Quantifying Jacobs’ notion of ‘eyes upon the street’ in 3-dimensions

References

• Batty, M. 2001. “Exploring Isovist Fields: Space and Shape in Architectural and Urban Morphology.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 123–150. doi:10.1068/b2725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedikt, M. L. 1979. “To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 6: 47–65. doi:10.1068/b060047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B. 1985. “Residential Territories: Cues to Burglary Vulnerability.” Journal of Architectural Planning and Research 2: 231–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., and I. Altman. 1981. “Territoriality and Residential Crime: A Conceptual Framework.” In Environmental Criminology, edited by P. J. Brantingham and P. L. Brantingham, 55–76. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., and I. Altman. 1983. “Territoriality, Defensible Space and Residential Burglary: An Environmental Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Psychology Journal of Environmental Psychology 3: 203–220. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(83)80001-2.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., and D. L. Bentley. 1993. “Residential Burglars Judge Risk: The Role of Territoriality.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 13: 51–61. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80214-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. V., and M. Felson. 1993. “Introduction: Criminology, Routine Activity and Rational Choice.” In Routine Activity and Rational Choice: Advances in Criminological Theories, edited by R. V. Clarke and M. Felson, 1–14. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. E., and M. Felson. 1979. “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach.” American Sociological Review 44: 588–608. doi:10.2307/2094589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, D. B., and R. V. Clarke. 1986. The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Coupe, T., and L. Blake. 2006. “Daylight and Darkness Targeting Strategies and the Risks of Being Seen at Residential Burglaries.” Criminology 44: 431–464. doi:10.1111/crim.2006.44.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromwell, P. F., J. N. Olson, and D. A. W. Avary. 1991. Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of Burglary. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. S., and M. L. Benedikt. 1979. “Computational Models of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields.” Computer Graphics and Image Processing 11: 49–72. doi:10.1016/0146-664X(79)90076-5.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, M., W. A. Wagenaar, G. Wolters, and I. M. Verstijnen. 2005. “Familiar Face Recognition as A Function of Distance and Illumination: A Practical Tool for Use in the Courtroom.” Psychology, Crime & Law 11: 87–97. doi:10.1080/10683160410001715123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desyllas, J., P. Connoly, and F. Hebbert. 2003. “Modelling Natural Surveillance.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 643–655. doi:10.1068/b2991.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, G. H., and J. P. Prestemon. 2012. “The Effect of Trees on Crime in Portland, Oregon.” Environment and Behavior 44: 3–30. doi:10.1177/0013916510383238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esri. 2014. ArcGIS Resources [ Online]. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Accessed 14 January 2014. http://resources.arcgis.com/en/home/
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., and J. L. Nasar. 1992. “Fear of Crime in Relation to Three Exterior Site Features: Prospect, Refuge, and Escape.” Environment and Behavior 24: 35–65. doi:10.1177/0013916592241002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, S., B. Giles-Corti, and M. Knuiman. 2011. “Creating Safe Walkable Streetscapes: Does House Design and Upkeep Discourage Incivilities in Suburban Neighbourhoods?” Journal of Environmental Psychology 31: 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, E., and S. C. Fraser. 2002. “Observation Distance and Recognition of Photographs of Celebrities’ Faces’.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 95: 637–651. doi:10.2466/PMS.95.6.637-651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, H., U. Thoennessen, and W. Von Hansen. 2005. “3D-Modeling of Urban Structures.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 36 (3), W24: 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Ham-Rowbottom, K. A., R. Gifford, and K. T. Shaw. 1999. “Defensible Space Theory and the Police: Assessing the Vulnerability of Residences to Burglary.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 117–129. doi:10.1006/jevp.1998.0108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, B. 2004. “Can Streets Be Made Safe?” Urban Design International 9: 31–45. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000079.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, B., and N. Raford. 2010. “Description and Discovery in Socio-spatial Analysis: The Case of Space Syntax.” In The SAGE Handbook of Measurement, edited by G. Walford, E. Tucker, and M. Viswanathan, 265–281. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, S. H., and W. Steenbeek. 2017. “Residential Burglary Target Selection: An Analysis at the Property-level Using Google Street View.” Applied Geography 86: 292–299. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., S. Jung, J. Lee, and E. Macdonald. 2017. “Street Crime Prediction Model Based on the Physical Characteristics of a Streetscape: Analysis of Streets in Low-rise Housing Areas in South Korea.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46: 862–879.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, A., and S. Kajalo. 2011. “The Use and Effectiveness of Formal and Informal Surveillance in Reducing Shoplifting: A Survey in Sweden, Norway and Finland.” The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research 21: 111–128. doi:10.1080/09593969.2011.562677.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. C. L., C. Semmler, N. Weber, N. Brewer, and M. R. Lindsay. 2008. “How Variations in Distance Affect Eyewitness Reports and Identification Accuracy.” Law and Human Behavior 32: 526–535. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9128-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R., and E. M. Harley. 2005. “Why Is It Easier to Identify Someone Close than Far Away?” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12: 43–65. doi:10.3758/BF03196348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, J. E., and R. Gifford. 1989. “Territorial Cues and Defensible Space Theory: The Burglars Point of View.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 9: 193–205. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80034-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean, C. L., C. A. E. Brimacombe, M. Allison, L. C. Dahl, and H. Kadlec. 2011. “Post-identification Feedback Effects: Investigators and Evaluators.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 25: 739–752. doi:10.1002/acp.v25.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, S. E., R. B. Hull, and D. L. Zahm. 2001. “Environmental Factors Influencing Auto Burglary: A Case Study.” Environment and Behavior 33: 368–388. doi:10.1177/00139160121973034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, L., M. Junger, and Y. Ongena. 2016. “The Relation between Residential Property and Its Surroundings and Day- and Night-time Residential Burglary.” Environment and Behavior 48: 515–549. doi:10.1177/0013916514551047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullaney, J., T. Lucke, and S. J. Trueman. 2015. “A Review of Benefits and Challenges in Growing Street Trees in Paved Urban Environments.” Landscape and Urban Planning 134: 157–166. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee, C., and A. Meenaghan. 2006. “Expert Decision Making in Burglars.” British Journal of Criminology 46: 935–949. doi:10.1093/bjc/azl013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, M. 2013. “Assessing the Vulnerability of Targets for Burglary: Creating a Multi-level Observational Instrument.” In Crime, Violence, Justice and Social Order. Monitoring Contemporacy Security Issues, edited by P. Ponsaers, A. Crawford, J. De Maillard, J. Shapland, and A. Verhage, 171–206. Antwerp: Maklu.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, M. P., and T. Vander Beken. 2017. “The Relation of CPTED Characteristics to the Risk of Residential Burglary in and outside the City Center of Ghent.” Applied Geography 86: 283–291. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pictometry. 2013. Pictometry® Oblique Imagery [ Online]. Accessed 3 March 2013. http://www.pictometry.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=76&Itemid=85
   Google Scholar
• Rengert, G. F., and J. Wasilchick. 1985. Suburban Burglary: A Time and A Place for Everything. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Reynald, D. M. 2011. “Factors Associated with the Guardianship of Places: Assessing the Relative Importance of the Spatio-physical and Sociodemographic Contexts in Generating Opportunities for Capable Guardianship.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 48: 110–142. doi:10.1177/0022427810384138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shach-Pinsly, D. 2010. “Visual Openness and Visual Exposure Analysis Models Used as Evaluation Tools during the Urban Design Development Process.” Journal of Urbanism 3: 161–184.
   Google Scholar
• Shach-Pinsly, D. 2019. “Measuring Security in the Built Environment: Evaluating Urban Vulnerability in a Human-scale Urban Form.” Landscape and Urban Planning 191: 103412. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shach-Pinsly, D., and T. Ganor. 2015. “Security Sensitivity Index: Evaluating Urban Vulnerability.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning 168: 115–128. doi:10.1680/udap.13.00015.
   Google Scholar
• Stamps, A. E. 2005. “Isovists, Enclosure, and Permeability Theory.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 32: 735–762. doi:10.1068/b31138.
   Google Scholar
• Tandy, C. R. V. 1967. “The Isovist Method of Landscape Survey.” In Methods of Landscape Analysis, edited by H. C. Murray, 9–10. London, UK: Landscape Research Group.
   Google Scholar
• Troy, A., A. Nunery, and J. M. Grove. 2016. “The Relationship between Residential Yard Management and Neighborhood Crime: An Analysis from Baltimore City and County.” Landscape and Urban Planning 147: 78–87. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2003. “Analysing the Visual Dynamics of Spatial Morphology.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 657–676. doi:10.1068/b12962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A. 2007. “From Axial to Road-centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and A New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 34: 539–555. doi:10.1068/b32067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, A., M. Doxa, D. O’sullivan, and A. Penn. 2001. “From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 28: 103–121. doi:10.1068/b2684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nes, A., and M. J. J. López. 2010. “Macro and Micro Scale Spatial Variables and the Distribution of Residential Burglaries and Theft from Cars: An Investigation of Space and Crime in the Dutch Cities of Alkmaar and Gouda.” The Journal of Space Syntax 1: 296–314.
   Google Scholar