Exploring criteria for reallocating road space dynamically: lessons from a workshop with experts

References

• Banister, D. 2008. “The Sustainable Mobility Paradigm.” Transport Policy 15 (2): 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrero, G. A., and A. Rodriguez-Valencia. 2022. “Asking the User: A Perceptional Approach for Bicycle Infrastructure Design.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 16 (3): 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1871127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghauser Pont, M., G. Stavroulaki, and L. Marcus. 2019. “Development of Urban Types Based on Network Centrality, Built Density and Their Impact on Pedestrian Movement.” Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46 (8): 1549–1564. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319852632.
   Google Scholar
• Cambra, P., and F. Moura. 2020. “How Does Walkability Change Relate to Walking Behavior Change? Effects of a Street Improvement in Pedestrian Volumes and Walking Experience.” Journal of Transport and Health 16 (November 2019): 100797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.100797.
   Google Scholar
• Candelo, C., G. A. Ortiz, and B. Unger. 2003. Organising and Running Workshops: A Practical Guide for Trainers. Cali, Colombia: WWF Colombia.
   Google Scholar
• Cervero, R. 1996. “Mixed Land-Uses and Commuting: Evidence from the American Housing Survey.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 30 (5): 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(95)00033-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. 1997. “Travel Demand and the 3ds: Density, Diversity, and Design.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 2 (3): 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., M. Sarvi, and B. Young. 2007. “A New Approach to Evaluating On-Road Public Transport Priority Projects: Balancing the Demand for Limited Road-Space.” Transportation 34 (4): 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-9107-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Gruyter, C., S. M. Zahraee, and W. Young. 2022. “Understanding the Allocation and Use of Street Space in Areas of High People Activity.” Journal of Transport Geography 101 (April): 103339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103339.
   Google Scholar
• Gössling, S. 2016. “Urban Transport Justice.” Journal of Transport Geography 54:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, S., M. Schröder, P. Späth, and T. Freytag. 2016. “Urban Space Distribution and Sustainable Transport.” Transport Reviews 36 (5): 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1147101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havârneanu, G. M., and C. E. Havârneanu. 2012. “When Norms Turn Perverse: Contextual Irrationality Vs. Rational Traffic Violations.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15 (2): 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebbert, M. 2005. “Engineering, Urbanism and the Struggle for Street Design.” Journal of Urban Design 10 (1): 39–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800500062361.
   Google Scholar
• İmre, Ş., D. Çelebi, and F. Koca. 2021. “Understanding Barriers and Enablers of Electric Vehicles in Urban Freight Transport: Addressing Stakeholder Needs in Turkey.” Sustainable Cities and Society 68 (May): 102794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102794.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2016. “A Comprehensive Basis for Determining the Allocation of Urban Street Space.” Paper presented at the 14th World Conference on Transport Research, Shanghai, China. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1502401/1/WCTRAcomprehensivebasisfordeterminingtheallocationofurbanstreetspace.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. 2018. “MORE: Multimodal Optimisation of Roadspace in Europe.” Horizon 2020. Project 769276. https://www.roadspace.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., N. Boujenko, and S. Marshall. 2007. Link & Place-A Guide to Street Planning and Design. London, UK: Landor Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Junghans, L., S. Kreft, and M. Welp. 2018. “Inclusive Visions for Urban Transitions: Lessons from Stakeholder Dialogues in Asian Medium Sized Cities.” Sustainable Cities and Society 42 (October): 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Kesselring, S., and M. Freudendal-Pedersen. 2021. “Searching for Urban Mobilities Futures. Methodological Innovation in the Light of COVID-19.” Sustainable Cities and Society 75 (December): 103138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krueger, R., and M. Anne Casey. 2015. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 5th ed. London, UK: SAGE Publications Lta.
   Google Scholar
• Lauttamäki, V. 2014. Practical Guide for Facilitating a Futures Workshop. Turku, Finland: Finland Futures Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, F., and A. Antunes. 2022. “STREETS4ALL: Dynamic and Equitable Reallocation of Urban Street Space.” Fundação Para a Ciência E a Technologia. https://streets4all.tecnico.ulisboa.pt/.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of City Transportation Officials. 2016. Transit Street Design Guide. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nello-Deakin, S. 2019. “Is There Such a Thing as a ‘Fair’ Distribution of Road Space?” Journal of Urban Design 24 (5): 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2019.1592664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., and M. Garcia. 2020. “Pedestrian Safety Perception and Urban Street Settings.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 14 (11): 860–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2019.1641577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• POLIS. 2022. “Flexcurb.” EIT Urban Mobility. https://www.polisnetwork.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Ruben, T.-G., and J. A. Soria-Lara. 2015. “Q-PLOS, Developing an Alternative Walking Index. A Method Based on Urban Design Quality.” Cities 45:7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, C., C. Webster, and S. Kumari. 2018. “Street Morphology and Severity of Road Casualties: A 5-Year Study of Greater London.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 12 (7): 510–525. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1402972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzamourani, E., P. G. Tzouras, S. Tsigdinos, I. Kosmidis, and K. Kepaptsoglou. 2022. “Exploring the Social Acceptance of Transforming Urban Arterials to Multimodal Corridors. The Case of Panepistimiou Avenue in Athens.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2037793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valença, G., F. Moura, and A. Morais de Sá. 2021. “Main Challenges and Opportunities to Dynamic Road Space Allocation: From Static to Dynamic Urban Designs.” Journal of Urban Mobility 1: 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100008.
   Google Scholar
• Valença, G., F. Moura, and A. Morais de Sá. 2022. “Using Network Centrality and Land-Use Indicators to Define Candidate Zones for Dynamic Road Space Allocation.” Poster Presented at the 101th Transportation Research Board (TRB). Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32406.68160.
   Google Scholar
• Valença, G., F. Moura, and A. Morais de Sá. 2023. “How Can We Develop Road Space Allocation Solutions for Smart Cities Using Emerging Information Technologies? A Review Using Text Mining.” International Journal of Information Management Data Insights 3 (1): 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100150.
   Google Scholar