Rethinking design studios as an integrative multi-layered collaboration environment

References

• Aritz, J., and R. C. Walker. 2010. “Cognitive Organization and Identity Maintenance in Multicultural Teams: A Discourse Analysis of Decision-Making Meetings.” The Journal of Business Communication 47 (1): 20–41. doi:10.1177/0021943609340669.
   Google Scholar
• Bowring, J. 1997. “Research by Design: The Refereed Studio.” Landscape Review 3 (2): 54–55.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L., and L. D. Mitgang. 1996. Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education and Practice: A Special Report. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, R. G., V. Leslie, N. Trenia, and A. Shawn. 2013. “Studio Pedagogy: A Model for Collaboration, Innovation, and Space Design.” In Cases on Higher Education Spaces: Innovation, Collaboration, and Technology, edited by G. Carpenter Russell, 313–329. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, K., C. Brandt, B. Scott, S. Douglas, M. McGrath, Y. Reimer, and M. Vernon. 2011. “Managing the Complexity of Design Problems through Studio-based Learning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning 5. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1253.
   Google Scholar
• Cerra, J. F. 2016. “Inland Adaptation: Developing a Studio Model for Climate-adaptive Design as a Framework for Design Practice.” Landscape Journal 35 (1): 37–56. doi:10.3368/lj.35.1.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaradia, A. J. F., L. Sieh, and F. Plimmer. 2017. “Values in Urban Design: A Design Studio Teaching Approach.” Design Studies 49: 66–100. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J. Y., and M.-H. Cho. 2014. “Student Perceptions and Performance in Collaboration.” The International Journal of Technology and Design Education 24: 473–491. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9265-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, J. 2006. “Terra Fluxus.” In The Landscape Urbanism Reader, edited by C. Waldheim, 21–33. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crowther, P. 2013. “Understanding the Signature Pedagogy of the Design Studio and the Opportunities for Its Technological Enhancement.” Journal of Learning Design 6. doi:10.5204/jld.v6i3.155.
   Google Scholar
• De La Harpe, B. J., F. Peterson, N. Frankham, R. Zehner, D. Neale, E. Musgrave, and R. McDermott. 2009. “Assessment Focus in Studio: What is Most Prominent in Architecture, Art and Design?” International Journal of Art & Design Education 28 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01591.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Rio, V., and D. Levi. 2009. “Internet-based Surveys and Urban Design Education: A Community Outreach Graduate Project in Redding, CA.” URBAN DESIGN International 14 (4): 192–206. doi:10.1057/udi.2009.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, T. A. 1991. Voices in Architectural Education: Cultural Politics and Pedagogy. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Erbil, L., and F. Dogan. 2012. “Collaboration within Student Design Teams Participating in Architectural Design Competitions.” Design and Technology Education: an International Journal 17 (3): 70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, G. 2005. “Distances and Diversity: Sources for Social Creativity.” In Paper presented at the 5th Conference of Creativity and Cognition. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Fister, C. 2012. “Regarding Student Collaboration in Art & Design.” Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education 5: 5.
   Google Scholar
• Forsyth, A., H. Lu, and P. McGirr. 1999. “Inside the Service Learning Studio in Urban Design.” Landscape Journal 18 (2): 166–178. doi:10.3368/lj.18.2.166.
   Google Scholar
• Grosse-Hering, B., J. Mason, D. Aliakseyeu, C. Bakker, and P. Desmet. 2013. “Slow Design for Meaningful Interactions.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3431–3440. Paris, France: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, A. 2017. The Changing Face of Today’s Student: More Diverse, Older and Requiring More Personalized Learning. Acrobatiq. http://acrobatiq.com/the-changing-face-of-todays-student-more-diverse-older-and-requiring-more-personalized-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Gul, C., G. Gunday, and Y. Afacan. 2018. “Analyzing the Effects of Critique Techniques on the Success of Interior Architecture Students.” International Journal of Art & Design Education, 37 (1):  469–479.
   Google Scholar
• Hainline, L., M. Gaines, C. L. Feather, E. Padilla, and E. Terry. 2010. “Changing Students, Faculty, and Institutions in the Twenty-First Century.” Peer Review 12: 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, A., and N. Teymur. 1996. Architectural History and the Studio. London: Question Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. 2007. “Four Ways of Knowing: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Teaching Community-based Design.” ENQ: Agricultural Research Communication Centre Journal 4 (1): 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. M. 2005. “Teaching with Culture in Mind: Cross-Cultural Learning in Landscape Architecture Education.” Landscape Journal 24 (2): 117–124. doi:10.3368/lj.24.2.117.
   Google Scholar
• Jarl, B. R. 2016. The Use of Personality Type to Improve Team Collaboration within Design Studios. Master's Thesis, University of Western Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Jutraž, A., and Z. Tadeja. 2014. “The Role of Architect in Interdisciplinary Collaborative Design Studios.” Creativity Game 2: 34–42. doi:10.15292/IU-CG.2014.02.034-042.
   Google Scholar
• Jutraz, A., and T. Zupancic. 2018. “Virtual Collaborative Technologies in Distributed Urban Design Projects: Innovative Computer-Mediated Learning Technologies.” In Transforming Engineering Education, edited by I. Mutis, R. Fruchter, and C. C. Menassa, 259–290. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, S. 2007. “Teaching Studio Exercises to Help Students Manage Distributed Design.” In Design Studio Pedagogy: Horizons for the Future, edited by A. M. Salama and N. Wilkinson, 167–176. Gateshead: Urban International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2009. “Urban Design as a Catalyst for Advancing Architectural Education.” Agricultural Research Communication Centre JOURNAL 6 (1): 11.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. J., S. R. Ju, and L. Lee. 2015. “A Cross-Cultural and Interdisciplinary Collaboration in a Joint Design Studio.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 34 (1): 102–120. doi:10.1111/jade.12019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, A. 2002. The Redesign of Studio Culture: A Report of the AIAS Studio Culture Task Force. Washington, DC: American Institute of Architecture Students.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and J. Sadler. 2014. “Team Cognition and Reframing Behavior: The Impact of Team Cognition on Problem Reframing, Team Dynamics and Design Performance.” In Design Thinking Research: Building Innovation Eco-systems, edited by L. Leifer, H. Plattner, and C. Meinel, 35–48. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and M. Schar. 2011. “Initial Conditions: The Structure and Composition of Effective Design Teams.” In International Conference on Engineering Design. Kongens Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. 1994. Urban Design: The American Experience. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lauche, K., E. Bohemia, C. Connor, and P. Badke-Schaub. 2008. “Distributed Collaboration in Design Education: practising Designer and Client Roles.” Journal of Design Research 7 (3): 238–258. doi:10.1504/JDR.2008.024193.
   Google Scholar
• Long, C. 2012a. “Teach Your Students to Fail Better with Design Thinking.” Learning & Leading with Technology 39 (5): 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Long, J. G. 2012b. “State of the Studio: Revisitingthe Potential of Studio Pedagogy in U.S.-Based Planning Programs.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 32 (4): 431–448. doi:10.1177/0739456x12457685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheson, B. 2006. “A Culture of Creativity: Design Education and the Creative Industries.” Journal of Management Development 25 (1): 55–64. doi:10.1108/02621710610637963.
   Google Scholar
• Mewburn, I. 2011. “Lost in Translation: Reconsidering Reflective Practice and Design Studio Pedagogy.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 11 (4): 363–379. doi:10.1177/1474022210393912.
   Google Scholar
• N/A. 2017. “Considering the Collaborators.” American Society of Landscape Architects Newsletter LAND https://www.asla.org/land/LandArticle.aspx?id=50975
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K., J. Horsford, E. Bernard, S. Park, C. Klein, Y. Luo, M. Currie, and M. Ross. 2018. “Semester of Learning: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Development and Implementation of an Integrated Course Model”. Paper presented at the The Council of Educators in Landscape Architecture 2018 Annual Conference, Blacksburg, VA, March, 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and S. Pilling. 2000. Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Professionalism. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, B. 2013. Creative Intelligence: Harnessing the Power to Create, Connect, and Inspire. New York, NY: HarperBusiness.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Y., S. Ishizaki, M. D. Gross, and E. Y.-L. Do. 2013. “A Theoretical Framework of Design Critiquing in Architecture Studios.” Design Studies 34 (3): 302–325. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, B., and J. Verbeke. 2013. “Redesigning the Urban Design Studio: Two Learning Experiments.” Journal of Learning Design 6 (3): 45–62. doi:10.5204/jld.v6i3.160.
   Google Scholar
• Poerschke, U., R. J. Holland, J. I. Messner, and M. Pihlak. 2010. “BIM Collaboration across Six Disciplines.” Proceedings of the International Conferenceon Computing in Civil and Building Engineering, Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. 1961. “An Analysis of Creativity.” The Phi Delta Kappan 42: 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. 2016. “Urban Design Pedagogy.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (5): 567–569. doi:10.1080/13574809.2016.1220150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. 2000. Out of Our Minds: Learning to Be Creative. Oxford: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, A. 1995. New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the Design Studio. Raleigh, NC: Tailored Text.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, A. M. A., and N. Wilkinson. 2007. Design Studio Pedagogy. Horizons for the Future.  Newcastle, UK:  Urban International Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, A. M. A., W. O’Reilly, and K. Noschis. 2002. Architectural Education Today: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Lausanne: Comportements.
   Google Scholar
• Sargın, G. A., and A. Savaş. 2012. “Dialectical Urbanism: Tactical Instruments in Urban Design Education.” Cities 29: 358–368. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, D. W. 1997. “Design, Collaboration, and Computation: The Design Studio as a Model for Computer Supported Collaboration in Mathematics.” In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, 253–258. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Stember, M. 1991. “Advancing the Social Sciences through the Interdisciplinary Enterprise.” Social Science Journal 28 (1): 1. doi:10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, C. F., and A. Fuad-Luke. 2008. The Slow Design Principles: A New Interrogative and Reflexive Tool for Design Research and Practice. Paper presented at the Changing the Change: Design, Visions, Proposals and Tools Conference, Turin, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. S., and D. Ladkin. 2014. “Leading as Craft-work: The Role of Studio Practices in Developing Artful Leaders.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 30 (1): 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Tech University Department of Landscape Architecture. 2017. Self-Evaluation Report of Bachelor of Landscape Architecture (BLA) for Landscape Architectural Accreditation Board. Lubbock: Texas Tech University Department of Landscape Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Teymur, N. 1992. Architectural Education: Issues in Educational Practice and Policy. London: Question Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, R., G. R. Neda Abbasi, M. J. Thorpe, A. P. Ostwald, L. W. Williams, and S. Kashuk. 2014. Enhancing and Assessing Group and Team Learning in Architecture and Related Design Contexts: Final Report. Sydney: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, H. 2007. “The Analytics of Power: RePresenting the Design Jury.” Journal of Architectural Education 60 (3): 21–27. doi:10.1111/j.1531-314X.2007.00092.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. E., and L. Zamberlan. 2017. “Design Pedagogy for an Unknown Future: A View from the Expanding Field of Design Scholarship and Professional Practice.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 36 (1): 106–117. doi:10.1111/jade.12076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamberlan, L., and S. Wilson. 2015. “Developing an Embedded Peer Tutor Program in Design Studio to Support First Year Design Students.” Journal of Peer Learning 8: 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar