What is urban design? A proposal for a common understanding

References

• Akbar, J. 1988. Crisis in the Built Environment: The Case of the Muslim City. Singapore: Concept Media Pte Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 1965. “A City is Not a Tree.” Architectural Forum, Vol. 122, No. 1, 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, D. E., and S. Moroni, eds. 2014. Cities and Private Planning: Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Araabi, H. F. 2016. “A Typology of Urban Design Theories and its Application to the Shared Body of Knowledge.” Urban Design International 21 (1): 11–24. doi:10.1057/udi.2015.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrainy, H., and A. Bakhtiar. 2016. Toward an Integrative Theory of Urban Design. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaud, A. 2018. Order Without Design: How Markets Shape Cities. Cambridge: Mit Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertaud, A., and B. Renaud. 1997. “Socialist Cities without Land Markets.” Journal of Urban Economics 41 (1): 137–151. doi:10.1006/juec.1996.1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddulph, M. 2012. “The Problem with Thinking about or for Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 17 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/13574809.2011.646251.
   Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. 2016. “The Territory of Property.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (5): 593–609. doi:10.1177/0309132515596380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobkova, E., L. Marcus, and M. Berghauser Pont. 2017. “Plot Systems and Property Rights: Morphological, Juridical and Economic Aspects.” In 24th ISUF International Conference. Book of Papers, 177–185, April. Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
   Google Scholar
• Bobkova, E., L. Marcus, M. Berghauser Pont, I. Stavroulaki, and D. Bolin. 2019. “Structure of Plot Systems and Economic Activity in Cities: Linking Plot Types to Retail and Food Services in London, Amsterdam and Stockholm.” Urban Science 3 (3): 66. doi:10.3390/urbansci3030066.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, S. 1995. How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., M. Galle, and N. Sorel. 2014. “The Public Planning of Private Planning: An Analysis of Controlled Spontaneity in the Netherlands.” In Cities and Private Planning. Property Rights, Entrepreneurship and Transaction Costs, edited by D. E. Andersson and S. Moroni, 248–268. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 1996. “Controlling Urban Design—Part 1: A Possible Renaissance?” Journal of Urban Design 1 (1): 47–73. doi:10.1080/13574809608724370.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2014. “The Place-Shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 2–36. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854695.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2016. “Design Governance: Theorizing an Urban Design Sub-Field.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (6): 705–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., S. Marshall, and Q. Stevens. 2006. “Design Codes: Their Use and Potential.” Progress in Planning 65: 209–289. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2006.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., T. Heath, T. Oc, and S. Tiesdell. 2012. Public Places-Urban Spaces. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, M. C. 2010. “A Spectrum of Urban Design Roles.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (1): 1–19. doi:10.1080/13574800903429357.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, R. 2005. The Dictionary of Urbanism. 67 vol. Tisbury: Streetwise Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, S. (2018). "Reconsidering Urban Spontaneity and Flexibility after Jane Jacobs: How do they work under different kinds of planning conditions?" Cosmos and Taxis 5 (3+4): 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, S. (2019). "The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment." Environmental Planning B. doi:10.1177/2399808319857451.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzolino, S., E. Buitelaar, S. Moroni, and N. Sorel. 2017. “Experimenting in Urban Self-organization. Frameworkrules and Emerging Orders in Oosterwold (Almere,The Netherlands).” Cosmos and Taxis 4 (2): 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, G. 1961. The Concise Townscape. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A. 2006. The Form of Cities: Political Economy of Urban Design. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A. R. 2007. “Urban Design: Requiem for an Era–Review and Critique of the Last 50 Years.” Urban Design International 12 (4): 177–223. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., and S. Wood. 2015. “Public/Private Urban Interfaces: Type, Adaptation, Assemblage.” Journal of Urbanism 8 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ellin, N. 1999. Postmodern Urbanism. revised ed. New York: Princeton architectural press.
   Google Scholar
• Frick, D. 2008. Theorie Des Städtebaus: Zur Baulich-räumlichen Organisation Von Stadt. Tübingen: Wasmuth.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. 2011. “Commentary: Is Urban Design Still Urban Planning? An Exploration and Response.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 31 (2): 184–195. doi:10.1177/0739456X10393358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakim, B. S. 2014. Mediterranean Urbanism. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, S. 2017. “The City Cannot be a Work of Art.” Cosmos + Taxis 4 (2): 79–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. S., E. Stolk, and J. Portugali. 2016. “Self-Organization and Design as a Complementary Pair.” In Complexity, Cognition, Urban Planning and Design, edited by J. A. Kelso, E. Stolk, and J. Portugali, 43–53. Zürich: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kempenaar, A., and A. van den Brink. 2018. “Regional Designing: A Strategic Design Approach in Landscape Architecture.” Design Studies 54: 80–95. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostof, S. 1991. The City Shaped: Urban Patterns and Meanings through History. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Krieger, A., and W. S. Saunders, eds. 2009. Urban Design. London: Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kropf, K. 2009. “Aspects of Urban Form.” Urban Morphology 13 (2): 105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropf, K. 2018. “Plots, Property and Behaviour.” Urban Morphology 22 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. 2006. Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 1999. “Why are the Design and Development of Public Spaces Significant for Cities?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26 (6): 879–891. doi:10.1068/b260879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2004. “Why Urban Design?” Town Planning Review 75 (2): i–iv. doi:10.3828/tpr.75.2.1.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2006. “Roles and Challenges of Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 11 (2): 173–193. doi:10.1080/13574800600644035.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. 2009. Cities, Design and Evolution. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. 2012. “Science, Pseudo Design and Urban Design.” Urban Design International 17 (4): 257–271. doi:10.1057/udi.2012.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. 2016. “The Kind of Art Urban Design Is.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (4): 399–423. doi:10.1080/13574809.2015.1133226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGreevy, M. P. 2017. “Complexity as the Telos of Postmodern Planning and Design: Designing Better Cities from the Bottom-Up.” Planning Theory 17 (3): 355–374. doi:10.1177/1473095217711473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni, S., and F. Chiodelli. 2013. “The Relevance of Public Space: Rethinking its Material and Political Aspects.” In Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment, edited by C. Basta and S. Moroni, 45–55. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni S., and Cozzolino S. 2019. “Action and the City. Emergence Complexity, Planning.” Cities 90 (2019): 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.039.
   Google Scholar
• Moroni, S., E. Buitelaar, N. Sorel, and S. Cozzolino. 2018. “Simple Planning Rules for Complex Urban Problems: Toward Legal Certainty for Spatial Flexibility.” Journal of Planning Education and Research.  doi:10.1177/0739456X18774122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroni, S., W. Rauws, and S. Cozzolino. 2019. “Forms of Self-Organization: Urban Complexity and Planning Implications.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. doi:10.1177/2399808319857721.
   Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V. 1992. “A Catholic Approach to Organizing What Urban Designers Should Know.” Journal of Planning Literature 6 (4): 331–349.
   Google Scholar
• Moughtin, J. C. [1999] 2003. Urban Design: Street and Squares. 2nd ed. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, E. 2009. Defining Urban Design: CIAM Architects and the Formation of a Discipline, 1937–1969. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, B. 2006. Planning, Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, M., and W. Zonneveld. 2018. “The Resurgence of Regional Design.” European Planning Studies 26 (1): 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palazzo, D. 2011. “Pedagogical Traditions.” In Companion to Urban Design, edited by T. Banerjee and A. Loukaitou-Sideris, 41–52. London. Routledge. chapter 3.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, P. C. 2014. “Whatever is Happening to Urban Planning and Urban Design? Musings on the Current Gap between Theory and Practice.” City, Territory and Architecture 7 (1). doi:10.1186/2195-2701-1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Porqueddu, E. 2018. “Toward the Open City: Design and Research for Emergent Urban Systems.” Urban Design International 23 (3): 236–248. doi:10.1057/s41289-018-0065-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porta, S., and O. Romice. 2014. “Plot-Based Urbanism: Towards Time-Consciousness in Place-Making.” In Dortmunder Vorträge zur Stadtbaukunst [Dortmunder Lectures on Civic Art], edited by W. Sonne. Sulgen, DE.
   Google Scholar
• Portugali, J. 2012. Self-organization and the City. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. [1990] 2013. History and Precedent in Environmental Design. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rauws, W. 2017. “Embracing Uncertainty without Abandoning Planning.” The Planning Review 53 (1): 32–45. doi:10.1080/02513625.2017.1316539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, M. 2010. Ascesa E Declino Della Città Europea. Milano: Cortina.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner-Manor, Y., S. G. Borghini, B. Boonstra, and P. Silva. 2019. “Adaptation of the Urban Codes–A Story of Placemaking in Jerusalem.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science doi:10.1177/2399808319867712.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley, A. 1994. “Definitions of Urban Design: The Nature and Concerns of Urban Design.” Planning Practice and Research 9 (3): 179–197. doi:10.1080/02697459408722929.
   Google Scholar
• Rudlin, D., and S. Hemani. 2019. Climax City: Masterplanning and the Complexity of Urban Growth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Slaev, A. D. 2016. “Types of Planning and Property Rights.” Planning Theory 15 (1): 23–41. doi:10.1177/1473095214540651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M. 2013. “The End (S) of Urban Design.” In The Urban Design Reader, edited by M. Larice and E. Macdonald, 638–654. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, E. 2000. “An Integrative Theory of Urban Design.” Journal of the American Planning Association 66 (3): 265–278. doi:10.1080/01944360008976106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2009. “Design by the Rules: The Historical Underpinnings of Form-Based Codes.” Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (2): 144–160. doi:10.1080/01944360802686662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tibbalds, F. 1984. “Urban Design - Who Needs It?” Places 1 (3): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. 2007. “Property Rights, Public Space and Urban Design.” Town Planning Review 78 (1): 81–101. doi:10.3828/tpr.78.1.6.
   Google Scholar