Local politics and planning over transnational initiatives: the case of Guggenheim Helsinki

References

• ALA arkkitehdit. 2008. Kirjava satama. Helsingin Eteläsataman ranta-alueiden ideasuunnitelma ja käytön konsepti [Idea and concept plan of Helsinki’s Southern Harbour]. Helsinki: Edita Prima.
   Google Scholar
• Alanen, A. 2012. “Helpompi perustaa kuin pyörittää—museot vetävät Suomessa vähemmän kuin muissa Pohjoismaissa [Easier to establish than to run - museums draw less audience in Finland then in the other Nordic countries].” Tieto & Trendit: 28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 743–758.10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baniotopoulou, E. 2001. “Art For Whose Sake? Modern Art Museums and Their Role in Transforming Societies: The Case of the Guggenheim Bilbao.” Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies (online) 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A., and J. Pierre. 2000. “Disputing the Global: A Sceptical View of Locality-Based International Initiatives.” Policy & Politics 28 (4): 465–478.10.1332/0305573002501081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchini, F., and M. Parkinson, eds. 1993. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunnell, T. 2013. “Antecedent Cities and Inter-Referencing Effects: Learning from and Extending Beyond Critiques of Neoliberalisation.” Urban Studies 52 (11): 1983–2000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2006. “Designing Mega-projects in Hong Kong: Reflections from an Academic Accomplice: Practice Note.” Journal of Urban Design 11 (1): 105–124.10.1080/13574800500490349
   Google Scholar
• Chien, S. S. 2013. “Chinese Eco-Cities: A Perspective of Land-Speculation-Oriented Local Entrepreneurialism.” China Information 27 (2): 173–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T. N., ed. 2004. The City as an Entertainment Machine. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, D. 2015. “Winning Helsinki Guggenheim Design ‘A Wake-up Call to Architecture’.” The Guardian, June 23.
   Google Scholar
• Edelson, Z. 2015. “‘We Mean to be Provocateurs’: Michael Sorkin on the Next Helsinki Competition.” Metropolis Magazine, January 22.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. 2003. “Hard-Branding the Cultural City - from Prado to Prada.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27 (2): 417–440.10.1111/ijur.2003.27.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frilander, A., J. Mannila, N. Mattila, J. Karila, N. Bäckgren, A. Airaksinen. 2015. “Guggenheim ei saa kannatusta Helsingin poliitikoilta [Guggenheim is not supported by Helsinki’s politicians].” Helsingin Sanomat, June 24.
   Google Scholar
• González, S. 2011. “Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in Motion’: How Urban Regeneration ‘Models’ Travel and Mutate in the Global Flows of Policy Tourism.” Urban Studies 48 (7): 1397–1418.10.1177/0042098010374510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gospodini, A. 2002. “European Cities in Competition and the New ‘Uses’ of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 7 (1): 59–73.10.1080/13574800220129231
   Google Scholar
• Gospodini, A. 2004. “Urban Morphology and Place Identity in European Cities: Built Heritage and Innovative Design.” Journal of Urban Design 9 (2): 225–248.10.1080/1357480042000227834
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim Foundation. 2011. Concept and Development Study for a Guggenheim Helsinki. New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim Foundation. 2013. Guggenheim Helsinki Revised Proposal. New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim Helsinki. 2017. A web page of the Guggenheim Helsinki Support Foundation. http://www.guggenheimhki.fi/en/
   Google Scholar
• Guggenheim Helsinki Design Competition. 2015. Winner. Moreau Kusunoki Architects: Art in the City. http://designguggenheimhelsinki.org/en/finalists/winner
   Google Scholar
• “Guggenheim Helsinki kaatui - eläköön uudenlainen taidemuseo! [Guggenheim Helsinki has fallen - hurray for a new kind of art museum!]” 2012. Iltalehti, Editorial, 3 May.
   Google Scholar
• Heinänen, K., and A. Uimonen 2011. “Helsinki tahtoo Guggenheimin [Helsinki wants the Guggenheim].” Helsingin Sanomat, 19 January.
   Google Scholar
• Helsingin kaupunki. 2009. Strategiaohjelma 2009-2012. http://www.hel.fi/hel2/taske/julkaisut/2009/Strategiaohjelma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Helsingin kaupunki. 2012. “Helsinki South Harbour Open Ideas Competition Jury Report / Kirjava satama -arvostelupöytäkirja.” Helsingin kaupunkisuunnitteluviraston asemakaavaosaston selvityksiä 2012:4.
   Google Scholar
• Helsingin kaupunki. 2013. Strategiaohjelma 2013-2016 [The City of Helsinki’s Strategy Programme 2013-2016].
   Google Scholar
• Helsingin kaupunki. 2015. Kauppatorin ympäristön kehittämisen kokonaissuunnitelma 31.8.2015 [General plan for developing the surroundings of the Market Square area 31.8.2015]. Helsinki: Kaupunginkanslia.
   Google Scholar
• Helsingin kaupunki. 2016. Sopimus Guggenheim Helsinki -taidemuseon perustamisesta ja toimintaa koskevasta yhteistyöstä.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P. 1996. “Urban Design and City Regeneration: Social Representations of Entrepreneurial Landscapes.” Urban Studies 33 (8): 1441–1461.10.1080/0042098966745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, D. 2014. “Square Roots.” Artforum.com, January 12.
   Google Scholar
• Jencks, C. 2005. The Iconic Building: The Power of Enigma. New York: Rizzoli.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, G. 2005. “Urban Designscapes and the Production of Aesthetic Consent.” Urban Studies 42 (5-6): 869–887.10.1080/00420980500107474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingmann, A. 2007. Brandscapes: Architecture in the Experience Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, L. 2007. “Cultural icons and urban development in Asia: Economic imperative, national identity, and global city status.” Political Geography 26 (4): 383–404.10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Lacking spark. The design for the Newest Guggenheim Museum Fails to Excite.” 2015. The Economist, 25 June.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen, J., and V. Sirén 2012. “Guggenheim tahtoo Helsinkiin [Guggenheim is willing to locate in Helsinki].” Helsingin Sanomat, 3 May.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, R., and T. N. Clark. 2001. “The City as an Entertainment Machine.” In Critical Perspectives in Urban Redevelopment, edited by K. F. Gotham, 357–378. Emerald: Bingley.10.1016/S1047-0042(01)80014-3
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, J. 2012. “Suomalainen Guggenheimin ytimessä [A Finn at the core of Guggenheim’s organization].” Helsingin Sanomat, 15 January.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, J. 2013. “Guggenheim haluaa näyttävästi Helsingin Etelärantaan.” Helsingin Sanomat, 20 September.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2006. “Roles and Challenges of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 11 (2): 173–193.10.1080/13574800600644035
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm Reading Consultants. 2014a. Guggenheim Helsinki Design Competition. London: Malcolm Reading Consultants Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm Reading Consultants. 2014b. Guggenheim Helsinki Design Competition: Stage One Jury Statement. http://designguggenheimhelsinki.org/finalists/jury-statement
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., P. Allmendinger, and S. Oosterlynck. 2014. Planning against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. 2011. “Urban Policy Mobilities and Global Circuits of Knowledge: Toward a Research Agenda.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (1): 107–130.10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Next Helsinki. 2015. Competition website: http://www.nexthelsinki.org
   Google Scholar
• Ong, A. 2011. “Hyperbuilding: Spectacle, Speculation, and the Hyperspace of Sovereignty.” In Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global, edited by A. Roy and A. Ong, 205–226. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444346800
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., J. van den Broeck, L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert, and A. Verhetsel, eds. 2011. Strategic Spatial Projects. Catalysts for Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Orueta, F. D., and S. S. Fainstein. 2008. “The New Mega Projects: Genesis and Impacts.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (4): 759–767.10.1111/ijur.2008.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Pajamäki: Aiesopimus Helsingille epäedullinen.” 2012. Helsingin Sanomat, 2 May.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, P. C., and D. Ponzini. 2015. Place-making and Urban Development. New Challenges for Planning and Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pinson, G., and C. Morel Journel. 2016. “The Neoliberal City—Theory, Evidence, Debates.” Territory, Politics, Governance 4 (2): 137–153.10.1080/21622671.2016.1166982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D. 2011. “Large Scale Development Projects and Star Architecture in the Absence of Democratic Politics: The Case of Abu Dhabi, UAE.” Cities 28 (3): 251–259.10.1016/j.cities.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D. 2013. “Branded Megaprojects and Fading Urban Structures in Contemporary Cities.” In Urban megaprojects: A worldwide view, edited by G. del Cerro Santamaría, 107–129. New York: Emerald.10.1108/ruso
   Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D. 2016. “Introduction: Crisis and Renewal of Contemporary Urban Planning.” European Planning Studies 24 (7): 1237–1245.10.1080/09654313.2016.1168782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponzini, D., and M. Nastasi. 2016. Starchitecture. Scenes, Actors and Spectacles in Contemporary Cities. New York: Monacelli Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruoppila, S., and P. Lehtovuori. 2012. “Guggenheim Helsinki: Landing-Site for Franchised Culture.” Domus Web, Op Ed, March 7.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. 2009. “Rising to a Challenge.” In Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies, edited by L. Porter and K. Shaw, 251–260. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., and L. Porter. 2009. “Introduction.” In Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies, edited by L. Porter and K. Shaw, 1–7. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sirén, V. 2013. “Guggenheim-johtaja suuttui suomalaiskriitikon Cheek-vertauksesta.” Helsingin Sanomat, 18 December.
   Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2017. The Icon Project. Architecture, Cities, and Capitalist Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and I. von Krogh Strand. 2011. “Oslo’s New Opera House: Cultural Flagship, Regeneration Tool or Destination Icon?” European Urban and Regional Studies 18 (1): 93–110.10.1177/0969776410382595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudjic, D. 2005. The Edifice Complex: How the Rich and Powerful Shape the World. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Sundqvist, J. 2016. “Alle puolet matkailijoista uskoo Guggenheim-museon lisäävän Helsingin vetovoimaa [Less than a half of tourists believe that the Guggenheim museum would increase Helsinki’s draw].” YLE uutiset, 20 January.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E., F. Moulaert, and A. Rodriguez. 2002. “Neoliberal Urbanization in Europe: Large-Scale Urban Development Projects and the New Urban Policy.” Antipode 34 (3): 542–577.10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taipale, K., ed. 2012. Guggenheimin Varjossa [In the Shadow of the Guggenheim]. Helsinki: Into-kustannus.
   Google Scholar
• van Aalst, I., and I. Boogaarts. 2002. “From Museum to Mass Entertainment: The Evolution of the Role of Museums in Cities.” European Urban and Regional Studies 9 (3): 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Vihreät esittävät Guggenheim-hankkeen hylkäämistä [The Greens propose to reject the Guggenheim initiative]” 2012. Helsingin Sanomat, 30 April.
   Google Scholar
• Vivant, E. 2011. “Who Brands Whom?: The Role of Local Authorities in the Branching of Art Museums.” Town Planning Review 82 (1): 99–115.10.3828/tpr.2011.6
   Google Scholar
• Wansborough, M., and A. Mageean. 2000. “The Role of Urban Design in Cultural Regeneration.” Journal of Urban Design 5 (2): 181–197.10.1080/713683962
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K. 2010. “Entrepreneurial Urbanism and Business Improvement Districts in the State of Wisconsin: A Cosmopolitan Critique.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100 (5): 1177–1196.10.1080/00045608.2010.520211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar