The impact of the built environment on creativity in public spaces of Dutch university campuses and science parks

References

• Amabile, T. M. 1983. “The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (2): 357–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., R. Conti, H. Coon, J. Lazenby, and M. Herron. 1996. “Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1154–1184. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/256995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameli, S. H., S. Hamidi, A. Garfinkel-Castro, and R. Ewing. 2015. “Do Better Urban Design Qualities Lead to More Walking in Salt Lake City, Utah?” Journal of Urban Design 20 (3): 393–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1041894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, S., S. Fuller, and J. Painter. 2012. “Wellbeing and Place.” In Wellbeing and Place, 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2014.891363.
   Google Scholar
• Bott, H. 2018. “City and University—An Architect’s Notes on an Intriguing Spatial Relationship.” In, 375–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_12.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. B., and D. D. Perkins. 1992. “Disruptions in Place Attachment.” In Place Attachment, 279–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8753-4_13.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G., and M. Kyttä. 2014. “Key Issues and Research Priorities for Public Participation GIS (PPGIS): A Synthesis Based on Empirical Research.” Applied Geography 46: 122–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannas da Silva, L., and T. V. Heitor. 2017. “Campuses as Sustainable Urban Engines ‘A Morphological Approach to Campus Social Sustainability’.” In World Sustainability Series, 259–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47889-0_19.
   Google Scholar
• Canter, D. 1977. The Psychology of Place. St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2010. “Contemporary Public Space, Part Two: Classification.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (2): 157–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574801003638111.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, S., M. Francis, L. G. Rivlin, and A. M. Stone. 1993. “Public Space.” Public Space. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315794808-4.
   Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. 2003. “An Outline of a Theory of Affordances.” Ecological Psychology 15: 181–195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, J., P. Roberts, and I. Taylor. 2017. University Trends. Routledge. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315213606.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 2014. “Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity.” In The Systems Model of Creativity, 47–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9085-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. W., E. Shiau, B. Lowery, D. Sloane, K. Hennigan, and A. Curtis. 2014. “The Prospects and Problems of Integrating Sketch Maps with Geographic Information Systems to Understand Environmental Perception: A Case Study of Mapping Youth Fear in Los Angeles Gang Neighborhoods.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 41 (2): 251–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/b38151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Heijer, A. C., and F. T. J. C. Magdaniel. 2018. “Campus–City Relations: Past, Present, and Future.” In, 439–459. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_13.
   Google Scholar
• den Heijer, A. C., M. H. Arkesteijn, P. de Jong, and E. de Bruyne. 2016. “Campus NL: Investeren in De Toekomst.”
   Google Scholar
• Dober, R. P. 1992. Campus Design. New York, NY: J. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dober, R. P. 2014. Campus Landscape: Functions, Forms, Features. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., and R. Metcalfe. 2012. “The Relationship between Innovation and Subjective Wellbeing.” Research Policy 41 (8): 1489–1498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbaugh, E., and R. Rae. 2009. “Safe Urban Form: Revisiting the Relationship between Community Design and Traffic Safety.” Journal of the American Planning Association 75: 309–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360902950349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., A. Hajrasouliha, K. M. Neckerman, M. Purciel-Hill, and W. Greene. 2016. “Streetscape Features Related to Pedestrian Activity.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 36 (1): 5–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X15591585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., M. Greenwald, M. Zhang, J. Walters, M. Feldman, R. Cervero, L. Frank, and J. Thomas. 2011. “Traffic Generated by Mixed-Use Developments—Six-Region Study Using Consistent Built Environmental Measures.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 137 (3): 248–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)up.1943-5444.0000068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and O. Clemente. 2013. Measuring Urban Design: Metrics for Livable Places. doi:https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-209-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. 2010. “Travel and the Built Environment.” Journal of the American Planning Association 76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2011. Life between Buildings. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J., and B. Svarre. 2013. How to Study Public Life. doi:https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0.
   Google Scholar
• Ghavampour, E., M. Del Aguila, and B. Vale. 2017. “GIS Mapping and Analysis of Behaviour in Small Urban Public Spaces.” Area 49: 349–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. “The Theory of Affordances.” In The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Giles-Corti, B., M. H. Broomhall, M. Knuiman, C. Collins, K. Douglas, K. Ng, A. Lange, and R. J. Donovan. 2005. “Increasing Walking: How Important Is Distance To, Attractiveness, and Size of Public Open Space?” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28: 169–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glǎveanu, V. P. 2012. “What Can Be Done with an Egg? Creativity, Material Objects, and the Theory of Affordances.” Journal of Creative Behavior 46 (3): 192–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göçer, Ö., K. Göçer, A. M. Başol, M. F. Kıraç, A. Özbil, M. Bakovic, F. P. Siddiqui, and B. Özcan. 2018. “Introduction of a Spatio-Temporal Mapping Based POE Method for Outdoor Spaces: Suburban University Campus as a Case Study.” Building and Environment 145: 125–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. 2007. “Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography.” GeoJournal 69: 211–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
   Google Scholar
• Guisan, A., and N. E. Zimmermann. 2000. “Predictive Habitat Distribution Models in Ecology.” Ecological Modelling 135 (2–3): 147–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadavi, S., R. Kaplan, and M. C. R. Hunter. 2015. “Environmental Affordances: A Practical Approach for Design of Nearby Outdoor Settings in Urban Residential Areas.” Landscape and Urban Planning 134: 19–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajrasouliha, A. H. 2017. “Master-Planning the American Campus: Goals, Actions, and Design Strategies.” Urban Design International 22 (4): 363–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-017-0044-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heft, H. 2010. “Affordances and the Perception of Landscape: An Inquiry into Environmental Perception and Aesthetics.” In Innovative Approaches to Researching Landscape and Health: Open Space: People Space 2. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853252.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbe, J. M. 2011. Negative Binomial Regression. 2nd ed. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973420.
   Google Scholar
• Kenney, D. R., R. Dumont, and G. Kenney. 2005. Mission and Place: Strengthening Learning and Community through Campus Design. ACE/Praeger Series on Higher Education. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2019. “Designing Multiple Urban Space: An Actor-Network Theory Analysis on Multiplicity and Stability of Public Space.” Journal of Urban Design 24 (2): 249–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1468214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., M. Kahila, and A. Broberg. 2011. “Perceived Environmental Quality as an Input to Urban Infill Policy-Making.” Urban Design International 16 (1): 19–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2010.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, S. S. Y., and F. Yang. 2009. “Introducing Healing Gardens into a Compact University Campus: Design Natural Space to Create Healthy and Sustainable Campuses.” Landscape Research 34 (1): 55–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390801981720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. 2013. “Does Context Matter? Understanding the Urban Design Requirements of Successful Neighborhood Parks.” ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, no. May, 136. https://librarylink.uncc.edu/login?url=https://search.proquest.com/docview/1355212898?accountid=14605%0Ahttps://uncc.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/openurl/01UNCC_INST/01UNCC_INST:01UNCC_INST?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&genr
   Google Scholar
• Lenzholzer, S., and N. Y. van der Wulp. 2010. “Thermal Experience and Perception of the Built Environment in Dutch Urban Squares.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (3): 375–401. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.488030
   Google Scholar
• Magdaniel, F. C. 2016. “Technology Campuses and Cities: A Study on the Relation between Innovation and the Built Environment at the Urban Area Level.” Doctoral dissertation, Delft University of Technology. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid:681830ff-db15-44f7-829c-95e6ee100385?collection=research [Accessed 21 June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. E., and N. W. Garrick. 2011. “Does Street Network Design Affect Traffic Safety?” Accident Analysis and Prevention 43: 769–781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2014. “Evaluating Public Space.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 53–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.854698.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2019. “Streets and Social Life in Cities: A Taxonomy of Sociability.” Urban Design International 24 (1): 16–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-018-0069-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meusburger, P. 2009. “Milieus of Creativity: The Role of Places, Environments, and Spatial Contexts.” In Milieus of Creativity, 97–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9877-2_7.
   Google Scholar
• Meusburger, P. 2018. “Knowledge Environments at Universities: Some Theoretical and Methodological Considerations.” In, 253–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75593-9_7.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R., 2007. The Character of Third Places. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rantisi, N. M., D. Leslie, and S. Christopherson. 2006. “Placing the Creative Economy: Scale, Politics, and the Material.” Environment and Planning A. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a39210.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. 1977. Human Aspects of Urban Form. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, Headignton Hill Hall. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-02616-3.
   Google Scholar
• Sailer, K. 2011. “Creativity as Social and Spatial Process.” Facilities 29 (1): 6–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771111101296.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, K., M. Giusti, G. D. Peterson, A. Legeby, S. A. Brandt, and S. Barthel. 2018. “Impact of Environment on People’s Everyday Experiences in Stockholm.” Landscape and Urban Planning 171: 7–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott Shafer, C., D. Scott, J. Baker, and K. Winemiller. 2013. “Recreation and Amenity Values of Urban Stream Corridors: Implications for Green Infrastructure.” Journal of Urban Design 18 (4): 478–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2013.800450.
   Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., L. L. Gilson, and T. C. Blum. 2000. “Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to Leave.” Academy of Management Journal 43 (2): 215–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1556378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões Aelbrecht, P. 2019. “Introducing Body-Language Methods into Urban Design to Research the Social and Interactional Potential of Public Space.” Journal of Urban Design 24 (3): 443–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1537712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, I., G. Weitkamp, and C. Yamu. 2020. “Public Spaces as Knowledgescapes: Understanding the Relationship between the Built Environment and Creative Encounters at Dutch University Campuses and Science Parks.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (20): 1–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., and T. I. Lubart. 1991. “An Investment Theory of Creativity and Its Development.” Human Development 34 (1): 1–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000277029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Q. 2015. “Creative Milieux: How Urban Design Nurtures Creative Clusters.” Journal of Urban Design 20: 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.981393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanovski, T. 2020. “Urban Design and Public Transportation – Public Spaces, Visual Proximity and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD).” Journal of Urban Design 25 (1): 134–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1592665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, C. C., J. H. Banning, and U. Delworth. 2001. Educating by Design : Creating Campus Learning Environments that Work. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, C. C., and J. Banning. 2015. Designing for Learning: Creating Campus Environments for Student Success. San Francisco: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E., and S. Shah. 2007. “Neighborhood Evaluation Using GIS.” Environment and Behavior 39 (5): 583–615. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506292332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talen, E. 2011. “The Geospatial Dimension in Urban Design.” Journal of Urban Design 16 (1): 127–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.521029.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, P. V. 1986. “Campus: An American Planning Tradition.” Landscape Journal 5 (1): 66–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.5.1.66.
   Google Scholar
• Van Melik, R. 2008. “Changing Public Space: The Recent Redevelopment of Dutch City Squares.” Nederlandse Geografische Studies, no. 373: 1–230.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Common Ground?: Readings and Reflections on Public Space. New York: Project for Public Spaces. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203873960.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D., and M. E. Patterson. 2008. “Place, Leisure and Well-Being.” In Sense of Place, Health and Quality of Life. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Wohl, S. 2016. “Considering How Morphological Traits of Urban Fabric Create Affordances for Complex Adaptation and Emergence.” Progress in Human Geography 40 (1): 30–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514566344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S., and K. Dovey. 2015. “Creative Multiplicities: Urban Morphologies of Creative Clustering.” Journal of Urban Design 20 (1): 52–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.972346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, C., B. Lyu, S. Deng, Y. Yu, N. Li, W. Lin, D. Li, and Q. Chen. 2020. “Benefits of a Three-Day Bamboo Forest Therapy Session on the Physiological Responses of University Students.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (9): 3238. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar