The logic of design: its role in understanding the antecedents of urban informality

References

• Adler, P. S., and S.-W. Kwon. 2002. “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept.” Academy of Management Review 27 (1): 17–40. doi:10.5465/amr.2002.5922314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, E. R. 1982. “Design in the Decision-Making Process.” Policy Sciences 14 (3): 279–292. doi:10.1007/BF00136401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiou, K., and T. Zamenopoulos. 2008. “Design as a Social Process: A Complex Systems Perspective.” Futures 40 (6): 586–595. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2007.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, S. 2008. “Occupancy Urbanism: Radicalizing Politics and Economy beyond Policy and Programs.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (3): 719–729. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00809.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braybrooke, D., and C. E. Lindblom. 1963. Strategy of Decision. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A., Ed.. 2006. Contested Space: Street Trading, Public Space, and Livelihoods in Developing Cities. Rugby: ITDG Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Çalışkan, O. 2012. “Design Thinking in Urbanism: Learning from the Designers.” Urban Design International 17 (4): 272–296. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. trans. Steven Rendall. California: University of Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, J., M. Crawford, and J. Kaliski, Eds. 1999. Everyday Urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., J. G. March, and J. P. Olsen. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1982. “Designerly Ways of Knowing.” Design Studies 3 (4): 221–227. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2001. “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science.” Design Issues 17 (3): 49–55. doi:10.1162/074793601750357196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta, R., C. Sarris, P. Signoretta, and J. C. Moughtin. 1999. Urban Design: Method and Techniques. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A. R. 2007. “Urban Design: Requiem for an Era–Review and Critique of the Last 50 Years.” Urban Design International 12 (4): 177–223. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry. Chicago: Aldin.
   Google Scholar
• Hou, J., Ed. 2010. (Not) Your Everyday Public Space. Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hubka, V., and W. E. Eder. 1987. “A Scientific Approach to Engineering Design.” Design Studies 8 (3): 123–137. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(87)90035-4.
   Google Scholar
• Kudva, N. 2009. “The Everyday and the Episodic: The Spatial and Political Impacts of Urban Informality.” Environment and Planning A 41 (7): 1614–1628. doi:10.1068/a41101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. 2012. “Rethinking Informality: Politics, Crisis, and the City.” Planning Theory & Practice 13 (1): 89–108. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.649951.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, J. 2000. “Singapore Is Not Bangalore’s Destiny.” Economic and Political Weekly 35 (18): 1512–1514.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., and H. A. Simon. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Vol. 104. No. 9. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, N. J. 1971. “Problem-Solving Methods.” In Artificial Intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan, M. 2014. “‘Mafias’ in the Waterscape: Urban Informality and Everyday Public Authority in Bangalore.” Water Alternatives 7 (1): 89–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravindra, A. 2010. “Urban Planning & the Dynamics of City Growth In.” In Urban Infrastructure & Governance, edited by G. Ramesh, V. Nagadevara, G. Naik, and A. Suraj. New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, L. 2011. “Informal/Peripheral Production”. In: Architectural Humanities Research Conference, 27th - 29th October 2011, Belfast, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., and M. M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4.2: 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2005. “Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (2): 147–158. doi:10.1080/01944360508976689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2009. “Why India Cannot Plan Its Cities: Informality, Insurgence and the Idiom of Urbanization.” Planning Theory 8 (1): 76–87. doi:10.1177/1473095208099299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2011. “Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A., and N. AlSayyad, Eds. 2004. Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East. Latin America, and South Asia: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2000. “Complexity and Urban Coherence.” Journal of Urban Design 5 (3): 291–316. doi:10.1080/713683969.
   Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2017. “Eight City Types and Their Interactions.” Czasopismo Techniczne, 2: 5–70.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behaviour in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 106 pp.467–482. [ Reprinted in Herbert A. Simon, “The Sciences of the Artificial”, M.I.T Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969, pp. 84–118]
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. Vol. 136. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First published 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. 2006. “From the Editors: What Grounded Theory Is Not.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (4): 633–642. doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhira, H. S., T. V. Ramachandra, and M. H. Subrahmanya. 2007. “Bangalore.” Cities 24 (5): 379–390. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2009. “Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues.” Urban Studies 46 (11): 2259–2275. doi:10.1177/0042098009342598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2013. “Planning and the ‘Stubborn Realities’ of Global South-East Cities: Some Emerging Ideas.” Planning Theory 12 (1): 81–100. doi:10.1177/1473095212446301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, D., and G. Huang. 2015. “Informality and the State’s Ambivalence in the Regulation of Street Vending in Transforming Guangzhou, China.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 62: 156–165. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O. 2009. “Theoretical Notes on Gray Cities’: The Coming of Urban Apartheid?” Planning Theory 8.1: 88–100. doi:10.1177/1473095208099300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar