A physical effort-based model for pedestrian movement in topographic urban environments

References

• Al-Widyan, F., A. Al-Ani, N. Kirchner, and M. Zeibots. 2017. “An Effort-Based Evaluation of Pedestrian Route Selection.” Scientific Research and Essays 12 (4): 42–50. doi:10.5897/SRE2017.6482.
   Google Scholar
• Asami, J., A. S. Kubat, K. Kitagawa, and S. Iida. 2003. “Introducing the Third Dimension on Space Syntax: An Application on the Historical Istanbul.” In Proceedings of the Fourth International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by J. Hanson, 48.1–48.18. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Bafna, S. 2003. “Space Syntax: A Brief Introduction to Its’ Logic and Analytical Techniques.” Environment and Behavior 35: 17–29. doi:10.1177/0013916502238863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batty, M. 2001. “Agent-Based Pedestrian Modeling.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 321–326. doi:10.1068/b2803ed.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt, M. 1979. “To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6: 47–65. doi:10.1068/b060047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, G. K. W., K. P. Van Niel, B. Giles-Corti, and M. Knuiman. 2007. “Accessibility and Connectivity in Physical Activity Studies: The Impact of Missing Pedestrian Data.” Preventive Medicine 46: 41–45. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy Dalton, R. 2003. “The Secret Is to Follow Your Nose: Route Path Selection and Angularity.” Environment & Behavior 35 (1): 107–131. doi:10.1177/0013916502238867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy Dalton, R., and N. S. Dalton. 2007. “Applying Depth Decay Functions to Space Syntax Network Graphs.” In The Proceedings of the Sixth International Space Syntax Symposium, 89.1–89.13. Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Conroy Dalton, R., C. Hölscher, and A. Turner. 2012. “Understanding Space: The Nascent Synthesis of Cognition and the Syntax of Spatial Morphologies.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 39: 7–11. doi:10.1068/b3901ge.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, N. 2001. “Fractional Configurational Analysis and a Solution to the Manhattan Problem.” In The Proceedings of the Third International Space Syntax Symposium. Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E. W. 1959. “A Note on Two Problems in Connexion with Graphs.” Numerische Mathematik 1: 269–271. doi:10.1007/BF01386390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, S. 1988. “Approximate Spatial Reasoning.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, edited by M. Ali, 126–140. New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Egorova, E. 2018. “Spatial Discourse Production: Applying Denis’s Framework to Non-Urban Context.” In Proceedings of Spatial Cognition 2018, edited by S. Creem-Regehr, J. Schöning, and A. Klippel, 134–148. Tübingen: Universität Tübingen. September 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G. W., D. G. Marrero, and P. A. Butler. 1981. “Environmental Learning and Cognitive Mapping.” Environment and Behaviour 13 (1): 83–104. doi:10.1177/0013916581131005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. 2012. “3D Models as a Platform for Urban Analysis and Studies on Human Perception of Space.” In Proceedings of Usage, Usability and Utility of 3D City Models (3U3D2012), edited by P. Rouch and W. Wafa Skalli, 1–16. Nantes. October 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D. 2017. “Can 3D Visibility Calculations along a Path Predict the Perceived Density of Participants Immersed in a Virtual Reality Environment?” In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by T. Heitor, M. Serra, J. Pinelo Silva, M. Bacharel, and L. Cannas Da Silva, Vol. 5, 160.1–160.18. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técni. July 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., and A. Natapov. 2014. “Different Approaches of Visibility Analyses Applied on Hilly Urban Environment.” Survey Review 46 (338): 366–382. doi:10.1179/1752270614Y.0000000117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., A. Shashkov, and Y. Doytsher. 2013. “Voxel Based Volumetric Visibility Analysis of Urban Environments.” Survey Review 45 (333): 451–461. doi:10.1179/1752270613Y.0000000059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher-Gewirtzman, D., and I. Wagner. 2003. “Spatial Openness as a Practical Metric for Evaluating Built- up Environments.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (1): 37–49. doi:10.1068/b12861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, M. J. 2017. “Using Qualitative Distance Metrics in Space Syntax and Configurational Analyses.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by T. Heitor, M. Serra, J. Pinelo Silva, M. Bacharel, and L. Cannas Da Silva, Vol. 5, 161.1–161.15. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técni. July 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gil, J. 2017. “Street Network Analysis “Edge Effects”: Examining the Sensitivity of Centrality Measures to Boundary Conditions.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 44 (5): 819–836.
   Google Scholar
• Golledge, R. G. 1995. Defining the Criteria Used in Path Selection. Berkeley, California: University of California Transportation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, E., A. Natapov, and D. Fisher-Gewirtzman. 2017. “The Effect of Topography on Pedestrian Movement: Developing an Analytical Model.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by T. Heitor, M. Serra, J. Pinelo Silva, M. Bacharel, and L. Cannas Da Silva, Vol. 6, 198.1–198.6. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técni. July 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996a. “Cities as Movement Economies.” Urban Design International 1 (1): 41–60. doi:10.1057/udi.1996.5.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1996b. Space Is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 1999. “Centrality as a Process: Accounting for Attraction Inequalities in Deformed Grids.” Urban Design International 4 (3–4): 107–127. doi:10.1057/udi.1999.19.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and J. Hanson. 1984. The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., A. Penn, J. Hanson, T. Grajewski, and J. Xu. 1993. “Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 20: 29–66. doi:10.1068/b200029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. C., and G. Tenenbaum. 2007. “Attention Focus during Physical Effort: The Mediating Role of Task Intensity.” Psychology of Sport and Exercise 8: 233–245. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, B. 2005. “A Structural Perspective on Visibility Patterns with A Topographic Surface.” Transactions in GIS 9 (4): 475–488. doi:10.1111/tgis.2005.9.issue-4.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B. 2006. “Ranking Spaces for Predicting Human Movement in an Urban Environment.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 23 (7): 823–837. doi:10.1080/13658810802022822.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., and C. Claramunt. 2002. “Integration of Space Syntax into GIS: New Perspectives for Urban Morphology.” Transactions in GIS 6 (3): 295–309. doi:10.1111/1467-9671.00112.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, B., and C. Claramunt. 2004. “Topological Analysis of Urban Street Networks.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (1): 151–162. doi:10.1068/b306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, K. 2012. “A Configurational Approach to Analytical Urban Design: “Space Syntax” Methodology.” Urban Design International 17 (4): 297–318. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella-Shaw, J. M., B. Shaw, and M. T. Turvey. 1992. “Perceiving “Walk-On-Able” Slopes.” Ecological Psychology 4 (4): 223–239. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0404_2.
   Google Scholar
• Koutsolampros, P., and T. Varoudis. 2017. “Assisted Agent-Based Simulations: Fusing Non-Player Character Movement with Space Syntax.” In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by T. Heitor, M. Serra, J. Pinelo Silva, M. Bacharel, and L. Cannas Da Silva, Vol. 5, 164.1–164.13. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técni. July 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moar, I., and G. H. Bower. 1983. “Inconsistency in Spatial Knowledge.” Memory & Cognition 11 (2): 107–113. doi:10.3758/BF03213464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. 1991. “Spatial Orientation and the Angularity of Urban Routes: A Field Study.” Environment and Behaviour 23 (1): 47–69. doi:10.1177/0013916591231003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. 1997. “The Perception and Cognition of Environmental Distance: Direct Sources of Information.” In Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, edited by S. C. Hirtle and A. U. Frank, 297–311. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R. 1998. “A New Framework for Understanding the Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in Large-Scale Environments.” In Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems, edited by M. J. Egenhofer and R. G. Golledge, 143–154. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montello, D. R., and A. U. Frank. 1996. “Modeling Directional Knowledge and Reasoning in Environmental Space: Testing Qualitative Metrics.” In The Construction of Cognitive Maps, edited by D. Mark and D. White, 321–344. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nourian, P., F. Van der Hoeven, S. Rezvani, and S. Sariyildiz. 2015. “Easiest Paths for Walking and Cycling: Combining Syntactic and Geographic Analyses in Studying Walking and Cycling Mobility.” In Proceedings of the Tenth International Space Syntax Symposium, edited by K. Karimi, L. Vaughan, K. Sailer, G. Palaiologou, and T. Bolton, Vol. 4, 78.1–78.15. London: University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Okabe, A., K. Aoki, and W. Hamamoto. 1987. “Distance and Direction Judgment in Large-Scale Natural Environments – Effects of a Slope and Winding Trail.” Environment and Behavior 18 (6): 755–772. doi:10.1177/0013916586186004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okabe, A., and K. Sugihara. 2012. Spatial Analysis along Networks: Statistical and Computational Methods. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Omer, I., Y. Rofé, and Y. Lerman. 2015. “The Impact of Planning on Pedestrian Movement: Contrasting Pedestrian Movement Models in Pre-Modern and Modern Neighborhoods in Israel.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science 29 (12): 2121–2142. doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1063638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, A., B. Hillier, D. Banister, and J. Xu. 1998. “Configurational Modelling of Urban Movement Networks.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25: 59–84. doi:10.1068/b250059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, A., and A. Turner. 2004. “Movement-Generated Land-Use Agglomeration: Simulation Experiments on the Drivers of Fine-Scale Land-Use Patterning.” Urban Design International 9: 81–96. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000120.
   Google Scholar
• Pingel, T. J. 2010. “Modeling Slope as a Contributor to Route Selection in Mountainous Areas.” Cartography and Geographic Information Science 37 (2): 137–148. doi:10.1559/152304010791232163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proffitt, D. R., J. Stefanucci, T. Banton, and W. Epstein. 2003. “The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance.” Psychological Science 14 (2): 106–112. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratti, C. 2004. “Urban Texture and Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31: 487–499. doi:10.1068/b3019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadalla, E. K., and S. G. Magel. 1980. “The Perception of Traversed Distance.” Environment and Behaviour 12 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1177/0013916580121005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadalla, E. K., and D. R. Montello. 1989. “Remembering Changes in Direction.” Environment and Behaviour 21 (3): 346–363. doi:10.1177/0013916589213006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadalla, E. K., and L. J. Staplin. 1980. “The Perception of Traversed Distance: Intersections.” Environment and Behaviour 12 (2): 167–182. doi:10.1177/0013916580122003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneviratne, P. N., and J. F. Morral. 1985. “Analysis of Factors Affecting the Choice of Route of Pedestrians.” Transportation Planning and Technology 10: 147–159. doi:10.1080/03081068508717309.
   Google Scholar
• Sholl, M. J. 1987. “Cognitive Maps as Orientation Schemata.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 13 (4): 615–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanucci, J. K., D. R. Proffitt, T. Banton, and W. Epstein. 2005. “Distances Appear Different on Hills.” Perception & Psychophysics 67 (6): 1052–1060. doi:10.3758/BF03193631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, G., R. Haining, H. Lin, N. M. Oreskovic, and J. He. 2015. “Comparing the Perception with the Reality of Walking in a Hilly Environment: An Accessibility Method Applied to a University Campus in Hong Kong.” Geospatial Health 10 (1): 32–39. doi:10.4081/gh.2015.340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndyke, P. W. 1981. “Distance Estimation from Cognitive Maps.” Cognitive Psychology 13: 526–550. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(81)90019-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. 1993. Three Presentations on Geographical Analysis and Modeling: Non-Isotropic Geographical Modeling Speculations on the Geometry of Geography Global Spatial Analysis. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2001. “Angular Analysis.” In The Proceedings of the Third International Space Syntax Symposium, 30–31. Atlanta.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A., M. Doxa, D. O’Sullivan, and A. Penn. 2001. “From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28 (1): 103–121. doi:10.1068/b2684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A., and A. Penn. 2002. “Encoding Natural Movement as an Agent-Based System: An Investigation into Human Pedestrian Behavior in the Built Environment.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 29: 473–490. doi:10.1068/b12850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley, T. G., and L. M. Hicks. 2003. “Geographic Information Systems Approach to Understanding Potential Prehistoric and Historic Travel Corridors.” Southeastern Archaeology 22 (1): 76–90.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, J. K., D. R. Proffitt, and W. Epstein. 2010. “When and How are Spatial Perceptions Scaled?” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36 (5): 1153–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadra, J. R., and D. R. Proffitt. 2016. “Optic Flow Is Calibrated to Walking Effort.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23 (5): 1491–1496. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1017-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadra, J. R., A. L. Weltman, and D. R. Proffitt. 2016. “Walkable Distances Are Bioenergetically Scaled.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42 (1): 39–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar