The impacts of mandatory design competitions on urban design quality in Sydney, Australia

References

• Alexander, Ernest R., and Lawrence P. Witzling. 1990. “Planning and Urban Design Compeititons: Introduction and Overview.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 7 (2): 91–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, Jonas, Magnus Rönn, and Leif Östman. 2013. “Editorial: Architectural Competitions I – Exploring the Phenomenon of Competing in Architecture and Urban Design.” FORMakademisk 6 (4): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Jonas, Magnus Rönn, and Leif Östman. 2014. “Editorial: Architectural Competition II—The Dynamics of Competing and Organising Competitions in Architecture and Urban Design.” FORMakademisk 7 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, Tridib, and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris. 1990. “Competitions as a Design Method: An Inquiry.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 7 (2): 114–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Jonathan. 1974. Urban Design as Public Policy. New York: Architectural Record, McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, Ian. 2004. Urban Transformations : Power, People and Urban Design. 1st ed. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 2011. “Urban Design, Regeneration and the Entrepreneurial City.” Progress in Planning 76 (2): 63–103.10.1016/j.progress.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CABE. 2006. Design Review: How CABE Evaluates Quality in Architecture and Urban Design. London: CABE.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, Matthew. 2009. “Design Coding and the Creative, Market and Regulatory Tyrannies of Practice.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2643–2667.10.1177/0042098009344226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, Matthew. 2016a. “Design Governance: Theorizing an Urban Design Sub-Field.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (6): 705–730.10.1080/13574809.2016.1234337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, Matthew. 2016b. “The Formal and Informal Tools of Design Governance.” Journal of Urban Design. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13574809.2016.1234338
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, Matthew, Steve Tiesdell, Tim Heath, and Taner Oc. 2010. Public Places-Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chupin, Jean-Pierre. 2011. “Judgement by Design: Towards a Model for Studying and Improving the Competition Process in Architecture and Urban Design.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 27 (1): 173–184. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chupin, Jean-Pierre, Carmela Cucuzzella, and Bechara Helal, eds. 2015. Architecture Competitions and the Production of Culture, Quality and Knowledge. Montreal: Potential Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• City of Sydney. 2012. “Local Environmental Plan.” Accessed November 1, 2016. http://www.legislation.nsw.gov.au/#/view/EPI/2012/628.
   Google Scholar
• City of Sydney. 2013. Competitive Design Policy. November 1, 2016. http://www.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/128065/Competitive-design-policy-adopted-09-December-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Eric, and Marilyn Higgins. 2009. “How Planning Authorities Can Improve Quality through the Design Review Process: Lessons from Edinburgh.” Journal of Urban Design 14 (1): 101–114.10.1080/13574800802452930
   Google Scholar
• DETR. 2000. By Design: Urban Design in the Planning System: Towards Better Practice. London: DETR.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, Kim. 2005. Fluid City: Transforming Melbourne’s Urban Waterfront. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, Reid, and Otto Clemente. 2013. Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places. Washington DC: Island Press.10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, Richard, Antonio Tavares, and Mark Lubell. 2008. “Policy Instrument Choices for Growth Management and Land Use Regulation.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (3): 461–480.10.1111/psj.2008.36.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garde, Ajay. 2014. “Citizen Participation, Design Competition and the Product in Urban Design: Insights from the Orange County Great Park.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 89–118. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854697.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, Jan. 2013. Cities for People. Washington, DC: Island press.
   Google Scholar
• George, R. Varkki. 1997. “A Procedural Explanation for Contemporary Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 2 (2): 143–161.10.1080/13574809708724401
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, Brendan, and Nicholas Low. 2000. Australian Urban Planning: New Challenges, New Agendas. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, María V. 1998. “Reflective Images: The Case of Urban Regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 22 (1): 106–121.10.1111/ijur.1998.22.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gospodini, Aspa. 2002. “European Cities in Competition and the New ‘Uses’ of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (1): 59–73.10.1080/13574800220129231
   Google Scholar
• Gospodini, Aspa. 2006. “Portraying, Classifying and Understanding the Emerging Landscapes in the Post-Industrial City.” Cities 23 (5): 311–330.10.1016/j.cities.2006.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, Phil. 1996. “Urban Design and City Regeneration: Social Representations of Entrepreneurial Landscapes.” Urban Studies 33 (8): 1441–1461. doi:10.1080/0042098966745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemian, Reza, and Magnus Rönn. 2009. “Finnish Architectural Competitions: Structure, Criteria and Judgement Process.” Building Research & Information 37 (2): 176–186.10.1080/09613210802450705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingmann, Anna. 2007. Brandscapes : Architecture in the Experience Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, Paul. 2011. Cities and Design. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Ute. 2011. “Design Competitions.” In Companion to Urban Design, edited by Tridib Banerjee and Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, 304–316. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, Gordon. 2002. “From Urban Entrepreneurialism to a ‘Revanchist City’? on the Spatial Injustices of Glasgow’s Renaissance.” Antipode 34 (3): 602–624.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuirk, P. M., Hilary Winchester, and Kevin M. Dunn. 1996. “Entrepreneurial Approaches to Urban Decline: The Honeysuckle Redevelopment in Inner Newcastle, New South Wales.” Environment and Planning a 28 (10): 1815–1841.10.1068/a281815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, Donald. 2009. The Global Architect: Firms, Fame and Urban Form. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nasar, Jack L. 1999. Design by Competition: Making Design Competition Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Government. 2016. “Better Placed.” Sydney: New South Wales Government. June 20, 2017. http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/~/media/Files/DPE/Plans-and-policies/draft-nsw-architecture-and-urban-design-policy-2016-09.ashx
   Google Scholar
• Ollswang, Jeffrey E. 1990. “Successful Competitions: Planning for Quality, Equity and Useful Results.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 7 (2): 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfect, M., and G. Power. 1997. Planning for Urban Quality : Urban Design in Towns and Cities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, Jamie, and Adam Tickell. 2002. “Neoliberalizing Space.” Antipode 34 (3): 380–404.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picken, Felicity. 2013. “From Designed Spaces to Designer Savvy Societies: The Potential of Ideas Competitions in Willing Participation.” Environment and Planning a 45 (8): 1963–1976.10.1068/a45460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prytherch, David, and Laura Huntoon. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Regionalist Planning in a Rescaled Spain: The Cases of Bilbao and Valencia.” GeoJournal 62 (1–2): 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John. 1999. “Design.” In British Planning, edited by B. Cullingworth, 137–155, London: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John. 2003. “From Design Advice to Peer Review: The Role of the Urban Design Panel in Vancouver.” Journal of Urban Design 8 (2): 113–135.10.1080/13574800306483
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John. 2004. “From the Ill-Mannered to the Iconic: Design Regulation in Central Sydney 1947–2002.” Town Planning Review 75 (4): 405–446.10.3828/tpr.75.4.3
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John. 2005. “Urban Design in Central Sydney 1945–2002: Laissez-Faire and Discretionary Traditions in the Accidental City.” Progress in Planning 63 (1): 11–160.10.1016/j.progress.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punter, John. 2007a. “Developing Urban Design as Public Policy: Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management.” Journal of Urban Design 12 (2): 167–202.10.1080/13574800701306195
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John. 2007b. “Design-Led Regeneration? Evaluating the Design Outcomes of Cardiff Bay and Their Implications for Future Regeneration and Design.” Journal of Urban Design 12 (3): 375–405.10.1080/13574800701602510
   Google Scholar
• Punter, J. 2010. “Planning and Good Design: Indivisible or Invisible? A Century of Design Regulation in English Town and Country Planning.” Town Planning Review 81 (4): 343–380.10.3828/tpr.2010.14
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John. 2011. “Design Review - an Effective Means of Raising Design Quality?” In Urban Design in the Real Estate Process, edited by Steve Tiesdell and David Adams, 182–198. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Punter, John, and Matthew Carmona. 1997. The Design Dimension of Planning. London: E&FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Rofe, Matthew, and Luke Stein. 2011. “Shedding New Light on Adelaide? Intersections between Urban Design Projects and City Marketing.” Journal of Urban Design 16 (3): 333–350.10.1080/13574809.2011.571162
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, Magnus, and Gerd Zettersten. 2012. “Editor’s Notes.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 24 (1): 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, Alan. 1998. “Private-Property Decision Makers and the Quality of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 3 (2): 151–173.10.1080/13574809808724423
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Herbert, and Irene Rubin. 2005. Qualitative Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sagalyn, Lynne. 2006. “The Political Fabric of Design Competitions.” In The Politics of Design: Competitions for Public Projects, edited by Catherine Malmberg, 29–52. Princeton, NJ: Policy Research Institute for the Region.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, Tore. 2011. “Neo-Liberal Urban Planning Policies: A Literature Survey 1990–2010.” Progress in Planning 76 (4): 147–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer, Brenda. 1994. “Introduction: The Debate on Design Review.” In Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control, edited by Brenda Scheer and Wolfgang Preiser, 1–10. New York: Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4615-2658-2
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Stephan, Jeremy Nemeth, and Erik Botsford. 2011. “The Evolution of Privately Owned Public Spaces in New York City.” Urban Design International 16 (4): 270–284.10.1057/udi.2011.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, Andrew D. 1990. “Design Competitions Receive Mixed Reviews.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 7 (2): 172–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, Hedley. 1994. Marketing the City: The Role of Flagship Developments in Urban Regeneration. London and New York: E & FN Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Spreiregen, P. D. 1979. Design Competitions. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, Erik, Frank Moulaert, and Arantxa Rodriguez. 2002. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large–Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode 34 (3): 542–577.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiesdell, Steve, and David Adams. 2011. Urban Design in the Real Estate Development Process. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444341188
   Google Scholar
• Turok, Ivan. 2009. “The Distinctive City: Pitfalls in the Pursuit of Differential Advantage.” Environment and Planning a 41 (1): 13–30.10.1068/a37379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alen institute / The Architectural Record. 2015. “Design Competition Survey.” Accessed November 1, 2016. https://www.vanalen.org/projects/architectural-record-van-alen-institute-competition-survey/#introduction.
   Google Scholar
• Wansborough, Matthew, and Andrea Mageean. 2000. “The Role of Urban Design in Cultural Regeneration.” Journal of Urban Design 5 (2): 181–197.10.1080/713683962
   Google Scholar
• White, James. 2014. “Design by Competition and the Potential for Public Participation: Assessing an Urban Design Competition on Toronto’s Waterfront.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (4): 541–564.10.1080/13574809.2014.923744
   Google Scholar
• White, James. 2015. “Future Directions in Urban Design as Public Policy: Reassessing Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management.” Journal of Urban Design 20 (3): 325–348.10.1080/13574809.2015.1031212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar