Reconsidering vulnerability in higher education

References

• American Association of University Professors. (1993). The status of non-tenure-track faculty. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2004). The cultural politics of education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822392781
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. (2014, February 2). The invisible professor. Boston Globe. Retrieved from http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/02/02/the-invisible-professor/4i7aHfxlT4sfKRvFgJwz2 N/story.html
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, R., & Postiglione, G. (2017). Academic promotion and the changing academic profession in Hong Kong. In G.Postiglione&J.Jung(Ed.), Changing academic profession (pp.15–35). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cigman, R. (2012). We need to talk about well-being. Research Papers in Education, 27(4), 449–462.10.1080/02671522.2012.690238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. (1997). Small worlds, different worlds: The uniqueness and troubles of American academic professions. Daedalus, 126(4), 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, A. (2016). All of us are vulnerable, but some are more vulnerable than others: The political ambiguity of vulnerability studies, an ambivalent critique. Critical Horizons: A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 2, 260–277.10.1080/14409917.2016.1153896
   Google Scholar
• De Boer, H. F., Enders, J., & Leisyte, L. (2007). Public sector reform in dutch higher education: The organizational transformation of the university. Public Administration, 85(1), 27–46.10.1111/padm.2007.85.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecclestone, K., & Goodley, D. (2016). Political and educational springboard or straitjacket? Theorising post/human subjects in an age of vulnerability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(2), 175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehenreich, B. (2009). Bright-sided: How positive thinking is undermining America. New York, NY: Holt & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34, 347–372.10.1023/A:1003023923056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fineman, M. A. (2008). The vulnerable subject: Anchoring equality in the human condition. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 20(1), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, S. K. (2012). ‘I couldn’t wait to leave the toxic environment’: A mixed methods study of women faculty satisfaction and departure from one research institution. NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, 5(1), 71–95.10.1515/1940-7890.1079
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, E. (2014). The ethics of vulnerability: A feminist analysis of social life and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2002). Neo-liberalism, corporate culture and the promise of higher education. Harvard Educational Review, 72(4), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L. (2017). Leaning out in higher education: A structural, postcolonial perspective. Policy Futures in Education. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1478210317708496
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., & Bingham, C. (2018). Precarious meritocracy: On the affective structure of merit in education. In A. Chinnery (Ed.), Philosophy of education 2017. Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, L., & Bingham, C. (in press). Reconsidering happiness in the context of social justice education. Interchange.
   Google Scholar
• Land, R., Meyer, J. H. F., & Flanagan, M. T. (Eds.). (2016). Threshold concepts in practice. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Leathwood, C. (2017). Women academic researchers: Still interlopers in the UK academy?In H.Eggins Ed.), The changing role of women in higher education (pp. 227–242). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L. (2016). Bridging the duality between universities and the academic profession: A tale of protected spaces, strategic gaming, and institutional entrepreneurs.In L.Leisyte & U. Wilkesmann (Eds.), Organizing academic work in higher education: Teaching, learning and identities (pp. 275–348). Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L., & Dee ,J. R. (2012). Understanding academic work in a changing institutional environment. In J. C.Smart & M. B.Paulsen (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 123–206). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lumby, J. (2009). Performativity and identity: Mechanisms of exclusion. Journal of Education Policy, 24(3), 353–369.10.1080/02680930802669284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, B. (2017). Publication and performativity. In G. Postiglione & J. Jung (Eds.), Changing academic profession (pp. 97–108).  Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mählck, P. (2013). Academic women with migrant background in the global knowledge economy: Bodies, hierarchies and resistance. Women’s Studies International Forum, 36, 65–74.10.1016/j.wsif.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, M. (2017). Embracing vulnerability: A reflection on my academic journey as a Japanese early career feminist academic abroad. In R. Thwaites & A. Pressland (Eds.), Being an early career feminist academic: Global perspectives, experiences, and challenges. (pp. 255–266). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. F., & Land ,R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning – Ten years on. (pp. 412–424). Oxford: OCSLD.
   Google Scholar
• Oleksiyenko, A. (2017). Enhancing university staff capacities for critical inquiry: Organisational change, professional development and cumulative powers in higher education. In G. Postiglione & J. Jung (Eds.), Changing academic profession. (pp. 125–142) Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Postiglione, G. & Jung, J. (Eds.). (2017). The changing academic profession in Hong Kong. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work and the will to lead. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Teichler, U., Arimoto, A., & Cummings, W. K. (2013). The changing academic profession: Major findings of a comparative study. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-6155-1
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G. (2004). Competing conceptions of academic governance: Negotiating the perfect storm. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R. (2010). Reconfiguring the public sciences: The impact of governance changes on authority and innovation in public science systems. In R.Whitley, J. Glaser, & L. Engwall (Eds.), Reconfiguring knowledge production: Changing authority relationships in the sciences and their consequences for intellectual innovation. (pp. 3–47). Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. (2008). Troubling the concept of the ‘academic profession’ in 21st Century higher education. Higher Education, 56, 533–544.10.1007/s10734-007-9109-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar