The form of social life: seeing beyond informality in emergent design qualities, the case of Yüksel Street in Ankara

References

• Aelbrecht, P. S. 2016. “‘Fourth Places’: The Contemporary Public Settings for Informal Social Interaction among Strangers.” Journal of Urban Design 21 (1): 124–152. doi:10.1080/13574809.2015.1106920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akış, T. 2001. “Urban Space and Everyday Life: Walking Through Yüksel Pedestrian District (YPD).” Master’s Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Appleyard, D. 1981. Livable Streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Augoyard, J. F. [1941] 2007. Step by Step: Everyday Walks in a French Urban Housing Project. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barlas, A. 2006. Urban Streets and Urban Rituals. Ankara: METU Faculty of Architecture Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, I., A. Alcock, P. Murrain, S. McGylnn, and G. Smith. 1985. Responsive Environments: A Manual for Designers. London: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, I. 2002. “Urban Designers as Artists.” Urban Design International 7 (3–4): 143–152. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000080.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, I. 2004. Urban Transformations: Power, People and Urban Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bilsel, G. 1977. “Ankara’nın Kentsel Gelişmesinde Yıkılıp Yeniden Yapılma Yoluyla Yükselip Yoğunlaşma Olgusu ve Yaygınlaşma Seçeneği.” Mimarlık 3 (152): 53–59.
   Google Scholar
• Borden, I. 2001. “Thick Edge: Architectural Boundaries in the Postmodern Metropolis.” In InterSections: Architectural History and Critical Theory, edited by I. Borden and J. Rendell, 221–246. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M., S. Tiesdell, T. Heath, and T. Oc. 2010. Public Places Urban Spaces, the Dimensions of Urban Design. 2nd ed. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2014. “The Place-Shaping Continuum: A Theory of Urban Design Process.” Journal of Urban Design 19 (1): 2–36. doi:10.1080/13574809.2013.854695.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, Z., D. Favro, and R. Ingersoll. 1994. Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cihanger Ribeiro, D. 2019. “The Poiesis of Everyday Life and Space in Yüksel Street.” Journal of Ankara Studies 7 (1): 1–25. doi:10.5505/jas.2019.63825.
   Google Scholar
• Clare, N. 2018. “Composing the Social Factory: An Autonomist Urban Geography of Buenos Aires.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (2): 255–275. doi:10.1177/0263775818805096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, A. 2007. “Urban Design: Requiem for an Era – Review and Critique of the Last 50 Years.” Urban Design International 12 (4): 177–223. doi:10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000200.
   Google Scholar
• Dinçer, Ö. 2016. “Sokak Siyasetinin Bir Örneği Olarak Yüksel ve Konur Sokaklar.” İlef Dergisi 3 (2): 55–77. doi:10.24955/ilef.305510.
   Google Scholar
• Doğan, İ. 1994. Bir Alt Kültür Olarak Ankara Yüksel Caddesi Gençliği. Ankara: Ministry of Culture and Tourism Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2016. Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor, T. 1998. “The Culture of the Indian Street.” In Images of the Street, edited by N. Fyfe, 201–219. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. 2004. Understanding Henri Lefebvre: Theory and the Possible. London: Continuum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erman, T. 1997. “Squatter (Gecekondu) Housing versus Apartment Housing: Turkish Rural-to-Urban Migrant Residents’ Perspectives.” Habitat International 21: 91–106. doi:10.1016/S0197-3975(96)00048-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evyapan, G. 1981. Kentleşme Olgusunun Hızlanması Nedeniyle Yapılar Yakın Çevresi Düzeyinde Açık Alan ve Mekanların Değişimi. Ankara: METU Faculty of Architecture Press.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, K. A., and Q. Stevens. 2006. Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fyfe, N. 2006. Images of the Street Planning, Identity and Control in Public Space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 1971. Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehl, J. 2004. Public Spaces, Public Life. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Habraken, N. J. 1998. The Structure of Ordinary. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S., and A. Datta. 2010. “The Translocal Street: Shop Signs and Local Multi-Culture along the Walworth Road, South London.” City, Culture and Society 1 (2): 69–77. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2010.08.001.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, S. 2009. “Citizenship’s Place: The State’s Creation of Public Space and Street Vendors’ Culture of Informality in Bogota-Colombia.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27: 331–351. doi:10.1068/d1806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Karaosmanoğlu, Y. K. [1934] 1981. Ankara. Istanbul: Birikim Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A. 2015. Sidewalk City: Remapping Public Space in Ho Chi Minh City. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, R., and K. Dovey. 2013. “Interstitial Metamorphoses: Informal Urbanism and the Tourist Gaze.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 31: 1022–1040. doi:10.1068/d1412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguerre, M. S. 1994. The Informal City. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. 1994. Urban Design: The American Experience. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991a. Critique of Everyday Life. 1 vol. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991b. The Production of Space. Translated by N. Donaldson-Smith. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell. Original work published 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M. 2014. “Constructing Ordinary Places: Place-Making in Urban Informal Settlements in Mexico.” Progress in Planning 94: 1–53. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2013.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. M. 2000. On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Low, S. 2017. Spatializing Culture: The Ethnography of Space and Place. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 1997. “Ambiguities of Urban Design.” Town Planning Review 68 (3): 363–383. doi:10.3828/tpr.68.3.2365658h658v0157.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A. 2007. Designing the City of Reason: Foundations and Frameworks. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. 2004. Streets and Patterns. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2009. “A Tale of Two Streets: Comparative Experiences on Streets in the East and West.” Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal 3 (5): 231–242. doi:10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v03i05/37766.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2013. The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2018. “Space, Time and Agency on the Indian Street.” In Handbook on Bottom-Up Urbanism, edited by M. Arefi and C. Kickert, 239–253. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, V. 2019. “Streets and Social Life in Cities: A Taxonomy of Sociability.” Urban Design International 24 (1): 16–37. doi:10.1057/s41289-018-0069-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrifield, A. 2006. Henri Lefebvre: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan, N. P., and R. Véron. 2018. “Informal Production of the City: Momos, Migrants, and an Urban Village in Delhi.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36 (6): 1026–1044. doi:10.1177/0263775818771695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan, E. 2016. “Tezgâhın Panaromasını Çıkarmak: Seyyar Esnafı (Ankara Yüksel Caddesi Örneği).” Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 4 (25): 341–358. doi:10.16992/ASOS.1095.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. 1977. Human Aspects of Urban Form: Towards a Man-Environment Approach to Urban Form and Design. New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, A. 1987. “Pedestrian Street Use: Culture and Perception.” In Public Streets for Public Use, edited by A. V. Moudon, 70–83. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rivlin, L. G. 2006. “Found Spaces: Freedom of Choice in Public Life.” In Loose Space: Possibility and Diversity in Urban Life, edited by K. Franck, 38–53. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2004. “Transnational Trespassings.” In Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia, edited by A. Roy and N. AlSayyad, 289–319. New York: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2005. “Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 71 (2): 147–158. doi:10.1080/01944360508976689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, A. 2011. “Slumdog Cities: Rethinking Subaltern Urbanism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35 (2): 223–238. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01051.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudofsky, B. 1964. Architecture without Architects: A Short Introduction to Non-Pedigreed Architecture. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rykwert, J. 1978. The Street: The Use of Its History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. 1979. A Geography of the Lifeworld. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sendra, P., and R. Sennett. 2020. Designing Disorder: Experiments and Disruptions in the City. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1971. The Uses of Disorder: Personal Identity and City Life. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, R. 1999. Lefebvre, Love and Struggle: Spatial Dialectics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sommer, R. 1974. Tight Spaces: Hard Architecture and How to Humanize It. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Stanek, L. 2011. Henri Lefebvre on Space: Architecture, Urban Research, and the Production of Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thwaites, K., J. Simpson, and I. Simkins. 2020. “Transitional Edges: A Conceptual Framework for Socio-Spatial Understanding of Urban Street Edges.” Urban Design International 25: 295–309. doi:10.1057/s41289-020-00115-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. H. 1980. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Ingram.
   Google Scholar
• Zack, T., and L. B. Landau. 2021. “An Enclave Entrepôt: The Informal Migration Industry and Johannesburg’s Socio-Spatial Transformation.” Urban Studies 1–19. doi:10.1177/00420980211012632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zieleniec, A. 2016. “The Right to Write the City: Lefebvre and Graffiti.” Urban Environment, Whose Right to the City? 10: 1–6. doi:10.7202/1040597ar.
   Google Scholar