. 2000. “Generating Viewsheds without Using Sightlines.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66 (1):87–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, H. 2003. Urban Open Spaces. London: Spon Press.10.4324/9780203402146
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X. B., and D. Z. Sui. 2001. “An Initial Exploration of a Lacunarity-based Segregation Measure.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 433–446.10.1068/b2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, P. P. J., S. Y. Putra, and W. Li. 2007. “Viewsphere: A GIS-Based 3D Visibility Analysis for Urban Design Evaluation.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34: 971–992.10.1068/b32142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmeskal, Oldrich, Tomas Bzatek, Martin Nezadal, and Miroslav Buchnicek. 2015. “HarFA, Harmonic and Fractal Image Analyser: Software for Determination of Fractal Dimension.” Accessed December 09, 2015. http://www.fch.vutbr.cz/lectures/imagesci/.
   Google Scholar