Myths and imaginaries in architectural competitions

References

• Ackerman, J. S. 2002. Origins, Imitation, Conventions: Representation in the Visual Arts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnesen, T. 1998. “LandscapesLost.” Landscape Research 23 (1): 39–50. doi:10.1080/01426399808706524.
   Google Scholar
• Aspen, J. 2013. “Oslo—The Triumph of Zombie Urbanism.” In Shaping the City: Studies in History, Theory and Urban Design, edited by R. El-Khoury and E. Robbins, 182–200. 2nd ed. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1987. Image, Music, Text. Roermond: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 2013. Mythologies. New York City: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, A., and D. Rigby. 1996. The New Waterfront: A Worldwide Urban Success Story. New York City: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., J. Peck, and N. Theodore. 2010. “Variegated Neoliberalization: Geographies, Modalities, Pathways.” Global Networks 10 (2): 182–222. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownill, S. 2010. “Just Add Water.” In The Routledge Companion to Urban Regeneration, edited by M. E. Leary and J. McCarthy, 45–55. Oxfordshire: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203108581.ch3.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., and J. M. Jacobs. 2017. Buildings Must Die: A Perverse View of Architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, D. 1985. “Prospect, Perspective and the Evolution of the LandscapeIdea.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 10 (1): 45–62. doi:10.2307/622249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutieru, A. 2020. “Architects’ Diverse Positions on Visualization: From Hyper-RealisticRenderings to Digital Collages.” ArchDaily, June 22. https://www.archdaily.com/941870/architects-diverse-positions-on-visualization-from-hyper-realistic-renderings-to-digital-collages
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, S. 2004. “Landscape and Art.” In A Companion to Cultural Geography, edited by J. S. Duncan, N. C. Johnson, and R. H. Schein, 430–446. Blackwell, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi:10.1002/9780470996515.ch28.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by. S. Rendall. Oakland: University of California Press
   Google Scholar
• De Chant, T. 2013. “Can We Please Stop Drawing Trees on Top ofSkyscrapers?” ArchDaily, March 21. https://www.archdaily.com/346374/can-we-please-stop-drawing-trees-on-top-of-skyscrapers
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, H., I. Haagsma, D. Sharp, and K. Frampton. 1988. Architects in Competition: International Architectural Competitions of the Last 200 Years. London: Thames and Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Degen, M., C. Melhuish, and G. Rose. 2016. “Looking at Digital Visualizations of Urban Redevelopment Projects: Dimming the Scintillating Glow of Unwork.” In Cities Interrupted: Visual Culture and Urban Space, edited by S. Jordan and C. Lindner, 105–120. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, N. 2018. “Urban Imaginaries and the Palimpsest of the Future.” C. Lindner and M. Meeredited by The Routledge Companion to Urban Imaginaries1st,373–386. Oxfordshire:Routledge. doi:10.4324/978131516395628.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, R. 1989. “Architectural Projection.” In Architecture and Its Image: Four Centuries of Architectural Representation, edited by E. Blau and E. Kaufman, 18–36. Montreal: Canadian Center for Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. L. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frearson, A. 2019. “‘We Banned Renders’ from the Design Process Says Tatiana Bilbao.” Dezeen, December 4. https://www.dezeen.com/2019/12/04/tatiana-bilbao-banned-renderings-architecture-interview/
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, B. 2013.“DigitalDeception.” Places Journal, May. doi:10.22269/130513.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., ed. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamran, U., K. Berg, P. Anker, and P. Palme. 1981. Norges Kunsthistorie. Oslo: Bind 4: Det Unge Norge. Gyldendal Norsk Forl.
   Google Scholar
• Harms, E. 2012. “Beauty as Control in the New Saigon: Eviction, New Urban Zones, and Atomized Dissent in a Southeast AsianCity.” American Ethnologist 39 (4): 735–750. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 1989. “From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in LateCapitalism.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 71 (1): 3–17. doi:10.1080/04353684.1989.11879583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, C., ed. 2011. Port Cities: Dynamic Landscapes and Global Networks. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hofseth, M. 2008. “The New Opera House in Oslo—A Boost for Urban Development?” Urban Research & Practice 1 (1): 101–103. doi:10.1080/17535060701795413.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2009. “Putting Architecture in Its Social Place: A Cultural Political Economy ofArchitecture.” Urban Studies 46 (12): 2519–2536. doi:10.1177/0042098009344230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knikker, J., and A. Davidson. 2016. “In Defense of Renders and Trees on Top ofSkyscrapers.” ArchDaily, March 2. https://www.archdaily.com/783045/in-defense-of-renders-and-trees-on-top-of-skyscrapers-mvrdv
   Google Scholar
• Landry, C., and F. Bianchini. 1995. The Creative City. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 2009.The Production of Space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lindner, C., and M. Meer. 2018. “Introduction—Urban Imaginaries in Theory and Practice.” In The Routledge Companion to Urban Imaginaries, edited by C. Lindner and M. Meer, 1–22. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, R., ed. 2007. Waterfronts in Post-IndustrialCities. London: Spon.
   Google Scholar
• Melhuish, C., M. Degen, and G. Rose. 2016. “‘The Real Modernity that Is Here’: Understanding the Role of Digital Visualisations in the Production of a New Urban Imaginary at Msheireb Downtown, Doha.” City & Society 28 (2): 222–245. doi:10.1111/ciso.12080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkjan, M. 2016. “What This MVRDV Rendering Says about Architecture and theMedia.” Failed Architecture. https://failedarchitecture.com/2016/02/what-this-mvrdv-rendering-says-about-architecture-and-media/?utm_medium=website&utm_source=archdaily.com
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2000. Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. 2003. “Cultural Landscapes: Just Landscapes or Landscapes ofJustice?” Progress in Human Geography 27 (6): 787–796. doi:10.1191/0309132503ph464pr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastasi, M. 2016. “The City of Renderings. Photorealism, Spectacle and Abstraction in Contemporary UrbanLandscapes.” In Proceedings of the Inter-photographyand Architecture International Conference, edited by R. A. Alcolea and J. T. Mingo, 274–285. Universidad de Navarra.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, J. 2010. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R. 1998. Modern Geographical Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, M., R. Kazemian, and J. E. Andersson. 2013. “Editors’ Comments: Architectural Competitions—Histories and Practice.” In Architectural Competitions—Histories and Practice, edited by M. Rönn, R. Kazemian, and J. E. Andersson, 7–22. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology and Rio Kulturkooperativ
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 4th ed. California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sauge, B. 2010. “The Rhetoric of the Interwar Period: The Competition for a New Office Building for the Norwegian Shipowners’ Association.” In The Architectural Competition: Research Inquiries and Experiences, edited by M. Rönn, R. Kazemian, and J. E. Andersson, 509–532. Stockholm: Axl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R., and P. Sendra. 2020. Designing Disorder: Experiments and Disruptions in the City. Brooklyn: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sklair, L. 2017. The Icon Project: Architecture, Cities, and Capitalist Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., and M. S. Garcia Ferrari, eds. 2012. Waterfront Regeneration: Experiences in City-Building.London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Stagni, L. 2019. “Competing Visualizations: How Architecture Becomes ItsImage.” Международный журнал исследований культуры,(International Journal of Culture) 4 (37): 115–129. doi:10.24411/2079-1100-2019-00055Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Norway. 2018, March 5. 14 prosent av befolkningen er innvandrere [14 Percentage of the Population Are Immigrants]. National Statistical Bureau. ssb.no. https://www.ssb.no/befolkning/artikler-og-publikasjoner/14-prosent-av-befolkningen-er-innvandrere
   Google Scholar
• Tostrup, E. 2010. “Promoting the Best: On Competition Rhetoric.” In The Architectural Competition: Research Inquiries and Experiences, edited by M. Rönn, R. Kazemian, and J. E. Andersson, 77–98. Stockholm: Axl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vaage, O. F. 2015. Fritidsaktiviteter 1997–2014 [Leisure Activities1997–2015]. Oslo: Statistics Norway. Resultater Fra Levekårsundersøkelsene No. 2015/25. https://www.ssb.no/kultur-og-fritid/artikler-og-publikasjoner/_attachment/229040?_ts=14d901926c8
   Google Scholar
• Veseley, D. 2004. Architecture in the Age of Divided Representation: The Question of Creativity in the Shadow of Production. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L. 2012. “Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually ExistingNeoliberalism.” Social Anthropology 20 (1): 66–79. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2011.00189.x.
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 2000. Landscapes of Power: From Detroit to Disney World. California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar