Architecture competitions in an urban planning context

References

• Andersson, Jonas E., Gerd Bloxham, Magnus Rönn. 2013. Architectural Competitions: Histories and Practice. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Fjällbacka: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, Ann, and Dick Rigby. 1996. The New Waterfront: A Worldwide Urban Success Story. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chupin, Jean-Pierre. 2015. “Should Competitions Always Be International – Political Reasons in a Multipolar World.” In Architecture Competitions and the Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge, edited by Jean-Pierre Chupin, Carmela Cucuzzella and Bechara Helal, 110–131. Montreal: Potential Architecture Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chupin, Jean-Pierre, Carmela Cucuzzella, and Bechara Helal, eds. 2015. Architecture Competitions and the Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge: An International Inquiry. Montreal: Potential Architecture Books.
   Google Scholar
• Crossman, Carmela. 2015. “Judging Architectural Quality – Judgment Criteria and Competition Juries.” In Architecture Competitions and the Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge, edited by Jean-Pierre Chupin, Carmela Cucuzzella and Bechara Helal. 162–175. Montreal: Potential Architecture Books.
   Google Scholar
• Desfor, Gene, and John Jørgensen. 2004. “Flexible Urban Governance. The Case of Copenhagen’s Recent Waterfront Development.” European Planning Studies 12 (4): 479–496. doi:10.1080/0965431042000212740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fainstein, Susan S. 2008. “Mega-projects in New York, London and Amsterdam.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (4): 768–785. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00826.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, James R. 2010. “Global Architects: Learning and Innovation through Communities and Constellations of Practice.” Environment and Planning A 42 (12): 2842–2858.10.1068/a4311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florida, Richard L. 2004. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, María V. 1998. “Reflective images: The Case of Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22 (1): 106–121. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, María V., and Sara González. 2001. “A Reply to Beatriz Plaza’s ‘The Guggenheim-Bilbao Museum Effect’.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (4): 898–900. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbauer, Monika. 2012. “Starchitecture Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities, by Davide Ponzini and Michele Nastasi.” Urban Research & Practice 5 (3): 371–372. doi:10.1080/17535069.2012.727573.
   Google Scholar
• Hagelqvist, Stina. 2010. “The Competition System.” In The Architectural Competition: Research, Inquiries and Experiences, edited by Magnus Rönn, Reza Kazemian, and Jonas E. Andersson, 425–448. Stockholm: Axl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism.” Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17. doi:10.2307/490503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofseth, Marius. 2008. “The New Opera House in Oslo – A Boost for Urban Development?” Urban Research & Practice 1 (1): 101–103. doi:10.1080/17535060701795413.
   Google Scholar
• Kaipiainen, Maarit. 2013. “Architectural Competitions in Finland.” In Architectural Competitions – Histories and Practice, edited by Jonas E. Andersson, Gerd Bloxham Zettersten, and Magnus Rönn, 23–35. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Fjällbacka: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Katsakou, Antigoni. 2013. “The Competition Generation. Young Professionals Emerging in the Architectural Scene of Switzerland through the Process Framework of Housing Competitions – Case Study.” In Architectural Competitions – Histories and Practice, edited by Jonas E. Andersson, Gerd Bloxham Zettersten, and Magnus Rönn, 37–65. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Fjällbacka: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemian, Reza. 2010. “Urban Design Competition Versus Design Interactivity and Communicative Quality Judgment.” In The Architectural Competition: Research Inquiries and Experiences, edited by Magnus Rönn, Reza Kazemian, and Jonas E. Andersson, 561–575. Stockholm: Axl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, Kristian. 2010. “Architectural Competitions: Empirical Observations and Strategic Implications for Architectural Firms.” In The Architectural Competition – Research Inquiries and Experiences, edited by Magnus Rönn, Reza Kazemian, and Jonas E. Andersson, 101–124. Stockholm: Axl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, Kristian. 2013. “Constructing the Client in Architectural Competitions. An Ethnographic Study of Architects’ Practices and the Strategies They Reveal.” In Architectural Competitions – Histories and Practice, edited by Jonas E. Andersson, Gerd Bloxham Zettersten, and Magnus Rönn, 217–241. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Fjällbacka: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Lipstadt, Hélène. 1989. The Experimental Tradition: Essays on Competitions in Architecture, edited by Barry Bergdoll and Architectural League of New York. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lipstadt, Hélène. 2009. “Experimenting with the Experimental Tradition, 1989–2009: On Competitions and Architecture Research.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2/3): 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Richard, ed. 2007. Waterfronts in Post-Industrial Cities: [Based on a Three-Day Conference entitled “Waterfronts in Post Industrial Cities”, Cambridge, October 1999]. Digital. Nachdr. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. 2009. The Global Architect: Firms, Fame and Urban Form. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.no/books?id=O82SAgAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Oslo Municipality. 2008. Fjorbyplanen. Oslo Municipality. https://www.oslo.kommune.no/getfile.php/Innhold/Plan%2C%20bygg%20og%20eiendom/Overordnede%20planer/Omr%C3%A5de%20-%20og%20planprogrammer/Plan%20for%20Fjordbyen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oslo Municipality. 2017. Accessed January 22. http://www.kulturbyggene.no/nyheter-munch/se-hvordan-rabygget-til-munchmuseet-ble-reist-pa-33-dogn-article377-459.html
   Google Scholar
• Paisiou, S. 2012. “Four Performances for the New Acropolis Museum.” Geographica Helvetica 66 (1): 33–41. doi:10.5194/gh-66-33-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, Jamie. 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580576.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Plaza, Beatriz. 1999. “The Guggenheim-Bilbao Museum Effect: A Reply to María V. Gomez’’Reflective Images: The Case of Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao’.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 23 (3): 589–592. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.00215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, Beatriz. 2006. “The Return on Investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (2): 452–467. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00672.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder, Bernhard. 2013. “Studying Facebook via Data Extraction: The Netvizz Application.” In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, 346–355. Paris, France: ACM.10.1145/2464464
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, Magnus. 2009. “Judgement in Architectural Competitions.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2/3): 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, Leonie, and Kim Dovey. 2002. “Pleasure, Politics, and the ‘Public Interest’: Melbourne’s Riverscape Revitalization.” Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (2): 151–164. doi:10.1080/01944360208976262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirefman, Susanna. 2015. “Design Combat – American Competitions and Decision-Making.” In Architecture Competitions and the Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge, edited by Jean-Pierre Chupin, Carmela Cucuzzella, and Bechara Helal, 216–229. Montreal: Potential Architecture Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Andrew, Ingvild von Krogh Strand. 2010. “Oslo’s New Opera House: Cultural Flagship, Regeneration Tool or Destination Icon?” European Urban and Regional Studies 18 (1): 93–110. doi:10.1177/0969776410382595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSB. 2016. “Økonomiske Analyser: Befolkningsframskrivinger" [ Economic Analysis: Population Projections]. 3/2016. Økonomiske Analyser.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, Judith. 2013. “Prequalification in the UK and Design Team Selection Procedures.” In Architectural Competitions – Histories and Practice, edited by Jonas E. Andersson, Gerd Bloxham Zettersten, and Magnus Rönn, 135–156. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Fjällbacka: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Charlotte. 2012. “Architectural Persuasion: On Quality Assessment in an Architectural Competition.” NA 24 (1). http://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/view/20.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, Charlotte. 2013. “Speaking of Architecture. A Study of the Jury’s Assessment in an Invited Competition.” NA 21 (2–3). http://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/view/90.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik, Frank Moulaert, and Arantxa Rodriguez. 2002. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode 34 (3): 542–577. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tostrup, Elisabeth. 2010. “Promoting the Best: On Competition Rhetoric.” In The Architectural Competition – Research Inquiries and Experiences, edited by Magnus Rönn, Reza Kazemian, and Jonas E. Andersson, 77–96. Stockholm: Axl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Våland, Marianne Stang. 2009. “End User Participation as an Input to Shape the Brief in Architectural Competitions—A Threefold Translation Process.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2/3): 108–122.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wezemael, J. 2012. “Forms, Places and Processes: Tracing Geographies of Architecture Through Design Competitions. Introduction to the Special Issue.” Geographica Helvetica 66 (1): 2–4. doi:10.5194/gh-66-2-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wezemael, J., and Jan Michel Silberberger. 2015. “We Have Never Been Swiss – Some Reflections on Helvetic Competition Culture.” In Architecture Competitions and the Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge, edited by Jean-Pierre Chupin, Carmela Cucuzzella, and Bechara Helal, 26–35. Montreal: Potential Architecture Books.
   Google Scholar
• Volker, Leentje. 2013. “Facing the Challenges of Organising a Competition – The Building for Bouwkunde Case.” In Architectural Competitions – Histories and Practices, edited by Jonas E. Andersson, Gerd Bloxham Zettersten, and Magnus Rönn, 193–215. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, Fjällbacka: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Volker, Leentje, and J. van Meel. 2012. “Dutch Design Competitions: Lost in EU Directives? Procurement Issues of Architect Selections in the Netherlands.” Geographica Helvetica 66 (1): 24–32. doi:10.5194/gh-66-24-2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, Loïc. 2012. “Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism.” Social Anthropology 20 (1): 66–79. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00189.x.
   Google Scholar
• Zettersten, Gerd Bloxham. 2010. “The Building of Visions and the Municipal Client’s Role?” In The Architectural Competition – Research Inquiries and Experiences, edited by Magnus Rönn, Reza Kazemian, and Jonas E. Andersson, 373–393. Stockholm: Axl Books.
   Google Scholar