Street design preference: an on-line survey

References

• Adams, M. 2014. “Quality of Urban Spaces and Wellbeing.” In Wellbeing and the Environment, edited by R. Cooper, E. Burton, and C. Cooper, 249–270. Vol. 2. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Adkins, A., J. Dill, G. Luhr, and M. Neal. 2012. “Unpacking Walkability: Testing the Influence of Urban Design Features on Perceptions of Walking Environment Attractiveness.” Journal of Urban Design 17 (4): 499–510. doi:10.1080/13574809.2012.706365.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Homoud, M., and L. Tassinary. 2004. “Social Interactions At The Neighborhood-Level As A Function Of External Space Enclosure.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 21 (1): 10–23. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43031056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, C. 2002. The Phenomenon of Life: An Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the Universe. Berkeley, Calif: Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D. 1979. “The Environment as a Social Symbol.” Ekistics 46 (278): 272–281. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43619666
   Google Scholar
• Askari, A. H., and S. Soltani. 2018. “Contribution of Building Façades to Attractive Streetscapes: Study of Two Main Streets in Kuala Lumpur City.” Journal of Design and Built Environment 18 (1): 29–40. doi:10.22452/jdbe.vol18no1.4.
   Google Scholar
• Benfield, K. (2014). “What Makes a Good Main Street Work?” What Makes a Good Main Street Work? May 27. http://kaidbenfieldarchive.com/20140527-what-makes-a-good-main-street-work.html
   Google Scholar
• Berman, M. G., J. Jonides, and S. Kaplan. 2008. “The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature.” Psychological Science 19 (12): 1207–1212. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, A. A., and B. J. Bond. 2008. “Policing Crime and Disorder Hot Spots: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Criminology 46 (3): 577–607. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2008.00124.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga, A. A., D. L. Weisburd, E. J. Waring, L. G. Mazerolle, W. Spelman, and F. Gajewski. 1999. “Problem-oriented Policing in Violent Crime Places: A Randomized Controlled Experiment.” Criminology 37 (3): 541–580. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00496.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., T. Gabrieli, R. Hickman, T. Laopoulou, and N. Livingstone. 2018. “Street Appeal: The Value of Street Improvements.” Progress in Planning 126: 1–51. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2017.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, B. G., and R. J. Zhu. 2014. “Environmental Disorder Leads to Self-regulatory Failure.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (6): 1203–1218. doi:10.1086/674547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente, O., R. Ewing, S. Handy, and R. Brownson (2005). Measuring Urban Design Qualities—An Illustrated Field Manual. Princeton, NJ: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. https://activelivingresearch.org/sites/activelivingresearch.org/files/FieldManual_071605.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., and E. Burton. 2014. “Wellbeing and the Environmental Implications for Design.” In Wellbeing and the Environment, edited by R. Cooper, E. Burton, and C. Cooper, 653–668. Vol. 2. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Difallah, D., E. Filatova, and P. Ipeirotis (2018). “Demographics and Dynamics of Mechanical Turk Workers.” Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 135–143. New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
   Google Scholar
• Ellard, C. 2015. Places of the Heart: The Psychogeography of Everyday Life. Toronto: Bellevue Literary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., and S. Handy. 2009. “Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.” Journal of Urban Design 14 (1): 65–84. doi:10.1080/13574800802451155.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., S. Handy, R. C. Brownson, O. Clemente, and E. Winston. 2006. “Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability.” Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3 (Suppl 1): 223–240. doi:10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2011. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Gillem, M. 2009. “Make-Believe Main Streets: Hyperreality and the Lifestyle Center.” Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 20 (2): 13–26. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41758698
   Google Scholar
• Gjerde, M. 2011. “Visual Evaluation of Urban Streetscapes: How Do Public Preferences Reconcile with Those Held by Experts?” Urban Design International 16 (3): 153–161. doi:10.1057/udi.2011.10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, T. 2008. “Green Space, Psychological Restoration, and Health Inequality.” The Lancet 372 (9650): 1614–1615. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61669-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, E., T. Heffernan, and W. Pan. 2014. “The Relationship between the Quality of Active Frontages and Public Perceptions of Public Spaces.” Urban Design International 19 (1): 92–102. doi:10.1057/udi.2013.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, T. R. 1992. “A Cognitive Analysis of Preference for Urban Spaces.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 12 (3): 237–248. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80138-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, J. B., and E. C. Anderson. 2020. “The Impact of Urban Façade Quality on Affective Feelings.” Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research 14 (2): 219–232. doi:10.1108/ARCH-07-2019-0181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, F. F., O. Kardan, M. R. Hunter, H. P. Kotabe, F. A. C. Meyer, and M. G. Berman. 2017. “Image Feature Types and Their Predictions of Aesthetic Preference and Naturalness.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. 1995. Great Streets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Q. Al-Shaheen, and N. Dunse. 2016. “Anatomy of a Successful High Street Shopping Centre.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (4): 495–511. doi:10.1080/13574809.2016.1192947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joye, Y. 2007. “Architectural Lessons from Environmental Psychology: The Case of Biophilic Architecture.” Review of General Psychology 11 (4): 305–328. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.11.4.305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R., and S. Kaplan. 1989. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge, UK: CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. 1987. “Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition: Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective.” Environment and Behavior 19 (1): 3–32. doi:10.1177/0013916587191001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., and M. G. Berman. 2010. “Directed Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self-Regulation.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (1): 43–57. doi:10.1177/1745691609356784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardan, O., E. Demiralp, M. C. Hout, M. R. Hunter, H. Karimi, T. Hanayik, and M. G. Berman. 2015. “Is the Preference of Natural versus Man-made Scenes Driven by Bottom–up Processing of the Visual Features of Nature?” Frontiers in Psychology 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashef, M. 2011. “Walkability and Residential Suburbs: A Multidisciplinary Perspective.” Journal of Urbanism 4 (1): 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, C. 2016. “Active Centers – Interactive Edges: The Rise and Fall of Ground Floor Frontages.” Urban Design International 21 (1): 55–77. doi:10.1057/udi.2015.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotabe, H. P., O. Kardan, and M. G. Berman. 2016. “The Order of Disorder: Deconstructing Visual Disorder and Its Effect on Rule-breaking.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 145 (12): 1713–1727. doi:10.1037/xge0000240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krempen, M. 1974. “A Possible Analogy between (Psycho-linguistic and Architectural Measure—The Type-Token Ratio (TTR).” In Psychology and the Built Environment, edited by D. Canter and T. Lee, 87–95. New York, NY: Halsted Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., B. Y. Cai, and C. Ratti. 2018. “Using Street-level Images and Deep Learning for Urban Landscape Studies.” Landscape Architecture Frontiers 6 (2): 20–29. doi:10.15302/J-LAF-20180203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 1981. A Theory of Good Urban Form. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mantho, R. 2015. The Urban Section: An Analytical Tool for Cities and Streets. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• McGinn, A. P., K. R. Evenson, A. H. Herring, S. L. Huston, and D. A. Rodriguez. 2007. “Exploring Associations between Physical Activity and Perceived and Objective Measures of the Built Environment.” Journal of Urban Health 84 (2): 162–184. doi:10.1007/s11524-006-9136-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidenbauer, K. L., C. U. Stenfors, G. N. Bratman, J. J. Gross, K. E. Schertz, K. W. Choe, and M. G. Berman. 2020. “The Affective Benefits of Nature Exposure: What’s Nature Got to Do with It?” Journal of Environmental Psychology 101498.
   Google Scholar
• Muhlebach, E., and R. Muhlebach. 2013. “The ‘Malling’ of American Retail and How to Re-Discover Street Retailing.” Journal of Property Management 78 (3): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Naik, N., J. Philipoom, R. Raskar, and C. Hidalgo (2014). “Streetscore – Predicting the Perceived Safety of One Million Streetscapes.” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition Workshops 2014, 793–799. doi:10.1109/CVPRW.2014.121.
   Google Scholar
• Nasar, J. L. 1994. “Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors.” Environment and Behavior 26 (3): 377–401. doi:10.1177/001391659402600305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. T., C. Farrell, and B. C. Welsh. 2019. “Looking through Broken Windows: The Impact of Neighborhood Disorder on Aggression and Fear of Crime Is an Artifact of Research Design.” Annual Review of Criminology 2 (1): 53–71. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskovic, N., P. Roth, S. Charles, D. Tsigaridi, K. Shepherd, K. Nelson, and M. Bar. 2014. “Attributes Of Form In The Built Environment That Influence Perceived Walkability.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 31 (3): 218–232. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/44114605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., G. Tian, and S. S. Larsen. 2019. “Street Life and the Built Environment in an Auto- Oriented US Region.” Cities 88: 243–251. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 1998. “A Scientific Basis for Creating Architectural Forms.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 15 (4): 283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salingaros, N. A. 2007. A Theory of Architecture. Solingen: ISI Distributed Titles.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Q., W. Zeng, Y. Ye, S. Müller Arisona, S. Schubiger, R. Burkhard, and Q. Huamin. 2018. “StreetVizor: Visual Exploration of Human-Scale Urban Forms Based on Street Views.” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24 (1): 1004–1013. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744159. January. 2018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani, A., M. Hosseinpour, and P. Zare. 2018. “The Development And Assessment Of Environmental Features Associated With Walkability Of Urban Streets.” Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management 13 (1): 22–36. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/26302734
   Google Scholar
• Southworth, M. 2005. “Designing the Walkable City.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 131 (4): 246–257. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2005)131:4(246).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speck, J. 2012. Walkable City: How Downtown Can Save America, One Step at a Time. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman, A., and B. H. Justin. 2021. Cognitive Architecture: Designing for How We Respond to the Built Environment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E., Ed. 2015. Retrofitting Sprawl: Addressing Seventy Years of Failed Urban Form. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E., and J. Koschinsky. 2014. “Compact, Walkable, Diverse Neighborhoods: Assessing Effects on Residents.” Housing Policy Debate 24 (4): 717–750. doi:10.1080/10511482.2014.900102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timms, P., and M. Tight. 2010. “Aesthetic Aspects of Walking and Cycling.” Built Environment (1978) 36 (4): 487–503. doi:10.2148/benv.36.4.487.
   Google Scholar
• Tomás, R., L. Hans, R. Víctor, and H. Ricardo. 2019. “Explaining Subjective Perceptions of Public Spaces as A Function of the Built Environment: A Massive Data Approach.” Landscape and Urban Planning 181: 169–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Y. Lu, J. Zhang, P. Liu, Y. Yao, and Y. Liu. 2019. “The Relationship between Visual Enclosure for Neighbourhood Street Walkability and Elders’ Mental Health in China: Using Street View Images.” Journal of Transport & Health 13: 90–102. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weuve, J., J. Kang, J. Manson, M. Breteler, J. Ware, and F. Grodstein. 2004. “Physical Activity, Including Walking, and Cognitive Function in Older Women.” Journal of the American Medical Association 29212 (12): 1454–1461. doi:10.1001/jama.292.12.1454.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q., and G. L. Kelling (1982). “Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety.” Atlantic Monthly 249 ( 3), 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Xiangyuan, M., M. Chenyan, W. Chao, X. Yuliang, R. Yang, N. Peng, C. Zhang, and F. Ren. 2020. “Measuring Human Perceptions of Streetscapes to Better Inform Urban Renewal: A Perspective of Scene Semantic Parsing.” Cities 110: 103086. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.103086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Y., D. Richards, Y. Lu, X. Song, Y. Zhuang, W. Zeng, and T. Zhong (2019). “Measuring Daily Accessed Street Greenery: A Human-scale Approach for Informing Better Urban Planning Practices.” Landscape and Urban Planning. h ttps://d oi.org/ 10.10 16/j.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, L., and Z. Wang. 2016. “Measuring Visual Enclosure for Street Walkability: Using Machine Learning Algorithms and Google Street View Imagery.” Applied Geography 76: 147–153. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., B. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Liu, H. H. Fung, H. Lin, C. Ratti, et al. 2018. “Measuring Human Perceptions of a Large-scale Urban Region Using Machine Learning”. Landscape and Urban Planning 180: 148–160. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., S. He, Y. Cai, M. Wang, and S. Su. 2019. “Social Inequalities in Neighborhood Visual Walkability: Using Street View Imagery and Deep Learning Technologies to Facilitate Healthy City Planning”. Sustainable Cities and Society 50: 101605. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar